South Korea - K League 1Data current as of September 12, 2026

Ulsan vs Sangju Sangmu: match statistics

Ulsan crest
Ulsan
0 : 0half-time 0:0
Sangju Sangmu crest
Sangju Sangmu
165%(0.00)
X25%(0.00)
210%(0.00)

Ulsan are in significantly better form, sitting top of the table with a perfect home win record (100% efficiency). The hosts are undefeated at home and score an average of 3 goals per game, demonstrating high efficiency (27% shot conversion rate). On the other hand, Sangju Sangmu have not won any away match this season, drawing all their away fixtures, which gives them just 1 point per game. The visitors' away goal difference is 0, and their form in the last five matches is poor (0.8 points per game). Considering Ulsan's home dominance and Sangju's lack of away wins, I strongly favor the hosts, although a draw is also in play due to the visitors' tendency to share points.

Ulsan vs Sangju Sangmu: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Ulsan played against Sangju Sangmu in K League 1 (South Korea). The game was played on March 22, 2026. Final score: 0:0.

Recent form

Ulsan has 3 wins, 0 draws and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 3.00 points per game. Sangju Sangmu has 0 wins, 4 draws and 0 losses, with 1.00 points per game.

Scoring records

Ulsan scores 2.33 goals per game and allows 0.67. Sangju Sangmu scores 1.00 and allows 1.00. Games in this league average 2.30 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 67% of Ulsan's games and 100% of Sangju Sangmu's. The Over 2.5 rates are 67% and 0%, compared with league averages of 74% for BTTS and 39% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Ulsan has the higher season xG average, 1.62 to 1.41 per game. Ulsan takes 13.3 shots per game, while Sangju Sangmu takes 11.8.

First-half and second-half trends

Ulsan leads at halftime in 33% of its games and scores 1.33 goals per game after halftime. Sangju Sangmu leads at halftime in 50% and scores 0.50 after halftime.

When the teams score

Ulsan's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (2 goals). For Sangju Sangmu, it is minutes 0-15 (1 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

K League 1 games average 2.30 goals. Both teams score in 74% of games, and 39% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 3 previous meetings were available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 2 away wins. Those games averaged 3.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Ulsan are in significantly better form, sitting top of the table with a perfect home win record (100% efficiency). The hosts are undefeated at home and score an average of 3 goals per game, demonstrating high efficiency (27% shot conversion rate). On the other hand, Sangju Sangmu have not won any away match this season, drawing all their away fixtures, which gives them just 1 point per game. The visitors' away goal difference is 0, and their form in the last five matches is poor (0.8 points per game). Considering Ulsan's home dominance and Sangju's lack of away wins, I strongly favor the hosts, although a draw is also in play due to the visitors' tendency to share points.

View the statistical overview

Stats by half

0 : 0
First half
0 : 0
Second half

Game stats

37Possession (%)63
UlsanSangju Sangmu
19Shots10
UlsanSangju Sangmu
4Shots on target1
UlsanSangju Sangmu
1.99xG1.16
UlsanSangju Sangmu
4Corners2
UlsanSangju Sangmu
71Dangerous attacks62
UlsanSangju Sangmu
9Fouls19
UlsanSangju Sangmu
0Cards4
UlsanSangju Sangmu

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

2.33Goals scored / game1
UlsanSangju Sangmu
0.67Goals allowed / game1
UlsanSangju Sangmu
49%Average possession49%
UlsanSangju Sangmu
5.33Shots on target / game3.75
UlsanSangju Sangmu

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

13.33Shots per game11.75
UlsanSangju Sangmu
5.33Shots on target3.75
UlsanSangju Sangmu
17.5%Shot conversion8.5%
UlsanSangju Sangmu
49%Possession49%
UlsanSangju Sangmu
1.62xG for1.41
UlsanSangju Sangmu
1.7xG against1.38
UlsanSangju Sangmu

Shooting quality

Ulsan: Efficient finishingSangju Sangmu: Balanced
UlsanSangju Sangmu
Accuracy (shots on target)40%32%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.440.27

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Ulsan is 200% better for: last-5 form.

3 pts / game - Ulsan · 1 pts / game - Sangju Sangmu

Ulsan
WWW
5 wins in a row
Season result split
100% W0% D0% L
Season (W-D-L)
3-0-0
3.00 pts / game · goal difference +5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-0
3.00 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-0-0
Last 5 at home
1-0-0
W
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 2.3Goals conceded: 0.7xG: 1.62Opponent xG: 1.70BTTS: 67%Over 2.5: 67%
Sangju Sangmu
DDDD
Unbeaten in the last 5 games
Season result split
0% W100% D0% L
Season (W-D-L)
0-4-0
1.00 pts / game · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-4-0
1.00 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
0-1-0
Last 5 away
0-1-0
D
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.41Opponent xG: 1.38BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 0%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Ulsan is 133% better for: goals scored per game.

2.33 goals / game - Ulsan · 1 goals / game - Sangju Sangmu

Ulsan is 49% better for: goals allowed per game.

0.67 goals / game - Ulsan · 1 goals / game - Sangju Sangmu

Ulsan scoring profile: very strong

Ulsan scores in 100% of games (3 of 3 meczów), while Sangju Sangmu keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 4 meczów).

Sangju Sangmu scoring profile: very strong

Sangju Sangmu scores in 100% of games (4 of 4 meczów), while Ulsan keeps a clean sheet in 33% (1 of 3 meczów).

7Goals scored (season)4
UlsanSangju Sangmu
2Goals conceded (season)4
UlsanSangju Sangmu
3Average goals per game2
UlsanSangju Sangmu
7Goals scored (last 5)4
UlsanSangju Sangmu
2Goals conceded (last 5)4
UlsanSangju Sangmu

How often they score at least...

100%1 goal100%
UlsanSangju Sangmu
100%2 goals0%
UlsanSangju Sangmu
33%3 goals0%
UlsanSangju Sangmu
0%4 goals0%
UlsanSangju Sangmu

How often they concede at least...

67%1 goal100%
UlsanSangju Sangmu
0%2 goals0%
UlsanSangju Sangmu
0%3 goals0%
UlsanSangju Sangmu
0%4 goals0%
UlsanSangju Sangmu

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

74%
League average

Goal patterns

33%BTTS at half-time0%
UlsanSangju Sangmu
0%BTTS in both halves0%
UlsanSangju Sangmu
67%Scored in both halves0%
UlsanSangju Sangmu

BTTS and goal count

67%Min. 3 goals and BTTS0%
UlsanSangju Sangmu
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
UlsanSangju Sangmu
67%BTTS - last 5100%
UlsanSangju Sangmu

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

67%Min. 1 goal before half-time50%
UlsanSangju Sangmu
67%Min. 2 goals before half-time0%
UlsanSangju Sangmu
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
UlsanSangju Sangmu

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
UlsanSangju Sangmu
67%Min. 2 goals after half-time50%
UlsanSangju Sangmu
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
UlsanSangju Sangmu

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Sangju Sangmu is 20% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.67 pts / game - Ulsan · 2 pts / game - Sangju Sangmu

Ulsan - half-time state
33% leading67% draw0% trailing
Sangju Sangmu - half-time state
50% leading50% draw0% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.67Points per game (1st half)2
UlsanSangju Sangmu
1Goals scored (1st half)0.5
UlsanSangju Sangmu
0.33Goals conceded (1st half)0
UlsanSangju Sangmu
1.33Average goals (1st half)0.5
UlsanSangju Sangmu
67%Clean sheet before half-time100%
UlsanSangju Sangmu
33%No goal before half-time50%
UlsanSangju Sangmu

After half-time (2nd half)

2.33Points per game (2nd half)0.5
UlsanSangju Sangmu
1.33Goals scored (2nd half)0.5
UlsanSangju Sangmu
0.33Goals conceded (2nd half)1
UlsanSangju Sangmu
1.67Average goals (2nd half)1.5
UlsanSangju Sangmu
67%Clean sheet after half-time0%
UlsanSangju Sangmu
0%No goal after half-time50%
UlsanSangju Sangmu

Ulsan - second-half results

67% W33% D0% L
5
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
7
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.67
PPG before half-time
Lead holding303%

Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 100%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime0.0

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Sangju Sangmu - second-half results

0% W50% D50% L
8
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
2
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding0%

Leads at halftime in 50% of games and wins 0%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.

Defense after halftime+1.0

Allows 1.0 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Ulsan - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.672.33
Goals scored / game1.01.3
Goals allowed / game0.30.3
Average goals per game1.31.7
1 goal67%100%
2 goals67%67%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet67%67%
No goal33%0%
Goal difference+2+3
Half-time: 33% leading - 67% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 67% won - 33% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 33% - Half-time goals total: 3
Sangju Sangmu - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game2.000.50
Goals scored / game0.50.5
Goals allowed / game0.01.0
Average goals per game0.51.5
1 goal50%100%
2 goals0%50%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%0%
No goal50%50%
Goal difference+2-2
Half-time: 50% leading - 50% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 50% draw - 50% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Ulsan
ScoredConceded
0
1
0-15
1
0
16-30
2
0
31-45
1
0
46-60
2
0
61-75
1
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (2 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Sangju Sangmu
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
0
0
16-30
1
0
31-45
1
1
46-60
0
2
61-75
1
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (1 goal). Concedes most in 61-75 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.50
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.7 : 0.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
109%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
84%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+33%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
100%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Ulsan

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.08
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+1.74
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.71
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+1.03
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
224%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
53%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
14% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
14%

Sangju Sangmu

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.03
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.03
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.41
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.38
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
79%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
96%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 25% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (K League 1).

Teams vs league

UlsanLigaSangju Sangmu
Average goals per game 3.002.30 2.00
Both teams scored 67%74% 100%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 67%39% 0%
Clean sheets 33%20% 0%
Goal before half-time 67%52% 50%
Goal after half-time 100%74% 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.30
Average goals per game
74%
Both teams scored
39%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
20%
Clean sheets
1.04
Home goals / game
1.26
Away goals / game
+-17%
Home attack advantage
+-21%
Home defensive advantage
+-18%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
52%
1 goal
30%
2 goals
0%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
52%
2 goals
22%
3 goals
0%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Sangju SangmuYellow cardTae-Hwan Kim
  2. Sangju SangmuSubstitutionOn: Kyeong-hyeon MinOff: Jae-Hyun Ko
  3. Sangju SangmuYellow cardGeon-hee Lee
  4. Sangju SangmuSubstitutionOn: Min-Kyu KangOff: Geon-hee Lee
  5. UlsanSubstitutionOn: Benji MichelOff: Dong-Kyung Lee
  6. Sangju SangmuSubstitutionOn: Hyun-Woo KimOff: Min-Kyu Kim
  7. Sangju SangmuYellow cardJung-Taek Lee
  8. Sangju SangmuYellow cardSe-Jin Park
  9. UlsanSubstitutionOn: Jae-Sang JungOff: Hee-Gyun Lee

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Byung-Jin ParkMatches officiated: 9
3.78Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 244%Home wins22%Draws33%Away wins

Head-to-head

Record from Ulsan's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 2 losses against Sangju Sangmu. Games average 3.33 goals, and both teams scored in 33% of them.

Sangju Sangmu Phoenix FC
3 : 0
Ulsan Hyundai Horang-i
Ulsan Hyundai Horang-i
3 : 2
Sangju Sangmu Phoenix FC
Sangju Sangmu Phoenix FC
2 : 0
Ulsan Hyundai Horang-i

FAQ

What was the result of Ulsan vs Sangju Sangmu?

The K League 1 match finished Ulsan 0:0 Sangju Sangmu. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Ulsan and Sangju Sangmu?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches Ulsan won 1, Sangju Sangmu won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Ulsan vs Sangju Sangmu?

Ulsan score 2.33 goals per game on average and Sangju Sangmu 1.00. The K League 1 average is 2.30 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 39% of games. Both teams score in 67% of Ulsan's matches and 100% of Sangju Sangmu's.

What form are Ulsan and Sangju Sangmu in?

Over the last 5 games Ulsan have a 3-0-0 record (3.00 points per game) and Sangju Sangmu 0-4-0 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Ulsan vs Sangju Sangmu?

The statistical background for Ulsan vs Sangju Sangmu — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.