Ulytau vs Astana: match statistics
Ulytau vs Astana: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Ulytau played against Astana in Kazakhstan Premier League (Kazakhstan). The game was played on August 2, 2026. Final score: 0:2.
Recent form
Ulytau has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.80 points per game. Astana has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss, with 2.00 points per game.
Scoring records
Ulytau scores 0.84 goals per game and allows 0.95. Astana scores 1.61 and allows 1.11. Games in this league average 2.39 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 47% of Ulytau's games and 50% of Astana's. The Over 2.5 rates are 32% and 50%, compared with league averages of 55% for BTTS and 45% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Astana has the higher season xG average, 1.82 to 1.31 per game. Ulytau takes 11.2 shots per game, while Astana takes 16.3.
First-half and second-half trends
Ulytau leads at halftime in 21% of its games and scores 0.42 goals per game after halftime. Astana leads at halftime in 44% and scores 0.78 after halftime.
When the teams score
Ulytau's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (4 goals). For Astana, it is minutes 46-60 (8 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Kazakhstan Premier League games average 2.39 goals. Both teams score in 55% of games, and 45% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 3 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 3 away wins. Those games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I back the home win (1). Ulytau scores 1.1 goals at home and concedes only 0.7 per match, records 40% clean sheets, 60% home wins and a +4 goal difference in home games. Astana shows better overall form (4 wins in last 5 and 2.4 points per match in that run, 10 goals in last 5), but struggles offensively away: just 0.63 goals per away match, 1.63 conceded and as many as 63% of away games without scoring. The quality of created chances is similar (xG 1.43 Ulytau vs 1.49 Astana), yet the hosts convert their chances more efficiently (shot conversion 9% versus 5% for the visitors), which together with the lower average goals conceded (0.7 vs 1.63) gives them the edge. Therefore I assign Ulytau a 55% probability to win, 25% for a draw and 20% for an Astana victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Statistical analysis favors the BTTS 'Yes' scenario: Ulytau scores on average 2.4 goals at home with an xG of 2.08, while Astana concedes on average 1.63 goals away — a strong basis to expect the hosts to find the net. The visitors, however, show attacking form in the last 5 matches: Astana scored 10 goals in their last 5 games (2.0 per game) and has a recent xG of 2.17, whereas Ulytau scored only 3 goals in the same period (0.6 per game) with an xG of 1.21, suggesting Astana has realistic chances to score. Season BTTS signals are mixed: Ulytau at home has BTTS 60%, Astana away 38%, and the league BTTS rate is 54%, which gives a moderate edge to this market, especially considering Astana’s low 13% clean sheets away versus Ulytau’s 40% at home. Additionally Ulytau averages 7.9 shots on target with a conversion rate of 13%, while Astana averages 4.38 shots on target with a 5% conversion, but Astana’s high recent finishing (10 goals in 5) compensates and increases the probability of both teams scoring. The aggregate signals (Ulytau home offense, Astana’s strong recent scoring form and the season 60% BTTS for the hosts) point to a moderate 'Yes' indication — I assess BTTS probability at roughly 65% for 'Yes' and 35% for 'No'.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
I estimate 1.80 goals for Ulytau and 1.27 for Astana, i.e. a total of 3.07 goals in the match. The forecast is based on xG: Ulytau xG_for 2.08 and Astana 1.49, and xG against 1.05 (Ulytau) and 1.52 (Astana), which gives averages (2.08+1.52)/2=1.80 and (1.49+1.05)/2=1.27. Ulytau creates significantly more chances (18.5 shots and 7.9 on target with a 13% conversion) compared to Astana (13.5 shots, 4.38 on target, 5% conversion), which increases the probability of a higher goal count. Additionally, Ulytau records 60% of home matches Over 2.5, Astana has 38% Over 2.5, and the league Over 2.5 rate is 44%, therefore the strongest signal from the data is to play Over 2.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Ulytau is the clear favorite: they have led at the break in 70% of home matches and won 90% of their home games, while Astana has no away wins (0%) and averages just 0.63 goals per away match. In the first 45 minutes Ulytau averages 1.3 goals and concedes only 0.2, whereas Astana averages 0.25 goals by half-time, giving the hosts a substantial advantage before the break. Chance quality also favors Ulytau: the hosts’ xG is 2.08 versus 1.49 for the visitors; the hosts average 7.9 shots on target against Astana’s 4.38 and, seasonally, 2.4 goals scored at home compared to 0.63 for their opponents. Additionally, Ulytau keep a clean sheet at the break in 80% of home games, and their high conversion of leads (90% home wins) suggests a lead at the break often translates into a full-time victory. For these reasons, the strongest signal is the scenario of Ulytau leading at half-time and winning the match (1/1).
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Ulytau | Astana | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 34% | 39% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.22 | 0.25 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Astana is 150% better for: last-5 form.
0.8 pts / game - Ulytau · 2 pts / game - Astana
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Astana is 92% better for: goals scored per game.
0.84 goals / game - Ulytau · 1.61 goals / game - Astana
Ulytau is 17% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.95 goals / game - Ulytau · 1.11 goals / game - Astana
Ulytau scores in 68% of games (13 of 19 games), while Astana keeps a clean sheet in 28% (5 of 18 games).
Astana scores in 72% of games (13 of 18 games), while Ulytau keeps a clean sheet in 32% (6 of 19 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Ulytau
Over / Under - Astana
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Astana is 44% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.16 pts / game - Ulytau · 1.67 pts / game - Astana
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Ulytau - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 21% of games and wins 37%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Astana - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 44% of games and wins 50%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.00 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 1.6 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 20% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (4 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Ulytau
Astana
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Kazakhstan Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Ulytau | Liga | Astana | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 1.79 | 2.39 | ▲ 2.72 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 47% | 55% | ▼ 50% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 32% | 45% | ▲ 50% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 32% | 27% | • 28% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 63% | 65% | ▲ 72% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 63% | 70% | ▲ 72% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Ulytau's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses against Astana. Games average 3.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Ulytau vs Astana?
The Kazakhstan Premier League match finished Ulytau 0:2 Astana. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Ulytau and Astana?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Ulytau won 0, Astana won 3 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Ulytau vs Astana?
Ulytau score 0.84 goals per game on average and Astana 1.61. The Kazakhstan Premier League average is 2.39 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 45% of games. Both teams score in 47% of Ulytau's matches and 50% of Astana's.
What form are Ulytau and Astana in?
Over the last 5 games Ulytau have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Astana 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Ulytau vs Astana?
The statistical background for Ulytau vs Astana — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


