Union Omaha vs Richmond Kickers: match statistics
Union Omaha vs Richmond Kickers: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Union Omaha played against Richmond Kickers in USL League One (United States). The game was played on August 16, 2026. Final score: 5:1.
Recent form
Union Omaha has 4 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 2.60 points per game. Richmond Kickers has 2 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses, with 1.20 points per game.
Scoring records
Union Omaha scores 1.70 goals per game and allows 1.10. Richmond Kickers scores 0.95 and allows 1.84. Games in this league average 2.89 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 60% of Union Omaha's games and 42% of Richmond Kickers's. The Over 2.5 rates are 60% and 53%, compared with league averages of 56% for BTTS and 60% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Union Omaha has the higher season xG average, 1.89 to 1.37 per game. Union Omaha takes 16.1 shots per game, while Richmond Kickers takes 11.8.
First-half and second-half trends
Union Omaha leads at halftime in 20% of its games and scores 1.10 goals per game after halftime. Richmond Kickers leads at halftime in 21% and scores 0.37 after halftime.
When the teams score
Union Omaha's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (13 goals). For Richmond Kickers, it is minutes 0-15 (6 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
USL League One games average 2.89 goals. Both teams score in 56% of games, and 60% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 3 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 3 away wins. Those games averaged 3.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Union Omaha are top of the table and remain unbeaten at home, winning 78% of their matches and averaging 2.11 goals scored. The hosts create plenty of high-quality chances: their average home xG is 2.17, alongside 18.44 shots and 6.89 shots on target per match, while Richmond allow opponents an xG of 1.92 away from home. Richmond Kickers sit 16th, have lost 11 of their 19 matches this season, and have scored just 2 goals in their last five games, suffering 3 defeats. The visitors’ problems are particularly evident away from home, where they lose 80% of their matches, concede an average of 2.5 goals, and fail to score in 40% of their appearances. The difference in game control also favors Union Omaha, who average 60% possession compared with Richmond’s 44%, making a convincing home win the most likely outcome.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The stronger signal points to BTTS - No, primarily due to Richmond’s attacking problems: in their last 5 matches, the team has scored just 2 goals, averaging 0.4 per game. The visitors have failed to score in 40% of their matches this season, while their current BTTS rate stands at just 20%, significantly lower than Union Omaha’s 80% over their last five outings. Union Omaha have kept a clean sheet in 33% of their matches, while Richmond are averaging only 2.9 shots on target per game and currently generate an xG of 1.00. The hosts are in considerably better offensive form, scoring 2.4 goals per game in their last five matches, so the most likely outcome is a home win with a clean sheet rather than necessarily a goalless draw.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Union Omaha are in excellent attacking form: over their last 5 matches, they have averaged 2.4 goals with an xG of 2.12, while Richmond have conceded 1.8 goals per game during the same period. The hosts should also be able to exploit their opponents’ weakness throughout the season, as Richmond have conceded an average of 2.5 goals away from home and have kept a clean sheet in only 10% of matches. At the same time, the visitors have limited attacking potential: they average 0.8 goals, have scored just 2 goals in their last five appearances, and their average xG stands at 1.00. Despite Union Omaha’s advantage, the hosts themselves have not exceeded 2 goals scored in 89% of their matches this season, which limits the probability of a very high-scoring game. The Under 3.5 goals line therefore has the edge, as the projected total of 2.65 goals assumes a home win but does not require an open match with four goals.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Union Omaha are clear favorites: they average 1.11 goals at home, while Richmond concede as many as 2.50 goals per away match and have lost 80% of their games. The home side’s advantage is also evident in the quality of chances, with an average xG of 1.57 compared with Richmond’s 1.19, while Union average 4.89 shots on target to Richmond’s 2.90. Union led at the break in 38% of their matches, whereas Richmond were trailing at half-time in 50% of their games and scored just 0.40 goals in the first half. In their last five matches, the hosts averaged 2.4 goals and won 60% of their games, while their opponents scored only 0.4 goals and suffered defeats in 60% of those matches. The HT/FT scenario of Union Omaha leading at half-time and securing the final victory is therefore the strongest-supported outcome, backed by both the difference in form and Richmond’s very weak away defense.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Union Omaha | Richmond Kickers | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 36% | 33% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.30 | 0.25 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Union Omaha is 117% better for: last-5 form.
2.6 pts / game - Union Omaha · 1.2 pts / game - Richmond Kickers
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Union Omaha is 79% better for: goals scored per game.
1.7 goals / game - Union Omaha · 0.95 goals / game - Richmond Kickers
Union Omaha is 67% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.1 goals / game - Union Omaha · 1.84 goals / game - Richmond Kickers
Union Omaha scores in 80% of games (16 of 20 games), while Richmond Kickers keeps a clean sheet in 21% (4 of 19 games).
Richmond Kickers scores in 58% of games (11 of 19 games), while Union Omaha keeps a clean sheet in 20% (4 of 20 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Union Omaha
Over / Under - Richmond Kickers
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Union Omaha is 20% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.2 pts / game - Union Omaha · 1 pts / game - Richmond Kickers
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Union Omaha - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 20% of games and wins 65%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Richmond Kickers - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 21% of games and wins 26%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.60 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.80 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -5 | -1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (13 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +9 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (6 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Union Omaha
Richmond Kickers
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (USL League One).
Teams vs league
| Union Omaha | Liga | Richmond Kickers | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | • 2.80 | 2.89 | ▼ 2.79 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 60% | 56% | ▼ 42% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 60% | 60% | ▼ 53% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 20% | 25% | ▼ 21% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 60% | 70% | ▲ 79% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 90% | 79% | ▼ 63% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Head-to-head
Record from Union Omaha's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses against Richmond Kickers. Games average 3.67 goals, and both teams scored in 67% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Union Omaha vs Richmond Kickers?
The USL League One match finished Union Omaha 5:1 Richmond Kickers. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Union Omaha and Richmond Kickers?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Union Omaha won 0, Richmond Kickers won 3 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Union Omaha vs Richmond Kickers?
Union Omaha score 1.70 goals per game on average and Richmond Kickers 0.95. The USL League One average is 2.89 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 60% of games. Both teams score in 60% of Union Omaha's matches and 42% of Richmond Kickers's.
What form are Union Omaha and Richmond Kickers in?
Over the last 5 games Union Omaha have a 4-1-0 record (2.60 points per game) and Richmond Kickers 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Union Omaha vs Richmond Kickers?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Union Omaha vs Richmond Kickers: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


