Chile - Primera DivisiónData current as of September 06, 2026

Univ. Concepción vs Cobresal: match statistics

Univ. Concepción crest
Univ. Concepción
1 : 0half-time 1:0
Cobresal crest
Cobresal

Univ. Concepción vs Cobresal: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Univ. Concepción played against Cobresal in Primera División (Chile). The game was played on April 13, 2026. Final score: 1:0.

Recent form

Univ. Concepción has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.00 points per game. Cobresal has 0 wins, 1 draw and 4 losses, with 0.20 points per game.

Scoring records

Univ. Concepción scores 0.88 goals per game and allows 1.75. Cobresal scores 1.50 and allows 2.38. Games in this league average 2.65 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 50% of Univ. Concepción's games and 75% of Cobresal's. The Over 2.5 rates are 50% and 63%, compared with league averages of 43% for BTTS and 49% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Univ. Concepción has the higher season xG average, 1.46 to 1.37 per game. Univ. Concepción takes 14.1 shots per game, while Cobresal takes 12.9.

First-half and second-half trends

Univ. Concepción leads at halftime in 13% of its games and scores 0.50 goals per game after halftime. Cobresal leads at halftime in 25% and scores 1.00 after halftime.

When the teams score

Univ. Concepción's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (2 goals). For Cobresal, it is minutes 76-90+ (4 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Primera División games average 2.65 goals. Both teams score in 43% of games, and 49% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

I back the home win: Univ. Concepción have won 75% of home matches, recording average xG 1.56, 14.5 shots per game and 4.5 on target. Defensively the hosts look superior — they concede an average 1.00 goal at home (xG against 1.25) and keep 50% clean sheets, whereas Cobresal concede 2.75 goals per away match (xG against 2.12) and have 0% clean sheets. In the last 5 matches Concepción have averaged 1.0 point per game, scoring 4 and conceding 10, while Cobresal average only 0.2 points per game: the visitors scored 7 in their last five but conceded 14. Quality of chances favors the hosts — average xG 1.56 versus 0.95 for the visitors and 14.5 vs 9.5 shots suggest more opportunities for Concepción, although Cobresal’s away conversion is high (16% vs the hosts’ 7%), which can yield a lone goal for the visitors. Considering the xG advantage, greater shot volume and better home defense, I estimate probabilities at roughly 65% home, 20% draw and 15% away.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Cobresal has a seasonal BTTS rate of 100% (both teams scored in all matches), with 12 goals scored and 19 conceded (avg 1.5 and 2.75 per match). Univ. Concepción has a seasonal BTTS of 50%, 7 goals scored and 14 conceded (avg 1.5 and 2.0), and in the last 5 home matches the hosts had BTTS 60% with 4 scored and 10 conceded. The visitors in their last 5 matches also show a high BTTS of 80%, scoring 7 and conceding 14, while over 2.5 goals occurs in Cobresal’s season in 75% of games (Univ. Concepción 50%), which together points to high-scoring matches. xG and shot metrics confirm this: Un. Concepción has xG 1.79 and 16.25 shots per match versus Cobresal’s xG 0.95 and 9.5 shots, but the visitors convert better (shot accuracy/conversion 16% vs 9%) and both teams have high xG against (1.55 and 2.12). Considering Cobresal’s 100% BTTS, the 60% and 80% values in the last 5 matches and the high goals conceded (2.0 and 2.75), I prefer BTTS with an estimated probability around 80% — I back 'BTTS - Yes'.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The xG-based model projects 1.96 expected goals for Univ. Concepción and 1.25 for Cobresal (total 3.21), calculated as the average of the team’s attacking xG and the xG the opponent typically concedes ((1.79+2.12)/2 and (0.95+1.55)/2). The 3.21 total exceeds the league average of 2.66 and is supported by season over 2.5 rates: home side 50% of matches over 2.5, away side 75%, with the last 5 matches showing 40% (home) and 60% (away). Additionally, Univ. Concepción averages 16.25 shots and 5.75 shots on target, Cobresal 9.5 shots and 3.25 on target, with shot conversion rates of 9% for the hosts and 16% for the visitors, which increases the effective conversion in scoring situations. Cobresal also has BTTS in 100% of matches; although fixtures involving both teams show 50% and 75% of matches with over 3.5 goals respectively, neither team has recorded an individual 4+ goal match (0%), which limits confidence for over 3.5. Therefore the strongest signal is the Over 2.5 line – the expected 3.21 goals combined with high BTTS frequency and conversion rates favor Over 2.5.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Univ. Concepción holds a clear xG advantage: 1.79 versus 0.95 for Cobresal, with more shots (16.25 vs 9.5) and more shots on target (5.75 vs 3.25), indicating a higher volume of goalscoring opportunities. At half-time the home side average 0.75 goals compared to 0.25 for the visitors; the hosts led at the break in 50% of matches, while Cobresal led at the break in 0% and were trailing at half-time in 75%, which points to the hosts’ superiority in the first half. For the full match, the hosts also benefit from a higher points-per-game average (1.5 for Univ. Concepción vs 0.25 for Cobresal) and a win rate of 50% versus 0%, making the home side the favorite for the final result. At the same time, Cobresal have 100% of away matches with both teams scoring, and the hosts have only 25% clean sheets, so a both-teams-to-score outcome (e.g. 2:1) is most likely. Therefore the strongest HT/FT signal is 1/1 — the hosts leading at half-time and ultimately winning.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

1 : 0
First half
0 : 0
Second half

Game stats

49Possession (%)51
Univ. ConcepciónCobresal
8Shots11
Univ. ConcepciónCobresal
2Shots on target1
Univ. ConcepciónCobresal
0.95xG1.04
Univ. ConcepciónCobresal
4Corners6
Univ. ConcepciónCobresal
40Dangerous attacks36
Univ. ConcepciónCobresal
11Fouls9
Univ. ConcepciónCobresal
4Cards2
Univ. ConcepciónCobresal

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Univ. ConcepciónCobresal
0.88Goals scored / game1.5
Univ. ConcepciónCobresal
1.75Goals allowed / game2.38
Univ. ConcepciónCobresal
47%Average possession45%
Univ. ConcepciónCobresal
4.13Shots on target / game4.5
Univ. ConcepciónCobresal

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

14.13Shots per game12.88
Univ. ConcepciónCobresal
4.13Shots on target4.5
Univ. ConcepciónCobresal
6.2%Shot conversion11.7%
Univ. ConcepciónCobresal
47%Possession45%
Univ. ConcepciónCobresal
1.46xG for1.37
Univ. ConcepciónCobresal
1.53xG against1.84
Univ. ConcepciónCobresal

Shooting quality

Univ. Concepción: AttackingCobresal: Balanced
Univ. ConcepciónCobresal
Accuracy (shots on target)29%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.100.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.210.33

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Univ. Concepción is 400% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / game - Univ. Concepción · 0.2 pts / game - Cobresal

Univ. Concepción
DLDWL
Season result split
38% W25% R38% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-2-3
1.38 pts / game · goal difference -7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-0-1
Last 5 at home
3-0-1
WWLW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.40Opponent xG: 1.83BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
Cobresal
DLLLL
No win in the last 5 games
Season result split
25% W13% R63% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-1-5
0.88 pts / game · goal difference -7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-4
0.20 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
0-1-3
Last 5 away
0-1-3
LDLL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 2.8xG: 1.40Opponent xG: 2.03BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Cobresal is 70% better for: goals scored per game.

0.88 goals / game - Univ. Concepción · 1.5 goals / game - Cobresal

Univ. Concepción is 36% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.75 goals / game - Univ. Concepción · 2.38 goals / game - Cobresal

Univ. Concepción scoring profile: very strong

Univ. Concepción scores in 75% of games (6 of 8 meczów), while Cobresal keeps a clean sheet in 13% (1 of 8 meczów).

Cobresal scoring profile: very strong

Cobresal scores in 88% of games (7 of 8 meczów), while Univ. Concepción keeps a clean sheet in 25% (2 of 8 meczów).

7Goals scored (season)12
Univ. ConcepciónCobresal
14Goals conceded (season)19
Univ. ConcepciónCobresal
2.63Average goals per game3.88
Univ. ConcepciónCobresal
4Goals scored (last 5)7
Univ. ConcepciónCobresal
10Goals conceded (last 5)14
Univ. ConcepciónCobresal

How often they score at least...

75%1 goal88%
Univ. ConcepciónCobresal
13%2 goals50%
Univ. ConcepciónCobresal
0%3 goals13%
Univ. ConcepciónCobresal
0%4 goals0%
Univ. ConcepciónCobresal

How often they concede at least...

75%1 goal88%
Univ. ConcepciónCobresal
38%2 goals63%
Univ. ConcepciónCobresal
38%3 goals50%
Univ. ConcepciónCobresal
13%4 goals25%
Univ. ConcepciónCobresal

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

43%
League average

Goal patterns

25%BTTS at half-time25%
Univ. ConcepciónCobresal
0%BTTS in both halves13%
Univ. ConcepciónCobresal
0%Scored in both halves13%
Univ. ConcepciónCobresal

BTTS and goal count

25%Min. 3 goals and BTTS63%
Univ. ConcepciónCobresal
25%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Univ. ConcepciónCobresal
60%BTTS - last 580%
Univ. ConcepciónCobresal

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

75%Min. 1 goal before half-time88%
Univ. ConcepciónCobresal
50%Min. 2 goals before half-time38%
Univ. ConcepciónCobresal
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time38%
Univ. ConcepciónCobresal

2nd half

88%Min. 1 goal after half-time63%
Univ. ConcepciónCobresal
25%Min. 2 goals after half-time63%
Univ. ConcepciónCobresal
13%Min. 3 goals after half-time38%
Univ. ConcepciónCobresal

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Univ. Concepción - half-time state
13% leading50% draw38% trailing
Cobresal - half-time state
25% leading13% draw63% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.88Points per game (1st half)0.88
Univ. ConcepciónCobresal
0.38Goals scored (1st half)0.5
Univ. ConcepciónCobresal
0.88Goals conceded (1st half)1.25
Univ. ConcepciónCobresal
1.25Average goals (1st half)1.75
Univ. ConcepciónCobresal
38%Clean sheet before half-time25%
Univ. ConcepciónCobresal
63%No goal before half-time63%
Univ. ConcepciónCobresal

After half-time (2nd half)

1.25Points per game (2nd half)0.88
Univ. ConcepciónCobresal
0.5Goals scored (2nd half)1
Univ. ConcepciónCobresal
0.88Goals conceded (2nd half)1.13
Univ. ConcepciónCobresal
1.38Average goals (2nd half)2.13
Univ. ConcepciónCobresal
50%Clean sheet after half-time38%
Univ. ConcepciónCobresal
63%No goal after half-time38%
Univ. ConcepciónCobresal

Univ. Concepción - second-half results

38% W13% R50% P
7
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
10
Second-half points
-3
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.88
PPG before half-time
Lead holding292%

Leads at halftime in 13% of games and wins 38%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime0.0

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Cobresal - second-half results

0% W88% R13% P
7
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
-6
Goal difference (1st half)
7
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.88
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 25% of games and wins 25%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.1

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Univ. Concepción - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.200.80
Goals scored / game0.60.2
Goals allowed / game0.81.2
Average goals per game1.41.4
1 goal80%80%
2 goals60%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal40%80%
Goal difference-1-5
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3
Cobresal - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.200.80
Goals scored / game0.01.4
Goals allowed / game1.21.6
Average goals per game1.23.0
1 goal80%80%
2 goals20%80%
3 goals20%60%
Clean sheet20%20%
No goal100%20%
Goal difference-6-1
Half-time: 0% leading - 20% draw - 80% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 80% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Univ. Concepción
ScoredConceded
1
2
0-15
0
3
16-30
2
2
31-45
2
2
46-60
1
2
61-75
1
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (2 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

Cobresal
ScoredConceded
2
2
0-15
0
2
16-30
2
6
31-45
2
0
46-60
2
5
61-75
4
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (4 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

3.25
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.6 : 1.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
123%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
63%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
66%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
3%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 33 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Univ. Concepción

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.07
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.80
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+6.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.58
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.22
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
54%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
173%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.38
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
14% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
14%

Cobresal

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.47
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.41
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.13
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.54
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
149%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
145%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.68
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Primera División).

Teams vs league

Univ. ConcepciónLigaCobresal
Average goals per game 2.632.65 3.88
Both teams scored 50%43% 75%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 50%49% 63%
Clean sheets 25%30% 13%
Goal before half-time 75%68% 88%
Goal after half-time 88%80% 63%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.65
Average goals per game
43%
Both teams scored
49%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
30%
Clean sheets
1.64
Home goals / game
1.01
Away goals / game
+62%
Home attack advantage
+38%
Home defensive advantage
+29%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
68%
1 goal
33%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
36%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
12%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Univ. ConcepciónYellow cardJorge Espejo
  2. Univ. ConcepciónYellow cardBryan Ogaz
  3. Univ. ConcepciónYellow cardFacundo Mater
  4. Univ. ConcepciónSubstitutionOn: Agustín UrziOff: Pablo Alejandro Parra Rubilar
  5. Univ. ConcepciónYellow cardCristopher Mesías
  6. CobresalYellow cardChristian Damián Moreno

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Univ. Concepción vs Cobresal?

The Primera División match finished Univ. Concepción 1:0 Cobresal. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Univ. Concepción vs Cobresal?

Univ. Concepción score 0.88 goals per game on average and Cobresal 1.50. The Primera División average is 2.65 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 49% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Univ. Concepción's matches and 75% of Cobresal's.

What form are Univ. Concepción and Cobresal in?

Over the last 5 games Univ. Concepción have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Cobresal 0-1-4 (0.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Univ. Concepción vs Cobresal?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Univ. Concepción vs Cobresal: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.