Universitatea Cluj vs Rapid Bucureşti: match statistics
Universitatea Cluj vs Rapid Bucureşti: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Universitatea Cluj played against Rapid Bucureşti in Liga I (Romania). The game was played on October 12, 2026. Venue: Cluj Arena. Final score: 3:4.
Recent form
Universitatea Cluj has 3 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.80 points per game. Rapid Bucureşti has 4 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses, with 2.60 points per game.
Scoring records
Universitatea Cluj scores 1.70 goals per game and allows 1.40. Rapid Bucureşti scores 1.40 and allows 0.60. Games in this league average 2.62 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 60% of Universitatea Cluj's games and 50% of Rapid Bucureşti's. The Over 2.5 rates are 80% and 30%, compared with league averages of 46% for BTTS and 48% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Rapid Bucureşti has the higher season xG average, 1.88 to 1.71 per game. Universitatea Cluj takes 15.2 shots per game, while Rapid Bucureşti takes 17.3.
First-half and second-half trends
Universitatea Cluj leads at halftime in 30% of its games and scores 1.30 goals per game after halftime. Rapid Bucureşti leads at halftime in 30% and scores 0.90 after halftime.
When the teams score
Universitatea Cluj's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (5 goals). For Rapid Bucureşti, it is minutes 76-90+ (5 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Liga I games average 2.62 goals. Both teams score in 46% of games, and 48% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 4 previous meetings were available. The record was 3 home wins, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 1.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 25% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Rapid București have won their last five matches, scoring 10 goals and conceding just 2, while Universitatea Cluj have won 3 of their 5 games, with a goal record of 8:7. The visitors are also solid away from home: they are unbeaten in four matches, conceding an average of 0.25 goals and keeping a clean sheet in 75% of games. The hosts, however, have a potent attacking weapon — they average 2.2 goals at home, and their xG stands at 1.74 compared with 1.55 for their opponents away. Rapid’s average of 1.4 xG conceded away suggests their excellent defensive record may be difficult to maintain against such prolific hosts. Even so, their run of five straight wins and significantly fewer goals conceded give Rapid a slight edge.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The strongest case for BTTS - No is Rapid’s defensive record: away from home, they keep a clean sheet in 75% of matches and concede an average of just 0.25 goals. The visitors have conceded only 2 goals in their last 5 matches, while both teams have scored in just 25% of their away games. However, Universitatea average 2.10 xG at home and score 1.67 goals per match, so breaking down Rapid’s defense remains a realistic possibility. Rapid, meanwhile, have averaged 2.0 goals in their last 5 matches, while the hosts have conceded 1.4 goals per game over that period. The visitors’ strong defense outweighs the arguments for both teams to score, making it slightly more likely that at least one team will fail to score.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The strongest pick is Under 3.5 goals: all of Rapid’s matches so far have stayed below this line, as have 67% of Universitatea Cluj’s fixtures. Rapid concede just 0.25 goals per match on average and have kept a clean sheet in 75% of their games, limiting the chances of a high-scoring outcome despite the hosts’ average of 1.67 goals scored. On the other hand, the teams’ attacking xG stands at 2,10 and 1,55 respectively, suggesting there could be more chances than the results alone indicate; Rapid have also averaged 2,0 goals in their last 5 matches. This makes the 2.5-goal line less clear-cut, while the total-goals forecast of 2,40 and the results so far support Under 3.5 goals.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
A half-time draw is the most likely starting point: it occurred in 60% of both teams’ last five matches, and Rapid were level at the break in three of their four away fixtures. The visitors have yet to concede in the first half of an away match, although the hosts create more chances, averaging 2.10 xG compared with Rapid’s 1.55. After the break, the form advantage points to the visitors: they have won all of their last five matches, averaging 1.8 goals scored and 0.2 conceded in second halves. Universitatea averaged 1.2 goals after the break during this period but also conceded 1.0, increasing Rapid’s chances of settling the match late on. The hosts’ strong home performances mean this outcome is far from certain; however, the combination of frequent half-time draws and Rapid’s second-half effectiveness most strongly supports the X/2 HT/FT pick.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Universitatea Cluj | Rapid Bucureşti | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 32% | 35% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.35 | 0.23 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Rapid Bucureşti is 44% better for: last-5 form.
1.8 pts / game - Universitatea Cluj · 2.6 pts / game - Rapid Bucureşti
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Universitatea Cluj is 21% better for: goals scored per game.
1.7 goals / game - Universitatea Cluj · 1.4 goals / game - Rapid Bucureşti
Rapid Bucureşti is 133% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.4 goals / game - Universitatea Cluj · 0.6 goals / game - Rapid Bucureşti
Universitatea Cluj scores in 80% of games (8 of 10 games), while Rapid Bucureşti keeps a clean sheet in 40% (4 of 10 games).
Rapid Bucureşti scores in 80% of games (8 of 10 games), while Universitatea Cluj keeps a clean sheet in 20% (2 of 10 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Universitatea Cluj
Over / Under - Rapid Bucureşti
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Rapid Bucureşti is 27% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.1 pts / game - Universitatea Cluj · 1.4 pts / game - Rapid Bucureşti
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Universitatea Cluj - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 30% of games and wins 60%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Rapid Bucureşti - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 30% of games and wins 60%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 1.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 2.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 100% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 3.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 1.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Average goals per game | 0.6 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 80% |
| No goal | 80% | 0% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +7 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (5 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Universitatea Cluj
Rapid Bucureşti
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga I).
Teams vs league
| Universitatea Cluj | Liga | Rapid Bucureşti | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 3.10 | 2.62 | ▼ 2.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 60% | 46% | ▲ 50% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 80% | 48% | ▼ 30% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 20% | 31% | ▲ 40% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 80% | 64% | ▼ 50% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 90% | 77% | ▲ 90% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Universitatea Cluj's perspective: 3 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses against Rapid Bucureşti. Games average 1.50 goals, and both teams scored in 25% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Universitatea Cluj vs Rapid Bucureşti?
The Liga I match finished Universitatea Cluj 3:4 Rapid Bucureşti. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Universitatea Cluj and Rapid Bucureşti?
In the last 4 head-to-head matches Universitatea Cluj won 3, Rapid Bucureşti won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 1.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 25% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Universitatea Cluj vs Rapid Bucureşti?
Universitatea Cluj score 1.70 goals per game on average and Rapid Bucureşti 1.40. The Liga I average is 2.62 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 48% of games. Both teams score in 60% of Universitatea Cluj's matches and 50% of Rapid Bucureşti's.
What form are Universitatea Cluj and Rapid Bucureşti in?
Over the last 5 games Universitatea Cluj have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Rapid Bucureşti 4-1-0 (2.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Universitatea Cluj vs Rapid Bucureşti?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


