URA vs Vipers: match statistics
URA vs Vipers: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
URA played against Vipers in Uganda Premier League (Uganda). The game was played on October 31, 2026. Final score: 1:0.
Recent form
URA has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.80 points per game. Vipers has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss, with 1.60 points per game.
Scoring records
URA scores 0.86 goals per game and allows 1.43. Vipers scores 1.86 and allows 0.43. Games in this league average 2.21 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 43% of URA's games and 14% of Vipers's. The Over 2.5 rates are 43% and 43%, compared with league averages of 40% for BTTS and 42% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Vipers has the higher season xG average, 1.55 to 1.18 per game. URA takes 5.6 shots per game, while Vipers takes 8.6.
First-half and second-half trends
URA leads at halftime in 0% of its games and scores 0.57 goals per game after halftime. Vipers leads at halftime in 43% and scores 1.14 after halftime.
When the teams score
URA's most productive scoring window is minutes 0-15 (2 goals). For Vipers, it is minutes 16-30 (3 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Uganda Premier League games average 2.21 goals. Both teams score in 40% of games, and 42% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 1 away win. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Vipers sit 6th and are unbeaten in their last 5 matches, winning 3, while 15th-placed URA have suffered 4 defeats and drawn once over the same period. The visitors have scored 13 goals and conceded just 1 in those five matches; the hosts have scored 3 and conceded 9. The contrast is especially clear at the respective venues: Vipers have won both away matches, averaging 4.5 goals, while URA have failed to win any of their three home games and have not scored in them. The visitors average 6 shots on target away from home, compared with 3 for the hosts at home, although the gap in the quality of chances created is smaller than the results suggest: their average xG stands at 1.54 and 1.27, respectively. The small sample of home and away matches calls for caution, but Vipers' finishing and the teams' recent results strongly point to an away win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The strongest signal points to BTTS - No: Vipers have yet to concede in away matches, while URA have failed to score in 50% of their home games. Across their last five matches, Vipers have conceded an average of just 0.2 goals, while URA have scored an average of 0.6, increasing the risk that the hosts will draw a blank. The visitors also have a clear edge in recent attacking form, averaging 2.6 goals scored compared with URA’s 0.6, so both teams do not need to be held scoreless for this pick to land. Some caution is warranted given the hosts’ xG of 1.63 and the 1.31 xG conceded by Vipers, but the visitors’ defensive record so far and the league BTTS rate of 36% still clearly support BTTS - No. This means at least one team is expected not to score; it does not necessarily imply a 0-0 draw.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Vipers have averaged 2.6 goals scored over their last 5 matches, while URA have conceded 1.8 goals per game over the same period, which points to the visitors getting on the scoresheet. Across the season, Vipers' matches have gone Over 1.5 goals in 100% of cases, compared with 50% for URA. However, Vipers' high season average of 4.5 goals scored calls for caution: their average xG is 1.54, so this level of finishing should not be projected directly into the next match. URA have scored just 0.6 goals per game recently, while Vipers have conceded 0.2, so the hosts' contribution to the total could be limited. The 2.75-goal projection offers the strongest edge on Over 1.5 goals, although with the league averaging 2.17 goals per game, higher goal lines carry less certainty.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest signal is Vipers leading at the break and maintaining their advantage through full time: in their last five matches, the visitors led at half-time three times, while URA were trailing at the break three times. Over the same period, Vipers recorded three wins and two draws, whereas URA lost four of their five matches. The visitors’ advantage is not limited to the opening half: after the break, they averaged 1.6 goals across their last five appearances, compared with URA’s 0.2, and did not concede during that period. In their two away matches to date, Vipers led at half-time and won on both occasions, although this small sample limits confidence in the prediction. The xG figures warrant additional caution: URA average 1.63 at home, slightly above Vipers’ away figure of 1.54, so a draw at half-time followed by an away win also has a meaningful chance.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| URA | Vipers | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 49% | 52% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.21 | 0.18 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.32 | 0.42 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Vipers is 100% better for: last-5 form.
0.8 pts / game - URA · 1.6 pts / game - Vipers
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Vipers is 116% better for: goals scored per game.
0.86 goals / game - URA · 1.86 goals / game - Vipers
Vipers is 233% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.43 goals / game - URA · 0.43 goals / game - Vipers
URA scores in 57% of games (4 of 7 games), while Vipers keeps a clean sheet in 57% (4 of 7 games).
Vipers scores in 57% of games (4 of 7 games), while URA keeps a clean sheet in 29% (2 of 7 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - URA
Over / Under - Vipers
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Vipers is 233% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.43 pts / game - URA · 1.43 pts / game - Vipers
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
URA - second-half results
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Vipers - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 43% of games and wins 43%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.60 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.0 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -3 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 2.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 100% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +6 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (2 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (3 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
URA
Vipers
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Uganda Premier League).
Teams vs league
| URA | Liga | Vipers | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | • 2.29 | 2.21 | • 2.29 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 43% | 40% | ▼ 14% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 43% | 42% | • 43% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 29% | 38% | ▲ 57% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 57% | 61% | ▲ 86% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 71% | 68% | ▼ 57% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Other recorded players
Away team
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- URAGoalLoyce Marius Mbaba
Head-to-head
Record from URA's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss against Vipers. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 50% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of URA vs Vipers?
The Uganda Premier League match finished URA 1:0 Vipers. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between URA and Vipers?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches URA won 0, Vipers won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before URA vs Vipers?
URA score 0.86 goals per game on average and Vipers 1.86. The Uganda Premier League average is 2.21 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 42% of games. Both teams score in 43% of URA's matches and 14% of Vipers's.
What form are URA and Vipers in?
Over the last 5 games URA have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Vipers 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for URA vs Vipers?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for URA vs Vipers: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.