UTA Arad vs Csikszereda: match statistics
UTA Arad vs Csikszereda: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
UTA Arad played against Csikszereda in Liga I (Romania). The game was played on September 5, 2026. Final score: 5:1.
Recent form
UTA Arad has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.00 points per game. Csikszereda has 0 wins, 1 draw and 4 losses, with 0.20 points per game.
Scoring records
UTA Arad scores 0.86 goals per game and allows 1.43. Csikszereda scores 0.57 and allows 1.86. Games in this league average 2.40 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 43% of UTA Arad's games and 29% of Csikszereda's. The Over 2.5 rates are 57% and 43%, compared with league averages of 46% for BTTS and 44% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
UTA Arad has the higher season xG average, 1.54 to 1.05 per game. UTA Arad takes 15.0 shots per game, while Csikszereda takes 8.6.
First-half and second-half trends
UTA Arad leads at halftime in 14% of its games and scores 0.71 goals per game after halftime. Csikszereda leads at halftime in 0% and scores 0.29 after halftime.
When the teams score
UTA Arad's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (3 goals). For Csikszereda, it is minutes 31-45+ (2 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Liga I games average 2.40 goals. Both teams score in 46% of games, and 44% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 3 previous meetings were available. The record was 1 home win, 1 draw and 1 away win. Those games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
UTA Arad remain unbeaten at home, drawing all three matches played so far, while their defense concedes just 0.67 goals per game there and keeps a clean sheet in 67% of appearances. Csikszereda have lost all four away matches, averaging only 0.5 goals scored, and fail to score in 75% of such fixtures. The hosts create significantly better chances, recording an average home xG of 1.68 compared with Csikszereda’s away xG of 0.94, while their opponents allow 1.97 xG. UTA also average 17 shots per home game, compared with just 7 attempts from the visitors, which should translate into clearer control of the match. However, UTA’s limited finishing—scoring 0.67 goals per home game and failing to score in 67% of appearances—increases the risk of a draw.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Seasonal BTTS figures are clearly low: UTA Arad have seen this outcome in 33% of their matches, while Csikszereda have recorded it in just 25%, compared with the league average of 47%. Both teams have serious problems in front of goal, averaging just 0.67 and 0.50 goals per game respectively, while the hosts have failed to score in 67% of their matches and the visitors in as many as 75%. Over their last five games, Csikszereda improved their scoring average to 1.2, but UTA scored only 0.8 goals and conceded just 0.8 per match. The visitors’ xG stands at 0.94 for the season and 1.12 over their last five games, which does not provide a strong basis for regularly breaking down the hosts’ defense. BTTS - Yes is not the more likely outcome, as the data primarily points to a genuine risk that at least one team will fail to score.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The profile of both teams points to limited goalscoring potential: UTA Arad scores an average of 0.67 goals, while Csikszereda averages 0.50 goals per match. Although both defenses allow opponents to generate a high xG—1.86 and 1.97, respectively—shot conversion remains low at just 6% for the home side and 7% for the visitors. In their last five matches, UTA recorded an average of 1.6 total goals, while Csikszereda’s games averaged 2.8 goals; however, only 3 of its last 5 matches went Over 2.5 goals. The Under 3.5 line is also supported by the season data, as this outcome occurred in 67% of UTA’s matches and 75% of Csikszereda’s fixtures. The projected total of 2.30 goals provides a clear buffer below four goals, making Under 3.5 goals the best choice.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest scenario is a draw at half-time, as UTA were level after 45 minutes in 60% of their last five matches, compared with 40% for Csikszereda; over the course of the current season, the visitors have had a level score at the break in as many as 75% of their matches. In their last five first halves, the hosts scored just 0.2 goals and conceded the same number, clearly indicating the likelihood of a cautious, frequently goalless opening. After the interval, the advantage should shift towards UTA: Csikszereda concede an average of 1.25 goals in second halves, while UTA concede just 0.33. UTA also have the higher average xG, 1.20 compared with 0.94, and in their last five matches they conceded an average of 0.8 goals, compared with 1.6 for the visitors. Csikszereda’s poor run, including defeats in 60% of their last five appearances, further strengthens the HT/FT draw/UTA win scenario.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| UTA Arad | Csikszereda | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 24% | 42% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.10 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.24 | 0.16 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
UTA Arad is 400% better for: last-5 form.
1 pts / game - UTA Arad · 0.2 pts / game - Csikszereda
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
UTA Arad is 51% better for: goals scored per game.
0.86 goals / game - UTA Arad · 0.57 goals / game - Csikszereda
UTA Arad is 30% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.43 goals / game - UTA Arad · 1.86 goals / game - Csikszereda
UTA Arad scores in 43% of games (3 of 7 games), while Csikszereda keeps a clean sheet in 14% (1 of 7 games).
Csikszereda scores in 29% of games (2 of 7 games), while UTA Arad keeps a clean sheet in 29% (2 of 7 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - UTA Arad
Over / Under - Csikszereda
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
UTA Arad is 75% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1 pts / game - UTA Arad · 0.57 pts / game - Csikszereda
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
UTA Arad - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 14% of games and wins 14%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.6 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Csikszereda - second-half results
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 0.4 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | 0 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.60 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.0 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -3 | -1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (3 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (2 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
UTA Arad
Csikszereda
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga I).
Teams vs league
| UTA Arad | Liga | Csikszereda | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.29 | 2.40 | • 2.43 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 43% | 46% | ▼ 29% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 57% | 44% | • 43% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 29% | 33% | ▼ 14% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 43% | 63% | ▼ 43% |
| Goal after half-time | • 71% | 72% | • 71% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from UTA Arad's perspective: 1 win, 1 draw and 1 loss against Csikszereda. Games average 1.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of UTA Arad vs Csikszereda?
The Liga I match finished UTA Arad 5:1 Csikszereda. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between UTA Arad and Csikszereda?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches UTA Arad won 1, Csikszereda won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before UTA Arad vs Csikszereda?
UTA Arad score 0.86 goals per game on average and Csikszereda 0.57. The Liga I average is 2.40 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 44% of games. Both teams score in 43% of UTA Arad's matches and 29% of Csikszereda's.
What form are UTA Arad and Csikszereda in?
Over the last 5 games UTA Arad have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Csikszereda 0-1-4 (0.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for UTA Arad vs Csikszereda?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for UTA Arad vs Csikszereda: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


