UTA Arad vs SSC Farul: match statistics
UTA Arad vs SSC Farul: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
UTA Arad played against SSC Farul in Liga I (Romania). The game was played on April 26, 2026. Final score: 0:0.
Recent form
UTA Arad has 3 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.80 points per game. SSC Farul has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses, with 0.80 points per game.
Scoring records
UTA Arad scores 1.43 goals per game and allows 1.43. SSC Farul scores 1.26 and allows 1.23. Games in this league average 2.55 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 60% of UTA Arad's games and 60% of SSC Farul's. The Over 2.5 rates are 51% and 46%, compared with league averages of 51% for BTTS and 47% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
SSC Farul has the higher season xG average, 1.51 to 1.50 per game. UTA Arad takes 13.5 shots per game, while SSC Farul takes 13.9.
First-half and second-half trends
UTA Arad leads at halftime in 29% of its games and scores 0.77 goals per game after halftime. SSC Farul leads at halftime in 34% and scores 0.57 after halftime.
When the teams score
UTA Arad's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (15 goals). For SSC Farul, it is minutes 31-45+ (10 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Liga I games average 2.55 goals. Both teams score in 51% of games, and 47% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 1 home win, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
UTA Arad is the clear favorite based on home metrics: at home they average 1.72 goals per match, have a 50% win rate and a +5 goal difference, whereas SSC Farul average just 0.82 goals away and carry a -8 away goal difference. UTA registers 4.61 shots on target per game with a 12% conversion rate and xG 1.59, while Farul posts 3.76 shots on target, 6% conversion and xG 1.44 — this underlines the hosts’ markedly higher efficiency in chance conversion. In the last 5 matches the hosts have scored 11 goals and recorded 3 wins (PPG 1.8), whereas Farul have 5 goals, one win and PPG 0.8, indicating superior form for UTA. Defensively both teams concede at similar rates (UTA 1.44 goals at home vs Farul 1.29 away), but Farul fail to score in 35% of away matches compared to 22% of UTA’s home matches without a goal, which increases the hosts’ chances.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I tip BTTS - Yes at 62% probability because UTA Arad has a season BTTS rate of 67% (60% in last 5) and SSC Farul 53% (40% in last 5), which strongly favors both teams scoring. UTA averages 1.67 goals per game seasonally and 2.2 in the last 5 (11 goals), while Farul has 0.82 seasonally and 1.0 in the last 5 (5 goals); nevertheless Farul concedes 1.29 goals per game on average and has only 12% clean sheets, so they are highly likely to concede. xG indicates both teams create and allow around 1.5 xG (UTA xG_for 1.57 vs Farul 1.44; xG_against 1.57 and 1.59), suggesting an open match with chances for both sides. UTA attempts more shots and shots on target (14.56 and 4.28 vs 13.29 and 3.76) and has a higher conversion rate (11% vs 6%), increasing the likelihood they will finish chances created. Considering seasonal BTTS 67%/53%, low clean sheet rates (22%/12%) and a league goals average of 2.56, I pick Yes as the stronger signal (62% vs 38%).
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Total expected goals (xG) are 3.09: UTA Arad 1.58 xG and SSC Farul 1.51 xG, indicating significant scoring potential. Seasonally UTA averages 1.67 goals (56% of matches Over 2.5), while Farul averages 0.82 goals (35% Over 2.5); both teams also have a very high share of matches with over 0.5 goals — 94% for UTA and 100% for Farul. Both sides concede goals (UTA 1.17, Farul 1.29 per match) and BTTS rates are 67% for UTA and 53% for Farul, which increases the likelihood of additional goals. In the last 5 matches UTA scored 11 goals (2.2 avg) and had 60% Over 2.5, whereas Farul scored 5 goals (1.0 avg) and 20% Over 2.5; however the combined xG=3.09 leads me to rate Over 2.5 as a realistic option (approx. 62%). The strongest signal is Over 1.5 (estimated 86%), therefore I recommend backing Over, with the 1.5 line as the safest choice.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
UTA Arad is a clear favorite to lead at the break — the hosts were leading at half-time in 56% of matches, while SSC Farul led in only 12%, and the average goals by half are 1.06 for UTA versus 0.29 for the visitors. Over the full match UTA scores an average of 1.67 goals and has a 44% win rate, compared to 0.82 and 18% for Farul; the hosts also have better shot efficiency (11% vs 6%), which increases the likelihood of maintaining the lead. The second half does not tend to produce many turnarounds — the hosts score an average of 0.61 goals after the break and the visitors 0.53, with visitors being behind at half-time in 47% of matches, so comebacks are unlikely. Based on this, I assign the highest probability to the 1/1 scenario (38%), with X/1 (13%) and X/X (10%) as the second and third most likely outcomes.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| UTA Arad | SSC Farul | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 33% | 29% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.32 | 0.31 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
UTA Arad is 125% better for: last-5 form.
1.8 pts / game - UTA Arad · 0.8 pts / game - SSC Farul
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
UTA Arad is 13% better for: goals scored per game.
1.43 goals / game - UTA Arad · 1.26 goals / game - SSC Farul
SSC Farul is 16% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.43 goals / game - UTA Arad · 1.23 goals / game - SSC Farul
UTA Arad scores in 74% of games (26 of 35 meczów), while SSC Farul keeps a clean sheet in 17% (6 of 35 meczów).
SSC Farul scores in 74% of games (26 of 35 meczów), while UTA Arad keeps a clean sheet in 17% (6 of 35 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - UTA Arad
Over / Under - SSC Farul
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
SSC Farul is 5% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.31 pts / game - UTA Arad · 1.37 pts / game - SSC Farul
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
UTA Arad - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 29% of games and wins 40%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
SSC Farul - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 34% of games and wins 31%. Usually protects a halftime lead through the final whistle.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.60 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 1.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +3 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.80 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.0 | 1.2 |
| Average goals per game | 0.4 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +2 | -3 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (15 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (10 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
UTA Arad
SSC Farul
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga I).
Teams vs league
| UTA Arad | Liga | SSC Farul | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 2.86 | 2.55 | • 2.49 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 60% | 51% | ▲ 60% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 51% | 47% | • 46% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 17% | 28% | ▼ 17% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 74% | 68% | ▲ 77% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 86% | 76% | • 77% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Record from UTA Arad's perspective: 1 win, 1 draw and 0 losses against SSC Farul. Games average 2.50 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of UTA Arad vs SSC Farul?
The Liga I match finished UTA Arad 0:0 SSC Farul. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between UTA Arad and SSC Farul?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches UTA Arad won 1, SSC Farul won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before UTA Arad vs SSC Farul?
UTA Arad score 1.43 goals per game on average and SSC Farul 1.26. The Liga I average is 2.55 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 47% of games. Both teams score in 60% of UTA Arad's matches and 60% of SSC Farul's.
What form are UTA Arad and SSC Farul in?
Over the last 5 games UTA Arad have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and SSC Farul 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for UTA Arad vs SSC Farul?
The statistical background for UTA Arad vs SSC Farul — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


