Utrecht II vs Eindhoven: match statistics
Utrecht II vs Eindhoven: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Utrecht II played against Eindhoven in Eerste Divisie (Netherlands). The game was played on April 17, 2026. Final score: 3:0.
Recent form
Utrecht II has 2 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.20 points per game. Eindhoven has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses, with 0.80 points per game.
Scoring records
Utrecht II scores 1.49 goals per game and allows 1.74. Eindhoven scores 1.39 and allows 1.83. Games in this league average 3.21 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 63% of Utrecht II's games and 50% of Eindhoven's. The Over 2.5 rates are 63% and 64%, compared with league averages of 62% for BTTS and 64% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
The teams have nearly identical season xG averages at 1.56 per game. Utrecht II takes 13.7 shots per game, while Eindhoven takes 14.3.
First-half and second-half trends
Utrecht II leads at halftime in 31% of its games and scores 0.89 goals per game after halftime. Eindhoven leads at halftime in 28% and scores 0.75 after halftime.
When the teams score
Utrecht II's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (13 goals). For Eindhoven, it is minutes 76-90+ (14 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Eerste Divisie games average 3.21 goals. Both teams score in 62% of games, and 64% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Utrecht II holds a clear offensive advantage at home — they average 1.89 goals per home match, register 6.00 shots on target and have a conversion rate of 13%, while Eindhoven average 1.00 goal on the road with 4.83 shots on target and a 7% conversion. In terms of chance quality the hosts are also superior: Utrecht’s average home xG is 1.69 versus Eindhoven’s 1.59 away xG, while Eindhoven concedes 1.76 xG on average compared to 1.57 xG conceded by Utrecht. Recent form over the last 5 matches also favors Utrecht — the hosts average 1.2 points per game in their last five, Eindhoven only 0.8; both teams have scored 5 goals in that period, but Eindhoven have conceded 11 compared to Utrecht’s 8. Additionally, Eindhoven fail to score in 39% of their away matches and concede an average of 2.00 goals away, whereas Utrecht concede 1.83 at home and keep 22% clean sheets, which reduces the visitors’ chances of a positive result. Considering efficiency (13% vs 7%), advantage in shots on target (6.00 vs 4.83), superior xG and Eindhoven’s poorer away form, I expect a home win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I back BTTS - Yes with a 62% vs 38% probability. The basis is a high league BTTS rate — 62% — and identical seasonal BTTS rates of 50% for both teams, indicating a league environment and team behaviors that favor goals from both sides. Utrecht II averages 1.78 goals scored and concedes 1.67 per match, Eindhoven scores 1.00 and concedes 2.00; xG shows 1.54 vs 1.59 (home vs away), so both sides create offensive chances. Utrecht failed to score in only 22% of matches (scoring in 78%), Eindhoven failed to score in 39% (scoring in 61%), and Utrecht has a higher shot conversion rate 13% versus Eindhoven’s 7% — this suggests the hosts are likely to score while the visitors have a realistic chance of a goal. Low clean sheet percentages (28% and 17%) and recent BTTS in the last 5 matches at 40% for Utrecht and 60% for Eindhoven confirm that a both-teams-to-score scenario is more probable.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The xG- and defensive-based model projects expected goals of 1.65 for Utrecht II and 1.65 for Eindhoven (total 3.30), based on xG: 1.54 for the home side vs 1.59 for the visitors and xG against of 1.71 and 1.76. Season-to-date Utrecht II have finished over 1.5 goals in 72% of matches and Eindhoven in 78%, while the league averages 3.21 goals per game, all strongly favoring Over 1.5. The hosts convert shots more efficiently (13% vs 7%) and average 5.22 shots on target vs 4.83 for the away team; in the last 5 fixtures both teams have scored 5 goals each, supporting a multi-goal scenario. Mapping to a Poisson distribution yields probabilities of approximately 84% for Over 1.5, 64% for Over 2.5 and 42% for Over 3.5, therefore the strongest and most likely signal from the data is Over 1.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The most likely Half-Time outcome is a draw — Utrecht II were level at the break in 9 of 18 matches (50%), while they led at half-time in only 6 of 18 (33%). Nonetheless, the hosts hold the advantage in Full-Time results: they win at home in 44% of games, whereas Eindhoven win away in 28%. Utrecht II score an average of 0.89 goals by half-time versus Eindhoven’s 0.39, and in the second half the hosts average 0.89 goals and have 89% of matches with at least one goal after the break, indicating decisions are often reached after half-time. Additionally, Utrecht II’s finishing efficiency is higher (conversion rate 13% versus 7% for the visitors) with a similar xG (1.54 vs 1.59), so the most probable scenario is a draw at Half-Time and a home win at Full-Time (X/1) — I assign it a 27% probability.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Utrecht II | Eindhoven | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 39% | 35% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.28 | 0.28 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Utrecht II is 50% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / game - Utrecht II · 0.8 pts / game - Eindhoven
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Utrecht II is 7% better for: goals scored per game.
1.49 goals / game - Utrecht II · 1.39 goals / game - Eindhoven
Utrecht II is 5% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.74 goals / game - Utrecht II · 1.83 goals / game - Eindhoven
Utrecht II scores in 71% of games (25 of 35 meczów), while Eindhoven keeps a clean sheet in 22% (8 of 36 meczów).
Eindhoven scores in 69% of games (25 of 36 meczów), while Utrecht II keeps a clean sheet in 14% (5 of 35 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Utrecht II
Over / Under - Eindhoven
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Utrecht II - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 31% of games and wins 29%. Usually protects a halftime lead through the final whistle.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Eindhoven - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 28% of games and wins 36%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.60 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 1.2 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 1.8 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 2.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -6 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (13 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (14). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (14 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (18). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Utrecht II
Eindhoven
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Eerste Divisie).
Teams vs league
| Utrecht II | Liga | Eindhoven | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | • 3.23 | 3.21 | • 3.22 |
| Both teams scored | • 63% | 62% | ▼ 50% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 63% | 64% | • 64% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 14% | 21% | • 22% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 71% | 77% | ▼ 69% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 89% | 85% | ▼ 83% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Record from Utrecht II's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Eindhoven. Games average 1.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Utrecht II vs Eindhoven?
The Eerste Divisie match finished Utrecht II 3:0 Eindhoven. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Utrecht II vs Eindhoven?
Utrecht II score 1.49 goals per game on average and Eindhoven 1.39. The Eerste Divisie average is 3.21 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 64% of games. Both teams score in 63% of Utrecht II's matches and 50% of Eindhoven's.
What form are Utrecht II and Eindhoven in?
Over the last 5 games Utrecht II have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Eindhoven 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Utrecht II vs Eindhoven?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


