UTS Rabat vs CODM Meknès: match statistics
UTS Rabat vs CODM Meknès: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
UTS Rabat played against CODM Meknès in Botola Pro (Morocco). The game was played on June 17, 2026. Final score: 2:0.
Recent form
UTS Rabat has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.60 points per game. CODM Meknès has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses, with 0.80 points per game.
Scoring records
UTS Rabat scores 1.00 goals per game and allows 1.42. CODM Meknès scores 0.71 and allows 0.96. Games in this league average 2.13 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 67% of UTS Rabat's games and 33% of CODM Meknès's. The Over 2.5 rates are 29% and 25%, compared with league averages of 51% for BTTS and 38% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
UTS Rabat has the higher season xG average, 1.26 to 1.12 per game. UTS Rabat takes 9.2 shots per game, while CODM Meknès takes 9.3.
First-half and second-half trends
UTS Rabat leads at halftime in 17% of its games and scores 0.50 goals per game after halftime. CODM Meknès leads at halftime in 13% and scores 0.50 after halftime.
When the teams score
UTS Rabat's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (6 goals). For CODM Meknès, it is minutes 46-60 (5 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Botola Pro games average 2.13 goals. Both teams score in 51% of games, and 38% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
UTS Rabat holds a form advantage in recent matches: in their last five games the hosts scored 4 goals and averaged 1.6 points per match, while CODM Meknès scored 5 goals but only 0.8 points per match. In offensive metrics UTS shows higher efficiency at home — on average 0.92 goals per game, 3.17 shots on target and a 11% conversion rate, versus 0.45 goals, 2.18 shots on target and a 5% conversion rate for the away side. The quality of created chances is, however, similar: xG for UTS is 1.13 against 1.12 for CODM, which suggests a comparable number of opportunities but superior finishing by the hosts. Risks for UTS include no home wins this season (0% home wins) and a negative home goal difference (-7), while CODM have a high share of matches without scoring on the road (64%) and have conceded 8 goals in the last 5 matches. Considering the hosts’ better recent form and markedly greater home finishing efficiency, I forecast an UTS victory; estimated probabilities are 50% home, 30% draw and 20% away.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
In my assessment the more likely scenario is 'No' (BTTS - No): UTS Rabat has a seasonal BTTS rate of only 31% and has kept a clean sheet in 54% of appearances, which significantly limits the likelihood of both teams scoring. CODM Meknès scores only 0.45 goals per game on the season and has a very low chance conversion rate of 5%, even though the visitors' xG is 1.12 — they create chances but rarely finish them. The hosts average 0.92 goals scored and concede 0.69 per match, while their xG against is 1.39 compared to an actual average of 0.69 goals conceded, which reinforces UTS’s frequent clean sheets. The counterargument is the visitors' recent form over the last 5 matches (80% BTTS, averaging 1.0 scored and 1.6 conceded), which raises the risk of them contributing goals, but this is a short-term signal against the seasonal data. Considering both teams' low seasonal BTTS figures (31% vs 36%), low Over 2.5 rates (23% and 27%) and the hosts' advantage in keeping clean sheets, I assign a 70% probability to the 'No' scenario and 30% to 'Yes' (BTTS - Yes).
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Combining both teams' xG yields 1.21 expected goals for UTS Rabat (home attack xG 1.13 and away defense xG 1.30) and 1.26 for CODM Meknès (attack xG 1.12 and home defense xG 1.39), totaling 2.47 expected goals. With λ=2.47 the Poisson model gives roughly a 71% probability of at least 2 goals (Over 1.5), which exceeds the home side's seasonal Over 1.5 rate (38%) and is close to the visitors' figure (64%). The chance of Over 2.5 is estimated moderately at ~45% (seasonally both teams record 23–27% each), while Over 3.5 is unlikely (~24%), consistent with seasonal 8–9%. Additionally, the hosts have 54% clean sheets versus 27% for the visitors, which limits the risk of a very open game, but the relatively high xG for both sides (1.13 and 1.12) supports an expectation of at least two goals; therefore I recommend betting Over 1.5 as the strongest signal.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
UTS Rabat draws at half-time in 62% of matches while winning 54% of their games this season, whereas CODM Meknès records only 9% victories. The home side is clearly stronger after the break: they average 0.62 goals in the second half versus 0.36 for the visitors and have collected 20 points in second halves compared to 9 for the away team. Halves tend to be low-scoring — UTS scores on average 0.31 goals before the break, CODM 0.09, and clean halves occur in 77% of the home team’s matches and 73% of the visitors’, hence a strong signal for a lead at the break. Given this, I assign the highest probability, 38%, to the scenario draw at half-time and home win at full-time (X/1), 18% to draw/draw (X/X), and 12% to home leading at the break and winning the match (1/1). The visitors’ low efficiency (0.45 goals per match and a 5% shot conversion rate versus the home’s 0.92 goals and 10% conversion) justifies the small likelihood of a turnaround by CODM, therefore only 9% in total is assigned to away wins.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| UTS Rabat | CODM Meknès | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 42% | 28% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.14 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.26 | 0.27 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
UTS Rabat is 100% better for: last-5 form.
1.6 pts / game - UTS Rabat · 0.8 pts / game - CODM Meknès
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
UTS Rabat is 41% better for: goals scored per game.
1 goals / game - UTS Rabat · 0.71 goals / game - CODM Meknès
CODM Meknès is 48% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.42 goals / game - UTS Rabat · 0.96 goals / game - CODM Meknès
UTS Rabat scores in 71% of games (17 of 24 meczów), while CODM Meknès keeps a clean sheet in 42% (10 of 24 meczów).
CODM Meknès scores in 58% of games (14 of 24 meczów), while UTS Rabat keeps a clean sheet in 8% (2 of 24 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - UTS Rabat
Over / Under - CODM Meknès
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
UTS Rabat - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 17% of games and wins 13%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
CODM Meknès - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 13% of games and wins 33%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.80 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +2 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.80 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 20% |
| No goal | 80% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
UTS Rabat
CODM Meknès
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Botola Pro).
Teams vs league
| UTS Rabat | Liga | CODM Meknès | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 2.42 | 2.13 | ▼ 1.67 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 67% | 51% | ▼ 33% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 29% | 38% | ▼ 25% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 8% | 31% | ▲ 42% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 58% | 61% | ▼ 38% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 75% | 73% | ▼ 71% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Head-to-head
Record from UTS Rabat's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses against CODM Meknès. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of UTS Rabat vs CODM Meknès?
The Botola Pro match finished UTS Rabat 2:0 CODM Meknès. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before UTS Rabat vs CODM Meknès?
UTS Rabat score 1.00 goals per game on average and CODM Meknès 0.71. The Botola Pro average is 2.13 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 38% of games. Both teams score in 67% of UTS Rabat's matches and 33% of CODM Meknès's.
What form are UTS Rabat and CODM Meknès in?
Over the last 5 games UTS Rabat have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and CODM Meknès 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for UTS Rabat vs CODM Meknès?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for UTS Rabat vs CODM Meknès: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


