Morocco - Botola ProData current as of September 06, 2026

UTS Rabat vs CODM Meknès: match statistics

UTS Rabat crest
UTS Rabat
2 : 0half-time 0:0
CODM Meknès crest
CODM Meknès

UTS Rabat vs CODM Meknès: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

UTS Rabat played against CODM Meknès in Botola Pro (Morocco). The game was played on June 17, 2026. Final score: 2:0.

Recent form

UTS Rabat has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.60 points per game. CODM Meknès has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses, with 0.80 points per game.

Scoring records

UTS Rabat scores 1.00 goals per game and allows 1.42. CODM Meknès scores 0.71 and allows 0.96. Games in this league average 2.13 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 67% of UTS Rabat's games and 33% of CODM Meknès's. The Over 2.5 rates are 29% and 25%, compared with league averages of 51% for BTTS and 38% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

UTS Rabat has the higher season xG average, 1.26 to 1.12 per game. UTS Rabat takes 9.2 shots per game, while CODM Meknès takes 9.3.

First-half and second-half trends

UTS Rabat leads at halftime in 17% of its games and scores 0.50 goals per game after halftime. CODM Meknès leads at halftime in 13% and scores 0.50 after halftime.

When the teams score

UTS Rabat's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (6 goals). For CODM Meknès, it is minutes 46-60 (5 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Botola Pro games average 2.13 goals. Both teams score in 51% of games, and 38% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

UTS Rabat holds a form advantage in recent matches: in their last five games the hosts scored 4 goals and averaged 1.6 points per match, while CODM Meknès scored 5 goals but only 0.8 points per match. In offensive metrics UTS shows higher efficiency at home — on average 0.92 goals per game, 3.17 shots on target and a 11% conversion rate, versus 0.45 goals, 2.18 shots on target and a 5% conversion rate for the away side. The quality of created chances is, however, similar: xG for UTS is 1.13 against 1.12 for CODM, which suggests a comparable number of opportunities but superior finishing by the hosts. Risks for UTS include no home wins this season (0% home wins) and a negative home goal difference (-7), while CODM have a high share of matches without scoring on the road (64%) and have conceded 8 goals in the last 5 matches. Considering the hosts’ better recent form and markedly greater home finishing efficiency, I forecast an UTS victory; estimated probabilities are 50% home, 30% draw and 20% away.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

In my assessment the more likely scenario is 'No' (BTTS - No): UTS Rabat has a seasonal BTTS rate of only 31% and has kept a clean sheet in 54% of appearances, which significantly limits the likelihood of both teams scoring. CODM Meknès scores only 0.45 goals per game on the season and has a very low chance conversion rate of 5%, even though the visitors' xG is 1.12 — they create chances but rarely finish them. The hosts average 0.92 goals scored and concede 0.69 per match, while their xG against is 1.39 compared to an actual average of 0.69 goals conceded, which reinforces UTS’s frequent clean sheets. The counterargument is the visitors' recent form over the last 5 matches (80% BTTS, averaging 1.0 scored and 1.6 conceded), which raises the risk of them contributing goals, but this is a short-term signal against the seasonal data. Considering both teams' low seasonal BTTS figures (31% vs 36%), low Over 2.5 rates (23% and 27%) and the hosts' advantage in keeping clean sheets, I assign a 70% probability to the 'No' scenario and 30% to 'Yes' (BTTS - Yes).

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Combining both teams' xG yields 1.21 expected goals for UTS Rabat (home attack xG 1.13 and away defense xG 1.30) and 1.26 for CODM Meknès (attack xG 1.12 and home defense xG 1.39), totaling 2.47 expected goals. With λ=2.47 the Poisson model gives roughly a 71% probability of at least 2 goals (Over 1.5), which exceeds the home side's seasonal Over 1.5 rate (38%) and is close to the visitors' figure (64%). The chance of Over 2.5 is estimated moderately at ~45% (seasonally both teams record 23–27% each), while Over 3.5 is unlikely (~24%), consistent with seasonal 8–9%. Additionally, the hosts have 54% clean sheets versus 27% for the visitors, which limits the risk of a very open game, but the relatively high xG for both sides (1.13 and 1.12) supports an expectation of at least two goals; therefore I recommend betting Over 1.5 as the strongest signal.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

UTS Rabat draws at half-time in 62% of matches while winning 54% of their games this season, whereas CODM Meknès records only 9% victories. The home side is clearly stronger after the break: they average 0.62 goals in the second half versus 0.36 for the visitors and have collected 20 points in second halves compared to 9 for the away team. Halves tend to be low-scoring — UTS scores on average 0.31 goals before the break, CODM 0.09, and clean halves occur in 77% of the home team’s matches and 73% of the visitors’, hence a strong signal for a lead at the break. Given this, I assign the highest probability, 38%, to the scenario draw at half-time and home win at full-time (X/1), 18% to draw/draw (X/X), and 12% to home leading at the break and winning the match (1/1). The visitors’ low efficiency (0.45 goals per match and a 5% shot conversion rate versus the home’s 0.92 goals and 10% conversion) justifies the small likelihood of a turnaround by CODM, therefore only 9% in total is assigned to away wins.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 0
First half
2 : 0
Second half

Game stats

63Possession (%)37
UTS RabatCODM Meknès
10Shots6
UTS RabatCODM Meknès
7Shots on target1
UTS RabatCODM Meknès
1.54xG0.72
UTS RabatCODM Meknès
7Corners2
UTS RabatCODM Meknès
56Dangerous attacks37
UTS RabatCODM Meknès
14Fouls11
UTS RabatCODM Meknès
4Cards3
UTS RabatCODM Meknès

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

UTS RabatCODM Meknès
1Goals scored / game0.71
UTS RabatCODM Meknès
1.42Goals allowed / game0.96
UTS RabatCODM Meknès
45%Average possession50%
UTS RabatCODM Meknès
3.88Shots on target / game2.63
UTS RabatCODM Meknès

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

9.17Shots per game9.33
UTS RabatCODM Meknès
3.88Shots on target2.63
UTS RabatCODM Meknès
10.9%Shot conversion7.6%
UTS RabatCODM Meknès
45%Possession50%
UTS RabatCODM Meknès
1.26xG for1.12
UTS RabatCODM Meknès
1.46xG against1.35
UTS RabatCODM Meknès

Shooting quality

UTS Rabat: BalancedCODM Meknès: Balanced
UTS RabatCODM Meknès
Accuracy (shots on target)42%28%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.140.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.260.27

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

UTS Rabat is 100% better for: last-5 form.

1.6 pts / game - UTS Rabat · 0.8 pts / game - CODM Meknès

UTS Rabat
LWDWD
Season result split
13% W50% R38% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-12-9
0.88 pts / game · goal difference -10
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-7-5
Last 5 at home
0-2-3
LDLLD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.30Opponent xG: 1.40BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%
CODM Meknès
LLWDL
Season result split
33% W29% R38% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-7-9
1.29 pts / game · goal difference -6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
1-5-5
Last 5 away
0-1-4
LLLLD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.30Opponent xG: 1.46BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

UTS Rabat is 41% better for: goals scored per game.

1 goals / game - UTS Rabat · 0.71 goals / game - CODM Meknès

CODM Meknès is 48% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.42 goals / game - UTS Rabat · 0.96 goals / game - CODM Meknès

UTS Rabat scoring profile: strong

UTS Rabat scores in 71% of games (17 of 24 meczów), while CODM Meknès keeps a clean sheet in 42% (10 of 24 meczów).

CODM Meknès scoring profile: very strong

CODM Meknès scores in 58% of games (14 of 24 meczów), while UTS Rabat keeps a clean sheet in 8% (2 of 24 meczów).

24Goals scored (season)17
UTS RabatCODM Meknès
34Goals conceded (season)23
UTS RabatCODM Meknès
2.42Average goals per game1.67
UTS RabatCODM Meknès
4Goals scored (last 5)5
UTS RabatCODM Meknès
3Goals conceded (last 5)8
UTS RabatCODM Meknès

How often they score at least...

71%1 goal58%
UTS RabatCODM Meknès
21%2 goals13%
UTS RabatCODM Meknès
8%3 goals0%
UTS RabatCODM Meknès
0%4 goals0%
UTS RabatCODM Meknès

How often they concede at least...

92%1 goal58%
UTS RabatCODM Meknès
29%2 goals25%
UTS RabatCODM Meknès
13%3 goals13%
UTS RabatCODM Meknès
8%4 goals0%
UTS RabatCODM Meknès

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

51%
League average

Goal patterns

29%BTTS at half-time4%
UTS RabatCODM Meknès
8%BTTS in both halves0%
UTS RabatCODM Meknès
13%Scored in both halves0%
UTS RabatCODM Meknès

BTTS and goal count

25%Min. 3 goals and BTTS21%
UTS RabatCODM Meknès
4%Min. 3 goals without BTTS4%
UTS RabatCODM Meknès
40%BTTS - last 580%
UTS RabatCODM Meknès

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

58%Min. 1 goal before half-time38%
UTS RabatCODM Meknès
33%Min. 2 goals before half-time21%
UTS RabatCODM Meknès
17%Min. 3 goals before half-time4%
UTS RabatCODM Meknès

2nd half

75%Min. 1 goal after half-time71%
UTS RabatCODM Meknès
38%Min. 2 goals after half-time29%
UTS RabatCODM Meknès
8%Min. 3 goals after half-time4%
UTS RabatCODM Meknès

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

UTS Rabat - half-time state
17% leading54% draw29% trailing
CODM Meknès - half-time state
13% leading63% draw25% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.04Points per game (1st half)1
UTS RabatCODM Meknès
0.5Goals scored (1st half)0.21
UTS RabatCODM Meknès
0.67Goals conceded (1st half)0.42
UTS RabatCODM Meknès
1.17Average goals (1st half)0.63
UTS RabatCODM Meknès
50%Clean sheet before half-time75%
UTS RabatCODM Meknès
63%No goal before half-time83%
UTS RabatCODM Meknès

After half-time (2nd half)

1Points per game (2nd half)1.21
UTS RabatCODM Meknès
0.5Goals scored (2nd half)0.5
UTS RabatCODM Meknès
0.75Goals conceded (2nd half)0.54
UTS RabatCODM Meknès
1.25Average goals (2nd half)1.04
UTS RabatCODM Meknès
38%Clean sheet after half-time50%
UTS RabatCODM Meknès
54%No goal after half-time58%
UTS RabatCODM Meknès

UTS Rabat - second-half results

17% W50% R33% P
25
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
24
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.04
PPG before half-time
Lead holding76%

Leads at halftime in 17% of games and wins 13%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.

Defense after halftime+0.1

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

CODM Meknès - second-half results

25% W46% R29% P
24
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
-5
Goal difference (1st half)
29
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding254%

Leads at halftime in 13% of games and wins 33%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.1

Allows 0.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

UTS Rabat - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.800.80
Goals scored / game0.60.2
Goals allowed / game0.20.4
Average goals per game0.80.6
1 goal40%40%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference+2-1
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 80% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
CODM Meknès - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.800.80
Goals scored / game0.40.6
Goals allowed / game0.80.8
Average goals per game1.21.4
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference-2-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 80% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

UTS Rabat
ScoredConceded
4
1
0-15
5
4
16-30
3
11
31-45
4
3
46-60
2
5
61-75
6
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

CODM Meknès
ScoredConceded
1
3
0-15
1
2
16-30
3
5
31-45
5
1
46-60
3
3
61-75
4
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.04
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.0 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
96%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-2%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
41%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
12%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 8 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

UTS Rabat

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.20
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.22
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.26
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.04
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
88%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
142%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.72
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

CODM Meknès

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.23
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.02
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+5.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.41
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.39
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
71%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
85%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.49
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 6% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Botola Pro).

Teams vs league

UTS RabatLigaCODM Meknès
Average goals per game 2.422.13 1.67
Both teams scored 67%51% 33%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 29%38% 25%
Clean sheets 8%31% 42%
Goal before half-time 58%61% 38%
Goal after half-time 75%73% 71%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.13
Average goals per game
51%
Both teams scored
38%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
31%
Clean sheets
1.13
Home goals / game
1.00
Away goals / game
+13%
Home attack advantage
+12%
Home defensive advantage
+11%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
61%
1 goal
24%
2 goals
7%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
34%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
1%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. UTS RabatYellow cardTahar Ahmed Madeira El Khalej
  2. CODM MeknèsYellow cardAyoub Lourhraz
  3. CODM MeknèsYellow cardZouhir Eddib
  4. CODM MeknèsYellow cardZouhir Eddib
  5. UTS RabatSubstitutionOn: Fouad ZahouaniOff: Mohamed Es Sahel
  6. UTS RabatYellow cardHoussam Bouelainine
  7. CODM MeknèsSubstitutionOn: Younes SakhiOff: Ismael Benktib
  8. UTS RabatGoalSamuel TebilyAssist: Saad Lotfi
  9. UTS RabatYellow cardSamuel Tebily
  10. CODM MeknèsSubstitutionOn: Mohammed El MiloudiOff: Mouad Goullous
  11. UTS RabatSubstitutionOn: Mohamed Reda AsmamaOff: Houssam Bouelainine
  12. UTS RabatGoalYouness DahmaniAssist: Samuel Tebily
  13. UTS RabatYellow cardKoffi Konan

Head-to-head

Record from UTS Rabat's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses against CODM Meknès. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.

FAQ

What was the result of UTS Rabat vs CODM Meknès?

The Botola Pro match finished UTS Rabat 2:0 CODM Meknès. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before UTS Rabat vs CODM Meknès?

UTS Rabat score 1.00 goals per game on average and CODM Meknès 0.71. The Botola Pro average is 2.13 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 38% of games. Both teams score in 67% of UTS Rabat's matches and 33% of CODM Meknès's.

What form are UTS Rabat and CODM Meknès in?

Over the last 5 games UTS Rabat have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and CODM Meknès 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for UTS Rabat vs CODM Meknès?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for UTS Rabat vs CODM Meknès: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.