Morocco - Botola ProData current as of September 06, 2026

UTS Rabat vs Ittihad Tanger: match statistics

UTS Rabat crest
UTS Rabat
1 : 0half-time 0:0
Ittihad Tanger crest
Ittihad Tanger

UTS Rabat vs Ittihad Tanger: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

UTS Rabat played against Ittihad Tanger in Botola Pro (Morocco). The game was played on July 2, 2026. Final score: 1:0.

Recent form

UTS Rabat has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.00 points per game. Ittihad Tanger has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss, with 2.00 points per game.

Scoring records

UTS Rabat scores 1.04 goals per game and allows 1.39. Ittihad Tanger scores 0.89 and allows 1.04. Games in this league average 2.17 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 64% of UTS Rabat's games and 54% of Ittihad Tanger's. The Over 2.5 rates are 32% and 25%, compared with league averages of 52% for BTTS and 38% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Ittihad Tanger has the higher season xG average, 1.32 to 1.23 per game. UTS Rabat takes 8.9 shots per game, while Ittihad Tanger takes 10.5.

First-half and second-half trends

UTS Rabat leads at halftime in 18% of its games and scores 0.54 goals per game after halftime. Ittihad Tanger leads at halftime in 18% and scores 0.61 after halftime.

When the teams score

UTS Rabat's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (7 goals). For Ittihad Tanger, it is minutes 76-90+ (9 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Botola Pro games average 2.17 goals. Both teams score in 52% of games, and 38% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

I predict a win for Ittihad Tanger (2). The visitors sit 7th versus the hosts’ 15th and have won 3 of their last 5 matches, while UTS Rabat has won only 1 of five (points per match in last 5: visitors 2.0 vs hosts 1.0). Ittihad creates more chances and has higher away xG — averaging 10.36 shots and xG 1.35 per match, versus 8.43 shots and xG 1.18 for the hosts. Defensively the visitors also fare better: UTS conceded 39 goals this season and 1.43 goals per home match, while Ittihad conceded 29 goals this season and 1.14 away; the hosts do have better home conversion (12% vs 8%) but rarely win at home (7% wins and 50% draws). Considering form, higher xG (1.35 vs 1.18) and lower average goals conceded (1.14 vs 1.43), I give the edge to the visitors, with a moderate risk of a draw due to UTS’s tendency to draw at home.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Looking at seasonal BTTS indicators, UTS Rabat has 64% and Ittihad Tanger 43%, yielding a simple average of about 54% which is close to the league average of 52%; in the last 5 matches it's 60% vs 40% in favor of UTS. Both teams generate real chances: xG_for is 1.28 for UTS and 1.35 for Ittihad, while xG_against is 1.38 and 1.50 respectively, meaning both defenses concede over 1.3 xG per match, which favors goals. Shot metrics are similar (10.64 vs 10.36 average shots and 3.21 vs 3.21 shots on target) and conversion 9% vs 8%, confirming a sufficient number of goal-scoring opportunities. Counterpoints are Ittihad’s better defense in the last 5 matches (0.8 average goals conceded vs 1.2 for UTS) and Ittihad’s lower seasonal BTTS (43%), but seasonal clean sheets 29% (UTS) and 14% (Ittihad) indicate a full shutout of one side is not the dominant scenario. Therefore my strongest signal is BTTS - Yes with a probability of 60% versus 40% for No.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Both teams have a high season percentage of matches over 1.5 goals: 71% for the home side and 71% for the away side, which is a strong signal for Over 1.5. From an xG perspective UTS has xG_for 1.28 vs the opponent’s xG_against 1.50 (≈1.39 for the home team), and Ittihad has xG_for 1.35 vs the home side’s xG_against 1.38 (≈1.36 for the away team) — combined xG ≈2.75. However, actual goals scored this season are 0.93 + 0.86 = 1.79, while in the last 5 matches both teams average 1.2 goals each (combined 2.4), so historical finishing is below xG. Considering xG (≈2.75), the last 5 matches (≈2.4) and season figures, I forecast 1.25 goals for the home team and 1.10 for the away team, total ≈2.35 goals. Consequently the strongest signal is Over 1.5 (pick: Over 1.5); Over 2.5 is less certain (estimate ~36% chance), and Over 3.5 has negligible probability (~8%).

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The most likely scenario is a draw at half-time and an away win at full-time (X/2): the home side were level at the break in 79% of their matches this season (11 of 14), and in the last 5 matches they had a 80% rate of HT draws (4 of 5). Both teams average 0.29 goals each by half-time, which confirms low scoring in the first 45 minutes and favors a goalless or drawn HT. The advantage shifts to the visitors in the second half — in the last 5 matches they won 60% of games (3 of 5) and won the second half in 80% of those matches (4 of 5), and the visitors’ xG is 1.35 versus the hosts’ 1.28, giving them a slight offensive edge. Therefore I assigned X/2 the highest probability (33%) and X/X the second highest (23%), because although an HT draw is a strong signal, form and second-half results favor a turnaround by Ittihad Tanger. Additionally, the hosts kept a clean sheet at half-time in 64% of HTs, while the visitors scored 14 goals by half-time compared to the hosts’ 9, which increases the chance of a breakthrough after the break.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 0
First half
1 : 0
Second half

Game stats

67Possession (%)33
UTS RabatIttihad Tanger
26Shots8
UTS RabatIttihad Tanger
9Shots on target1
UTS RabatIttihad Tanger
2.94xG0.81
UTS RabatIttihad Tanger
7Corners1
UTS RabatIttihad Tanger
95Dangerous attacks31
UTS RabatIttihad Tanger
-1Fouls-1
UTS RabatIttihad Tanger
3Cards3
UTS RabatIttihad Tanger

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

UTS RabatIttihad Tanger
1.04Goals scored / game0.89
UTS RabatIttihad Tanger
1.39Goals allowed / game1.04
UTS RabatIttihad Tanger
47%Average possession49%
UTS RabatIttihad Tanger
3.86Shots on target / game3.21
UTS RabatIttihad Tanger

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

8.86Shots per game10.5
UTS RabatIttihad Tanger
3.86Shots on target3.21
UTS RabatIttihad Tanger
11.7%Shot conversion8.5%
UTS RabatIttihad Tanger
47%Possession49%
UTS RabatIttihad Tanger
1.23xG for1.32
UTS RabatIttihad Tanger
1.39xG against1.44
UTS RabatIttihad Tanger

Shooting quality

UTS Rabat: BalancedIttihad Tanger: Balanced
UTS RabatIttihad Tanger
Accuracy (shots on target)44%31%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.140.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.270.28

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Ittihad Tanger is 100% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / game - UTS Rabat · 2 pts / game - Ittihad Tanger

UTS Rabat
DWLLD
Season result split
14% W46% R39% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-13-11
0.89 pts / game · goal difference -10
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-7-6
Last 5 at home
1-1-3
LLDWL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.20Opponent xG: 1.06BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
Ittihad Tanger
WWWLD
Season result split
29% W43% R29% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-12-8
1.29 pts / game · goal difference -4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
4-4-6
Last 5 away
2-1-2
DWLWL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.28Opponent xG: 1.46BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

UTS Rabat is 17% better for: goals scored per game.

1.04 goals / game - UTS Rabat · 0.89 goals / game - Ittihad Tanger

Ittihad Tanger is 34% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.39 goals / game - UTS Rabat · 1.04 goals / game - Ittihad Tanger

UTS Rabat scoring profile: very strong

UTS Rabat scores in 71% of games (20 of 28 meczów), while Ittihad Tanger keeps a clean sheet in 21% (6 of 28 meczów).

Ittihad Tanger scoring profile: very strong

Ittihad Tanger scores in 68% of games (19 of 28 meczów), while UTS Rabat keeps a clean sheet in 11% (3 of 28 meczów).

29Goals scored (season)25
UTS RabatIttihad Tanger
39Goals conceded (season)29
UTS RabatIttihad Tanger
2.43Average goals per game1.93
UTS RabatIttihad Tanger
6Goals scored (last 5)6
UTS RabatIttihad Tanger
6Goals conceded (last 5)4
UTS RabatIttihad Tanger

How often they score at least...

71%1 goal68%
UTS RabatIttihad Tanger
25%2 goals21%
UTS RabatIttihad Tanger
7%3 goals0%
UTS RabatIttihad Tanger
0%4 goals0%
UTS RabatIttihad Tanger

How often they concede at least...

89%1 goal79%
UTS RabatIttihad Tanger
32%2 goals21%
UTS RabatIttihad Tanger
11%3 goals4%
UTS RabatIttihad Tanger
7%4 goals0%
UTS RabatIttihad Tanger

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

52%
League average

Goal patterns

29%BTTS at half-time11%
UTS RabatIttihad Tanger
7%BTTS in both halves0%
UTS RabatIttihad Tanger
11%Scored in both halves11%
UTS RabatIttihad Tanger

BTTS and goal count

29%Min. 3 goals and BTTS21%
UTS RabatIttihad Tanger
4%Min. 3 goals without BTTS4%
UTS RabatIttihad Tanger
60%BTTS - last 540%
UTS RabatIttihad Tanger

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

54%Min. 1 goal before half-time64%
UTS RabatIttihad Tanger
32%Min. 2 goals before half-time18%
UTS RabatIttihad Tanger
18%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
UTS RabatIttihad Tanger

2nd half

79%Min. 1 goal after half-time71%
UTS RabatIttihad Tanger
39%Min. 2 goals after half-time29%
UTS RabatIttihad Tanger
11%Min. 3 goals after half-time11%
UTS RabatIttihad Tanger

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

UTS Rabat is 11% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.11 pts / game - UTS Rabat · 1 pts / game - Ittihad Tanger

UTS Rabat - half-time state
18% leading57% draw25% trailing
Ittihad Tanger - half-time state
18% leading46% draw36% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.11Points per game (1st half)1
UTS RabatIttihad Tanger
0.5Goals scored (1st half)0.29
UTS RabatIttihad Tanger
0.61Goals conceded (1st half)0.54
UTS RabatIttihad Tanger
1.11Average goals (1st half)0.82
UTS RabatIttihad Tanger
54%Clean sheet before half-time54%
UTS RabatIttihad Tanger
64%No goal before half-time71%
UTS RabatIttihad Tanger

After half-time (2nd half)

0.96Points per game (2nd half)1.46
UTS RabatIttihad Tanger
0.54Goals scored (2nd half)0.61
UTS RabatIttihad Tanger
0.79Goals conceded (2nd half)0.5
UTS RabatIttihad Tanger
1.32Average goals (2nd half)1.11
UTS RabatIttihad Tanger
36%Clean sheet after half-time57%
UTS RabatIttihad Tanger
54%No goal after half-time50%
UTS RabatIttihad Tanger

UTS Rabat - second-half results

18% W43% R39% P
31
Half-time points
14
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
27
Second-half points
-7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.11
PPG before half-time
Lead holding78%

Leads at halftime in 18% of games and wins 14%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.

Defense after halftime+0.2

Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Ittihad Tanger - second-half results

36% W39% R25% P
28
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
-7
Goal difference (1st half)
41
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding161%

Leads at halftime in 18% of games and wins 29%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.0

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

UTS Rabat - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.400.80
Goals scored / game0.40.8
Goals allowed / game0.21.0
Average goals per game0.61.8
1 goal20%100%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet80%20%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference+1-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
Ittihad Tanger - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.002.60
Goals scored / game0.40.8
Goals allowed / game0.80.0
Average goals per game1.20.8
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet40%100%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference-2+4
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 20% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

UTS Rabat
ScoredConceded
4
1
0-15
5
5
16-30
5
11
31-45
5
3
46-60
3
6
61-75
7
13
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.

Ittihad Tanger
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
3
3
16-30
4
11
31-45
3
5
46-60
5
5
61-75
9
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.18
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.0 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
100%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
59%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-8%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
48%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
9%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 11 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

UTS Rabat

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.16
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.19
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.19
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
0.00
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
90%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
136%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.11
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.0
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

Ittihad Tanger

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.12
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.03
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.43
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.40
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
87%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
90%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.71
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
36% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 4% come in the first quarter-hour.
36%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Botola Pro).

Teams vs league

UTS RabatLigaIttihad Tanger
Average goals per game 2.432.17 1.93
Both teams scored 64%52% 54%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 32%38% 25%
Clean sheets 11%30% 21%
Goal before half-time 54%63% 64%
Goal after half-time 79%73% 71%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.17
Average goals per game
52%
Both teams scored
38%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
30%
Clean sheets
1.15
Home goals / game
1.02
Away goals / game
+13%
Home attack advantage
+11%
Home defensive advantage
+11%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
63%
1 goal
25%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
35%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
0%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Ittihad TangerYellow cardEnnaama El Bellali
  2. UTS RabatYellow cardKoffi Konan
  3. UTS RabatGoalSamuel TebilyAssist: Omar Arjoune
  4. UTS RabatSubstitutionOn: Youssef KajaiOff: Nacer Moustaghfir
  5. UTS RabatYellow cardSamuel Tebily
  6. UTS RabatYellow cardHoussam Bouelainine

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from UTS Rabat's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses against Ittihad Tanger. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.

FAQ

What was the result of UTS Rabat vs Ittihad Tanger?

The Botola Pro match finished UTS Rabat 1:0 Ittihad Tanger. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before UTS Rabat vs Ittihad Tanger?

UTS Rabat score 1.04 goals per game on average and Ittihad Tanger 0.89. The Botola Pro average is 2.17 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 38% of games. Both teams score in 64% of UTS Rabat's matches and 54% of Ittihad Tanger's.

What form are UTS Rabat and Ittihad Tanger in?

Over the last 5 games UTS Rabat have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Ittihad Tanger 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for UTS Rabat vs Ittihad Tanger?

The statistical background for UTS Rabat vs Ittihad Tanger — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.