Valmiera / BSS vs Metta - LU: match statistics
Valmiera / BSS vs Metta - LU: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Valmiera / BSS played against Metta - LU in 1. Liga (Latvia). The game was played on September 5, 2026. Venue: Vidzemes Olimpiskais centrs. Final score: 2:2.
Recent form
Valmiera / BSS has 5 wins, 0 draws and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 3.00 points per game. Metta - LU has 4 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses, with 2.60 points per game.
Scoring records
Valmiera / BSS scores 3.00 goals per game and allows 0.89. Metta - LU scores 4.28 and allows 0.78. Games in this league average 3.64 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 72% of Valmiera / BSS's games and 50% of Metta - LU's. The Over 2.5 rates are 83% and 83%, compared with league averages of 64% for BTTS and 69% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Metta - LU has the higher season xG average, 3.01 to 1.87 per game. Valmiera / BSS takes 12.8 shots per game, while Metta - LU takes 19.4.
First-half and second-half trends
Valmiera / BSS leads at halftime in 56% of its games and scores 2.06 goals per game after halftime. Metta - LU leads at halftime in 72% and scores 2.00 after halftime.
When the teams score
Valmiera / BSS's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (15 goals). For Metta - LU, it is minutes 31-45+ (18 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
1. Liga games average 3.64 goals. Both teams score in 64% of games, and 69% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Valmiera / BSS are in excellent form, having won their last five matches and scored 19 goals in the process, while Metta - LU recorded 3 wins, a draw, and a defeat over the same period. The hosts win 86% of their home matches, average 3.00 goals scored, and have not lost a single game, while their average xG stands at 2.14. Metta - LU actually have an even higher away xG of 2.46 and concede only 0.67 goals per match, confirming that the league leaders will be a very demanding opponent. Valmiera’s advantage, however, comes from their current attacking efficiency and an 18% shot conversion rate compared with the visitors’ 14%, along with 9.43 shots on target per home match. Both teams regularly create numerous chances, and neither has failed to score in a match, but home advantage and a perfect recent run slightly favor the hosts.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Both teams possess exceptionally strong attacking units: Valmiera / BSS score an average of 5.67 goals, while Metta - LU average 2.89 goals per match, with high xG figures of 3.38 and 2.46 respectively. In their last five matches, the hosts scored 3.8 goals per game, while the visitors scored as many as 4.6, with both sides also conceding goals—an average of 0.8 and 1.4 per match respectively. The BTTS trend is particularly positive based on current form, as BTTS landed in 80% of Valmiera’s recent matches and 60% of Metta’s, compared with the league average of 64%. The hosts have kept a clean sheet in 44% of their matches, and the visitors in 56%, posing a genuine risk to the pick; however, the attacking potential of both teams and their recent results more clearly support a goal for each side. The most likely scenario therefore remains one in which at least one team fails to keep a clean sheet, with both teams finding the net.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Valmiera / BSS score an average of 5.67 goals per home game, with an impressive average xG of 3.38, while Metta - LU concede just 0.89 goals per away match. Metta - LU also possess significant attacking potential: they score an average of 2.89 goals, generate 2.46 xG, and have netted 23 goals in their last five matches. The hosts’ last five games produced an average of 4.6 goals, compared with 6.0 in the visitors’ matches, with the 2.5 line covered in 100% and 80% of those games respectively. Over 1.5 goals landed in 100% of Valmiera’s matches and 89% of Metta’s, making Over 1.5 the most stable option, despite both defenses recording relatively low seasonal goals-conceded averages.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Valmiera / BSS has an exceptionally strong first-half profile: they were leading at the break in 8 of their 9 matches, scoring an average of 3.56 goals and conceding just 0.11. Metta - LU led at half-time in 63% of their matches, but away from home they score an average of only 0.88 goals before the break, while the hosts keep a clean sheet in this period in 89% of their appearances. Valmiera’s advantage is also evident in chance creation, with an average xG of 3.38 compared with the opponents’ 2.46, while their number of shots on target stands at 15.44 versus Metta’s 8.00. The hosts have won 89% of their matches this season and all of their last five, whereas the visitors, despite their high overall efficiency, were level at half-time in 3 of their last 5 matches. Both teams remain attacking after the interval, but Valmiera averages 2.11 goals, making a Valmiera lead at half-time and a full-time victory the most likely scenario.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Valmiera / BSS | Metta - LU | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 54% | 53% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.15 | 0.15 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.43 | 0.42 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Valmiera / BSS is 15% better for: last-5 form.
3 pts / game - Valmiera / BSS · 2.6 pts / game - Metta - LU
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Metta - LU is 43% better for: goals scored per game.
3 goals / game - Valmiera / BSS · 4.28 goals / game - Metta - LU
Metta - LU is 14% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.89 goals / game - Valmiera / BSS · 0.78 goals / game - Metta - LU
Valmiera / BSS scores in 94% of games (17 of 18 games), while Metta - LU keeps a clean sheet in 50% (9 of 18 games).
Metta - LU scores in 100% of games (18 of 18 games), while Valmiera / BSS keeps a clean sheet in 28% (5 of 18 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Valmiera / BSS
Over / Under - Metta - LU
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Metta - LU is 16% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
2.06 pts / game - Valmiera / BSS · 2.39 pts / game - Metta - LU
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Valmiera / BSS - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 56% of games and wins 83%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.5 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Metta - LU - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 72% of games and wins 83%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.60 | 2.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.8 | 2.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 2.2 | 2.4 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 0% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +7 | +8 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.60 | 3.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 3.0 | 3.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Average goals per game | 3.4 | 3.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 100% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 80% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 80% |
| No goal | 60% | 0% |
| Goal difference | +13 | +15 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (15 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +10 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (18 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +11 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Valmiera / BSS
Metta - LU
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (1. Liga).
Teams vs league
| Valmiera / BSS | Liga | Metta - LU | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 3.89 | 3.64 | ▲ 5.06 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 72% | 64% | ▼ 50% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 83% | 69% | ▲ 83% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 28% | 20% | ▲ 50% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 72% | 76% | ▲ 78% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 89% | 84% | ▲ 89% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Other recorded players
Away team
Other recorded players
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Valmiera / BSS's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 0 losses against Metta - LU. Games average 3.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Valmiera / BSS vs Metta - LU?
The 1. Liga match finished Valmiera / BSS 2:2 Metta - LU. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Valmiera / BSS vs Metta - LU?
Valmiera / BSS score 3.00 goals per game on average and Metta - LU 4.28. The 1. Liga average is 3.64 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 69% of games. Both teams score in 72% of Valmiera / BSS's matches and 50% of Metta - LU's.
What form are Valmiera / BSS and Metta - LU in?
Over the last 5 games Valmiera / BSS have a 5-0-0 record (3.00 points per game) and Metta - LU 4-1-0 (2.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Valmiera / BSS vs Metta - LU?
The statistical background for Valmiera / BSS vs Metta - LU — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


