Van vs Shirak: match statistics
Van vs Shirak: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Van play Shirak in Armenian Premier League (Armenia). The match date is 8 May 2026 at 13:00. Final score: 1:0.
Current form
Van: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match. Shirak: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
Van scores 1.00 and concedes 1.48 goals per match. Shirak scores 0.62 and concedes 1.81. League average: 2.56 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Van 52%, Shirak 35%. Over 2.5: Van 56%, Shirak 42%. League level: BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 46%.
xG, shots and style
Van has higher xG: 1.13 vs 1.00. Van: 9.8 shots per match, Shirak: 8.3.
Match halves
Van: half-time lead 11%, second-half goals 0.67. Shirak: half-time lead 15%, second-half goals 0.27.
Goals by minute
Van: 61-75 (7 goals). Shirak: 16-30 (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Armenian Premier League: 2.56 goals per match, BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 46%.
Head-to-head
2 H2H matches: 2-0-0. Average goals 5.00, BTTS 100%.
Match description
Van is the favorite for this match: the hosts sit 6th and average 1.33 goals per home game with xG 1.16, while Shirak are 9th and score only 0.64 goals away with xG 0.96. Van averages 10.42 shots and 3.42 on target per home match versus Shirak’s 7.91 shots and 2.82 on target away, and a conversion rate of 13% versus 8% indicates superior efficiency for the hosts. Defensively Van concedes 1.5 goals at home, while Shirak concede 2.27 on the road; additionally the visitors failed to score in 55% of away matches, whereas Van failed to score in only 25% of home games. Win statistics also favor the hosts — Van has 33% home wins, while Shirak have 0% away wins this season. In the last 5 matches Van are 1-0-4 (3 scored, 8 conceded), and Shirak 0-2-3 (3 scored, 10 conceded), so I predict a Van victory.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Van | Shirak | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 33% | 36% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.31 | 0.21 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Van is 500% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / match - Van · 0.2 pts / match - Shirak
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Van is 61% better for: goals scored per match.
1 goals / match - Van · 0.62 goals / match - Shirak
Van is 22% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.48 goals / match - Van · 1.81 goals / match - Shirak
Van scores in 63% of matches (17 of 27 matches), while Shirak keeps a clean sheet in 19% (5 of 26 matches).
Shirak scores in 38% of matches (10 of 26 matches), while Van keeps a clean sheet in 22% (6 of 27 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Van
Over / Under — Shirak
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Shirak is 14% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.81 pts / match - Van · 0.92 pts / match - Shirak
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Van - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 11% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Shirak - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 15% of matches and wins 8%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 100% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -6 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (7 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (4 goli). Concedes most in 61-75 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Van
Shirak
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Armenian Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Van | Liga | Shirak | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 2.48 | 2.56 | ▼ 2.42 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 52% | 44% | ▼ 35% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 56% | 46% | ▼ 42% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 22% | 33% | ▼ 19% |
| Goal before half-time | • 70% | 69% | ▼ 62% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 74% | 78% | • 77% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Van 2 - 0 - 0 Shirak. Average goals 5.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Van vs Shirak?
The Armenian Premier League match finished Van 1:0 Shirak. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Van and Shirak?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Van won 2, Shirak won 0 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 5.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Van vs Shirak?
Van score 1.00 goals per game on average and Shirak 0.62. The Armenian Premier League average is 2.56 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 46% of games. Both teams score in 52% of Van's matches and 35% of Shirak's.
What form are Van and Shirak in?
Over the last 5 games Van have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Shirak 0-1-4 (0.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Van vs Shirak?
The statistical background for Van vs Shirak — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.