Varzim vs CD Trofense: match statistics
Varzim is in excellent form, winning four of their last five matches and averaging 2.4 points per game. At home, they boast an impressive 50% win rate with just 10% losses, scoring an average of 1.7 goals and conceding only 0.8 per match. CD Trofense is showing weaker form with only one win in their last five games and averaging just 1.0 point per match. Away from home, the visitors have a high draw percentage (56%), but their average xG (1.05) is significantly lower than Varzim's (1.48), indicating lesser offensive potential. The goal difference of both teams (+9 for Varzim at home vs +5 for Trofense away) and the hosts' higher chance conversion (15% vs 19%, but with a higher shot volume) point towards a Varzim victory, although the guests' solid defense (44% clean sheets) could make this a closely-fought contest.
Varzim vs CD Trofense: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Varzim played against CD Trofense in Liga 3 (Portugal). The game was played on February 21, 2026. Final score: 2:0.
Recent form
Varzim has 4 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.40 points per game. CD Trofense has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses, with 1.00 points per game.
Scoring records
Varzim scores 1.40 goals per game and allows 0.95. CD Trofense scores 1.20 and allows 0.85. Games in this league average 2.14 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 55% of Varzim's games and 55% of CD Trofense's. The Over 2.5 rates are 45% and 35%, compared with league averages of 46% for BTTS and 36% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Varzim has the higher season xG average, 1.29 to 1.20 per game. Varzim takes 9.7 shots per game, while CD Trofense takes 8.1.
First-half and second-half trends
Varzim leads at halftime in 35% of its games and scores 0.75 goals per game after halftime. CD Trofense leads at halftime in 35% and scores 0.55 after halftime.
When the teams score
Varzim's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (8 goals). For CD Trofense, it is minutes 16-30 (5 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Liga 3 games average 2.14 goals. Both teams score in 46% of games, and 36% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 2 away wins. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Varzim is in excellent form, winning four of their last five matches and averaging 2.4 points per game. At home, they boast an impressive 50% win rate with just 10% losses, scoring an average of 1.7 goals and conceding only 0.8 per match. CD Trofense is showing weaker form with only one win in their last five games and averaging just 1.0 point per match. Away from home, the visitors have a high draw percentage (56%), but their average xG (1.05) is significantly lower than Varzim's (1.48), indicating lesser offensive potential. The goal difference of both teams (+9 for Varzim at home vs +5 for Trofense away) and the hosts' higher chance conversion (15% vs 19%, but with a higher shot volume) point towards a Varzim victory, although the guests' solid defense (44% clean sheets) could make this a closely-fought contest.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Varzim | CD Trofense | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 38% | 41% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.15 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.38 | 0.36 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Varzim is 140% better for: last-5 form.
2.4 pts / game - Varzim · 1 pts / game - CD Trofense
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Varzim is 17% better for: goals scored per game.
1.4 goals / game - Varzim · 1.2 goals / game - CD Trofense
CD Trofense is 12% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.95 goals / game - Varzim · 0.85 goals / game - CD Trofense
Varzim scores in 70% of games (14 of 20 meczów), while CD Trofense keeps a clean sheet in 30% (6 of 20 meczów).
CD Trofense scores in 65% of games (13 of 20 meczów), while Varzim keeps a clean sheet in 25% (5 of 20 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Varzim
Over / Under - CD Trofense
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Varzim - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 35% of games and wins 40%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
CD Trofense - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 35% of games and wins 35%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.60 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 20% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +4 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.60 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (5 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Varzim
CD Trofense
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga 3).
Teams vs league
| Varzim | Liga | CD Trofense | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 2.35 | 2.14 | • 2.05 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 55% | 46% | ▲ 55% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 45% | 36% | • 35% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 25% | 33% | ▼ 30% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 70% | 63% | ▲ 70% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 80% | 73% | ▼ 60% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Record from Varzim's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses against CD Trofense. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 50% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Varzim vs CD Trofense?
The Liga 3 match finished Varzim 2:0 CD Trofense. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Varzim and CD Trofense?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Varzim won 0, CD Trofense won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Varzim vs CD Trofense?
Varzim score 1.40 goals per game on average and CD Trofense 1.20. The Liga 3 average is 2.14 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 36% of games. Both teams score in 55% of Varzim's matches and 55% of CD Trofense's.
What form are Varzim and CD Trofense in?
Over the last 5 games Varzim have a 4-0-1 record (2.40 points per game) and CD Trofense 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Varzim vs CD Trofense?
The statistical background for Varzim vs CD Trofense — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.