Denmark - SuperligaData current as of October 30, 2026

Viborg vs SønderjyskE: match statistics

Viborg crest
Viborg
0 : 1half-time 0:0
SønderjyskE crest
SønderjyskE

Viborg vs SønderjyskE: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Viborg played against SønderjyskE in Superliga (Denmark). The game was played on May 8, 2026. Final score: 0:1.

Recent form

Viborg has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.40 points per game. SønderjyskE has 1 win, 0 draws and 4 losses, with 0.60 points per game.

Scoring records

Viborg scores 1.57 goals per game and allows 1.47. SønderjyskE scores 1.40 and allows 1.50. Games in this league average 3.07 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 60% of Viborg's games and 57% of SønderjyskE's. The Over 2.5 rates are 60% and 57%, compared with league averages of 61% for BTTS and 61% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Viborg has the higher season xG average, 1.45 to 1.39 per game. Viborg takes 12.6 shots per game, while SønderjyskE takes 12.3.

First-half and second-half trends

Viborg leads at halftime in 27% of its games and scores 0.73 goals per game after halftime. SønderjyskE leads at halftime in 20% and scores 0.87 after halftime.

When the teams score

Viborg's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (11 goals). For SønderjyskE, it is minutes 76-90+ (15 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Superliga games average 3.07 goals. Both teams score in 61% of games, and 61% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 3 previous meetings were available. The record was 2 home wins, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 2.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

I back the home win (Viborg). Their home record is superior: 47% home wins versus just 20% away wins for SønderjyskE, and Viborg have scored 47 goals this season compared to 42 for their opponents. On the pitch the hosts create 11.53 shots per game and 4.33 on target with a 15% conversion, yielding an average of 1.73 goals at home, while the visitors average 11.73 shots, 4.13 on target and only a 10% conversion (1.20 goals away); xG is nevertheless similar (1.36 vs 1.34). Defensively the difference is significant: SønderjyskE concede 1.93 goals away and have conceded 12 goals in the last 5 matches (2.4 per game), whereas Viborg concede 1.53 at home and have conceded 6 in the last 5 (1.2 per game). Recent form confirms the hosts' advantage — Viborg average 1.4 points per game in the last 5 and have scored 7 goals, while the visitors average 0.6 points and 5 goals; the visitors also fail to score in 33% of away matches versus 7% for the hosts.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Both teams show season BTTS rates of 60% (Viborg) and 53% (SønderjyskE), versus a league average of 61%, providing an initial signal for “BTTS - Yes”. Offensively Viborg averages 1.6 goals per match with xG 1.44, while SønderjyskE averages 1.2 goals with xG 1.34; both sides register a similar number of shots on target (4.2 vs 4.13), indicating real chance creation. Defensively SønderjyskE concedes 1.93 goals on the season and as much as 2.4 goals in the last 5 matches, whereas Viborg concedes 1.07 on the season and 1.2 in the last 5, which favors the hosts finding the net and the visitors having the potential to respond. Additionally, 47% of matches involving both teams finish over 2.5 goals with concurrent BTTS, and the league averages 3.07 goals per match, reinforcing the both-teams-to-score scenario. Although both teams have a lower BTTS rate in the last 5 matches (40% each), combining the season figures 60%/53% and the league 61% I give the “Yes” option an edge at 66% vs 34% due to SønderjyskE’s susceptibility to conceding (2.4 in the last 5) and Viborg’s consistent attacking efficiency (1.6 goals on the season).

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

I expect a combined xG around 3.05: the home side has xG ~1.60, the visitors ~1.45, which is close to the league average of 3.07. Seasonal indicators clearly favor Over 1.5 — Viborg had 87% of matches over 1.5, SønderjyskE 80%, and the teams score on average 1.6 and 1.2 goals per game. The 2.5 line also has merits for Over: Viborg recorded Over 2.5 in 60% of matches, SønderjyskE in 53%, and the visitors conceded 12 goals in their last 5 games (2.4 on average), so I assess Over 2.5 as a realistic option. Over 3.5 looks less likely — seasonally only 13% of Viborg’s matches exceeded 3.5 versus 40% for SønderjyskE, and the projected 3.05 goals points toward Under 3.5. The strongest signal is Over 1.5 (I pick Over at the 1.5 line) due to the 87%/80% figures and xG 1.60 vs 1.45.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

At half-time the most frequent state is a draw: Viborg leads at the break in 27% of matches, a draw occurs in 53% of cases, and SønderjyskE leads only in 20%. Over the full-time result the home side has a clear advantage — Viborg win 53% of home matches while the visitors win only 20% of away matches; additionally xG shows a slight edge for Viborg (xG 1.44 vs 1.34) and SønderjyskE concedes more xG against (1.75 vs 1.56). Viborg score on average 0.67 goals before the break versus 0.4 for the visitors and are capable of turnarounds in the second half — they score 0.93 goals on average after the break, have 93% of matches with at least one goal in the second half and register on average 1.8 points in the second half versus 1.07 for the visitors. Taking this into account, the strongest signal is a draw at half-time and a home win at full-time: a draw at the break occurs in 53% of matches and the estimated conversion of that draw into a Viborg win is about 57%, giving the X/1 scenario the highest probability (approx. 30%). The 1/1 and 2/2 options are less likely due to the rarity of the away side leading at the break (20%) and the home advantage in the second-half profile, hence 1/1 receives ~22% and 2/2 ~14%.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 0
First half
0 : 1
Second half

Game stats

68Possession (%)32
ViborgSønderjyskE
18Shots5
ViborgSønderjyskE
4Shots on target3
ViborgSønderjyskE
2.04xG0.65
ViborgSønderjyskE
8Corners0
ViborgSønderjyskE
85Dangerous attacks16
ViborgSønderjyskE
6Fouls14
ViborgSønderjyskE
0Cards1
ViborgSønderjyskE

Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

ViborgSønderjyskE
1.57Goals scored / game1.4
ViborgSønderjyskE
1.47Goals allowed / game1.5
ViborgSønderjyskE
47%Average possession45%
ViborgSønderjyskE
4.57Shots on target / game4.17
ViborgSønderjyskE

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

12.63Shots per game12.3
ViborgSønderjyskE
4.57Shots on target4.17
ViborgSønderjyskE
12.4%Shot conversion11.4%
ViborgSønderjyskE
47%Possession45%
ViborgSønderjyskE
1.45xG for1.39
ViborgSønderjyskE
1.58xG against1.65
ViborgSønderjyskE

Shooting quality

Viborg: Counter-attackingSønderjyskE: Balanced
ViborgSønderjyskE
Accuracy (shots on target)36%34%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.340.34

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Viborg is 133% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / game - Viborg · 0.6 pts / game - SønderjyskE

Viborg
WLLWD
Season result split
43% W17% D40% L
Season (W-D-L)
13-5-12
1.47 pts / game · goal difference +3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
7-2-6
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
WDLLW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.50Opponent xG: 1.77BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
SønderjyskE
LLLWL
Season result split
37% W27% D37% L
Season (W-D-L)
11-8-11
1.37 pts / game · goal difference -3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-4
0.60 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
3-5-7
Last 5 away
0-2-3
DLDLL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 2.4xG: 1.28Opponent xG: 2.05BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 80%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Viborg is 12% better for: goals scored per game.

1.57 goals / game - Viborg · 1.4 goals / game - SønderjyskE

Viborg scoring profile: very strong

Viborg scores in 87% of games (26 of 30 games), while SønderjyskE keeps a clean sheet in 27% (8 of 30 games).

SønderjyskE scoring profile: very strong

SønderjyskE scores in 77% of games (23 of 30 games), while Viborg keeps a clean sheet in 30% (9 of 30 games).

47Goals scored (season)42
ViborgSønderjyskE
44Goals conceded (season)45
ViborgSønderjyskE
3.03Average goals per game2.9
ViborgSønderjyskE
7Goals scored (last 5)5
ViborgSønderjyskE
6Goals conceded (last 5)12
ViborgSønderjyskE

How often they score at least...

87%1 goal77%
ViborgSønderjyskE
47%2 goals50%
ViborgSønderjyskE
17%3 goals13%
ViborgSønderjyskE
3%4 goals0%
ViborgSønderjyskE

How often they concede at least...

70%1 goal73%
ViborgSønderjyskE
50%2 goals47%
ViborgSønderjyskE
20%3 goals10%
ViborgSønderjyskE
3%4 goals7%
ViborgSønderjyskE

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

37%BTTS at half-time23%
ViborgSønderjyskE
10%BTTS in both halves7%
ViborgSønderjyskE
30%Scored in both halves27%
ViborgSønderjyskE

BTTS and goal count

57%Min. 3 goals and BTTS47%
ViborgSønderjyskE
3%Min. 3 goals without BTTS10%
ViborgSønderjyskE
40%BTTS - last 540%
ViborgSønderjyskE

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

73%Min. 1 goal before half-time63%
ViborgSønderjyskE
40%Min. 2 goals before half-time37%
ViborgSønderjyskE
23%Min. 3 goals before half-time13%
ViborgSønderjyskE

2nd half

73%Min. 1 goal after half-time83%
ViborgSønderjyskE
43%Min. 2 goals after half-time53%
ViborgSønderjyskE
20%Min. 3 goals after half-time27%
ViborgSønderjyskE

Game halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Viborg is 18% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.3 pts / game - Viborg · 1.1 pts / game - SønderjyskE

Viborg - half-time state
27% leading50% draw23% trailing
SønderjyskE - half-time state
20% leading50% draw30% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.3Points per game (1st half)1.1
ViborgSønderjyskE
0.83Goals scored (1st half)0.53
ViborgSønderjyskE
0.7Goals conceded (1st half)0.63
ViborgSønderjyskE
1.53Average goals (1st half)1.17
ViborgSønderjyskE
50%Clean sheet before half-time53%
ViborgSønderjyskE
40%No goal before half-time60%
ViborgSønderjyskE

After half-time (2nd half)

1.3Points per game (2nd half)1.43
ViborgSønderjyskE
0.73Goals scored (2nd half)0.87
ViborgSønderjyskE
0.77Goals conceded (2nd half)0.87
ViborgSønderjyskE
1.5Average goals (2nd half)1.73
ViborgSønderjyskE
53%Clean sheet after half-time50%
ViborgSønderjyskE
43%No goal after half-time37%
ViborgSønderjyskE

Viborg - second-half results

30% W40% D30% L
39
Half-time points
25
Half-time goals
+4
Goal difference (1st half)
39
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.30
PPG before half-time
Lead holding159%

Leads at halftime in 27% of games and wins 43%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.1

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

SønderjyskE - second-half results

40% W23% D37% L
33
Half-time points
16
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
43
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.10
PPG before half-time
Lead holding185%

Leads at halftime in 20% of games and wins 37%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.2

Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Viborg - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.401.00
Goals scored / game0.80.6
Goals allowed / game0.60.6
Average goals per game1.41.2
1 goal60%80%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+10
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4
SønderjyskE - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.200.60
Goals scored / game0.60.4
Goals allowed / game0.81.6
Average goals per game1.42.0
1 goal60%100%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference-1-6
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 0% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Viborg
ScoredConceded
7
12
0-15
9
1
16-30
9
8
31-45
8
9
46-60
3
6
61-75
11
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

SønderjyskE
ScoredConceded
7
4
0-15
3
7
16-30
6
8
31-45
6
13
46-60
5
6
61-75
15
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (15 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): +8 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.97
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.5 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
97%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
59%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-21%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
67%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
3%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 33 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Viborg

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.13
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.23
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.12
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.11
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
95%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
104%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.07
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

SønderjyskE

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.26
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.16
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.01
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.15
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
99%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
91%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.77
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
36% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
36%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Superliga).

Teams vs league

ViborgLigaSønderjyskE
Average goals per game• 3.033.07▼ 2.90
Both teams scored• 60%61%▼ 57%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)• 60%61%▼ 57%
Clean sheets▲ 30%23%▲ 27%
Goal before half-time• 73%73%▼ 63%
Goal after half-time▼ 73%79%▲ 83%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.07
Average goals per game
61%
Both teams scored
61%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
23%
Clean sheets
1.65
Home goals / game
1.42
Away goals / game
+16%
Home attack advantage
+14%
Home defensive advantage
+8%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
41%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
9%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
79%
1 goal
48%
2 goals
25%
3 goals
7%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. SønderjyskEGoalSefer EminiAssist: Olti Hyseni
  2. SønderjyskESubstitutionOn: Chidiebube Gideon DuruOff: Daníel Leó Grétarsson
  3. SønderjyskESubstitutionOn: Alexander LyngOff: Olti Hyseni
  4. SønderjyskEYellow cardAlexander Lyng
  5. SønderjyskESubstitutionOn: Pachanga Cassoma KristensenOff: Simon Sylvest Wæver

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Aydin UsluMatches officiated: 12
3.33Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 257%Home wins8%Draws33%Away wins

Head-to-head

Record from Viborg's perspective: 2 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses against SønderjyskE. Games average 2.33 goals, and both teams scored in 33% of them.

FAQ

What was the result of Viborg vs SønderjyskE?

The Superliga match finished Viborg 0:1 SønderjyskE. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Viborg and SønderjyskE?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches Viborg won 2, SønderjyskE won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Viborg vs SønderjyskE?

Viborg score 1.57 goals per game on average and SønderjyskE 1.40. The Superliga average is 3.07 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 61% of games. Both teams score in 60% of Viborg's matches and 57% of SønderjyskE's.

What form are Viborg and SønderjyskE in?

Over the last 5 games Viborg have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and SønderjyskE 1-0-4 (0.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Viborg vs SønderjyskE?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Viborg vs SønderjyskE: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.