Videoton vs Kecskeméti TE: match statistics
Videoton presents solid home form with 44% of matches won at home and an impressive record of 67% clean sheets in home matches, which testifies to a stable defense. Kecskeméti TE occupies a higher position in the table (4th place) and has better recent form (1.8 PPG), however, their away statistics are significantly weaker – only 33% victories away and just 11% clean sheets. The hosts have an advantage in expected goals at home (xG 1.42 vs xGA 1.09), while the guests have a slight advantage in xG away (1.57) but concede more goals (average 1.44 per match). Taking into account Videoton's defensive solidity in home matches and Kecskeméti TE's problems keeping a clean sheet away, I expect an even encounter. The recent form of both teams (Videoton: dlwlw, Kecskeméti: wwlwl) suggests volatility in results, which additionally speaks for a draw.
Videoton vs Kecskeméti TE: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Videoton played against Kecskeméti TE in NB II (Hungary). The game was played on February 23, 2026. Final score: 2:1.
Recent form
Videoton has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.60 points per game. Kecskeméti TE has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses, with 1.40 points per game.
Scoring records
Videoton scores 1.22 goals per game and allows 1.17. Kecskeméti TE scores 1.61 and allows 1.17. Games in this league average 2.52 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 44% of Videoton's games and 50% of Kecskeméti TE's. The Over 2.5 rates are 39% and 50%, compared with league averages of 48% for BTTS and 42% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Kecskeméti TE has the higher season xG average, 1.66 to 1.43 per game. Videoton takes 11.3 shots per game, while Kecskeméti TE takes 13.6.
First-half and second-half trends
Videoton leads at halftime in 39% of its games and scores 0.61 goals per game after halftime. Kecskeméti TE leads at halftime in 22% and scores 1.00 after halftime.
When the teams score
Videoton's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (7 goals). For Kecskeméti TE, it is minutes 76-90+ (8 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
NB II games average 2.52 goals. Both teams score in 48% of games, and 42% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Videoton presents solid home form with 44% of matches won at home and an impressive record of 67% clean sheets in home matches, which testifies to a stable defense. Kecskeméti TE occupies a higher position in the table (4th place) and has better recent form (1.8 PPG), however, their away statistics are significantly weaker – only 33% victories away and just 11% clean sheets. The hosts have an advantage in expected goals at home (xG 1.42 vs xGA 1.09), while the guests have a slight advantage in xG away (1.57) but concede more goals (average 1.44 per match). Taking into account Videoton's defensive solidity in home matches and Kecskeméti TE's problems keeping a clean sheet away, I expect an even encounter. The recent form of both teams (Videoton: dlwlw, Kecskeméti: wwlwl) suggests volatility in results, which additionally speaks for a draw.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Videoton | Kecskeméti TE | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 31% | 36% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.34 | 0.33 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Videoton is 14% better for: last-5 form.
1.6 pts / game - Videoton · 1.4 pts / game - Kecskeméti TE
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Kecskeméti TE is 32% better for: goals scored per game.
1.22 goals / game - Videoton · 1.61 goals / game - Kecskeméti TE
Videoton scores in 67% of games (12 of 18 meczów), while Kecskeméti TE keeps a clean sheet in 28% (5 of 18 meczów).
Kecskeméti TE scores in 78% of games (14 of 18 meczów), while Videoton keeps a clean sheet in 33% (6 of 18 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Videoton
Over / Under - Kecskeméti TE
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Videoton is 28% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.5 pts / game - Videoton · 1.17 pts / game - Kecskeméti TE
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Videoton - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 39% of games and wins 28%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Kecskeméti TE - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 22% of games and wins 50%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.20 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.2 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.6 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 20% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +4 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Videoton
Kecskeméti TE
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (NB II).
Teams vs league
| Videoton | Liga | Kecskeméti TE | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.39 | 2.52 | ▲ 2.78 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 44% | 48% | ▲ 50% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 39% | 42% | ▲ 50% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 33% | 29% | • 28% |
| Goal before half-time | • 72% | 71% | ▼ 67% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 72% | 80% | ▲ 89% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Record from Videoton's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Kecskeméti TE. Games average 4.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Videoton vs Kecskeméti TE?
The NB II match finished Videoton 2:1 Kecskeméti TE. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Videoton vs Kecskeméti TE?
Videoton score 1.22 goals per game on average and Kecskeméti TE 1.61. The NB II average is 2.52 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 42% of games. Both teams score in 44% of Videoton's matches and 50% of Kecskeméti TE's.
What form are Videoton and Kecskeméti TE in?
Over the last 5 games Videoton have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Kecskeméti TE 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Videoton vs Kecskeméti TE?
The statistical background for Videoton vs Kecskeméti TE — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.