Videoton vs Mezőkövesd-Zsóry: match statistics
Videoton vs Mezőkövesd-Zsóry: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Videoton played against Mezőkövesd-Zsóry in NB II (Hungary). The game was played on August 22, 2026. Venue: Puskás Akadémia Pancho Aréna. Final score: 1:2.
Recent form
Videoton has 2 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.50 points per game. Mezőkövesd-Zsóry has 1 win, 0 draws and 2 losses, with 1.00 points per game.
Scoring records
Videoton scores 1.75 goals per game and allows 1.25. Mezőkövesd-Zsóry scores 0.33 and allows 0.67. Games in this league average 2.55 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 50% of Videoton's games and 0% of Mezőkövesd-Zsóry's. The Over 2.5 rates are 75% and 0%, compared with league averages of 55% for BTTS and 48% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Videoton has the higher season xG average, 1.37 to 1.17 per game. Videoton takes 9.8 shots per game, while Mezőkövesd-Zsóry takes 5.7.
First-half and second-half trends
Videoton leads at halftime in 25% of its games and scores 1.25 goals per game after halftime. Mezőkövesd-Zsóry leads at halftime in 33% and scores 0.00 after halftime.
When the teams score
Videoton's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (3 goals). For Mezőkövesd-Zsóry, it is minutes 31-45+ (1 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
NB II games average 2.55 goals. Both teams score in 55% of games, and 48% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 1 home win, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Videoton are clear favorites, having won both of their home matches so far, averaging 2.5 goals scored and conceding none. At home, the hosts create chances worth an average of 1.70 xG, register 13 shots and as many as 7 shots on target per match, while Mezőkövesd-Zsóry average just 0.73 xG and 6 shots away from home. The visitors have lost both away fixtures, failed to score in either, and have been unable to find the net in 100% of such matches. Recent form also favors Videoton: they have scored 8 goals in their last five matches, compared with just 2 for Mezőkövesd-Zsóry, who have also suffered 4 defeats. The difference in attacking efficiency, combined with the hosts’ highly solid defense, points to a controlled Videoton victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The strongest argument for BTTS - No is Mezőkövesd-Zsóry’s extremely weak attack: the visitors average 0.0 goals, have failed to score in 100% of their matches so far, and average 0 shots on target. Videoton have kept a clean sheet in 100% of their matches, while their average xG against is just 1.04, further limiting the visitors’ chances of breaking through. In their last five appearances, Mezőkövesd-Zsóry have scored just 0.4 goals per match, with an xG of 0.88, while BTTS has landed in only 20% of their games. The hosts should create chances of their own, as they generate 1.61 xG and 5.0 shots on target per match, but the most likely scenario remains one in which at least one team—above all the visitors—fails to score.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Videoton have averaged 1.6 goals in their last 5 matches, while Mezőkövesd-Zsóry have scored just 0.4 goals per game and have failed to score in any of their away appearances so far this season. The hosts create more chances, as evidenced by an average of 1.61 xG and 5 shots on target, whereas the visitors generate just 0.73 xG and average 6 shots per match. Videoton’s last five matches produced at least three goals in 80% of games, but the opponents’ weaker attacking output significantly reduces the likelihood of an open, high-scoring game. A projection of 2.10 goals, combined with the fact that both teams have recorded Under 3.5 goals in 100% of their matches so far, gives the strongest edge to Under 3.5 goals.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest scenario is a draw at half-time followed by a Videoton victory, as the hosts were level at the break in 4 of their last 5 matches, while Mezőkövesd-Zsóry were level after 45 minutes in 3 of their last 5. Videoton have a clear edge in chance creation: their average xG stands at 1.61 compared with the visitors’ meagre 0.73, while the hosts average 5 shots on target per match compared with 0 for their opponents. The visitors have scored just 0.4 goals per match across their last five outings and lost 4 of those 5 games, limiting their chances of maintaining a favourable result after half-time. At the same time, Videoton have averaged 1.0 goal scored after the break in their last five matches, whereas Mezőkövesd-Zsóry have failed to score a single second-half goal during that period. A level opening is therefore realistic, but the hosts’ greater attacking activity should ultimately secure victory late in the game.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Videoton | Mezőkövesd-Zsóry | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 56% | 23% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.14 | 0.21 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.32 | 0.25 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Videoton is 50% better for: last-5 form.
1.5 pts / game - Videoton · 1 pts / game - Mezőkövesd-Zsóry
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Videoton is 430% better for: goals scored per game.
1.75 goals / game - Videoton · 0.33 goals / game - Mezőkövesd-Zsóry
Mezőkövesd-Zsóry is 87% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.25 goals / game - Videoton · 0.67 goals / game - Mezőkövesd-Zsóry
Videoton scores in 100% of games (4 of 4 meczów), while Mezőkövesd-Zsóry keeps a clean sheet in 33% (1 of 3 meczów).
Mezőkövesd-Zsóry scores in 33% of games (1 of 3 meczów), while Videoton keeps a clean sheet in 50% (2 of 4 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Videoton
Over / Under - Mezőkövesd-Zsóry
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Videoton is 13% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.5 pts / game - Videoton · 1.33 pts / game - Mezőkövesd-Zsóry
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Videoton - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 25% of games and wins 50%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.8 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Mezőkövesd-Zsóry - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 33%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.50 | 1.50 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.5 | 1.3 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.3 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 2.3 |
| 1 goal | 50% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 25% | 75% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 50% |
| Clean sheet | 75% | 50% |
| No goal | 50% | 25% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.33 | 0.67 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.3 | 0.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.3 | 0.3 |
| Average goals per game | 0.7 | 0.3 |
| 1 goal | 67% | 33% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 67% | 67% |
| No goal | 67% | 100% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (3 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (1 goal). Concedes most in 0-15 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Videoton
Mezőkövesd-Zsóry
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (NB II).
Teams vs league
| Videoton | Liga | Mezőkövesd-Zsóry | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 3.00 | 2.55 | ▼ 1.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 50% | 55% | ▼ 0% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 75% | 48% | ▼ 0% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 50% | 26% | ▲ 33% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 50% | 66% | • 67% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 100% | 76% | ▼ 33% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Videoton's perspective: 1 win, 1 draw and 0 losses against Mezőkövesd-Zsóry. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 50% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Videoton vs Mezőkövesd-Zsóry?
The NB II match finished Videoton 1:2 Mezőkövesd-Zsóry. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Videoton and Mezőkövesd-Zsóry?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Videoton won 1, Mezőkövesd-Zsóry won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Videoton vs Mezőkövesd-Zsóry?
Videoton score 1.75 goals per game on average and Mezőkövesd-Zsóry 0.33. The NB II average is 2.55 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 48% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Videoton's matches and 0% of Mezőkövesd-Zsóry's.
What form are Videoton and Mezőkövesd-Zsóry in?
Over the last 5 games Videoton have a 2-0-2 record (1.50 points per game) and Mezőkövesd-Zsóry 1-0-2 (1.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Videoton vs Mezőkövesd-Zsóry?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.