Ghana - Ghana Premier LeagueData current as of 22 July 2026

Vision vs Berekum Chelsea: match statistics

Vision crest
Vision
3 : 1half-time 0:0
Berekum Chelsea crest
Berekum Chelsea
165%(0.00)
X25%(0.00)
210%(0.00)

Vision clearly dominates this clash, especially considering the hosts' advantage at home. In home matches, the hosts hold an impressive record of 45% wins and 45% draws, with only 9% losses, and a positive goal difference of +7. Berekum Chelsea presents very poor form in away matches with 0% wins, 67% losses, and a catastrophic goal difference of -13. The visitors are unable to attack effectively on the road, averaging a mere 0.42 goals per match and failing to score in 58% of fixtures. Vision, in good form (unbeaten in the last 5 matches) and with an advantage in possession and shot efficiency, should confidently win this meeting. The difference in quality between the two teams, particularly in the context of home versus away records, points to a clear favorite.

Vision vs Berekum Chelsea: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Vision play Berekum Chelsea in Ghana Premier League (Ghana). The match date is 7 March 2026 at 16:00. Final score: 3:1.

Current form

Vision: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match. Berekum Chelsea: 5-0-0, 3.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Vision scores 1.12 and concedes 1.00 goals per match. Berekum Chelsea scores 1.03 and concedes 0.97. League average: 2.03 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Vision 32%, Berekum Chelsea 38%. Over 2.5: Vision 44%, Berekum Chelsea 32%. League level: BTTS 34%, Over 2.5 34%.

xG, shots and style

Berekum Chelsea has higher xG: 1.15 vs 1.14. Vision: 6.0 shots per match, Berekum Chelsea: 2.7.

Match halves

Vision: half-time lead 26%, second-half goals 0.71. Berekum Chelsea: half-time lead 32%, second-half goals 0.47.

Goals by minute

Vision: 76-90+ (10 goals). Berekum Chelsea: 31-45+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ghana Premier League: 2.03 goals per match, BTTS 34%, Over 2.5 34%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.

Match description

Vision clearly dominates this clash, especially considering the hosts' advantage at home. In home matches, the hosts hold an impressive record of 45% wins and 45% draws, with only 9% losses, and a positive goal difference of +7. Berekum Chelsea presents very poor form in away matches with 0% wins, 67% losses, and a catastrophic goal difference of -13. The visitors are unable to attack effectively on the road, averaging a mere 0.42 goals per match and failing to score in 58% of fixtures. Vision, in good form (unbeaten in the last 5 matches) and with an advantage in possession and shot efficiency, should confidently win this meeting. The difference in quality between the two teams, particularly in the context of home versus away records, points to a clear favorite.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
3 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

65Possession (%)35
VisionBerekum Chelsea
11Shots8
VisionBerekum Chelsea
5Shots on target3
VisionBerekum Chelsea
1.62xG1.15
VisionBerekum Chelsea
4Corners5
VisionBerekum Chelsea
78Dangerous attacks59
VisionBerekum Chelsea
-1Fouls-1
VisionBerekum Chelsea
1Cards0
VisionBerekum Chelsea

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

VisionBerekum Chelsea
1.12Goals scored / match1.03
VisionBerekum Chelsea
1Goals conceded / match0.97
VisionBerekum Chelsea
41%Average possession18%
VisionBerekum Chelsea
2.5Shots on target / match0.68
VisionBerekum Chelsea

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

6Shots per match2.71
VisionBerekum Chelsea
2.5Shots on target0.68
VisionBerekum Chelsea
18.6%Shot conversion38%
VisionBerekum Chelsea
41%Possession18%
VisionBerekum Chelsea
1.14xG for1.15
VisionBerekum Chelsea
1.31xG against1.16
VisionBerekum Chelsea

Shooting quality

Vision: Counter-attackingBerekum Chelsea: Counter-attacking
VisionBerekum Chelsea
Accuracy (shots on target)42%25%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.190.42
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.451.51

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Berekum Chelsea is 67% better for: last-5 form.

1.8 pts / match - Vision · 3 pts / match - Berekum Chelsea

Vision
LLWWW
Season result split
35% W32% R32% P
Season (W-D-L)
12-11-11
1.38 pts / match · goal difference +4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
9-6-2
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
DWLWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.15Opponent xG: 1.24BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 80%
Berekum Chelsea
WWWWW
5 wins in a row
Season result split
41% W24% R35% P
Season (W-D-L)
14-8-12
1.47 pts / match · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
5-0-0
3.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-5-10
Last 5 away
2-1-2
LDLWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.87Opponent xG: 0.64BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Vision is 9% better for: goals scored per match.

1.12 goals / match - Vision · 1.03 goals / match - Berekum Chelsea

Vision scoring profile: mixed

Vision scores in 59% of matches (20 of 34 matches), while Berekum Chelsea keeps a clean sheet in 38% (13 of 34 matches).

Berekum Chelsea scoring profile: mixed

Berekum Chelsea scores in 65% of matches (22 of 34 matches), while Vision keeps a clean sheet in 44% (15 of 34 matches).

38Goals scored (season)35
VisionBerekum Chelsea
34Goals conceded (season)33
VisionBerekum Chelsea
2.12Average goals in match2
VisionBerekum Chelsea
9Goals scored (last 5)11
VisionBerekum Chelsea
5Goals conceded (last 5)3
VisionBerekum Chelsea

How often they score at least...

59%1 goal65%
VisionBerekum Chelsea
35%2 goals29%
VisionBerekum Chelsea
18%3 goals9%
VisionBerekum Chelsea
0%4 goals0%
VisionBerekum Chelsea

How often they concede at least...

56%1 goal62%
VisionBerekum Chelsea
35%2 goals24%
VisionBerekum Chelsea
6%3 goals12%
VisionBerekum Chelsea
3%4 goals0%
VisionBerekum Chelsea

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

34%
League average

Goal patterns

12%BTTS at half-time12%
VisionBerekum Chelsea
6%BTTS in both halves3%
VisionBerekum Chelsea
21%Scored in both halves24%
VisionBerekum Chelsea

BTTS and goal count

29%Min. 3 goals and BTTS26%
VisionBerekum Chelsea
15%Min. 3 goals without BTTS6%
VisionBerekum Chelsea
40%BTTS - last 540%
VisionBerekum Chelsea

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

53%Min. 1 goal before half-time59%
VisionBerekum Chelsea
24%Min. 2 goals before half-time21%
VisionBerekum Chelsea
6%Min. 3 goals before half-time3%
VisionBerekum Chelsea

2nd half

68%Min. 1 goal after half-time65%
VisionBerekum Chelsea
41%Min. 2 goals after half-time32%
VisionBerekum Chelsea
15%Min. 3 goals after half-time9%
VisionBerekum Chelsea

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Berekum Chelsea is 11% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.32 pts / match - Vision · 1.47 pts / match - Berekum Chelsea

Vision - half-time state
26% leading53% draw21% trailing
Berekum Chelsea - half-time state
32% leading50% draw18% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.32Points per match (1st half)1.47
VisionBerekum Chelsea
0.41Goals scored (1st half)0.47
VisionBerekum Chelsea
0.41Goals conceded (1st half)0.35
VisionBerekum Chelsea
0.82Average goals (1st half)0.82
VisionBerekum Chelsea
71%Clean sheet before half-time71%
VisionBerekum Chelsea
65%No goal before half-time59%
VisionBerekum Chelsea

After half-time (2nd half)

1.32Points per match (2nd half)1.12
VisionBerekum Chelsea
0.71Goals scored (2nd half)0.47
VisionBerekum Chelsea
0.59Goals conceded (2nd half)0.62
VisionBerekum Chelsea
1.29Average goals (2nd half)1.09
VisionBerekum Chelsea
56%Clean sheet after half-time56%
VisionBerekum Chelsea
56%No goal after half-time56%
VisionBerekum Chelsea

Vision - second-half results

29% W44% R26% P
45
Half-time points
14
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
45
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.32
PPG before half-time
Lead holding135%

Leads at half-time in 26% of matches and wins 35%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Berekum Chelsea - second-half results

21% W50% R29% P
50
Half-time points
16
Half-time goals
+4
Goal difference (1st half)
38
Second-half points
-5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.47
PPG before half-time
Lead holding128%

Leads at half-time in 32% of matches and wins 41%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Vision - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.001.60
Goals scored / match0.61.2
Goals conceded / match0.40.6
Average goals in match1.01.8
1 goal80%80%
2 goals20%80%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference+1+3
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3
Berekum Chelsea - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.201.80
Goals scored / match1.00.6
Goals conceded / match0.40.2
Average goals in match1.40.8
1 goal80%60%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet60%80%
No goal20%40%
Goal difference+3+2
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 60% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Vision
ScoredConceded
3
4
0-15
4
3
16-30
7
7
31-45
8
5
46-60
6
6
61-75
10
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Berekum Chelsea
ScoredConceded
5
6
0-15
6
2
16-30
8
4
31-45
3
6
46-60
8
7
61-75
5
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (8 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.06
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.0 : 1.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
101%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
35%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-51%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
38%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
14%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 7 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Vision

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.17
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.29
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-9.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.02
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.31
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
82%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
152%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.42
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
26% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
26%

Berekum Chelsea

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.01
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.07
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.12
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.19
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
156%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
71%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+1.53
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
14% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
14%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ghana Premier League).

Teams vs league

VisionLigaBerekum Chelsea
Average goals in match 2.122.03 2.00
Both teams scored 32%34% 38%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 44%34% 32%
Clean sheets 44%41% 38%
Goal before half-time 53%62% 59%
Goal after half-time 68%59% 65%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.03
Average goals per match
34%
Both teams scored
34%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
41%
Clean sheets
1.37
Home goals / match
0.66
Away goals / match
+108%
Home attack advantage
+52%
Home defence advantage
+42%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
62%
1 goal
26%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
59%
1 goal
28%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Vision 0 - 0 - 1 Berekum Chelsea. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

Berekum Chelsea
1 : 0
Vision

FAQ

What was the result of Vision vs Berekum Chelsea?

The Ghana Premier League match finished Vision 3:1 Berekum Chelsea. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Vision vs Berekum Chelsea?

Vision score 1.12 goals per game on average and Berekum Chelsea 1.03. The Ghana Premier League average is 2.03 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 34% of games. Both teams score in 32% of Vision's matches and 38% of Berekum Chelsea's.

What form are Vision and Berekum Chelsea in?

Over the last 5 games Vision have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Berekum Chelsea 5-0-0 (3.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Vision vs Berekum Chelsea?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.