Vision vs Medeama: match statistics
Medeama is the clear favorite for this encounter, sitting in 1st place in the table with an impressive record of 10 wins, 7 draws, and just 1 defeat. Their form in the last 5 matches is excellent (4 wins, 1 draw), scoring 8 goals while conceding only 1, resulting in a PPG of 2.6. Vision occupies the 11th position in the table and displays clearly weaker form (PPG 1.4), with a goal difference of 14:17 indicating offensive struggles. Medeama dominates away statistics with 50% clean sheets, averaging 1 goal scored and only 0.63 conceded per match, while Vision has only a 50% win rate in home matches and averages 1.25 goals scored. The visitors' qualitative and form advantage points towards their victory, although Vision's solid home defense (75% CS%) could make the match tight, hence a significant probability of a draw.
Vision vs Medeama: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Vision played against Medeama in Ghana Premier League (Ghana). The game was played on January 17, 2026. Final score: 1:2.
Recent form
Vision has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.40 points per game. Medeama has 3 wins, 2 draws and 0 losses, with 2.20 points per game.
Scoring records
Vision scores 0.78 goals per game and allows 0.94. Medeama scores 1.39 and allows 0.56. Games in this league average 1.86 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 22% of Vision's games and 44% of Medeama's. The Over 2.5 rates are 28% and 39%, compared with league averages of 33% for BTTS and 28% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Medeama has the higher season xG average, 1.62 to 0.91 per game. Vision takes 4.6 shots per game, while Medeama takes 14.6.
First-half and second-half trends
Vision leads at halftime in 17% of its games and scores 0.50 goals per game after halftime. Medeama leads at halftime in 39% and scores 0.72 after halftime.
When the teams score
Vision's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (4 goals). For Medeama, it is minutes 76-90+ (8 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Ghana Premier League games average 1.86 goals. Both teams score in 33% of games, and 28% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Medeama is the clear favorite for this encounter, sitting in 1st place in the table with an impressive record of 10 wins, 7 draws, and just 1 defeat. Their form in the last 5 matches is excellent (4 wins, 1 draw), scoring 8 goals while conceding only 1, resulting in a PPG of 2.6. Vision occupies the 11th position in the table and displays clearly weaker form (PPG 1.4), with a goal difference of 14:17 indicating offensive struggles. Medeama dominates away statistics with 50% clean sheets, averaging 1 goal scored and only 0.63 conceded per match, while Vision has only a 50% win rate in home matches and averages 1.25 goals scored. The visitors' qualitative and form advantage points towards their victory, although Vision's solid home defense (75% CS%) could make the match tight, hence a significant probability of a draw.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Vision | Medeama | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 37% | 38% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.20 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.47 | 0.25 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Medeama is 57% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / game - Vision · 2.2 pts / game - Medeama
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Medeama is 78% better for: goals scored per game.
0.78 goals / game - Vision · 1.39 goals / game - Medeama
Medeama is 68% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.94 goals / game - Vision · 0.56 goals / game - Medeama
Vision scores in 44% of games (8 of 18 meczów), while Medeama keeps a clean sheet in 50% (9 of 18 meczów).
Medeama scores in 78% of games (14 of 18 meczów), while Vision keeps a clean sheet in 44% (8 of 18 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Vision
Over / Under - Medeama
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Medeama is 38% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.17 pts / game - Vision · 1.61 pts / game - Medeama
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Vision - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 17% of games and wins 28%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Medeama - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 39% of games and wins 56%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.60 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 100% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.60 | 2.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.0 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 100% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +3 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (4 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Vision
Medeama
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ghana Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Vision | Liga | Medeama | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 1.72 | 1.86 | • 1.94 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 22% | 33% | ▲ 44% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 28% | 28% | ▲ 39% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 44% | 42% | ▲ 50% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 44% | 60% | ▲ 67% |
| Goal after half-time | • 61% | 60% | ▲ 72% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Head-to-head
Record from Vision's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Medeama. Games average 4.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Vision vs Medeama?
The Ghana Premier League match finished Vision 1:2 Medeama. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Vision vs Medeama?
Vision score 0.78 goals per game on average and Medeama 1.39. The Ghana Premier League average is 1.86 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 28% of games. Both teams score in 22% of Vision's matches and 44% of Medeama's.
What form are Vision and Medeama in?
Over the last 5 games Vision have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Medeama 3-2-0 (2.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Vision vs Medeama?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.