Ghana - Ghana Premier LeagueData current as of 20 July 2026

Vision vs Medeama: match statistics

Vision crest
Vision
1 : 2half-time 1:0
Medeama crest
Medeama
125%(0.00)
X30%(0.00)
245%(0.00)

Medeama is the clear favorite for this encounter, sitting in 1st place in the table with an impressive record of 10 wins, 7 draws, and just 1 defeat. Their form in the last 5 matches is excellent (4 wins, 1 draw), scoring 8 goals while conceding only 1, resulting in a PPG of 2.6. Vision occupies the 11th position in the table and displays clearly weaker form (PPG 1.4), with a goal difference of 14:17 indicating offensive struggles. Medeama dominates away statistics with 50% clean sheets, averaging 1 goal scored and only 0.63 conceded per match, while Vision has only a 50% win rate in home matches and averages 1.25 goals scored. The visitors' qualitative and form advantage points towards their victory, although Vision's solid home defense (75% CS%) could make the match tight, hence a significant probability of a draw.

Vision vs Medeama: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Vision play Medeama in Ghana Premier League (Ghana). The match date is 17 January 2026 at 16:00. Final score: 1:2.

Current form

Vision: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match. Medeama: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Vision scores 1.12 and concedes 1.00 goals per match. Medeama scores 1.53 and concedes 0.82. League average: 2.03 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Vision 32%, Medeama 53%. Over 2.5: Vision 44%, Medeama 47%. League level: BTTS 34%, Over 2.5 34%.

xG, shots and style

Medeama has higher xG: 1.43 vs 1.14. Vision: 6.0 shots per match, Medeama: 9.5.

Match halves

Vision: half-time lead 26%, second-half goals 0.71. Medeama: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 0.76.

Goals by minute

Vision: 76-90+ (10 goals). Medeama: 16-30 (14 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ghana Premier League: 2.03 goals per match, BTTS 34%, Over 2.5 34%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 0%.

Match description

Medeama is the clear favorite for this encounter, sitting in 1st place in the table with an impressive record of 10 wins, 7 draws, and just 1 defeat. Their form in the last 5 matches is excellent (4 wins, 1 draw), scoring 8 goals while conceding only 1, resulting in a PPG of 2.6. Vision occupies the 11th position in the table and displays clearly weaker form (PPG 1.4), with a goal difference of 14:17 indicating offensive struggles. Medeama dominates away statistics with 50% clean sheets, averaging 1 goal scored and only 0.63 conceded per match, while Vision has only a 50% win rate in home matches and averages 1.25 goals scored. The visitors' qualitative and form advantage points towards their victory, although Vision's solid home defense (75% CS%) could make the match tight, hence a significant probability of a draw.

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
0 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

42Possession (%)58
VisionMedeama
6Shots10
VisionMedeama
2Shots on target2
VisionMedeama
0.93xG1.41
VisionMedeama
8Corners22
VisionMedeama
55Dangerous attacks88
VisionMedeama
29Fouls8
VisionMedeama
0Cards0
VisionMedeama

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.12Goals scored / match1.53
VisionMedeama
1Goals conceded / match0.82
VisionMedeama
41%Average possession45%
VisionMedeama
2.5Shots on target / match3.59
VisionMedeama

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

6Shots per match9.5
VisionMedeama
2.5Shots on target3.59
VisionMedeama
18.6%Shot conversion16.1%
VisionMedeama
41%Possession45%
VisionMedeama
1.14xG for1.43
VisionMedeama
1.31xG against1.07
VisionMedeama

Shooting quality

Vision: Counter-attackingMedeama: Counter-attacking
VisionMedeama
Accuracy (shots on target)42%38%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.190.15
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.450.43

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Vision
LLWWW
Season result split
35% W32% R32% P
Season (W-D-L)
12-11-11
1.38 pts / match · goal difference +4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
9-6-2
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
DWLWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.15Opponent xG: 1.24BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 80%
Medeama
WLWWL
Season result split
50% W32% R18% P
Season (W-D-L)
17-11-6
1.82 pts / match · goal difference +24
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
5-7-5
Last 5 away
1-1-3
LDLWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 0.99Opponent xG: 0.69BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Medeama is 37% better for: goals scored per match.

1.12 goals / match - Vision · 1.53 goals / match - Medeama

Medeama is 22% better for: goals conceded per match.

1 goals / match - Vision · 0.82 goals / match - Medeama

Vision scoring profile: mixed

Vision scores in 59% of matches (20 of 34 matches), while Medeama keeps a clean sheet in 44% (15 of 34 matches).

Medeama scoring profile: strong

Medeama scores in 82% of matches (28 of 34 matches), while Vision keeps a clean sheet in 44% (15 of 34 matches).

38Goals scored (season)52
VisionMedeama
34Goals conceded (season)28
VisionMedeama
2.12Average goals in match2.35
VisionMedeama
9Goals scored (last 5)11
VisionMedeama
5Goals conceded (last 5)8
VisionMedeama

How often they score at least...

59%1 goal82%
VisionMedeama
35%2 goals44%
VisionMedeama
18%3 goals15%
VisionMedeama
0%4 goals9%
VisionMedeama

How often they concede at least...

56%1 goal56%
VisionMedeama
35%2 goals21%
VisionMedeama
6%3 goals3%
VisionMedeama
3%4 goals3%
VisionMedeama

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

12%BTTS at half-time18%
VisionMedeama
6%BTTS in both halves3%
VisionMedeama
21%Scored in both halves26%
VisionMedeama

BTTS and goal count

29%Min. 3 goals and BTTS38%
VisionMedeama
15%Min. 3 goals without BTTS9%
VisionMedeama
40%BTTS - last 560%
VisionMedeama

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

53%Min. 1 goal before half-time68%
VisionMedeama
24%Min. 2 goals before half-time35%
VisionMedeama
6%Min. 3 goals before half-time12%
VisionMedeama

2nd half

68%Min. 1 goal after half-time71%
VisionMedeama
41%Min. 2 goals after half-time32%
VisionMedeama
15%Min. 3 goals after half-time9%
VisionMedeama

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Medeama is 18% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.32 pts / match - Vision · 1.56 pts / match - Medeama

Vision - half-time state
26% leading53% draw21% trailing
Medeama - half-time state
38% leading41% draw21% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.32Points per match (1st half)1.56
VisionMedeama
0.41Goals scored (1st half)0.76
VisionMedeama
0.41Goals conceded (1st half)0.38
VisionMedeama
0.82Average goals (1st half)1.15
VisionMedeama
71%Clean sheet before half-time65%
VisionMedeama
65%No goal before half-time50%
VisionMedeama

After half-time (2nd half)

1.32Points per match (2nd half)1.65
VisionMedeama
0.71Goals scored (2nd half)0.76
VisionMedeama
0.59Goals conceded (2nd half)0.44
VisionMedeama
1.29Average goals (2nd half)1.21
VisionMedeama
56%Clean sheet after half-time68%
VisionMedeama
56%No goal after half-time41%
VisionMedeama

Vision - second-half results

29% W44% R26% P
45
Half-time points
14
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
45
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.32
PPG before half-time
Lead holding135%

Leads at half-time in 26% of matches and wins 35%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Medeama - second-half results

41% W41% R18% P
53
Half-time points
26
Half-time goals
+13
Goal difference (1st half)
56
Second-half points
+11
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.56
PPG before half-time
Lead holding132%

Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Vision - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.001.60
Goals scored / match0.61.2
Goals conceded / match0.40.6
Average goals in match1.01.8
1 goal80%80%
2 goals20%80%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference+1+3
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3
Medeama - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.40
Goals scored / match1.01.2
Goals conceded / match0.61.0
Average goals in match1.62.2
1 goal80%80%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+2+1
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Vision
ScoredConceded
3
4
0-15
4
3
16-30
7
7
31-45
8
5
46-60
6
6
61-75
10
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Medeama
ScoredConceded
5
3
0-15
14
5
16-30
7
5
31-45
3
6
46-60
9
4
61-75
14
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (14 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +9 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.24
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.0 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
110%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
43%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+79%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
48%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
7%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 14 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Vision

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.17
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.29
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-9.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.02
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.31
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
82%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
152%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.42
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
26% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
26%

Medeama

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.36
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.35
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-17.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.10
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.25
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
232%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
60%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.02
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
27% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
27%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ghana Premier League).

Teams vs league

VisionLigaMedeama
Average goals in match 2.122.03 2.35
Both teams scored 32%34% 53%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 44%34% 47%
Clean sheets 44%41% 44%
Goal before half-time 53%62% 68%
Goal after half-time 68%59% 71%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.03
Average goals per match
34%
Both teams scored
34%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
41%
Clean sheets
1.37
Home goals / match
0.66
Away goals / match
+108%
Home attack advantage
+52%
Home defence advantage
+42%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
62%
1 goal
26%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
59%
1 goal
28%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Vision 0 - 0 - 1 Medeama. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

Medeama SC
4 : 0
Vision FC

FAQ

What was the result of Vision vs Medeama?

The Ghana Premier League match finished Vision 1:2 Medeama. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Vision vs Medeama?

Vision score 1.12 goals per game on average and Medeama 1.53. The Ghana Premier League average is 2.03 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 34% of games. Both teams score in 32% of Vision's matches and 53% of Medeama's.

What form are Vision and Medeama in?

Over the last 5 games Vision have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Medeama 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Vision vs Medeama?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.