Vision vs Young Apostles: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Vision play Young Apostles in Ghana Premier League (Ghana). The match date is 7 December 2025 at 16:00. Final score: 0:0.

Current form

Vision: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match. Young Apostles: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Vision scores 1.12 and concedes 1.00 goals per match. Young Apostles scores 1.06 and concedes 1.09. League average: 2.03 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Vision 32%, Young Apostles 39%. Over 2.5: Vision 44%, Young Apostles 36%. League level: BTTS 34%, Over 2.5 34%.

xG, shots and style

Young Apostles has higher xG: 1.38 vs 1.14. Vision: 6.0 shots per match, Young Apostles: 6.4.

Match halves

Vision: half-time lead 26%, second-half goals 0.71. Young Apostles: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 0.55.

Goals by minute

Vision: 76-90+ (10 goals). Young Apostles: 31-45+ (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ghana Premier League: 2.03 goals per match, BTTS 34%, Over 2.5 34%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 100%.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

59Possession (%)41
VisionYoung Apostles
7Shots9
VisionYoung Apostles
2Shots on target5
VisionYoung Apostles
1.16xG1.51
VisionYoung Apostles
4Corners4
VisionYoung Apostles
79Dangerous attacks81
VisionYoung Apostles
24Fouls22
VisionYoung Apostles
0Cards0
VisionYoung Apostles

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

VisionYoung Apostles
1.12Goals scored / match1.06
VisionYoung Apostles
1Goals conceded / match1.09
VisionYoung Apostles
41%Average possession28%
VisionYoung Apostles
2.5Shots on target / match1.88
VisionYoung Apostles

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

6Shots per match6.36
VisionYoung Apostles
2.5Shots on target1.88
VisionYoung Apostles
18.6%Shot conversion16.7%
VisionYoung Apostles
41%Possession28%
VisionYoung Apostles
1.14xG for1.38
VisionYoung Apostles
1.31xG against1.25
VisionYoung Apostles

Shooting quality

Vision: Counter-attackingYoung Apostles: Counter-attacking
VisionYoung Apostles
Accuracy (shots on target)42%30%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.190.22
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.450.56

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Vision
LLWWW
Season result split
35% W32% R32% P
Season (W-D-L)
12-11-11
1.38 pts / match · goal difference +4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
9-6-2
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
DWLWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.15Opponent xG: 1.24BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 80%
Young Apostles
LWWLW
Season result split
33% W27% R39% P
Season (W-D-L)
11-9-13
1.27 pts / match · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-5-11
Last 5 away
0-1-4
DLLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.29Opponent xG: 0.98BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Vision is 6% better for: goals scored per match.

1.12 goals / match - Vision · 1.06 goals / match - Young Apostles

Vision is 9% better for: goals conceded per match.

1 goals / match - Vision · 1.09 goals / match - Young Apostles

Vision scoring profile: strong

Vision scores in 59% of matches (20 of 34 matches), while Young Apostles keeps a clean sheet in 30% (10 of 33 matches).

Young Apostles scoring profile: mixed

Young Apostles scores in 61% of matches (20 of 33 matches), while Vision keeps a clean sheet in 44% (15 of 34 matches).

38Goals scored (season)35
VisionYoung Apostles
34Goals conceded (season)36
VisionYoung Apostles
2.12Average goals in match2.15
VisionYoung Apostles
9Goals scored (last 5)8
VisionYoung Apostles
5Goals conceded (last 5)6
VisionYoung Apostles

How often they score at least...

59%1 goal61%
VisionYoung Apostles
35%2 goals30%
VisionYoung Apostles
18%3 goals15%
VisionYoung Apostles
0%4 goals0%
VisionYoung Apostles

How often they concede at least...

56%1 goal70%
VisionYoung Apostles
35%2 goals33%
VisionYoung Apostles
6%3 goals6%
VisionYoung Apostles
3%4 goals0%
VisionYoung Apostles

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

34%
League average

Goal patterns

12%BTTS at half-time12%
VisionYoung Apostles
6%BTTS in both halves3%
VisionYoung Apostles
21%Scored in both halves27%
VisionYoung Apostles

BTTS and goal count

29%Min. 3 goals and BTTS27%
VisionYoung Apostles
15%Min. 3 goals without BTTS9%
VisionYoung Apostles
40%BTTS - last 560%
VisionYoung Apostles

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

53%Min. 1 goal before half-time70%
VisionYoung Apostles
24%Min. 2 goals before half-time30%
VisionYoung Apostles
6%Min. 3 goals before half-time3%
VisionYoung Apostles

2nd half

68%Min. 1 goal after half-time67%
VisionYoung Apostles
41%Min. 2 goals after half-time33%
VisionYoung Apostles
15%Min. 3 goals after half-time12%
VisionYoung Apostles

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Vision is 9% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.32 pts / match - Vision · 1.21 pts / match - Young Apostles

Vision - half-time state
26% leading53% draw21% trailing
Young Apostles - half-time state
27% leading39% draw33% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.32Points per match (1st half)1.21
VisionYoung Apostles
0.41Goals scored (1st half)0.52
VisionYoung Apostles
0.41Goals conceded (1st half)0.52
VisionYoung Apostles
0.82Average goals (1st half)1.03
VisionYoung Apostles
71%Clean sheet before half-time58%
VisionYoung Apostles
65%No goal before half-time61%
VisionYoung Apostles

After half-time (2nd half)

1.32Points per match (2nd half)1.21
VisionYoung Apostles
0.71Goals scored (2nd half)0.55
VisionYoung Apostles
0.59Goals conceded (2nd half)0.58
VisionYoung Apostles
1.29Average goals (2nd half)1.12
VisionYoung Apostles
56%Clean sheet after half-time55%
VisionYoung Apostles
56%No goal after half-time52%
VisionYoung Apostles

Vision - second-half results

29% W44% R26% P
45
Half-time points
14
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
45
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.32
PPG before half-time
Lead holding135%

Leads at half-time in 26% of matches and wins 35%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Young Apostles - second-half results

24% W48% R27% P
40
Half-time points
17
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
40
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.21
PPG before half-time
Lead holding122%

Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Vision - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.001.60
Goals scored / match0.61.2
Goals conceded / match0.40.6
Average goals in match1.01.8
1 goal80%80%
2 goals20%80%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference+1+3
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3
Young Apostles - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.200.60
Goals scored / match1.20.4
Goals conceded / match0.21.0
Average goals in match1.41.4
1 goal80%60%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal20%60%
Goal difference+5-3
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 6

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Vision
ScoredConceded
3
4
0-15
4
3
16-30
7
7
31-45
8
5
46-60
6
6
61-75
10
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Young Apostles
ScoredConceded
3
2
0-15
5
8
16-30
9
7
31-45
7
4
46-60
8
5
61-75
3
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (9 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.13
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.1 : 1.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
105%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
36%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+87%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
36%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
16%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 6 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Vision

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.17
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.29
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-9.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.02
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.31
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
82%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
152%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.42
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
26% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
26%

Young Apostles

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.13
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.16
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.32
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.16
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
161%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
80%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.53
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.0
Late goals
9% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
9%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ghana Premier League).

Teams vs league

VisionLigaYoung Apostles
Average goals in match 2.122.03 2.15
Both teams scored 32%34% 39%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 44%34% 36%
Clean sheets 44%41% 30%
Goal before half-time 53%62% 70%
Goal after half-time 68%59% 67%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.03
Average goals per match
34%
Both teams scored
34%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
41%
Clean sheets
1.37
Home goals / match
0.66
Away goals / match
+108%
Home attack advantage
+52%
Home defence advantage
+42%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
62%
1 goal
26%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
59%
1 goal
28%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Vision 0 - 0 - 1 Young Apostles. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Vision vs Young Apostles?

The Ghana Premier League match finished Vision 0:0 Young Apostles. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Vision vs Young Apostles?

Vision score 1.12 goals per game on average and Young Apostles 1.06. The Ghana Premier League average is 2.03 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 34% of games. Both teams score in 32% of Vision's matches and 39% of Young Apostles's.

What form are Vision and Young Apostles in?

Over the last 5 games Vision have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Young Apostles 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Vision vs Young Apostles?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.