Finland - VeikkausliigaData current as of October 15, 2026

VPS vs TPS: match statistics

VPS crest
VPS
1 : 3half-time 0:2
TPS crest
TPS

VPS vs TPS: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

VPS played against TPS in Veikkausliiga (Finland). The game was played on August 14, 2026. Final score: 1:3.

Recent form

VPS has 2 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.20 points per game. TPS has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses, with 1.40 points per game.

Scoring records

VPS scores 1.42 goals per game and allows 0.95. TPS scores 1.26 and allows 1.11. Games in this league average 2.58 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 58% of VPS's games and 53% of TPS's. The Over 2.5 rates are 42% and 47%, compared with league averages of 49% for BTTS and 46% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

VPS has the higher season xG average, 1.50 to 1.46 per game. VPS takes 12.3 shots per game, while TPS takes 11.9.

First-half and second-half trends

VPS leads at halftime in 37% of its games and scores 0.63 goals per game after halftime. TPS leads at halftime in 21% and scores 0.68 after halftime.

When the teams score

VPS's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (7 goals). For TPS, it is minutes 76-90+ (7 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Veikkausliiga games average 2.58 goals. Both teams score in 49% of games, and 46% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

VPS have a clear home advantage: they have won 56% of their home matches, scoring an average of 1.89 goals and conceding just 0.78 per game. TPS are still without an away win, losing 56% of their matches, scoring only 0.67 goals per game, and failing to find the net in as many as 44% of their away fixtures. The hosts create more high-quality chances, recording a home xG of 1.57 and 5.22 shots on target per match, while TPS average just 3.89 shots on target away from home. Although VPS’s form over their last five matches has been inconsistent and TPS have conceded only 5 goals during that period, the hosts’ more reliable defense and the visitors’ very poor away finishing strongly support a VPS win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The BTTS pick is slightly supported by current form: VPS and TPS have averaged 1.2 and 1.6 goals respectively over their last five matches. During this period, VPS conceded 1.4 goals per game and TPS 1.0, while their average xG against figures stand at 1.41 and 1.68, suggesting opportunities for both sides. The seasonal rate of matches in which both teams scored is 50% for VPS and 56% for TPS, while over their last five appearances it was 60% and 40% respectively. The hosts are clearly stronger offensively, scoring 1.8 goals per game this season, whereas TPS's weaker finishing—just 0.67 goals on average and 44% of matches without scoring—limits confidence in the pick. Despite this caveat, TPS's xG of 1.53 and the visitors' low clean-sheet rate of just 11% point to a slight preference for the scenario in which both teams find the net.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

VPS averages 1.8 goals at home, while TPS concedes 1.33 goals per away match, clearly supporting at least one goal for the home side. In their last five matches, both teams recorded games with Over 2.5 goals in 60% of cases, while their average xG stood at 1.57 and 1.48, respectively. During this period, TPS scored an average of 1.6 goals, although its season-long away scoring rate is lower, at just 0.67 goals per match. The Over 1.5 goals line has an edge, as VPS scored at least two goals in 80% of its matches this season, while the combination of current attacking data points to a forecast of 2.65 goals. At the same time, only 20% of VPS matches and 22% of TPS matches went Over 3.5 goals, so a high-scoring game is not the baseline scenario.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

VPS have won 70% of their matches and average 2.2 points per game, while TPS have failed to win any away match, averaging just 0.44 points. The hosts led at the break in 4 of 10 matches, whereas TPS have never been ahead at half-time and were trailing after the first half in 56% of their games. VPS’s advantage is also evident in their finishing: they score an average of 1.80 goals with a 16% shot-conversion rate, while TPS score only 0.67 goals per match and convert 5% of their attempts. However, the visitors’ recent form has improved, as they have averaged 1.6 goals across their last five matches, so a turnaround or an upset cannot be completely ruled out. The strongest signal still points to VPS leading at the break and holding on to win at full-time.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 2
First half
1 : 1
Second half

Game stats

55Possession (%)45
VPSTPS
14Shots11
VPSTPS
4Shots on target4
VPSTPS
1.56xG1.3
VPSTPS
7Corners4
VPSTPS
55Dangerous attacks44
VPSTPS
14Fouls12
VPSTPS
4Cards2
VPSTPS

Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

1.42Goals scored / game1.26
VPSTPS
0.95Goals allowed / game1.11
VPSTPS
48%Average possession47%
VPSTPS
4.95Shots on target / game4.37
VPSTPS

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

12.26Shots per game11.89
VPSTPS
4.95Shots on target4.37
VPSTPS
11.6%Shot conversion10.6%
VPSTPS
48%Possession47%
VPSTPS
1.5xG for1.46
VPSTPS
1.33xG against1.6
VPSTPS

Shooting quality

VPS: BalancedTPS: Balanced
VPSTPS
Accuracy (shots on target)40%37%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.290.29

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

TPS is 17% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / game - VPS · 1.4 pts / game - TPS

VPS
WLLLW
Season result split
42% W32% D26% L
Season (W-D-L)
8-6-5
1.58 pts / game · goal difference +9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-3-1
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
DWWWL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.57Opponent xG: 1.40BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
TPS
WLLWD
Season result split
37% W26% D37% L
Season (W-D-L)
7-5-7
1.37 pts / game · goal difference +3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
0-4-5
Last 5 away
0-2-3
LDLLD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.48Opponent xG: 1.68BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

VPS is 13% better for: goals scored per game.

1.42 goals / game - VPS · 1.26 goals / game - TPS

VPS is 17% better for: goals allowed per game.

0.95 goals / game - VPS · 1.11 goals / game - TPS

VPS scoring profile: strong

VPS scores in 74% of games (14 of 19 games), while TPS keeps a clean sheet in 32% (6 of 19 games).

TPS scoring profile: very strong

TPS scores in 79% of games (15 of 19 games), while VPS keeps a clean sheet in 26% (5 of 19 games).

27Goals scored (season)24
VPSTPS
18Goals conceded (season)21
VPSTPS
2.37Average goals per game2.37
VPSTPS
6Goals scored (last 5)8
VPSTPS
7Goals conceded (last 5)5
VPSTPS

How often they score at least...

74%1 goal79%
VPSTPS
32%2 goals32%
VPSTPS
21%3 goals16%
VPSTPS
11%4 goals0%
VPSTPS

How often they concede at least...

74%1 goal68%
VPSTPS
16%2 goals32%
VPSTPS
5%3 goals11%
VPSTPS
0%4 goals0%
VPSTPS

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

21%BTTS at half-time21%
VPSTPS
0%BTTS in both halves5%
VPSTPS
16%Scored in both halves26%
VPSTPS

BTTS and goal count

37%Min. 3 goals and BTTS37%
VPSTPS
5%Min. 3 goals without BTTS11%
VPSTPS
60%BTTS - last 540%
VPSTPS

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

74%Min. 1 goal before half-time68%
VPSTPS
37%Min. 2 goals before half-time32%
VPSTPS
21%Min. 3 goals before half-time21%
VPSTPS

2nd half

68%Min. 1 goal after half-time79%
VPSTPS
32%Min. 2 goals after half-time32%
VPSTPS
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time5%
VPSTPS

Game halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

VPS is 47% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.47 pts / game - VPS · 1 pts / game - TPS

VPS - half-time state
37% leading37% draw26% trailing
TPS - half-time state
21% leading37% draw42% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.47Points per game (1st half)1
VPSTPS
0.79Goals scored (1st half)0.58
VPSTPS
0.58Goals conceded (1st half)0.63
VPSTPS
1.37Average goals (1st half)1.21
VPSTPS
53%Clean sheet before half-time53%
VPSTPS
53%No goal before half-time58%
VPSTPS

After half-time (2nd half)

1.47Points per game (2nd half)1.53
VPSTPS
0.63Goals scored (2nd half)0.68
VPSTPS
0.37Goals conceded (2nd half)0.47
VPSTPS
1Average goals (2nd half)1.16
VPSTPS
68%Clean sheet after half-time58%
VPSTPS
58%No goal after half-time37%
VPSTPS

VPS - second-half results

37% W37% D26% L
28
Half-time points
15
Half-time goals
+4
Goal difference (1st half)
28
Second-half points
+5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.47
PPG before half-time
Lead holding114%

Leads at halftime in 37% of games and wins 42%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.2

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

TPS - second-half results

37% W42% D21% L
19
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
29
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding176%

Leads at halftime in 21% of games and wins 37%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.2

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

VPS - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.802.20
Goals scored / game0.40.8
Goals allowed / game1.20.2
Average goals per game1.61.0
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals40%0%
Clean sheet20%80%
No goal80%20%
Goal difference-4+3
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
TPS - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.201.60
Goals scored / game1.20.4
Goals allowed / game0.80.2
Average goals per game2.00.6
1 goal100%60%
2 goals60%0%
3 goals40%0%
Clean sheet40%80%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+2+1
Half-time: 40% leading - 0% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 6

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

VPS
ScoredConceded
5
3
0-15
3
4
16-30
7
4
31-45
3
1
46-60
6
5
61-75
3
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (7 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

TPS
ScoredConceded
2
0
0-15
4
5
16-30
5
7
31-45
6
2
46-60
0
5
61-75
7
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.37
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.3 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
92%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
56%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-58%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
58%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
5%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 20 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

VPS

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.17
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.30
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-9.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.08
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.38
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
95%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
87%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.38
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
11% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 19% come in the first quarter-hour.
11%

TPS

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.14
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.29
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.20
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.49
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
116%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
74%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.03
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
29% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
29%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Veikkausliiga).

Teams vs league

VPSLigaTPS
Average goals per game▼ 2.372.58▼ 2.37
Both teams scored▲ 58%49%▲ 53%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 42%46%• 47%
Clean sheets▼ 26%29%▲ 32%
Goal before half-time▼ 74%76%▼ 68%
Goal after half-time▼ 68%75%▲ 79%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.58
Average goals per game
49%
Both teams scored
46%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
29%
Clean sheets
1.49
Home goals / game
1.09
Away goals / game
+37%
Home attack advantage
+27%
Home defensive advantage
+24%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
34%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
36%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
4%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. VPSSubstitutionOn: Henri SalomaaOff: Jonathan Muzinga
  2. VPSYellow cardOluwaseyi Ogunniyi
  3. TPSYellow cardPau Juvanteny Costa
  4. TPSSubstitutionOn: Miika KauppilaOff: Nikolas Talo
  5. VPSYellow cardXavier Odhiambo
  6. VPSSubstitutionOn: Yassin DaoussiOff: Simon Lindholm

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from VPS's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against TPS. Games average 1.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.

FAQ

What was the result of VPS vs TPS?

The Veikkausliiga match finished VPS 1:3 TPS. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before VPS vs TPS?

VPS score 1.42 goals per game on average and TPS 1.26. The Veikkausliiga average is 2.58 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 46% of games. Both teams score in 58% of VPS's matches and 53% of TPS's.

What form are VPS and TPS in?

Over the last 5 games VPS have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and TPS 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for VPS vs TPS?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for VPS vs TPS: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.