Wattens vs Grazer AK: match statistics
Wattens display significantly superior home form with a 45% win rate and a positive goal difference (+4) at their own stadium, while Grazer AK have a catastrophic away record with just 9% wins and a -13 goal difference. The hosts have averaged 2.0 points per game over their last 5 matches, winning 3 games, which contrasts with the visitors' unstable form (1.4 PPG). Offensive efficiency is also key – Wattens score an average of 1.64 goals at home, whereas Grazer AK net only 0.64 goals away and fail to score in as many as 55% of their away matches. The xG statistics also favor the hosts (1.45 vs 0.93), and their advantage in shots on target (4.45 vs 3.0) confirms greater offensive quality. Considering all indicators, especially Wattens' home dominance and Grazer AK's dire away results, the hosts are the clear favorites.
Wattens vs Grazer AK: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Wattens played against Grazer AK in Bundesliga (Austria). The game was played on March 21, 2026. Final score: 1:5.
Recent form
Wattens has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.00 points per game. Grazer AK has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses, with 1.40 points per game.
Scoring records
Wattens scores 1.39 goals per game and allows 1.39. Grazer AK scores 1.04 and allows 1.57. Games in this league average 2.64 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 65% of Wattens's games and 61% of Grazer AK's. The Over 2.5 rates are 48% and 57%, compared with league averages of 55% for BTTS and 50% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Wattens has the higher season xG average, 1.31 to 1.06 per game. Wattens takes 12.1 shots per game, while Grazer AK takes 9.5.
First-half and second-half trends
Wattens leads at halftime in 30% of its games and scores 0.74 goals per game after halftime. Grazer AK leads at halftime in 13% and scores 0.57 after halftime.
When the teams score
Wattens's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (7 goals). For Grazer AK, it is minutes 16-30 (7 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Bundesliga games average 2.64 goals. Both teams score in 55% of games, and 50% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 1 home win, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Wattens display significantly superior home form with a 45% win rate and a positive goal difference (+4) at their own stadium, while Grazer AK have a catastrophic away record with just 9% wins and a -13 goal difference. The hosts have averaged 2.0 points per game over their last 5 matches, winning 3 games, which contrasts with the visitors' unstable form (1.4 PPG). Offensive efficiency is also key – Wattens score an average of 1.64 goals at home, whereas Grazer AK net only 0.64 goals away and fail to score in as many as 55% of their away matches. The xG statistics also favor the hosts (1.45 vs 0.93), and their advantage in shots on target (4.45 vs 3.0) confirms greater offensive quality. Considering all indicators, especially Wattens' home dominance and Grazer AK's dire away results, the hosts are the clear favorites.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Wattens | Grazer AK | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 31% | 32% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.37 | 0.34 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Wattens is 43% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / game - Wattens · 1.4 pts / game - Grazer AK
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Wattens is 34% better for: goals scored per game.
1.39 goals / game - Wattens · 1.04 goals / game - Grazer AK
Wattens is 13% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.39 goals / game - Wattens · 1.57 goals / game - Grazer AK
Wattens scores in 78% of games (18 of 23 meczów), while Grazer AK keeps a clean sheet in 13% (3 of 23 meczów).
Grazer AK scores in 65% of games (15 of 23 meczów), while Wattens keeps a clean sheet in 22% (5 of 23 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Wattens
Over / Under - Grazer AK
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Wattens is 34% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.17 pts / game - Wattens · 0.87 pts / game - Grazer AK
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Wattens - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 30% of games and wins 35%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Grazer AK - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 13% of games and wins 22%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.6 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.60 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (7 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Wattens
Grazer AK
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Bundesliga).
Teams vs league
| Wattens | Liga | Grazer AK | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 2.78 | 2.64 | • 2.61 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 65% | 55% | ▲ 61% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 48% | 50% | ▲ 57% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 22% | 25% | ▼ 13% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 83% | 74% | ▲ 78% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 78% | 75% | • 74% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Record from Wattens's perspective: 1 win, 1 draw and 0 losses against Grazer AK. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 50% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Wattens vs Grazer AK?
The Bundesliga match finished Wattens 1:5 Grazer AK. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Wattens and Grazer AK?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Wattens won 1, Grazer AK won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Wattens vs Grazer AK?
Wattens score 1.39 goals per game on average and Grazer AK 1.04. The Bundesliga average is 2.64 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 50% of games. Both teams score in 65% of Wattens's matches and 61% of Grazer AK's.
What form are Wattens and Grazer AK in?
Over the last 5 games Wattens have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Grazer AK 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Wattens vs Grazer AK?
The statistical background for Wattens vs Grazer AK — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.