Poland - 3 Liga Group 1Data current as of September 07, 2026

Wikielec vs Lomza: match statistics

Wikielec crest
Wikielec
1 : 2half-time 0:0
Lomza crest
Lomza

Wikielec vs Lomza: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Wikielec played against Lomza in 3 Liga Group 1 (Poland). The game was played on April 25, 2026. Final score: 1:2.

Recent form

Wikielec has 1 win, 0 draws and 4 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.60 points per game. Lomza has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses, with 1.40 points per game.

Scoring records

Wikielec scores 1.11 goals per game and allows 1.59. Lomza scores 2.19 and allows 0.96. Games in this league average 3.38 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 70% of Wikielec's games and 48% of Lomza's. The Over 2.5 rates are 56% and 56%, compared with league averages of 63% for BTTS and 67% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Lomza has the higher season xG average, 1.74 to 1.57 per game. Wikielec takes 10.2 shots per game, while Lomza takes 10.4.

First-half and second-half trends

Wikielec leads at halftime in 22% of its games and scores 0.70 goals per game after halftime. Lomza leads at halftime in 33% and scores 1.41 after halftime.

When the teams score

Wikielec's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (12 goals). For Lomza, it is minutes 76-90+ (17 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

3 Liga Group 1 games average 3.38 goals. Both teams score in 63% of games, and 67% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 5.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Lomza is the clear favorite: they sit 3rd in the table with a 16-5-6 record, while Wikielec are 15th at 8-5-14. Offensively the visitors have scored 59 goals this season (1.85 goals per away match) versus Wikielec’s 30 goals (0.92 in home matches); their average xG is 1.70 against the hosts’ 1.36, indicating better chance quality. Lomza’s efficiency is higher: 5.55 shots on target per match and a conversion rate of 13% compared to 3.8 and 8% for Wikielec; additionally the visitors concede 0.92 goals per away game on average, while the hosts concede 1.54 at home. In the last 5 matches Lomza averaged 1.4 points (2 wins, 1 draw, 2 losses), while Wikielec averaged only 0.6 points (1 win, 4 losses), and Lomza have 38% of away games with a clean sheet versus 0% for the hosts. Considering the advantage in wins (16 vs 8), goals (59 vs 30), superior xG (1.70 vs 1.36) and form, I predict an away win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

I back BTTS - Yes at 65% vs 35% because Wikielec has a seasonal BTTS of 57% and BTTS in the last 5 matches at 100%, conceding an average of 2.2 goals in those 5 games, indicating significant home vulnerability. Lomża has a seasonal BTTS of 38% and only 20% BTTS in the last 5, but averaged 1.4 goals in that period and posts a season xG_for of 1.70, so the visitors have genuine scoring potential. Both teams have similar xG values: 1.78 for Wikielec vs 1.70 for Lomża, and shots on target 6.4 vs 5.55 confirm both create chances. Additionally, the league shows a high BTTS of 64% and an average of 3.4 goals per match, which supports a Goal/Goal outcome, although Lomża has conceded only 26 goals this season versus Wikielec’s 43, so I apply a conservative 65/35 weighting.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Based on xG and opponent metrics, I expect about 1.59 goals for Wikielec (xG 1.78 vs opponent conceded xG 1.40) and 1.41 goals for Łomża (xG 1.70 vs opponent conceded xG 1.13), totaling 3.00 goals. A Poisson model with λ=3.00 yields probabilities: Over 1.5 ≈80.1%, Over 2.5 ≈57.7% and Over 3.5 ≈35.3%. Season indicators confirm a high-goal profile: Wikielec has 100% of matches with over 1.5 goals, Łomża 77%, and the league averages 3.4 goals per match with 68% of games over 2.5. Home side averages 2.5 goals with 17% shot conversion, visitors 1.85 goals with 13% conversion, which strengthens the over signal. Therefore I recommend Over 1.5 as the strongest line (highest statistical support), with moderate backing for Over 2.5 and low support for Over 3.5.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The most likely scenario is 1/1 (Wikielec leading at the break and winning the match). Wikielec led at half-time in 7 matches this season (50%), while Łomża did so in only 2 (15%), and the home side score an average of 1.0 goals by half-time versus 0.54 for the visitors. Over the full match Wikielec average 2.5 goals and have a 64% win rate (an average of 2.14 points per home game), whereas Łomża record 1.85 goals and a 54% win rate; the home advantage is supported by xG of 1.78 versus 1.7 and a higher number of shots on target (6.4 vs 5.55) and conversion rate 17% vs 13%. Additionally, the hosts are strong in second halves: they average 1.86 goals in the second half and have a 71% win rate in that period, which increases the likelihood that a lead at the break will be maintained to full-time.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 0
First half
0 : 0
Second half

Game stats

-1Possession (%)-1
WikielecLomza
-1Shots-1
WikielecLomza
-1Shots on target-1
WikielecLomza
0xG0
WikielecLomza
-1Corners-1
WikielecLomza
0Dangerous attacks0
WikielecLomza
-1Fouls-1
WikielecLomza
-1Cards-1
WikielecLomza

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

1.11Goals scored / game2.19
WikielecLomza
1.59Goals allowed / game0.96
WikielecLomza
36%Average possession43%
WikielecLomza
3.7Shots on target / game4.41
WikielecLomza

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

10.15Shots per game10.41
WikielecLomza
3.7Shots on target4.41
WikielecLomza
10.9%Shot conversion21%
WikielecLomza
36%Possession43%
WikielecLomza
1.57xG for1.74
WikielecLomza
1.46xG against1.27
WikielecLomza

Shooting quality

Wikielec: BalancedLomza: Counter-attacking
WikielecLomza
Accuracy (shots on target)36%42%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.150.17
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.300.50

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Lomza is 133% better for: last-5 form.

0.6 pts / game - Wikielec · 1.4 pts / game - Lomza

Wikielec
LLWLL
Season result split
30% W19% R52% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-5-14
1.07 pts / game · goal difference -13
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-4
0.60 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-3-8
Last 5 at home
2-0-3
LWLWL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 1.37Opponent xG: 1.75BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 100%
Lomza
LWWLD
Season result split
59% W19% R22% P
Season (W-D-L)
16-5-6
1.96 pts / game · goal difference +33
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
7-2-4
Last 5 away
3-0-2
WWLWL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.32Opponent xG: 1.28BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Lomza is 97% better for: goals scored per game.

1.11 goals / game - Wikielec · 2.19 goals / game - Lomza

Lomza is 66% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.59 goals / game - Wikielec · 0.96 goals / game - Lomza

Wikielec scoring profile: strong

Wikielec scores in 78% of games (21 of 27 meczów), while Lomza keeps a clean sheet in 41% (11 of 27 meczów).

Lomza scoring profile: very strong

Lomza scores in 85% of games (23 of 27 meczów), while Wikielec keeps a clean sheet in 11% (3 of 27 meczów).

30Goals scored (season)59
WikielecLomza
43Goals conceded (season)26
WikielecLomza
2.7Average goals per game3.15
WikielecLomza
6Goals scored (last 5)7
WikielecLomza
11Goals conceded (last 5)4
WikielecLomza

How often they score at least...

78%1 goal85%
WikielecLomza
30%2 goals59%
WikielecLomza
4%3 goals37%
WikielecLomza
0%4 goals22%
WikielecLomza

How often they concede at least...

89%1 goal59%
WikielecLomza
44%2 goals26%
WikielecLomza
19%3 goals7%
WikielecLomza
7%4 goals4%
WikielecLomza

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

7%BTTS at half-time15%
WikielecLomza
4%BTTS in both halves0%
WikielecLomza
11%Scored in both halves41%
WikielecLomza

BTTS and goal count

56%Min. 3 goals and BTTS33%
WikielecLomza
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS22%
WikielecLomza
100%BTTS - last 520%
WikielecLomza

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

67%Min. 1 goal before half-time63%
WikielecLomza
30%Min. 2 goals before half-time41%
WikielecLomza
4%Min. 3 goals before half-time11%
WikielecLomza

2nd half

96%Min. 1 goal after half-time89%
WikielecLomza
56%Min. 2 goals after half-time63%
WikielecLomza
15%Min. 3 goals after half-time26%
WikielecLomza

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Lomza is 38% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.04 pts / game - Wikielec · 1.44 pts / game - Lomza

Wikielec - half-time state
22% leading37% draw41% trailing
Lomza - half-time state
33% leading44% draw22% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.04Points per game (1st half)1.44
WikielecLomza
0.41Goals scored (1st half)0.78
WikielecLomza
0.59Goals conceded (1st half)0.52
WikielecLomza
1Average goals (1st half)1.3
WikielecLomza
56%Clean sheet before half-time70%
WikielecLomza
70%No goal before half-time52%
WikielecLomza

After half-time (2nd half)

0.93Points per game (2nd half)2.07
WikielecLomza
0.7Goals scored (2nd half)1.41
WikielecLomza
1Goals conceded (2nd half)0.44
WikielecLomza
1.7Average goals (2nd half)1.85
WikielecLomza
26%Clean sheet after half-time59%
WikielecLomza
41%No goal after half-time22%
WikielecLomza

Wikielec - second-half results

22% W26% R52% P
28
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
-5
Goal difference (1st half)
25
Second-half points
-8
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.04
PPG before half-time
Lead holding136%

Leads at halftime in 22% of games and wins 30%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.4

Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Lomza - second-half results

59% W30% R11% P
39
Half-time points
21
Half-time goals
+7
Goal difference (1st half)
56
Second-half points
+26
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.44
PPG before half-time
Lead holding179%

Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 59%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.1

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Wikielec - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.800.80
Goals scored / game0.60.6
Goals allowed / game1.21.0
Average goals per game1.81.6
1 goal100%100%
2 goals80%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet20%20%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-3-2
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
Lomza - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.201.60
Goals scored / game0.21.2
Goals allowed / game0.20.6
Average goals per game0.41.8
1 goal40%80%
2 goals0%80%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference0+3
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Wikielec
ScoredConceded
4
5
0-15
4
7
16-30
3
4
31-45
2
7
46-60
5
7
61-75
12
13
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Lomza
ScoredConceded
3
4
0-15
7
4
16-30
11
6
31-45
10
5
46-60
11
5
61-75
17
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (17 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +15 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.93
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.0 : 1.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
87%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
59%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+71%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
66%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
3%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 33 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Wikielec

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.11
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.59
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.46
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.13
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
58%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
107%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.47
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
40% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
40%

Lomza

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.47
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.76
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-14.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.45
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.31
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
148%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
51%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.56
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.6
Late goals
29% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 5% come in the first quarter-hour.
29%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (3 Liga Group 1).

Teams vs league

WikielecLigaLomza
Average goals per game 2.703.38 3.15
Both teams scored 70%63% 48%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 56%67% 56%
Clean sheets 11%20% 41%
Goal before half-time 67%76% 63%
Goal after half-time 96%86% 89%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.38
Average goals per game
63%
Both teams scored
67%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
20%
Clean sheets
1.90
Home goals / game
1.48
Away goals / game
+28%
Home attack advantage
+22%
Home defensive advantage
+9%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
46%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
86%
1 goal
56%
2 goals
32%
3 goals
12%
4 goals

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Wikielec's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Lomza. Games average 5.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.

Lomza
4 : 1
Wikielec

FAQ

What was the result of Wikielec vs Lomza?

The 3 Liga Group 1 match finished Wikielec 1:2 Lomza. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Wikielec vs Lomza?

Wikielec score 1.11 goals per game on average and Lomza 2.19. The 3 Liga Group 1 average is 3.38 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 67% of games. Both teams score in 70% of Wikielec's matches and 48% of Lomza's.

What form are Wikielec and Lomza in?

Over the last 5 games Wikielec have a 1-0-4 record (0.60 points per game) and Lomza 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Wikielec vs Lomza?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.