Switzerland - Challenge LeagueData current as of October 28, 2026

Wil vs Winterthur: match statistics

Reasoning:

Full analysis and pick in the app

Check the betting analysis, pick, value bet and full reasoning for this match.

Check analysis and pick

Wil vs Winterthur: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Wil plays Winterthur in Challenge League (Switzerland). The game is scheduled for November 1, 2026.

Recent form

Wil has 1 win, 3 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.20 points per game. Winterthur has 4 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss, with 2.40 points per game.

Scoring records

Wil scores 1.64 goals per game and allows 2.18. Winterthur scores 2.09 and allows 1.00. Games in this league average 3.04 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 64% of Wil's games and 36% of Winterthur's. The Over 2.5 rates are 64% and 64%, compared with league averages of 55% for BTTS and 62% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Winterthur has the higher season xG average, 1.88 to 1.62 per game. Wil takes 16.3 shots per game, while Winterthur takes 17.4.

First-half and second-half trends

Wil leads at halftime in 18% of its games and scores 1.00 goals per game after halftime. Winterthur leads at halftime in 45% and scores 0.91 after halftime.

When the teams score

Wil's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (4 goals). For Winterthur, it is minutes 0-15 (5 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Challenge League games average 3.04 goals. Both teams score in 55% of games, and 62% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 5.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

Before kickoff

1X2 odds

(3.83)
(3.87)
(1.78)

Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

1.64Goals scored / game2.09
WilWinterthur
2.18Goals allowed / game1
WilWinterthur
48%Average possession55%
WilWinterthur
4.36Shots on target / game5.73
WilWinterthur

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

16.27Shots per game17.36
WilWinterthur
4.36Shots on target5.73
WilWinterthur
10.1%Shot conversion12%
WilWinterthur
48%Possession55%
WilWinterthur
1.62xG for1.88
WilWinterthur
1.67xG against1.39
WilWinterthur

Shooting quality

Wil: AttackingWinterthur: Dominant
WilWinterthur
Accuracy (shots on target)27%33%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.100.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.380.36

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Winterthur is 100% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / game - Wil · 2.4 pts / game - Winterthur

Wil
DLWDD
Season result split
18% W45% D36% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-5-4
1.00 pts / game · goal difference -6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-2-2
Last 5 at home
1-2-2
LLDWD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.79Opponent xG: 1.54BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Winterthur
WWWLW
Season result split
55% W27% D18% L
Season (W-D-L)
6-3-2
1.91 pts / game · goal difference +12
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-0-1
2.40 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
2-1-2
Last 5 away
2-1-2
LWDWL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.99Opponent xG: 1.20BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 80%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Winterthur is 27% better for: goals scored per game.

1.64 goals / game - Wil · 2.09 goals / game - Winterthur

Winterthur is 118% better for: goals allowed per game.

2.18 goals / game - Wil · 1 goals / game - Winterthur

Wil scoring profile: strong

Wil scores in 73% of games (8 of 11 games), while Winterthur keeps a clean sheet in 45% (5 of 11 games).

Winterthur scoring profile: very strong

Winterthur scores in 82% of games (9 of 11 games), while Wil keeps a clean sheet in 9% (1 of 11 games).

18Goals scored (season)23
WilWinterthur
24Goals conceded (season)11
WilWinterthur
3.82Average goals per game3.09
WilWinterthur
9Goals scored (last 5)11
WilWinterthur
8Goals conceded (last 5)4
WilWinterthur

How often they score at least...

73%1 goal82%
WilWinterthur
36%2 goals64%
WilWinterthur
18%3 goals27%
WilWinterthur
18%4 goals27%
WilWinterthur

How often they concede at least...

91%1 goal55%
WilWinterthur
64%2 goals36%
WilWinterthur
27%3 goals9%
WilWinterthur
27%4 goals0%
WilWinterthur

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

36%BTTS at half-time18%
WilWinterthur
18%BTTS in both halves0%
WilWinterthur
27%Scored in both halves45%
WilWinterthur

BTTS and goal count

36%Min. 3 goals and BTTS27%
WilWinterthur
27%Min. 3 goals without BTTS36%
WilWinterthur
60%BTTS - last 520%
WilWinterthur

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

91%Min. 1 goal before half-time82%
WilWinterthur
64%Min. 2 goals before half-time45%
WilWinterthur
18%Min. 3 goals before half-time36%
WilWinterthur

2nd half

91%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
WilWinterthur
64%Min. 2 goals after half-time27%
WilWinterthur
18%Min. 3 goals after half-time9%
WilWinterthur

Game halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Winterthur is 80% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.91 pts / game - Wil · 1.64 pts / game - Winterthur

Wil - half-time state
18% leading36% draw45% trailing
Winterthur - half-time state
45% leading27% draw27% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.91Points per game (1st half)1.64
WilWinterthur
0.64Goals scored (1st half)1.18
WilWinterthur
1.27Goals conceded (1st half)0.45
WilWinterthur
1.91Average goals (1st half)1.64
WilWinterthur
18%Clean sheet before half-time55%
WilWinterthur
55%No goal before half-time45%
WilWinterthur

After half-time (2nd half)

1.18Points per game (2nd half)2
WilWinterthur
1Goals scored (2nd half)0.91
WilWinterthur
0.91Goals conceded (2nd half)0.55
WilWinterthur
1.91Average goals (2nd half)1.45
WilWinterthur
36%Clean sheet after half-time64%
WilWinterthur
45%No goal after half-time27%
WilWinterthur

Wil - second-half results

27% W36% D36% L
10
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
-7
Goal difference (1st half)
13
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.91
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 18% of games and wins 18%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.4

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Winterthur - second-half results

64% W9% D27% L
18
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
+8
Goal difference (1st half)
22
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.64
PPG before half-time
Lead holding122%

Leads at halftime in 45% of games and wins 55%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.1

Allows 0.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Wil - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.001.60
Goals scored / game0.41.4
Goals allowed / game0.80.8
Average goals per game1.22.2
1 goal80%100%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference-2+3
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
Winterthur - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.602.40
Goals scored / game1.40.8
Goals allowed / game0.40.4
Average goals per game1.81.2
1 goal80%100%
2 goals60%20%
3 goals40%0%
Clean sheet60%80%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference+5+2
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 0% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 7

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Wil
ScoredConceded
3
8
0-15
3
3
16-30
1
3
31-45
4
2
46-60
3
2
61-75
4
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (4 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

Winterthur
ScoredConceded
5
1
0-15
4
2
16-30
4
2
31-45
3
2
46-60
3
3
61-75
4
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (5 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

3.45
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.3 : 2.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
114%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+45%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
60%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
5%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 20 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Wil

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.05
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.49
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.02
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.51
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
90%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
179%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.20
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
22% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
22%

Winterthur

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.49
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.60
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.21
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.39
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
171%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
55%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.49
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 22% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Challenge League).

Teams vs league

WilLigaWinterthur
Average goals per game▲ 3.823.04• 3.09
Both teams scored▲ 64%55%▼ 36%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 64%62%▲ 64%
Clean sheets▼ 9%25%▲ 45%
Goal before half-time▲ 91%78%▲ 82%
Goal after half-time▲ 91%87%▲ 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.04
Average goals per game
55%
Both teams scored
62%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
25%
Clean sheets
1.82
Home goals / game
1.22
Away goals / game
+49%
Home attack advantage
+33%
Home defensive advantage
+15%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
42%
2 goals
16%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
87%
1 goal
47%
2 goals
16%
3 goals
9%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Record from Wil's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Winterthur. Games average 5.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.

FAQ

When do Wil and Winterthur play?

Wil face Winterthur on November 1, 2026 in Challenge League. The exact kick-off time in your timezone is shown at the top of the match page.

What do the goal statistics show before Wil vs Winterthur?

Wil score 1.64 goals per game on average and Winterthur 2.09. The Challenge League average is 3.04 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 62% of games. Both teams score in 64% of Wil's matches and 36% of Winterthur's.

What form are Wil and Winterthur in?

Over the last 5 games Wil have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and Winterthur 4-0-1 (2.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Wil vs Winterthur?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.