Austria - BundesligaData current as of September 12, 2026

Wolfsberger AC vs Grazer AK: match statistics

Wolfsberger AC crest
Wolfsberger AC
1 : 0half-time 0:0
Grazer AK crest
Grazer AK

Wolfsberger AC vs Grazer AK: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Wolfsberger AC played against Grazer AK in Bundesliga (Austria). The game was played on April 25, 2026. Final score: 1:0.

Recent form

Wolfsberger AC has 0 wins, 3 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.60 points per game. Grazer AK has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses, with 1.40 points per game.

Scoring records

Wolfsberger AC scores 1.18 goals per game and allows 1.46. Grazer AK scores 1.18 and allows 1.50. Games in this league average 2.69 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 61% of Wolfsberger AC's games and 64% of Grazer AK's. The Over 2.5 rates are 61% and 57%, compared with league averages of 57% for BTTS and 51% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Wolfsberger AC has the higher season xG average, 1.27 to 1.08 per game. Wolfsberger AC takes 11.3 shots per game, while Grazer AK takes 9.7.

First-half and second-half trends

Wolfsberger AC leads at halftime in 32% of its games and scores 0.39 goals per game after halftime. Grazer AK leads at halftime in 18% and scores 0.68 after halftime.

When the teams score

Wolfsberger AC's most productive scoring window is minutes 0-15 (8 goals). For Grazer AK, it is minutes 16-30 (8 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Bundesliga games average 2.69 goals. Both teams score in 57% of games, and 51% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 3 previous meetings were available. The record was 1 home win, 1 draw and 1 away win. Those games averaged 3.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Wolfsberger AC holds a clear home advantage in underlying metrics: at home they average 1.21 goals per game with xG 1.28, 11.64 shots and 52% possession, while Grazer AK on the road records 0.93 goals per game, xG 1.00 and only 8.14 shots. Defensively the hosts also perform better — Wolfsberger concedes 1.07 goals on their own ground and has a 36% clean sheet rate, whereas Grazer concedes 1.71 away and has just a 7% clean sheet rate. Nevertheless, recent form favors the visitors: Grazer scored 9 goals in their last 5 matches (1.8 per game) and averages 1.4 points per game, while Wolfsberger in their last 5 have 0 wins, 3 draws, 2 losses with only 2 goals and 0.6 points per game. Grazer have a slightly higher average on-target shots (3.5 vs 3.29) and an 11% conversion versus the hosts’ 10%, giving them counter-attacking opportunities, but a high away loss rate (64%) and 50% of away matches without scoring weaken their prospects. Considering the hosts’ xG advantage (1.28 vs 1.00), better home defense (1.07 vs 1.71) and greater shot volume, I assess Wolfsberger as more likely to win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Seasonal indicators favor the "both teams to score" outcome: Wolfsberger has a seasonal BTTS of 79%, Grazer AK 50%, giving an average of ~65% which exceeds the league BTTS level of 56%. However, the last 5 matches show a contrast — Wolfsberger has only 40% BTTS and scores on average 0.4 goals, while Grazer AK has 80% BTTS and scores 1.8 goals per game, so the visitors are in better scoring form. From a chance-creation perspective seasonal xG are 1.17 (Wolfsberger) and 1.00 (Grazer AK); combined xG 2.17 is below the league average 2.69, suggesting a moderate number of goals. Although Grazer AK failed to score in 50% of season matches and the home side have only 2 goals in the last 5, the low clean sheet percentages 14% (Wolfsberger) and 7% (Grazer AK) and an even seasonal goals tally 33–33 support the probability that both teams will score. Considering the strong seasonal BTTS signal from the hosts (79%), the visitors’ good scoring form (1.8 in the last 5) and weak clean sheets, I tip BTTS "Yes" as the more likely outcome.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The strongest signal comes from the 1.5 line: Wolfsberger have 93% of their matches this season with over 1.5 goals, and Grazer 71%, so I rate Over 1.5 at a high 85%. xG analysis shows 1.17 xG for Wolfsberger and 1.00 xG for Grazer, while their opponents concede on average 1.41 (Grazer) and 1.37 (Wolfsberger) xG, which yields a projection of about 1.29 goals for the home side and 1.19 for the away side, i.e. a total of 2.48 expected goals. Both teams historically have Over 2.5 in 57% of their matches (seasonal), versus a league average of 51%, so Over 2.5 has a slight edge — therefore I assign it a 56% probability. Over 3.5 looks unlikely: Wolfsberger have 29% of such games, Grazer 21%, so I assess Over 3.5 at around 25% and prefer Under 3.5. Additional support for Over 1.5 comes from penalty-area activity: Wolfsberger average 11.29 shots with 3.0 on target and a 13% conversion, Grazer 8.14 shots with 3.5 on target and an 11% conversion, which increases the chance of at least two goals.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

A draw at half-time appears most likely: Wolfsberger were level at the break in 43% of home games, while Grazer were level at half-time in 50% of their away matches. After the break the home side have the advantage — Wolfsberger average 1.5 points per home match and win 36% of home games, whereas Grazer collect only 0.64 points on average away and win 14% of away fixtures, which increases the likelihood of a home victory following a draw at the interval. Additionally, Wolfsberger score 1.43 goals per game on average with an xG of 1.17 versus Grazer’s 0.93 goals and xG 1.00, and before the break Wolfsberger average 0.71 goals compared to the visitors’ 0.29; home matches end with both teams scoring in 79% of cases, so I expect goal activity and a Wolfsberger advantage after half-time. On this basis the strongest signal is X/1 — a draw at half-time followed by a Wolfsberger win by full-time.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 0
First half
1 : 0
Second half

Game stats

44Possession (%)56
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
8Shots12
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
4Shots on target2
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
1.08xG1.18
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
5Corners8
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
42Dangerous attacks40
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
13Fouls10
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
0Cards2
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
1.18Goals scored / game1.18
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
1.46Goals allowed / game1.5
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
52%Average possession47%
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
3.54Shots on target / game3.25
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

11.25Shots per game9.71
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
3.54Shots on target3.25
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
10.5%Shot conversion12.1%
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
52%Possession47%
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
1.27xG for1.08
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
1.45xG against1.39
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK

Shooting quality

Wolfsberger AC: BalancedGrazer AK: Counter-attacking
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
Accuracy (shots on target)31%33%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.330.36

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Grazer AK is 133% better for: last-5 form.

0.6 pts / game - Wolfsberger AC · 1.4 pts / game - Grazer AK

Wolfsberger AC
DLDDL
No win in the last 5 games
Season result split
25% W29% D46% L
Season (W-D-L)
7-8-13
1.04 pts / game · goal difference -8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-3-2
0.60 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-6-4
Last 5 at home
0-5-0
DDDDD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.4Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.19Opponent xG: 1.43BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Grazer AK
WWLDL
Season result split
25% W32% D43% L
Season (W-D-L)
7-9-12
1.07 pts / game · goal difference -9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
2-3-9
Last 5 away
1-0-4
LLWLL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.19Opponent xG: 1.22BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Wolfsberger AC scoring profile: very strong

Wolfsberger AC scores in 71% of games (20 of 28 meczów), while Grazer AK keeps a clean sheet in 11% (3 of 28 meczów).

Grazer AK scoring profile: very strong

Grazer AK scores in 68% of games (19 of 28 meczów), while Wolfsberger AC keeps a clean sheet in 21% (6 of 28 meczów).

33Goals scored (season)33
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
41Goals conceded (season)42
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
2.64Average goals per game2.68
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
2Goals scored (last 5)9
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
7Goals conceded (last 5)6
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK

How often they score at least...

71%1 goal68%
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
32%2 goals32%
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
14%3 goals11%
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
0%4 goals4%
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK

How often they concede at least...

79%1 goal89%
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
54%2 goals39%
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
14%3 goals14%
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
0%4 goals4%
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

57%
League average

Goal patterns

25%BTTS at half-time29%
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
4%BTTS in both halves7%
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
18%Scored in both halves25%
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK

BTTS and goal count

54%Min. 3 goals and BTTS46%
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
7%Min. 3 goals without BTTS11%
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
40%BTTS - last 580%
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

75%Min. 1 goal before half-time75%
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
46%Min. 2 goals before half-time43%
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
7%Min. 3 goals before half-time7%
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK

2nd half

79%Min. 1 goal after half-time79%
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
46%Min. 2 goals after half-time46%
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
11%Min. 3 goals after half-time14%
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Wolfsberger AC is 43% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.43 pts / game - Wolfsberger AC · 1 pts / game - Grazer AK

Wolfsberger AC - half-time state
32% leading46% draw21% trailing
Grazer AK - half-time state
18% leading46% draw36% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.43Points per game (1st half)1
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
0.79Goals scored (1st half)0.5
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
0.5Goals conceded (1st half)0.75
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
1.29Average goals (1st half)1.25
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
54%Clean sheet before half-time39%
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
46%No goal before half-time57%
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK

After half-time (2nd half)

0.79Points per game (2nd half)1.29
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
0.39Goals scored (2nd half)0.68
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
0.96Goals conceded (2nd half)0.75
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
1.36Average goals (2nd half)1.43
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
36%Clean sheet after half-time43%
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
64%No goal after half-time50%
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK

Wolfsberger AC - second-half results

14% W36% D50% L
40
Half-time points
22
Half-time goals
+8
Goal difference (1st half)
22
Second-half points
-16
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.43
PPG before half-time
Lead holding78%

Leads at halftime in 32% of games and wins 25%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.

Defense after halftime+0.5

Allows 0.5 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Grazer AK - second-half results

29% W43% D29% L
28
Half-time points
14
Half-time goals
-7
Goal difference (1st half)
36
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding139%

Leads at halftime in 18% of games and wins 25%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime0.0

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Wolfsberger AC - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.200.60
Goals scored / game0.40.0
Goals allowed / game0.41.0
Average goals per game0.81.0
1 goal60%40%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal60%100%
Goal difference0-5
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
Grazer AK - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.601.60
Goals scored / game0.61.2
Goals allowed / game0.60.6
Average goals per game1.21.8
1 goal60%100%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference0+3
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Wolfsberger AC
ScoredConceded
8
3
0-15
7
6
16-30
7
5
31-45
3
3
46-60
2
11
61-75
6
13
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.

Grazer AK
ScoredConceded
2
4
0-15
8
7
16-30
4
10
31-45
6
3
46-60
5
7
61-75
8
11
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.66
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.3 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
99%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
63%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+25%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
48%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
9%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 11 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Wolfsberger AC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.18
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.10
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.09
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.01
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
83%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
116%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.44
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.4
Late goals
18% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 24% come in the first quarter-hour.
18%

Grazer AK

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.31
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.01
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.10
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.11
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
94%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
105%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.33
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 6% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Bundesliga).

Teams vs league

Wolfsberger ACLigaGrazer AK
Average goals per game 2.642.69 2.68
Both teams scored 61%57% 64%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 61%51% 57%
Clean sheets 21%25% 11%
Goal before half-time 75%74% 75%
Goal after half-time 79%75% 79%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.69
Average goals per game
57%
Both teams scored
51%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
25%
Clean sheets
1.43
Home goals / game
1.26
Away goals / game
+13%
Home attack advantage
+12%
Home defensive advantage
+10%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
40%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
43%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
4%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Grazer AKYellow cardBeres Owusu
  2. Grazer AKYellow cardAlexander Hofleitner
  3. Grazer AKSubstitutionOn: Tobias KochOff: Thorsten Schriebl
  4. Wolfsberger ACSubstitutionOn: Donis Xhemë AvdijajOff: Alessandro Schöpf
  5. Grazer AKSubstitutionOn: Dominik FrieserOff: Ramiz Harakaté
  6. Wolfsberger ACGoalMarkus PinkAssist: Fabian Wohlmuth
  7. Wolfsberger ACSubstitutionOn: Tobias GruberOff: Fabian Wohlmuth

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Alain SadikovskiMatches officiated: 8
5.25Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 263%Home wins25%Draws13%Away wins

Head-to-head

Record from Wolfsberger AC's perspective: 1 win, 1 draw and 1 loss against Grazer AK. Games average 3.33 goals, and both teams scored in 67% of them.

FAQ

What was the result of Wolfsberger AC vs Grazer AK?

The Bundesliga match finished Wolfsberger AC 1:0 Grazer AK. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Wolfsberger AC and Grazer AK?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches Wolfsberger AC won 1, Grazer AK won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 3.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Wolfsberger AC vs Grazer AK?

Wolfsberger AC score 1.18 goals per game on average and Grazer AK 1.18. The Bundesliga average is 2.69 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 51% of games. Both teams score in 61% of Wolfsberger AC's matches and 64% of Grazer AK's.

What form are Wolfsberger AC and Grazer AK in?

Over the last 5 games Wolfsberger AC have a 0-3-2 record (0.60 points per game) and Grazer AK 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Wolfsberger AC vs Grazer AK?

The statistical background for Wolfsberger AC vs Grazer AK — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.