Austria - BundesligaData current as of 23 July 2026

Wolfsberger AC vs Grazer AK: match statistics

Wolfsberger AC crest
Wolfsberger AC
1 : 0half-time 0:0
Grazer AK crest
Grazer AK

Wolfsberger AC vs Grazer AK: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Wolfsberger AC play Grazer AK in Bundesliga (Austria). The match date is 25 April 2026 at 17:00. Final score: 1:0.

Current form

Wolfsberger AC: 4-0-1, 2.40 points/match. Grazer AK: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Wolfsberger AC scores 1.27 and concedes 1.33 goals per match. Grazer AK scores 1.31 and concedes 1.41. League average: 2.70 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Wolfsberger AC 58%, Grazer AK 59%. Over 2.5: Wolfsberger AC 58%, Grazer AK 59%. League level: BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 51%.

xG, shots and style

Wolfsberger AC has higher xG: 1.25 vs 1.13. Wolfsberger AC: 11.0 shots per match, Grazer AK: 10.1.

Match halves

Wolfsberger AC: half-time lead 36%, second-half goals 0.48. Grazer AK: half-time lead 22%, second-half goals 0.78.

Goals by minute

Wolfsberger AC: 76-90+ (10 goals). Grazer AK: 76-90+ (11 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Bundesliga: 2.70 goals per match, BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 51%.

Head-to-head

3 H2H matches: 1-1-1. Average goals 3.33, BTTS 67%.

Match description

Wolfsberger AC holds a clear home advantage in underlying metrics: at home they average 1.21 goals per game with xG 1.28, 11.64 shots and 52% possession, while Grazer AK on the road records 0.93 goals per game, xG 1.00 and only 8.14 shots. Defensively the hosts also perform better — Wolfsberger concedes 1.07 goals on their own ground and has a 36% clean sheet rate, whereas Grazer concedes 1.71 away and has just a 7% clean sheet rate. Nevertheless, recent form favors the visitors: Grazer scored 9 goals in their last 5 matches (1.8 per game) and averages 1.4 points per game, while Wolfsberger in their last 5 have 0 wins, 3 draws, 2 losses with only 2 goals and 0.6 points per game. Grazer have a slightly higher average on-target shots (3.5 vs 3.29) and an 11% conversion versus the hosts’ 10%, giving them counter-attacking opportunities, but a high away loss rate (64%) and 50% of away matches without scoring weaken their prospects. Considering the hosts’ xG advantage (1.28 vs 1.00), better home defense (1.07 vs 1.71) and greater shot volume, I assess Wolfsberger as more likely to win.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

44Possession (%)56
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
8Shots12
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
4Shots on target2
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
1.08xG1.18
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
5Corners8
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
42Dangerous attacks40
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
13Fouls10
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
0Cards2
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
1.27Goals scored / match1.31
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
1.33Goals conceded / match1.41
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
51%Average possession48%
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
3.67Shots on target / match3.5
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.97Shots per match10.06
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
3.67Shots on target3.5
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
11.6%Shot conversion13%
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
51%Possession48%
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
1.25xG for1.13
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
1.41xG against1.36
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK

Shooting quality

Wolfsberger AC: BalancedGrazer AK: Efficient finishing
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
Accuracy (shots on target)33%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.350.37

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Wolfsberger AC is 71% better for: last-5 form.

2.4 pts / match - Wolfsberger AC · 1.4 pts / match - Grazer AK

Wolfsberger AC
WWWWL
Season result split
33% W24% R42% P
Season (W-D-L)
11-8-14
1.24 pts / match · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-0-1
2.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
6-6-4
Last 5 at home
2-3-0
DDDWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.19Opponent xG: 1.16BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Grazer AK
LLWDW
Season result split
28% W31% R41% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-10-13
1.16 pts / match · goal difference -3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-3-10
Last 5 away
2-0-3
WLLLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.33Opponent xG: 1.31BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Wolfsberger AC is 6% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.33 goals / match - Wolfsberger AC · 1.41 goals / match - Grazer AK

Wolfsberger AC scoring profile: very strong

Wolfsberger AC scores in 76% of matches (25 of 33 matches), while Grazer AK keeps a clean sheet in 16% (5 of 32 matches).

Grazer AK scoring profile: strong

Grazer AK scores in 69% of matches (22 of 32 matches), while Wolfsberger AC keeps a clean sheet in 27% (9 of 33 matches).

42Goals scored (season)42
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
44Goals conceded (season)45
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
2.61Average goals in match2.72
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
9Goals scored (last 5)10
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
3Goals conceded (last 5)5
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK

How often they score at least...

76%1 goal69%
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
33%2 goals38%
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
15%3 goals16%
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
3%4 goals6%
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK

How often they concede at least...

73%1 goal84%
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
48%2 goals38%
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
12%3 goals13%
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
0%4 goals3%
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

55%
League average

Goal patterns

24%BTTS at half-time25%
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
3%BTTS in both halves6%
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
21%Scored in both halves28%
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK

BTTS and goal count

52%Min. 3 goals and BTTS44%
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
6%Min. 3 goals without BTTS16%
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
40%BTTS - last 540%
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

73%Min. 1 goal before half-time75%
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
42%Min. 2 goals before half-time41%
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
9%Min. 3 goals before half-time6%
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK

2nd half

79%Min. 1 goal after half-time81%
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
45%Min. 2 goals after half-time50%
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
12%Min. 3 goals after half-time16%
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Wolfsberger AC is 42% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.55 pts / match - Wolfsberger AC · 1.09 pts / match - Grazer AK

Wolfsberger AC - half-time state
36% leading45% draw18% trailing
Grazer AK - half-time state
22% leading44% draw34% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.55Points per match (1st half)1.09
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
0.79Goals scored (1st half)0.53
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
0.45Goals conceded (1st half)0.69
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
1.24Average goals (1st half)1.22
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
58%Clean sheet before half-time44%
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
45%No goal before half-time56%
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK

After half-time (2nd half)

0.97Points per match (2nd half)1.41
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
0.48Goals scored (2nd half)0.78
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
0.88Goals conceded (2nd half)0.72
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
1.36Average goals (2nd half)1.5
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
42%Clean sheet after half-time44%
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
58%No goal after half-time47%
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK

Wolfsberger AC - second-half results

21% W33% R45% P
51
Half-time points
26
Half-time goals
+11
Goal difference (1st half)
32
Second-half points
-13
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.55
PPG before half-time
Lead holding92%

Leads at half-time in 36% of matches and wins 33%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Grazer AK - second-half results

34% W38% R28% P
35
Half-time points
17
Half-time goals
-5
Goal difference (1st half)
45
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.09
PPG before half-time
Lead holding127%

Leads at half-time in 22% of matches and wins 28%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Wolfsberger AC - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.202.00
Goals scored / match0.81.0
Goals conceded / match0.20.4
Average goals in match1.01.4
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet80%80%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference+3+3
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4
Grazer AK - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.402.40
Goals scored / match0.61.4
Goals conceded / match0.60.4
Average goals in match1.21.8
1 goal80%100%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference0+5
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 0% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Wolfsberger AC
ScoredConceded
9
4
0-15
8
6
16-30
9
5
31-45
3
3
46-60
3
11
61-75
10
15
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (15). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

Grazer AK
ScoredConceded
3
4
0-15
8
7
16-30
6
11
31-45
8
4
46-60
6
7
61-75
11
12
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.66
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
99%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
59%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+25%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
52%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
7%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 14 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Wolfsberger AC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.16
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.10
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.02
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.08
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
88%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
105%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+1.16
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 21% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

Grazer AK

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.23
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.13
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-7.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.18
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.05
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
103%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
98%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.24
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
26% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 7% come in the first quarter-hour.
26%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Bundesliga).

Teams vs league

Wolfsberger ACLigaGrazer AK
Average goals in match 2.612.70 2.72
Both teams scored 58%55% 59%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 58%51% 59%
Clean sheets 27%25% 16%
Goal before half-time 73%74% 75%
Goal after half-time 79%78% 81%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.70
Average goals per match
55%
Both teams scored
51%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
25%
Clean sheets
1.44
Home goals / match
1.27
Away goals / match
+13%
Home attack advantage
+12%
Home defence advantage
+12%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
38%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
44%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
4%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (3): Wolfsberger AC 1 - 1 - 1 Grazer AK. Average goals 3.33, both teams scored in 67% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Wolfsberger AC vs Grazer AK?

The Bundesliga match finished Wolfsberger AC 1:0 Grazer AK. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Wolfsberger AC and Grazer AK?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches Wolfsberger AC won 1, Grazer AK won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 3.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Wolfsberger AC vs Grazer AK?

Wolfsberger AC score 1.27 goals per game on average and Grazer AK 1.31. The Bundesliga average is 2.70 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 51% of games. Both teams score in 58% of Wolfsberger AC's matches and 59% of Grazer AK's.

What form are Wolfsberger AC and Grazer AK in?

Over the last 5 games Wolfsberger AC have a 4-0-1 record (2.40 points per game) and Grazer AK 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Wolfsberger AC vs Grazer AK?

The statistical background for Wolfsberger AC vs Grazer AK — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.