Žilina vs Podbrezová: match statistics
Žilina vs Podbrezová: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Žilina played against Podbrezová in Super Liga (Slovakia). The game was played on September 5, 2026. Venue: Štadión Pod Dubňom. Final score: 3:1.
Recent form
Žilina has 4 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.40 points per game. Podbrezová has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses, with 1.40 points per game.
Scoring records
Žilina scores 2.50 goals per game and allows 2.00. Podbrezová scores 1.67 and allows 2.00. Games in this league average 3.56 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 83% of Žilina's games and 50% of Podbrezová's. The Over 2.5 rates are 83% and 83%, compared with league averages of 62% for BTTS and 71% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Žilina has the higher season xG average, 1.76 to 1.73 per game. Žilina takes 15.7 shots per game, while Podbrezová takes 16.3.
First-half and second-half trends
Žilina leads at halftime in 33% of its games and scores 1.67 goals per game after halftime. Podbrezová leads at halftime in 50% and scores 0.83 after halftime.
When the teams score
Žilina's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (4 goals). For Podbrezová, it is minutes 61-75 (3 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Super Liga games average 3.56 goals. Both teams score in 62% of games, and 71% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 4 previous meetings were available. The record was 2 home wins, 0 draws and 2 away wins. Those games averaged 3.25 goals, with both teams scoring in 25% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Žilina enter this match having won 4 of their last 5 games, scoring as many as 18 goals in the process, while Podbrezová have won 3 times and scored 11 goals over the same period. The hosts create significantly more chances at home, averaging 19.33 shots and 6.67 shots on target per match, compared with the visitors’ 12.67 shots and 2 on target. Žilina’s advantage is also evident in the quality of their chances, with an average xG of 2.04 compared with Podbrezová’s 1.28 away from home. The visitors have failed to score in 67% of their away matches, while conceding an average of 3 goals per game on the road, which should benefit the hosts’ attacking play. Žilina’s defense is not entirely reliable either, as they allow opponents an average of 2.67 goals at home, giving Podbrezová a realistic chance of scoring. However, the hosts’ victory remains the more likely outcome.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Žilina have recorded BTTS - Yes in 67% of their league matches, with that figure rising to 80% across their last five games, averaging 3.6 goals scored and 1.6 conceded. Podbrezová have a lower season BTTS rate of 33%, but their recent run stands at 60%, while the team has averaged 2.2 goals per match during that period. The hosts create a high volume of chances, posting an xG of 2.17 and 7.67 shots on target per game, whereas the visitors have failed to keep a single clean sheet and concede an average of 3.0 goals. Podbrezová’s chances of scoring are supported by an xG of 1.57 across their last five matches, as well as Žilina conceding an average of 1.6 goals over the same period. Žilina’s attacking advantage and the visitors’ improved finishing point towards goals at both ends, although Podbrezová’s seasonal inconsistency limits confidence in the pick.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Žilina average 2.0 goals at home, while Podbrezová concede as many as 3.0 goals per away game, which clearly strengthens the outlook for goals from the home side. Žilina’s attacking potential is confirmed by an average xG of 2.17 and 7.67 shots on target per match, while the visitors have failed to keep a single clean sheet. In their last five matches, both teams exceeded the 2.5-goal line in 100% of games, with Žilina and Podbrezová scoring an average of 3.6 and 2.2 goals respectively. The full-season data also points to an open game: over 1.5 goals were scored in 100% of both teams’ matches, while the league average stands at a high 3.56 goals. The strongest pick is Over 1.5 goals, as even with a cautious projection of 3.15 goals, the risk of the match finishing with no more than one goal remains low.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Žilina holds a clear edge in the seasonal data: they score an average of 2.00 goals at home, while Podbrezová concede as many as 3.00 goals away from home, with the hosts winning 67% of their matches and recording no defeats. Žilina’s attacking superiority is also evident in the quality of their chances: their average xG stands at 2.17 compared with the visitors’ 1.28, while their average number of shots on target is 7.67 per match versus 2.00. The hosts were leading at the break in 2 of their 3 home matches, scoring an average of 1.00 goal before half-time, whereas Podbrezová failed to score in the first half in 67% of their away fixtures. After the break, the visitors are particularly vulnerable to conceding, allowing an average of 2.33 goals, while Žilina keep a clean sheet in 67% of their matches during that period. The most likely scenario is therefore Žilina taking the lead before half-time and maintaining it until the final whistle.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Žilina | Podbrezová | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 40% | 30% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.39 | 0.35 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Žilina is 71% better for: last-5 form.
2.4 pts / game - Žilina · 1.4 pts / game - Podbrezová
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Žilina is 50% better for: goals scored per game.
2.5 goals / game - Žilina · 1.67 goals / game - Podbrezová
Žilina scores in 100% of games (6 of 6 games), while Podbrezová keeps a clean sheet in 17% (1 of 6 games).
Podbrezová scores in 67% of games (4 of 6 games), while Žilina keeps a clean sheet in 17% (1 of 6 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Žilina
Over / Under - Podbrezová
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Podbrezová is 26% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.33 pts / game - Žilina · 1.67 pts / game - Podbrezová
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Žilina - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 67%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.7 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Podbrezová - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 50% of games and wins 50%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.7 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.60 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 1.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 1.2 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 2.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 0% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 2.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 100% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -3 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (3 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Žilina
Podbrezová
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Super Liga).
Teams vs league
| Žilina | Liga | Podbrezová | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 4.50 | 3.56 | ▲ 3.67 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 83% | 62% | ▼ 50% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 83% | 71% | ▲ 83% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 17% | 19% | ▼ 17% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 67% | 82% | • 83% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 100% | 88% | ▼ 83% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Žilina's perspective: 2 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses against Podbrezová. Games average 3.25 goals, and both teams scored in 25% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Žilina vs Podbrezová?
The Super Liga match finished Žilina 3:1 Podbrezová. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Žilina and Podbrezová?
In the last 4 head-to-head matches Žilina won 2, Podbrezová won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.25 goals, with both teams scoring in 25% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Žilina vs Podbrezová?
Žilina score 2.50 goals per game on average and Podbrezová 1.67. The Super Liga average is 3.56 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 71% of games. Both teams score in 83% of Žilina's matches and 50% of Podbrezová's.
What form are Žilina and Podbrezová in?
Over the last 5 games Žilina have a 4-0-1 record (2.40 points per game) and Podbrezová 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Žilina vs Podbrezová?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Žilina vs Podbrezová: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


