Switzerland - Super LeagueData current as of September 11, 2026

Zürich vs Servette: match statistics

Zürich crest
Zürich
0 : 2half-time 0:1
Servette crest
Servette

Zürich vs Servette: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Zürich played against Servette in Super League (Switzerland). The game was played on May 16, 2026. Final score: 0:2.

Recent form

Zürich has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.80 points per game. Servette has 3 wins, 2 draws and 0 losses, with 2.20 points per game.

Scoring records

Zürich scores 1.32 goals per game and allows 1.89. Servette scores 1.86 and allows 1.70. Games in this league average 3.28 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 68% of Zürich's games and 70% of Servette's. The Over 2.5 rates are 78% and 62%, compared with league averages of 66% for BTTS and 67% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Servette has the higher season xG average, 1.59 to 1.50 per game. Zürich takes 13.1 shots per game, while Servette takes 13.7.

First-half and second-half trends

Zürich leads at halftime in 24% of its games and scores 0.70 goals per game after halftime. Servette leads at halftime in 30% and scores 1.11 after halftime.

When the teams score

Zürich's most productive scoring window is minutes 61-75 (12 goals). For Servette, it is minutes 76-90+ (19 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Super League games average 3.28 goals. Both teams score in 66% of games, and 67% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 3 previous meetings were available. The record was 1 home win, 1 draw and 1 away win. Those games averaged 2.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Servette holds a clear form advantage: in the last 5 matches they scored 13 goals and recorded 3 wins and 2 draws, averaging 2.2 points per game, while Zürich scored only 4 goals in that period and have a 1-1-3 record averaging 0.8 points per game. Over the season the visitors have scored 69 goals versus the hosts' 49 and simultaneously concede fewer goals (63 vs 70), indicating Servette superiority both offensively and in limiting opponents. Zürich’s home stats show on average 1.61 goals scored and 1.89 conceded with xG 1.68 for and 1.64 against, whereas Servette away average 1.78 scored and 1.89 conceded with xG 1.54 for and 1.45 against; this suggests a similar level of chance creation but higher efficiency for the visitors (conversion 13% vs 11%). Additionally, Zürich records 5.61 shots on target per home match versus 4.44 for Servette away, however the hosts have a higher home loss rate (56% vs 33% away losses for the visitors) and more frequently fail to score (clean sheet conceded rate 17% vs 0%), which goes against Zürich. Considering the 13 vs 4 goals in the last 5, the 2.2 vs 0.8 points per match and the seasonal 69 vs 49 goals, I predict a Servette victory; I assess the chances as approximately 55% for the away win, 25% for a draw and 20% for the home win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The "Both Teams To Score" scenario is more likely based on clear statistical signals: Servette has a season BTTS rate of 83% versus 58% for Zürich and 66% league-wide. The away side averages 2.6 goals in their last 5 matches with an xG of 1.88, while Zürich averages 0.8 goals and xG 1.43 over the last 5, suggesting Servette will generate the majority of chances. Both teams also concede frequently: Zürich has conceded 70 goals this season (1.53 per match) and Servette 63 (1.89 per match), with recent 5-match conceded averages of 1.6 and 1.4, so a clean sheet expected is unlikely (clean sheets: 26% vs 17%). Additionally, seasonal xG 1.63 (Zürich) and 1.54 (Servette), a league average of 3.28 goals per match and percentages of matches over 2.5 at 63% and 61% for the two teams amplify the BTTS case; therefore I assess BTTS - Yes at 72% versus 28% No Goal.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The model based on xG and statistical indicators forecasts 1.54 goals for Zürich (attacking xG 1.63 and opponent defense 1.45 → average 1.54) and 1.43 for Servette (attacking xG 1.54 and opponent defense 1.31 → average 1.43), totaling ~2.97 goals. A strong signal is Over 1.5: this season 84% of Zürich’s matches and 94% of Servette’s matches finished over 1.5 goals, giving an average ~89% probability for that outcome. Over 2.5 has moderate support — seasonal rates 63% for Zürich and 61% for Servette (average ~62–63%) and the league records 3.28 goals/match; additionally Servette scored 13 goals in the last 5 matches (2.6 avg) while Zürich has only 4 goals in the last 5 (0.8 avg), which on one hand increases the chance of Over 2.5 but on the other is limited by the hosts’ poorer form. Over 3.5 appears less likely: seasonal values 42%/56% yield ~49% chance, and the projected total xG 2.97 is clearly below the 3.5 threshold. Therefore I recommend backing the over at the 1.5 line as the strongest and most data-driven selection, also considering both teams scored in 58% of Zürich’s matches and 83% of Servette’s matches and average shots on target 5.11 vs 4.44.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

I select '1/1' (Zürich leading at Half-Time and winning Full-Time) as the most likely scenario. Zürich averages 0.95 goals by the break versus Servette's 0.56 and scored 8 goals in the 0–15 minute window while Servette conceded 9 in that interval, strongly indicating an early lead for the home side. Over the season Zürich also posts higher xG (1.63 vs 1.54), more shots on target (5.11 vs 4.44), a higher points-per-game (1.47 vs 1.22) and a 37% home win rate versus 28% for the away side, supporting maintenance of the lead until full-time. Servette, however, are in better recent form over the last five matches (60% wins) and were leading at half-time in 60% of those games, averaging 1.2 goals by the break, so I assign moderate chances to a draw at half and full (X/X 20%) and to a turnaround to a draw after the break (1/X 10%). Given Zürich’s advantage in half-time metrics (0.95 vs 0.56) along with superior xG and shots on target, the HT/FT scenario '1/1' receives the highest probability, while accounting for the risk of turnarounds due to Servette’s form.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 1
First half
0 : 1
Second half

Game stats

43Possession (%)57
ZürichServette
5Shots15
ZürichServette
1Shots on target6
ZürichServette
0.72xG1.8
ZürichServette
6Corners8
ZürichServette
45Dangerous attacks60
ZürichServette
10Fouls13
ZürichServette
3Cards2
ZürichServette

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

1.32Goals scored / game1.86
ZürichServette
1.89Goals allowed / game1.7
ZürichServette
51%Average possession52%
ZürichServette
4.76Shots on target / game4.78
ZürichServette

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

13.14Shots per game13.7
ZürichServette
4.76Shots on target4.78
ZürichServette
10.1%Shot conversion13.6%
ZürichServette
51%Possession52%
ZürichServette
1.5xG for1.59
ZürichServette
1.7xG against1.38
ZürichServette

Shooting quality

Zürich: BalancedServette: Efficient finishing
ZürichServette
Accuracy (shots on target)36%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.280.39

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Servette is 175% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / game - Zürich · 2.2 pts / game - Servette

Zürich
LLDWL
Season result split
30% W14% D57% L
Season (W-D-L)
11-5-21
1.03 pts / game · goal difference -21
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
7-1-10
Last 5 at home
2-0-3
LLWLW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.43Opponent xG: 1.45BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%
Servette
DWWDW
Unbeaten in the last 5 games
Season result split
32% W38% D30% L
Season (W-D-L)
12-14-11
1.35 pts / game · goal difference +6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-2-0
2.20 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
5-7-6
Last 5 away
1-3-1
DLDWD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 2.6Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.88Opponent xG: 1.13BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Servette is 41% better for: goals scored per game.

1.32 goals / game - Zürich · 1.86 goals / game - Servette

Servette is 11% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.89 goals / game - Zürich · 1.7 goals / game - Servette

Zürich scoring profile: very strong

Zürich scores in 73% of games (27 of 37 meczów), while Servette keeps a clean sheet in 22% (8 of 37 meczów).

Servette scoring profile: very strong

Servette scores in 89% of games (33 of 37 meczów), while Zürich keeps a clean sheet in 5% (2 of 37 meczów).

49Goals scored (season)69
ZürichServette
70Goals conceded (season)63
ZürichServette
3.22Average goals per game3.57
ZürichServette
4Goals scored (last 5)13
ZürichServette
8Goals conceded (last 5)7
ZürichServette

How often they score at least...

73%1 goal89%
ZürichServette
46%2 goals51%
ZürichServette
14%3 goals27%
ZürichServette
0%4 goals14%
ZürichServette

How often they concede at least...

95%1 goal78%
ZürichServette
57%2 goals46%
ZürichServette
27%3 goals35%
ZürichServette
11%4 goals11%
ZürichServette

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

66%
League average

Goal patterns

27%BTTS at half-time30%
ZürichServette
5%BTTS in both halves14%
ZürichServette
22%Scored in both halves35%
ZürichServette

BTTS and goal count

62%Min. 3 goals and BTTS51%
ZürichServette
16%Min. 3 goals without BTTS11%
ZürichServette
40%BTTS - last 560%
ZürichServette

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

81%Min. 1 goal before half-time78%
ZürichServette
46%Min. 2 goals before half-time46%
ZürichServette
14%Min. 3 goals before half-time24%
ZürichServette

2nd half

86%Min. 1 goal after half-time89%
ZürichServette
57%Min. 2 goals after half-time54%
ZürichServette
27%Min. 3 goals after half-time32%
ZürichServette

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Servette is 10% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.11 pts / game - Zürich · 1.22 pts / game - Servette

Zürich - half-time state
24% leading38% draw38% trailing
Servette - half-time state
30% leading32% draw38% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.11Points per game (1st half)1.22
ZürichServette
0.62Goals scored (1st half)0.76
ZürichServette
0.81Goals conceded (1st half)0.89
ZürichServette
1.43Average goals (1st half)1.65
ZürichServette
38%Clean sheet before half-time46%
ZürichServette
54%No goal before half-time46%
ZürichServette

After half-time (2nd half)

1Points per game (2nd half)1.54
ZürichServette
0.7Goals scored (2nd half)1.11
ZürichServette
1.08Goals conceded (2nd half)0.81
ZürichServette
1.78Average goals (2nd half)1.92
ZürichServette
32%Clean sheet after half-time43%
ZürichServette
51%No goal after half-time30%
ZürichServette

Zürich - second-half results

24% W27% D49% L
41
Half-time points
23
Half-time goals
-7
Goal difference (1st half)
37
Second-half points
-14
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.11
PPG before half-time
Lead holding125%

Leads at halftime in 24% of games and wins 30%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.3

Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Servette - second-half results

43% W24% D32% L
45
Half-time points
28
Half-time goals
-5
Goal difference (1st half)
57
Second-half points
+11
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.22
PPG before half-time
Lead holding107%

Leads at halftime in 30% of games and wins 32%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.1

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Zürich - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.601.00
Goals scored / game0.20.6
Goals allowed / game1.00.6
Average goals per game1.21.2
1 goal60%80%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-40
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1
Servette - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game2.202.00
Goals scored / game1.21.4
Goals allowed / game0.41.0
Average goals per game1.62.4
1 goal60%100%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal40%0%
Goal difference+4+2
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 6

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Zürich
ScoredConceded
5
11
0-15
9
6
16-30
9
13
31-45
6
7
46-60
12
9
61-75
8
24
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (12 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (24). Late-goal balance (76-90): -16 - late phases are a weakness.

Servette
ScoredConceded
10
14
0-15
10
9
16-30
8
10
31-45
12
11
46-60
10
10
61-75
19
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (19 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (14). Late-goal balance (76-90): +10 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

3.38
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.5 : 1.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
103%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
69%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-21%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
65%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
3%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 33 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Zürich

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.20
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.37
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.18
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.19
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
74%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
126%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.23
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
16% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
16%

Servette

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.21
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.05
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-10.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.27
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.32
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
124%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
96%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.85
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
28% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
28%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Super League).

Teams vs league

ZürichLigaServette
Average goals per game 3.223.28 3.57
Both teams scored 68%66% 70%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 78%67% 62%
Clean sheets 5%19% 22%
Goal before half-time 81%76% 78%
Goal after half-time 86%84% 89%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.28
Average goals per game
66%
Both teams scored
67%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
19%
Clean sheets
1.78
Home goals / game
1.50
Away goals / game
+19%
Home attack advantage
+16%
Home defensive advantage
+6%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
41%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
7%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
84%
1 goal
56%
2 goals
31%
3 goals
9%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. ZürichSubstitutionOn: Umeh Umeh EmmanuelOff: Juan José Perea Mendoza
  2. ServetteYellow cardJeremy Bruno Guillemenot
  3. ServetteYellow cardLamine Fomba
  4. ZürichYellow cardPhilippe Paulin Keny
  5. ServetteSubstitutionOn: Lilian NjohOff: Thomas Lopes
  6. ServetteSubstitutionOn: Malek IshuayedOff: David Douline
  7. ZürichSubstitutionOn: Silas HuberOff: Yanick Brecher

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Luca PiccoloMatches officiated: 15
6Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 240%Home wins27%Draws33%Away wins

Head-to-head

Record from Zürich's perspective: 1 win, 1 draw and 1 loss against Servette. Games average 2.67 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.

FAQ

What was the result of Zürich vs Servette?

The Super League match finished Zürich 0:2 Servette. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Zürich and Servette?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches Zürich won 1, Servette won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Zürich vs Servette?

Zürich score 1.32 goals per game on average and Servette 1.86. The Super League average is 3.28 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 67% of games. Both teams score in 68% of Zürich's matches and 70% of Servette's.

What form are Zürich and Servette in?

Over the last 5 games Zürich have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Servette 3-2-0 (2.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Zürich vs Servette?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.