Al Dhafra vs Al Nasr: match stats
Al Dhafra vs Al Nasr: form, goals at mahahalagang stats
Mahahalagang detalye ng match
Al Dhafra vs Al Nasr sa Arabian Gulf League (United Arab Emirates). Naka-schedule ang match sa 11 April 2026 at 15:55. Final score: 0:1.
Current form
Al Dhafra: 1-1-3 sa last five matches at 0.80 points per match. Al Nasr: 3-1-1 at 2.00 points per match.
Goal statistics
Al Dhafra scores 1.08 at concedes 2.00 goals per match. Al Nasr scores 1.38 at concedes 1.31. League average: 2.82 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Al Dhafra 50%, Al Nasr 69%. Over 2.5: Al Dhafra 54%, Al Nasr 50%. League level: BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 52%.
xG, shots at playing style
Al Nasr ang may mas mataas na xG per match: 1.37 vs 1.08. Al Dhafra averages 9.5 shots per match, habang Al Nasr ay 11.9.
First at second half
Al Dhafra leads at half-time sa 12% ng matches at scores 0.69 goals after the break. Al Nasr: 35% at 0.73.
Goals by minute
Al Dhafra: 61-75 (8 goals). Al Nasr: 0-15 (9 goals). Historical goal distribution ito, hindi prediction ng exact goal minute.
League context
Arabian Gulf League: 2.82 goals per match, BTTS 55% at Over 2.5 52%.
Head-to-head
Sa 1 head-to-head matches, ang record ay 0-0-1. Average goals: 2.00, BTTS: 0%.
Match description
Al Nasr (6th) clearly fares better sa table kaysa Al Dhafra (13th): visitors may 6 wins, 10 draws at 5 losses at 27 goals scored, habang hosts may 5 wins, 3 draws, 13 losses at 25 goals. Sa last 5 matches Al Dhafra earned 4 points (1 win, 1 draw, 3 losses), scoring 5 at conceding 9, habang Al Nasr has 7 points (1 win, 4 draws, 0 losses) with an 8-7 goal record; PPG respectively 0.8 vs 1.4 in favor ng visitors. Defensively advantage ng Al Nasr is evident: they concede on average 1.1 goals away, habang Al Dhafra concedes 1.9 at home, at clean sheet rate 30% versus 10%. Offensively hosts have better home conversion (15% vs 11%), pero Al Nasr attempts more shots (11.6 vs 9.8) at generates higher xG (1.29 vs 1.13), indicating better quality chances; kaya I favor a visitors win.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Al Dhafra | Al Nasr | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 33% | 34% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.34 | 0.34 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Al Nasr is 150% better for: last-5 form.
0.8 pts / match - Al Dhafra · 2 pts / match - Al Nasr
Goals— paano nag-i-score at nagko-concede ang dalawang teams?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Al Nasr is 28% better for: goals scored per match.
1.08 goals / match - Al Dhafra · 1.38 goals / match - Al Nasr
Al Nasr is 53% better for: goals conceded per match.
2 goals / match - Al Dhafra · 1.31 goals / match - Al Nasr
Al Dhafra scores in 58% of matches (15 of 26 matches), while Al Nasr keeps a clean sheet in 23% (6 of 26 matches).
Al Nasr scores in 85% of matches (22 of 26 matches), while Al Dhafra keeps a clean sheet in 8% (2 of 26 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— gaano kadalas nakaka-score ang parehong teams?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— gaano kadalas lumalagpas sa goal lines ang kanilang matches?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Al Dhafra
Over / Under — Al Nasr
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— saang half mas madalas silang maka-score?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Al Nasr is 89% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.73 pts / match - Al Dhafra · 1.38 pts / match - Al Nasr
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Al Dhafra - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 12% of matches and wins 23%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Al Nasr - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 35% of matches and wins 35%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -4 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 1.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -2 | +4 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (8 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (9 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Karagdagang team indicators— ano ang ipinapakita ng xG, efficiency at form?
Comparison ng chance quality, results at trends mula sa mga natapos na matches ngayong season.
Match profile
Al Dhafra
Al Nasr
* Ang estimated goals, goal split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk at goal range ay galing sa public season averages at frequencies ng dalawang teams. Statistical match profile ito, hindi private model prediction o betting pick.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Arabian Gulf League).
Teams vs league
| Al Dhafra | Liga | Al Nasr | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.08 | 2.82 | ▼ 2.69 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 50% | 55% | ▲ 69% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 54% | 52% | ▼ 50% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 8% | 25% | ▼ 23% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 77% | 70% | ▲ 73% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 85% | 81% | ▲ 85% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Al Dhafra 0 - 0 - 1 Al Nasr. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 0% mga match.
Mga madalas itanong
Ano ang result ng Al Dhafra vs Al Nasr?
Natapos ang Arabian Gulf League match sa score na Al Dhafra 0:1 Al Nasr. Nasa page na ito ang match statistics, half-by-half data at head-to-head record.
Ano ang ipinapakita ng goal statistics bago ang Al Dhafra vs Al Nasr?
Al Dhafra scores 1.08 goals per match at Al Nasr 1.38. Ang Arabian Gulf League average ay 2.82 goals, may Over 2.5 sa 52% ng matches. BTTS: Al Dhafra 50%, Al Nasr 69%.
Ano ang current form ng Al Dhafra at Al Nasr?
Sa last 5 matches, ang Al Dhafra ay 1-1-3 (0.80 points per match), habang ang Al Nasr ay 3-1-1 (2.00 points per match).
Saan makikita ang betting pick at full analysis ng Al Dhafra vs Al Nasr?
Nasa page na ito ang statistical context: form, H2H, goals, BTTS at Over/Under. Makikita sa NoFluffPicks app ang betting pick, value bet at full reasoning.