Aluminij vs Radomlje: match stats
Aluminij vs Radomlje: form, goals at mahahalagang stats
Mahahalagang detalye ng match
Aluminij vs Radomlje sa PrvaLiga (Slovenia). Naka-schedule ang match sa 3 April 2026 at 17:30. Final score: 1:2.
Current form
Aluminij: 0-1-4 sa last five matches at 0.20 points per match. Radomlje: 3-0-2 at 1.80 points per match.
Goal statistics
Aluminij scores 1.24 at concedes 1.79 goals per match. Radomlje scores 1.47 at concedes 1.85. League average: 3.09 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Aluminij 68%, Radomlje 76%. Over 2.5: Aluminij 71%, Radomlje 79%. League level: BTTS 59%, Over 2.5 65%.
xG, shots at playing style
Radomlje ang may mas mataas na xG per match: 1.30 vs 1.29. Aluminij averages 9.4 shots per match, habang Radomlje ay 9.3.
First at second half
Aluminij leads at half-time sa 21% ng matches at scores 0.82 goals after the break. Radomlje: 35% at 0.82.
Goals by minute
Aluminij: 76-90+ (17 goals). Radomlje: 76-90+ (11 goals). Historical goal distribution ito, hindi prediction ng exact goal minute.
League context
PrvaLiga: 3.09 goals per match, BTTS 59% at Over 2.5 65%.
Head-to-head
Sa 3 head-to-head matches, ang record ay 2-0-1. Average goals: 3.00, BTTS: 100%.
Match description
Aluminij has a slight but measurable edge kaya bet ko sila to win: home side averages 4.23 shots on target per game vs Radomlje’s 3.23 SoT away, ibig sabihin more chances. Hosts score 1.46 goals per game with average xG 1.35, guests 1.31 goals and xG 1.26, conversion rate 15% vs 14%. Short-term form: Aluminij in last 5 matches 2W-1D-2L (1.4 pts/game) habang Radomlje 1W-1D-3L (0.8 pts/game). Both defenses are vulnerable — Aluminij concedes 1.85 goals at home, Radomlje concedes 1.77 away, at the same time total goals averages 3.31 vs 3.08, so expect an open game. Plus, hosts fail to score only in 15% of home games vs guests’ 23% away clean sheets, which confirms Aluminij’s better efficiency and justifies the edge.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Aluminij | Radomlje | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 38% | 39% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.14 | 0.14 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.35 | 0.41 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Radomlje is 800% better for: last-5 form.
0.2 pts / match - Aluminij · 1.8 pts / match - Radomlje
Goals— paano nag-i-score at nagko-concede ang dalawang teams?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Radomlje is 19% better for: goals scored per match.
1.24 goals / match - Aluminij · 1.47 goals / match - Radomlje
Aluminij scores in 76% of matches (26 of 34 matches), while Radomlje keeps a clean sheet in 9% (3 of 34 matches).
Radomlje scores in 82% of matches (28 of 34 matches), while Aluminij keeps a clean sheet in 15% (5 of 34 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— gaano kadalas nakaka-score ang parehong teams?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— gaano kadalas lumalagpas sa goal lines ang kanilang matches?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Aluminij
Over / Under — Radomlje
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— saang half mas madalas silang maka-score?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Radomlje is 38% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.91 pts / match - Aluminij · 1.26 pts / match - Radomlje
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Aluminij - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 29%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Radomlje - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 35% of matches and wins 38%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.40 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 100% | 100% |
| Goal difference | -5 | -5 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.00 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 20% |
| No goal | 20% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +2 | -1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (17 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (16). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Karagdagang team indicators— ano ang ipinapakita ng xG, efficiency at form?
Comparison ng chance quality, results at trends mula sa mga natapos na matches ngayong season.
Match profile
Aluminij
Radomlje
* Ang estimated goals, goal split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk at goal range ay galing sa public season averages at frequencies ng dalawang teams. Statistical match profile ito, hindi private model prediction o betting pick.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (PrvaLiga).
Teams vs league
| Aluminij | Liga | Radomlje | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 3.03 | 3.09 | ▲ 3.32 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 68% | 59% | ▲ 76% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 71% | 65% | ▲ 79% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 15% | 23% | ▼ 9% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 79% | 86% | ▲ 88% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 76% | 80% | ▲ 97% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (3): Aluminij 2 - 0 - 1 Radomlje. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% mga match.
Mga madalas itanong
Ano ang result ng Aluminij vs Radomlje?
Natapos ang PrvaLiga match sa score na Aluminij 1:2 Radomlje. Nasa page na ito ang match statistics, half-by-half data at head-to-head record.
Ano ang head-to-head record ng Aluminij at Radomlje?
Sa huling 3 head-to-head matches, nanalo ang Aluminij ng 2, ang Radomlje ng 1, at 0 ang draws. Average goals: 3.00; BTTS: 100%.
Ano ang ipinapakita ng goal statistics bago ang Aluminij vs Radomlje?
Aluminij scores 1.24 goals per match at Radomlje 1.47. Ang PrvaLiga average ay 3.09 goals, may Over 2.5 sa 65% ng matches. BTTS: Aluminij 68%, Radomlje 76%.
Ano ang current form ng Aluminij at Radomlje?
Sa last 5 matches, ang Aluminij ay 0-1-4 (0.20 points per match), habang ang Radomlje ay 3-0-2 (1.80 points per match).
Saan makikita ang betting pick at full analysis ng Aluminij vs Radomlje?
Nasa page na ito ang statistical context: form, H2H, goals, BTTS at Over/Under. Makikita sa NoFluffPicks app ang betting pick, value bet at full reasoning.