Belgium - First Division BData updated noong July 23, 2026

AS Eupen vs KAA Gent II: match stats

AS Eupen crest
AS Eupen
4 : 0half-time 2:0
KAA Gent II crest
KAA Gent II
135%(2.15)
X30%(3.30)
235%(2.80)

Mukhang extremely close ang match na ito, reflecting the similar table positions ng both teams (7th place AS Eupen vs 8th place KAA Gent II). Solid ang home form ng AS Eupen with 42% wins at low 17% loss rate, averaging 1.33 goals per match, pero ang last 5 general matches ay nagbigay lang ng 1.2 points per match. Ang KAA Gent II ay mas offensive sa away games with 1.67 goals average at higher xG (1.59 vs 1.2), pero volatile sila – 58% wins at 42% losses, indicating instability. Key factor dito ay ang 0% draw rate ng Gent II sa away games, making this unpredictable. Considering ang possession advantage ng guests (57% vs 53%) at slightly better away goal difference (+6 vs +4 ng hosts), expect a fierce duel with slight winning chances for both, pero valid scenario pa rin ang draw dahil sa balanced potential.

AS Eupen vs KAA Gent II: form, goals at mahahalagang stats

Mahahalagang detalye ng match

AS Eupen vs KAA Gent II sa First Division B (Belgium). Naka-schedule ang match sa 6 March 2026 at 20:00. Final score: 4:0.

Current form

AS Eupen: 2-2-1 sa last five matches at 1.60 points per match. KAA Gent II: 1-1-3 at 0.80 points per match.

Goal statistics

AS Eupen scores 1.38 at concedes 1.13 goals per match. KAA Gent II scores 1.31 at concedes 1.59. League average: 2.84 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: AS Eupen 53%, KAA Gent II 53%. Over 2.5: AS Eupen 47%, KAA Gent II 56%. League level: BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 54%.

xG, shots at playing style

KAA Gent II ang may mas mataas na xG per match: 1.50 vs 1.21. AS Eupen averages 10.5 shots per match, habang KAA Gent II ay 12.5.

First at second half

AS Eupen leads at half-time sa 38% ng matches at scores 0.66 goals after the break. KAA Gent II: 28% at 0.72.

Goals by minute

AS Eupen: 31-45+ (11 goals). KAA Gent II: 61-75 (12 goals). Historical goal distribution ito, hindi prediction ng exact goal minute.

League context

First Division B: 2.84 goals per match, BTTS 55% at Over 2.5 54%.

Head-to-head

Sa 1 head-to-head matches, ang record ay 0-0-1. Average goals: 3.00, BTTS: 100%.

Match description

Mukhang extremely close ang match na ito, reflecting the similar table positions ng both teams (7th place AS Eupen vs 8th place KAA Gent II). Solid ang home form ng AS Eupen with 42% wins at low 17% loss rate, averaging 1.33 goals per match, pero ang last 5 general matches ay nagbigay lang ng 1.2 points per match. Ang KAA Gent II ay mas offensive sa away games with 1.67 goals average at higher xG (1.59 vs 1.2), pero volatile sila – 58% wins at 42% losses, indicating instability. Key factor dito ay ang 0% draw rate ng Gent II sa away games, making this unpredictable. Considering ang possession advantage ng guests (57% vs 53%) at slightly better away goal difference (+6 vs +4 ng hosts), expect a fierce duel with slight winning chances for both, pero valid scenario pa rin ang draw dahil sa balanced potential.

Half-by-half

2 : 0
1st half
2 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

43Possession (%)57
AS EupenKAA Gent II
12Shots3
AS EupenKAA Gent II
8Shots on target2
AS EupenKAA Gent II
1.75xG0.6
AS EupenKAA Gent II
7Corners4
AS EupenKAA Gent II
60Dangerous attacks35
AS EupenKAA Gent II
10Fouls9
AS EupenKAA Gent II
0Cards0
AS EupenKAA Gent II

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

AS EupenKAA Gent II
1.38Goals scored / match1.31
AS EupenKAA Gent II
1.13Goals conceded / match1.59
AS EupenKAA Gent II
52%Average possession58%
AS EupenKAA Gent II
3.81Shots on target / match4.38
AS EupenKAA Gent II

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.5Shots per match12.47
AS EupenKAA Gent II
3.81Shots on target4.38
AS EupenKAA Gent II
13.1%Shot conversion10.5%
AS EupenKAA Gent II
52%Possession58%
AS EupenKAA Gent II
1.21xG for1.5
AS EupenKAA Gent II
1.61xG against1.63
AS EupenKAA Gent II

Shooting quality

AS Eupen: Efficient finishingKAA Gent II: Balanced
AS EupenKAA Gent II
Accuracy (shots on target)36%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.360.30

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

AS Eupen is 100% better for: last-5 form.

1.6 pts / match - AS Eupen · 0.8 pts / match - KAA Gent II

AS Eupen
WDWDL
Season result split
38% W34% R28% P
Season (W-D-L)
12-11-9
1.47 pts / match · goal difference +8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
6-7-3
Last 5 at home
1-3-1
DWLDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.31Opponent xG: 1.65BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
KAA Gent II
LWLLD
Season result split
38% W16% R47% P
Season (W-D-L)
12-5-15
1.28 pts / match · goal difference -9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
7-1-8
Last 5 away
1-1-3
WLLLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 1.49Opponent xG: 1.88BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalspaano nag-i-score at nagko-concede ang dalawang teams?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

AS Eupen is 5% better for: goals scored per match.

1.38 goals / match - AS Eupen · 1.31 goals / match - KAA Gent II

AS Eupen is 41% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.13 goals / match - AS Eupen · 1.59 goals / match - KAA Gent II

Scoring profile ng AS Eupen: napakalakas

AS Eupen scores in 84% of matches (27 of 32 matches), while KAA Gent II keeps a clean sheet in 19% (6 of 32 matches).

Scoring profile ng KAA Gent II: malakas

KAA Gent II scores in 66% of matches (21 of 32 matches), while AS Eupen keeps a clean sheet in 38% (12 of 32 matches).

44Goals scored (season)42
AS EupenKAA Gent II
36Goals conceded (season)51
AS EupenKAA Gent II
2.5Average goals in match2.91
AS EupenKAA Gent II
6Goals scored (last 5)5
AS EupenKAA Gent II
5Goals conceded (last 5)11
AS EupenKAA Gent II

How often they score at least...

84%1 goal66%
AS EupenKAA Gent II
38%2 goals44%
AS EupenKAA Gent II
13%3 goals16%
AS EupenKAA Gent II
3%4 goals6%
AS EupenKAA Gent II

How often they concede at least...

63%1 goal81%
AS EupenKAA Gent II
38%2 goals47%
AS EupenKAA Gent II
13%3 goals22%
AS EupenKAA Gent II
0%4 goals9%
AS EupenKAA Gent II

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)gaano kadalas nakaka-score ang parehong teams?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

55%
League average

Goal patterns

16%BTTS at half-time19%
AS EupenKAA Gent II
6%BTTS in both halves0%
AS EupenKAA Gent II
16%Scored in both halves28%
AS EupenKAA Gent II

BTTS and goal count

41%Min. 3 goals and BTTS47%
AS EupenKAA Gent II
6%Min. 3 goals without BTTS9%
AS EupenKAA Gent II
40%BTTS - last 560%
AS EupenKAA Gent II

Goal count (Over/Under)gaano kadalas lumalagpas sa goal lines ang kanilang matches?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

75%Min. 1 goal before half-time66%
AS EupenKAA Gent II
34%Min. 2 goals before half-time41%
AS EupenKAA Gent II
13%Min. 3 goals before half-time16%
AS EupenKAA Gent II

2nd half

72%Min. 1 goal after half-time81%
AS EupenKAA Gent II
38%Min. 2 goals after half-time53%
AS EupenKAA Gent II
13%Min. 3 goals after half-time22%
AS EupenKAA Gent II

Match halvessaang half mas madalas silang maka-score?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

AS Eupen is 17% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.5 pts / match - AS Eupen · 1.28 pts / match - KAA Gent II

AS Eupen - half-time state
38% leading38% draw25% trailing
KAA Gent II - half-time state
28% leading44% draw28% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.5Points per match (1st half)1.28
AS EupenKAA Gent II
0.72Goals scored (1st half)0.59
AS EupenKAA Gent II
0.53Goals conceded (1st half)0.66
AS EupenKAA Gent II
1.25Average goals (1st half)1.25
AS EupenKAA Gent II
59%Clean sheet before half-time56%
AS EupenKAA Gent II
50%No goal before half-time59%
AS EupenKAA Gent II

After half-time (2nd half)

1.44Points per match (2nd half)1.34
AS EupenKAA Gent II
0.66Goals scored (2nd half)0.72
AS EupenKAA Gent II
0.59Goals conceded (2nd half)0.94
AS EupenKAA Gent II
1.25Average goals (2nd half)1.66
AS EupenKAA Gent II
59%Clean sheet after half-time44%
AS EupenKAA Gent II
50%No goal after half-time47%
AS EupenKAA Gent II

AS Eupen - second-half results

34% W41% R25% P
48
Half-time points
23
Half-time goals
+6
Goal difference (1st half)
46
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.50
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 38%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

KAA Gent II - second-half results

34% W31% R34% P
41
Half-time points
19
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
43
Second-half points
-7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.28
PPG before half-time
Lead holding136%

Leads at half-time in 28% of matches and wins 38%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

AS Eupen - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.200.60
Goals scored / match1.00.2
Goals conceded / match0.40.6
Average goals in match1.40.8
1 goal80%40%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal20%80%
Goal difference+3-2
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 5
KAA Gent II - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.601.00
Goals scored / match0.01.0
Goals conceded / match0.81.4
Average goals in match0.82.4
1 goal40%100%
2 goals20%80%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%0%
No goal100%40%
Goal difference-4-2
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

AS Eupen
ScoredConceded
3
2
0-15
9
9
16-30
11
6
31-45
8
2
46-60
6
8
61-75
7
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (11 goli). Concedes most in 16-30 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

KAA Gent II
ScoredConceded
6
8
0-15
6
6
16-30
7
7
31-45
4
7
46-60
12
11
61-75
7
12
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (12 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Karagdagang team indicatorsano ang ipinapakita ng xG, efficiency at form?

Comparison ng chance quality, results at trends mula sa mga natapos na matches ngayong season.

Match profile

2.71
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.5 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
95%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
53%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+11%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
55%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
5%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 20 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

AS Eupen

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.40
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.65
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-10.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.17
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.48
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
95%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
82%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.13
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
16% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 7% come in the first quarter-hour.
16%

KAA Gent II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.13
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.15
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.19
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.04
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
96%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
109%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.48
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

* Ang estimated goals, goal split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk at goal range ay galing sa public season averages at frequencies ng dalawang teams. Statistical match profile ito, hindi private model prediction o betting pick.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division B).

Teams vs league

AS EupenLigaKAA Gent II
Average goals in match 2.502.84 2.91
Both teams scored 53%55% 53%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 47%54% 56%
Clean sheets 38%26% 19%
Goal before half-time 75%71% 66%
Goal after half-time 72%79% 81%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.84
Average goals per match
55%
Both teams scored
54%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
26%
Clean sheets
1.46
Home goals / match
1.37
Away goals / match
+7%
Home attack advantage
+6%
Home defence advantage
+5%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
71%
1 goal
34%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
79%
1 goal
50%
2 goals
22%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: AS Eupen 0 - 0 - 1 KAA Gent II. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% mga match.

KAA Gent B
2 : 1
KAS Eupen

Mga madalas itanong

Ano ang result ng AS Eupen vs KAA Gent II?

Natapos ang First Division B match sa score na AS Eupen 4:0 KAA Gent II. Nasa page na ito ang match statistics, half-by-half data at head-to-head record.

Ano ang ipinapakita ng goal statistics bago ang AS Eupen vs KAA Gent II?

AS Eupen scores 1.38 goals per match at KAA Gent II 1.31. Ang First Division B average ay 2.84 goals, may Over 2.5 sa 54% ng matches. BTTS: AS Eupen 53%, KAA Gent II 53%.

Ano ang current form ng AS Eupen at KAA Gent II?

Sa last 5 matches, ang AS Eupen ay 2-2-1 (1.60 points per match), habang ang KAA Gent II ay 1-1-3 (0.80 points per match).

Saan makikita ang betting pick at full analysis ng AS Eupen vs KAA Gent II?

Nasa page na ito ang statistical context: form, H2H, goals, BTTS at Over/Under. Makikita sa NoFluffPicks app ang betting pick, value bet at full reasoning.