Carolina Core vs Chicago Fire II: match stats
Full analysis at pick sa app
Tingnan ang betting analysis, pick, value bet at full reasoning para sa match na ito.
Carolina Core vs Chicago Fire II: form, goals at mahahalagang stats
Mahahalagang detalye ng match
Carolina Core vs Chicago Fire II sa MLS Next Pro (United States). Naka-schedule ang match sa 26 July 2026 at 01:30.
Current form
Carolina Core: 2-2-1 sa last five matches at 1.60 points per match. Chicago Fire II: 2-2-1 at 1.60 points per match.
Goal statistics
Carolina Core scores 1.30 at concedes 1.60 goals per match. Chicago Fire II scores 1.56 at concedes 1.56. League average: 3.23 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Carolina Core 65%, Chicago Fire II 67%. Over 2.5: Carolina Core 60%, Chicago Fire II 83%. League level: BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 65%.
xG, shots at playing style
Chicago Fire II ang may mas mataas na xG per match: 1.49 vs 1.46. Carolina Core averages 12.2 shots per match, habang Chicago Fire II ay 12.4.
First at second half
Carolina Core leads at half-time sa 25% ng matches at scores 0.80 goals after the break. Chicago Fire II: 39% at 0.67.
Goals by minute
Carolina Core: 46-60 (7 goals). Chicago Fire II: 31-45+ (10 goals). Historical goal distribution ito, hindi prediction ng exact goal minute.
League context
MLS Next Pro: 3.23 goals per match, BTTS 61% at Over 2.5 65%.
Head-to-head
Sa 3 head-to-head matches, ang record ay 1-2-0. Average goals: 1.67, BTTS: 67%.
Before the match
1X2 odds
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Carolina Core | Chicago Fire II | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 37% | 33% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.29 | 0.38 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Goals— paano nag-i-score at nagko-concede ang dalawang teams?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Chicago Fire II is 20% better for: goals scored per match.
1.3 goals / match - Carolina Core · 1.56 goals / match - Chicago Fire II
Carolina Core scores in 80% of matches (16 of 20 matches), while Chicago Fire II keeps a clean sheet in 22% (4 of 18 matches).
Chicago Fire II scores in 78% of matches (14 of 18 matches), while Carolina Core keeps a clean sheet in 25% (5 of 20 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— gaano kadalas nakaka-score ang parehong teams?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— gaano kadalas lumalagpas sa goal lines ang kanilang matches?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Carolina Core
Over / Under — Chicago Fire II
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— saang half mas madalas silang maka-score?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Chicago Fire II is 49% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.05 pts / match - Carolina Core · 1.56 pts / match - Chicago Fire II
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Carolina Core - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 20%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Chicago Fire II - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 39% of matches and wins 33%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 80% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.2 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 2.0 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 20% |
| No goal | 20% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (7 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (10 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Karagdagang team indicators— ano ang ipinapakita ng xG, efficiency at form?
Comparison ng chance quality, results at trends mula sa mga natapos na matches ngayong season.
Match profile
Carolina Core
Chicago Fire II
* Ang estimated goals, goal split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk at goal range ay galing sa public season averages at frequencies ng dalawang teams. Statistical match profile ito, hindi private model prediction o betting pick.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS Next Pro).
Teams vs league
| Carolina Core | Liga | Chicago Fire II | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.90 | 3.23 | ▼ 3.11 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 65% | 61% | ▲ 67% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 60% | 65% | ▲ 83% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 25% | 22% | • 22% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 85% | 75% | ▲ 78% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 80% | 84% | ▲ 89% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (3): Carolina Core 1 - 2 - 0 Chicago Fire II. Average goals 1.67, both teams scored in 67% mga match.
Mga madalas itanong
Kailan ang Carolina Core vs Chicago Fire II?
Carolina Core vs Chicago Fire II ay naka-schedule sa July 25, 2026 sa MLS Next Pro. Makikita sa match header ang exact kick-off time sa iyong timezone.
Ano ang head-to-head record ng Carolina Core at Chicago Fire II?
Sa huling 3 head-to-head matches, nanalo ang Carolina Core ng 1, ang Chicago Fire II ng 0, at 2 ang draws. Average goals: 1.67; BTTS: 67%.
Ano ang ipinapakita ng goal statistics bago ang Carolina Core vs Chicago Fire II?
Carolina Core scores 1.30 goals per match at Chicago Fire II 1.56. Ang MLS Next Pro average ay 3.23 goals, may Over 2.5 sa 65% ng matches. BTTS: Carolina Core 65%, Chicago Fire II 67%.
Ano ang current form ng Carolina Core at Chicago Fire II?
Sa last 5 matches, ang Carolina Core ay 2-2-1 (1.60 points per match), habang ang Chicago Fire II ay 2-2-1 (1.60 points per match).
Saan makikita ang betting pick at full analysis ng Carolina Core vs Chicago Fire II?
Nasa page na ito ang statistical context: form, H2H, goals, BTTS at Over/Under. Makikita sa NoFluffPicks app ang betting pick, value bet at full reasoning.


