United States - USL ChampionshipData updated noong July 23, 2026

Charleston Battery vs Pittsburgh Riverhounds: match stats

155%(2.15)
X30%(3.00)
215%(3.37)

Ang Charleston Battery ay nagpapakita ng significantly better offensive form sa huling limang laban, scoring 8 goals at nag-concede lang ng 3, na nagreresulta sa favorable goal difference. Ang hosts ay nasa mataas na 3rd position sa table at may 1.6 points per match sa recent games, nanalo ng dalawang beses sa period na ito. Ang Pittsburgh Riverhounds ay nasa malayong 19th place at nagde-demonstrate ng very weak efficiency – 1 goal lang sa last 5 matches at may series ng apat na draws, na nagpapakita ng problems sa pag-break ng defense ng rivals. Kahit na may solid defense ang guests (0 conceded goals sa last 5 matches), ang kanilang inability na mag-score (1.4 PPG) at passive form (dddwd) ay nagsu-suggest ng difficulties kontra Charleston. Considering ang advantage ng hosts sa offense, higher table position, at laro sa sariling crowd, ang Charleston Battery ay may clear chances na makuha ang three points, though ang defensive solidity ng Pittsburgh ay pwedeng maging dahilan ng tight victory.

Charleston Battery vs Pittsburgh Riverhounds: form, goals at mahahalagang stats

Mahahalagang detalye ng match

Charleston Battery vs Pittsburgh Riverhounds sa USL Championship (United States). Naka-schedule ang match sa 8 March 2026 at 00:00. Final score: 2:1.

Current form

Charleston Battery: 3-1-1 sa last five matches at 2.00 points per match. Pittsburgh Riverhounds: 2-1-2 at 1.40 points per match.

Goal statistics

Charleston Battery scores 1.94 at concedes 1.38 goals per match. Pittsburgh Riverhounds scores 1.27 at concedes 1.20. League average: 2.79 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Charleston Battery 50%, Pittsburgh Riverhounds 47%. Over 2.5: Charleston Battery 56%, Pittsburgh Riverhounds 47%. League level: BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 52%.

xG, shots at playing style

Charleston Battery ang may mas mataas na xG per match: 1.61 vs 1.24. Charleston Battery averages 13.1 shots per match, habang Pittsburgh Riverhounds ay 9.7.

First at second half

Charleston Battery leads at half-time sa 44% ng matches at scores 1.00 goals after the break. Pittsburgh Riverhounds: 27% at 0.87.

Goals by minute

Charleston Battery: 76-90+ (8 goals). Pittsburgh Riverhounds: 46-60 (7 goals). Historical goal distribution ito, hindi prediction ng exact goal minute.

League context

USL Championship: 2.79 goals per match, BTTS 58% at Over 2.5 52%.

Head-to-head

Sa 5 head-to-head matches, ang record ay 3-1-1. Average goals: 1.80, BTTS: 40%.

Match description

Ang Charleston Battery ay nagpapakita ng significantly better offensive form sa huling limang laban, scoring 8 goals at nag-concede lang ng 3, na nagreresulta sa favorable goal difference. Ang hosts ay nasa mataas na 3rd position sa table at may 1.6 points per match sa recent games, nanalo ng dalawang beses sa period na ito. Ang Pittsburgh Riverhounds ay nasa malayong 19th place at nagde-demonstrate ng very weak efficiency – 1 goal lang sa last 5 matches at may series ng apat na draws, na nagpapakita ng problems sa pag-break ng defense ng rivals. Kahit na may solid defense ang guests (0 conceded goals sa last 5 matches), ang kanilang inability na mag-score (1.4 PPG) at passive form (dddwd) ay nagsu-suggest ng difficulties kontra Charleston. Considering ang advantage ng hosts sa offense, higher table position, at laro sa sariling crowd, ang Charleston Battery ay may clear chances na makuha ang three points, though ang defensive solidity ng Pittsburgh ay pwedeng maging dahilan ng tight victory.

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
1 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

50Possession (%)50
Charleston BatteryPittsburgh Riverhounds
10Shots5
Charleston BatteryPittsburgh Riverhounds
7Shots on target2
Charleston BatteryPittsburgh Riverhounds
0xG0
Charleston BatteryPittsburgh Riverhounds
8Corners1
Charleston BatteryPittsburgh Riverhounds
0Dangerous attacks0
Charleston BatteryPittsburgh Riverhounds
9Fouls2
Charleston BatteryPittsburgh Riverhounds
2Cards0
Charleston BatteryPittsburgh Riverhounds

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Charleston BatteryPittsburgh Riverhounds
1.94Goals scored / match1.27
Charleston BatteryPittsburgh Riverhounds
1.38Goals conceded / match1.2
Charleston BatteryPittsburgh Riverhounds
Charleston BatteryPittsburgh Riverhounds
56%Average possession49%
Charleston BatteryPittsburgh Riverhounds
5.44Shots on target / match3.47
Charleston BatteryPittsburgh Riverhounds
Charleston BatteryPittsburgh Riverhounds

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

13.06Shots per match9.67
Charleston BatteryPittsburgh Riverhounds
5.44Shots on target3.47
Charleston BatteryPittsburgh Riverhounds
14.8%Shot conversion13.1%
Charleston BatteryPittsburgh Riverhounds
56%Possession49%
Charleston BatteryPittsburgh Riverhounds
1.61xG for1.24
Charleston BatteryPittsburgh Riverhounds
1.27xG against1.29
Charleston BatteryPittsburgh Riverhounds

Shooting quality

Charleston Battery: Efficient finishingPittsburgh Riverhounds: Efficient finishing
Charleston BatteryPittsburgh Riverhounds
Accuracy (shots on target)42%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.360.37

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Charleston Battery is 43% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / match - Charleston Battery · 1.4 pts / match - Pittsburgh Riverhounds

Charleston Battery
WWWLD
Season result split
50% W19% R31% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-3-5
1.69 pts / match · goal difference +9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
6-2-0
Last 5 at home
4-1-0
WWWWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 3.0Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.78Opponent xG: 1.20BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%
Pittsburgh Riverhounds
WDLLW
Season result split
47% W13% R40% P
Season (W-D-L)
7-2-6
1.53 pts / match · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-2-4
Last 5 away
1-2-2
DLWDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.30Opponent xG: 1.14BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalspaano nag-i-score at nagko-concede ang dalawang teams?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Charleston Battery is 53% better for: goals scored per match.

1.94 goals / match - Charleston Battery · 1.27 goals / match - Pittsburgh Riverhounds

Pittsburgh Riverhounds is 15% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.38 goals / match - Charleston Battery · 1.2 goals / match - Pittsburgh Riverhounds

Scoring profile ng Charleston Battery: malakas

Charleston Battery scores in 69% of matches (11 of 16 matches), while Pittsburgh Riverhounds keeps a clean sheet in 27% (4 of 15 matches).

Scoring profile ng Pittsburgh Riverhounds: napakalakas

Pittsburgh Riverhounds scores in 67% of matches (10 of 15 matches), while Charleston Battery keeps a clean sheet in 19% (3 of 16 matches).

31Goals scored (season)19
Charleston BatteryPittsburgh Riverhounds
22Goals conceded (season)18
Charleston BatteryPittsburgh Riverhounds
3.31Average goals in match2.47
Charleston BatteryPittsburgh Riverhounds
15Goals scored (last 5)5
Charleston BatteryPittsburgh Riverhounds
7Goals conceded (last 5)5
Charleston BatteryPittsburgh Riverhounds

How often they score at least...

69%1 goal67%
Charleston BatteryPittsburgh Riverhounds
56%2 goals40%
Charleston BatteryPittsburgh Riverhounds
31%3 goals20%
Charleston BatteryPittsburgh Riverhounds
25%4 goals0%
Charleston BatteryPittsburgh Riverhounds

How often they concede at least...

81%1 goal73%
Charleston BatteryPittsburgh Riverhounds
38%2 goals40%
Charleston BatteryPittsburgh Riverhounds
13%3 goals7%
Charleston BatteryPittsburgh Riverhounds
6%4 goals0%
Charleston BatteryPittsburgh Riverhounds

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)gaano kadalas nakaka-score ang parehong teams?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

50%
Charleston Battery - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.8 of 16 matches
47%
Pittsburgh Riverhounds - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.7 of 15 matches
58%
League average

Goal patterns

13%BTTS at half-time7%
Charleston BatteryPittsburgh Riverhounds
6%BTTS in both halves7%
Charleston BatteryPittsburgh Riverhounds
38%Scored in both halves27%
Charleston BatteryPittsburgh Riverhounds

BTTS and goal count

38%Min. 3 goals and BTTS40%
Charleston BatteryPittsburgh Riverhounds
19%Min. 3 goals without BTTS7%
Charleston BatteryPittsburgh Riverhounds
80%BTTS - last 540%
Charleston BatteryPittsburgh Riverhounds

Goal count (Over/Under)gaano kadalas lumalagpas sa goal lines ang kanilang matches?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

Full match - team comparison (Over)

Charleston BatteryPittsburgh Riverhounds
Charleston BatteryPittsburgh Riverhounds
Charleston BatteryPittsburgh Riverhounds
Charleston BatteryPittsburgh Riverhounds
Charleston BatteryPittsburgh Riverhounds

1st half

63%Min. 1 goal before half-time60%
Charleston BatteryPittsburgh Riverhounds
44%Min. 2 goals before half-time13%
Charleston BatteryPittsburgh Riverhounds
19%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Charleston BatteryPittsburgh Riverhounds

2nd half

94%Min. 1 goal after half-time87%
Charleston BatteryPittsburgh Riverhounds
63%Min. 2 goals after half-time60%
Charleston BatteryPittsburgh Riverhounds
31%Min. 3 goals after half-time20%
Charleston BatteryPittsburgh Riverhounds

Match halvessaang half mas madalas silang maka-score?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Charleston Battery is 33% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.69 pts / match - Charleston Battery · 1.27 pts / match - Pittsburgh Riverhounds

Charleston Battery - half-time state
44% leading38% draw19% trailing
Pittsburgh Riverhounds - half-time state
27% leading47% draw27% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.69Points per match (1st half)1.27
Charleston BatteryPittsburgh Riverhounds
0.94Goals scored (1st half)0.4
Charleston BatteryPittsburgh Riverhounds
0.44Goals conceded (1st half)0.33
Charleston BatteryPittsburgh Riverhounds
1.38Average goals (1st half)0.73
Charleston BatteryPittsburgh Riverhounds
69%Clean sheet before half-time67%
Charleston BatteryPittsburgh Riverhounds
56%No goal before half-time67%
Charleston BatteryPittsburgh Riverhounds

After half-time (2nd half)

1.56Points per match (2nd half)1.47
Charleston BatteryPittsburgh Riverhounds
1Goals scored (2nd half)0.87
Charleston BatteryPittsburgh Riverhounds
0.94Goals conceded (2nd half)0.87
Charleston BatteryPittsburgh Riverhounds
1.94Average goals (2nd half)1.73
Charleston BatteryPittsburgh Riverhounds
31%Clean sheet after half-time40%
Charleston BatteryPittsburgh Riverhounds
38%No goal after half-time40%
Charleston BatteryPittsburgh Riverhounds

Charleston Battery - second-half results

44% W25% R31% P
27
Half-time points
15
Half-time goals
+8
Goal difference (1st half)
25
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.69
PPG before half-time
Lead holding114%

Leads at half-time in 44% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Pittsburgh Riverhounds - second-half results

40% W27% R33% P
19
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
22
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.27
PPG before half-time
Lead holding174%

Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 47%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Charleston Battery - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.202.00
Goals scored / match1.61.4
Goals conceded / match0.41.0
Average goals in match2.02.4
1 goal60%100%
2 goals60%100%
3 goals40%40%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference+6+2
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 8
Pittsburgh Riverhounds - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.40
Goals scored / match0.20.8
Goals conceded / match0.01.0
Average goals in match0.21.8
1 goal20%80%
2 goals0%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet100%40%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference+1-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Charleston Battery
ScoredConceded
4
2
0-15
6
3
16-30
5
2
31-45
5
3
46-60
3
5
61-75
8
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Pittsburgh Riverhounds
ScoredConceded
3
0
0-15
3
3
16-30
0
2
31-45
7
4
46-60
3
4
61-75
3
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (7 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Karagdagang team indicatorsano ang ipinapakita ng xG, efficiency at form?

Comparison ng chance quality, results at trends mula sa mga natapos na matches ngayong season.

Match profile

2.89
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.6 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
104%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
49%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-38%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
46%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
10%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 10 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Charleston Battery

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.34
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.22
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.33
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.11
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
126%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
110%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.31
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
26% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
26%

Pittsburgh Riverhounds

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.05
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.12
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.03
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.09
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
102%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
78%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.13
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
16% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 16% come in the first quarter-hour.
16%

* Ang estimated goals, goal split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk at goal range ay galing sa public season averages at frequencies ng dalawang teams. Statistical match profile ito, hindi private model prediction o betting pick.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (USL Championship).

Teams vs league

Charleston BatteryLigaPittsburgh Riverhounds
Average goals in match 3.312.79 2.47
Both teams scored 50%58% 47%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 56%52% 47%
Clean sheets 19%26% 27%
Goal before half-time 63%67% 60%
Goal after half-time 94%80% 87%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.79
Average goals per match
58%
Both teams scored
52%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
26%
Clean sheets
1.54
Home goals / match
1.25
Away goals / match
+23%
Home attack advantage
+19%
Home defence advantage
+17%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
67%
1 goal
36%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
50%
2 goals
22%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (5): Charleston Battery 3 - 1 - 1 Pittsburgh Riverhounds. Average goals 1.80, both teams scored in 40% mga match.

Pittsburgh Riverhounds FC
1 : 2
Charleston Battery
Charleston Battery
2 : 1
Pittsburgh Riverhounds FC
Charleston Battery
1 : 0
Pittsburgh Riverhounds
Pittsburgh Riverhounds
2 : 0
Charleston Battery
Charleston Battery
0 : 0
Pittsburgh Riverhounds

Mga madalas itanong

Ano ang result ng Charleston Battery vs Pittsburgh Riverhounds?

Natapos ang USL Championship match sa score na Charleston Battery 2:1 Pittsburgh Riverhounds. Nasa page na ito ang match statistics, half-by-half data at head-to-head record.

Ano ang head-to-head record ng Charleston Battery at Pittsburgh Riverhounds?

Sa huling 5 head-to-head matches, nanalo ang Charleston Battery ng 3, ang Pittsburgh Riverhounds ng 1, at 1 ang draws. Average goals: 1.80; BTTS: 40%.

Ano ang ipinapakita ng goal statistics bago ang Charleston Battery vs Pittsburgh Riverhounds?

Charleston Battery scores 1.94 goals per match at Pittsburgh Riverhounds 1.27. Ang USL Championship average ay 2.79 goals, may Over 2.5 sa 52% ng matches. BTTS: Charleston Battery 50%, Pittsburgh Riverhounds 47%.

Ano ang current form ng Charleston Battery at Pittsburgh Riverhounds?

Sa last 5 matches, ang Charleston Battery ay 3-1-1 (2.00 points per match), habang ang Pittsburgh Riverhounds ay 2-1-2 (1.40 points per match).

Saan makikita ang betting pick at full analysis ng Charleston Battery vs Pittsburgh Riverhounds?

Nasa page na ito ang statistical context: form, H2H, goals, BTTS at Over/Under. Makikita sa NoFluffPicks app ang betting pick, value bet at full reasoning.