United States - USL ChampionshipMUSC Health StadiumData updated noong July 23, 2026

Charleston Battery vs Tulsa Roughnecks: match stats

Charleston Battery vs Tulsa Roughnecks: form, goals at mahahalagang stats

Mahahalagang detalye ng match

Charleston Battery vs Tulsa Roughnecks sa USL Championship (United States). Naka-schedule ang match sa 14 June 2026 at 01:30. Venue: MUSC Health Stadium. Final score: 5:1.

Current form

Charleston Battery: 3-1-1 sa last five matches at 2.00 points per match. Tulsa Roughnecks: 2-1-2 at 1.40 points per match.

Goal statistics

Charleston Battery scores 1.94 at concedes 1.38 goals per match. Tulsa Roughnecks scores 1.29 at concedes 1.14. League average: 2.79 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Charleston Battery 50%, Tulsa Roughnecks 50%. Over 2.5: Charleston Battery 56%, Tulsa Roughnecks 36%. League level: BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 52%.

xG, shots at playing style

Charleston Battery ang may mas mataas na xG per match: 1.61 vs 1.29. Charleston Battery averages 13.1 shots per match, habang Tulsa Roughnecks ay 10.9.

First at second half

Charleston Battery leads at half-time sa 44% ng matches at scores 1.00 goals after the break. Tulsa Roughnecks: 36% at 0.79.

Goals by minute

Charleston Battery: 76-90+ (8 goals). Tulsa Roughnecks: 31-45+ (5 goals). Historical goal distribution ito, hindi prediction ng exact goal minute.

League context

USL Championship: 2.79 goals per match, BTTS 58% at Over 2.5 52%.

Head-to-head

Sa 1 head-to-head matches, ang record ay 1-0-0. Average goals: 5.00, BTTS: 100%.

Match description

Charleston Battery may malinaw na home advantage: nag-s-suffers ng average na 2.4 goals per home match with average xG 1.88, kumukuha ng 14.6 shots with 6.8 on target, habang ang Tulsa on the road averages 1.4 goals with xG 1.37 at 11.6 shots and 4.2 on target. Ang hosts concede average 0.8 goals at home at may 40% clean sheets, at 0% home matches na hindi sila nag-s-score; ang visitors naman concede 1.0 goals away at may 40% away matches without scoring. Charleston converts chances better (16% shot conversion vs 12% Tulsa) at may higher possession (57% vs 45%), resulting in superiority in quality of chances (xG For 1.88 vs 1.37 at xG Against 1.03 vs 1.19). Tulsa however has better short-term form: 3 wins in last 5 and average 2.0 points in that span vs Charleston’s 2 wins and 1.6 points, so visitors can be dangerous on counterattacks. Given statistical dominance ng home attack ng hosts and better defense, tip ko is a Charleston win.

Half-by-half

3 : 1
1st half
2 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

66Possession (%)34
Charleston BatteryTulsa Roughnecks
18Shots13
Charleston BatteryTulsa Roughnecks
10Shots on target4
Charleston BatteryTulsa Roughnecks
2.17xG1.38
Charleston BatteryTulsa Roughnecks
3Corners4
Charleston BatteryTulsa Roughnecks
48Dangerous attacks39
Charleston BatteryTulsa Roughnecks
9Fouls16
Charleston BatteryTulsa Roughnecks
1Cards3
Charleston BatteryTulsa Roughnecks

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Charleston BatteryTulsa Roughnecks
1.94Goals scored / match1.29
Charleston BatteryTulsa Roughnecks
1.38Goals conceded / match1.14
Charleston BatteryTulsa Roughnecks
Charleston BatteryTulsa Roughnecks
56%Average possession45%
Charleston BatteryTulsa Roughnecks
5.44Shots on target / match3.36
Charleston BatteryTulsa Roughnecks
Charleston BatteryTulsa Roughnecks

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

13.06Shots per match10.93
Charleston BatteryTulsa Roughnecks
5.44Shots on target3.36
Charleston BatteryTulsa Roughnecks
14.8%Shot conversion11.8%
Charleston BatteryTulsa Roughnecks
56%Possession45%
Charleston BatteryTulsa Roughnecks
1.61xG for1.29
Charleston BatteryTulsa Roughnecks
1.27xG against1.29
Charleston BatteryTulsa Roughnecks

Shooting quality

Charleston Battery: Efficient finishingTulsa Roughnecks: Balanced
Charleston BatteryTulsa Roughnecks
Accuracy (shots on target)42%31%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.360.38

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Charleston Battery is 43% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / match - Charleston Battery · 1.4 pts / match - Tulsa Roughnecks

Charleston Battery
WWWLD
Season result split
50% W19% R31% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-3-5
1.69 pts / match · goal difference +9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
6-2-0
Last 5 at home
4-1-0
WWWWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 3.0Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.78Opponent xG: 1.20BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%
Tulsa Roughnecks
DLWLW
Season result split
43% W29% R29% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-4-4
1.57 pts / match · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-2-2
Last 5 away
2-2-1
DWWDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.17Opponent xG: 1.41BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalspaano nag-i-score at nagko-concede ang dalawang teams?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Charleston Battery is 50% better for: goals scored per match.

1.94 goals / match - Charleston Battery · 1.29 goals / match - Tulsa Roughnecks

Tulsa Roughnecks is 21% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.38 goals / match - Charleston Battery · 1.14 goals / match - Tulsa Roughnecks

Scoring profile ng Charleston Battery: malakas

Charleston Battery scores in 69% of matches (11 of 16 matches), while Tulsa Roughnecks keeps a clean sheet in 36% (5 of 14 matches).

Scoring profile ng Tulsa Roughnecks: napakalakas

Tulsa Roughnecks scores in 71% of matches (10 of 14 matches), while Charleston Battery keeps a clean sheet in 19% (3 of 16 matches).

31Goals scored (season)18
Charleston BatteryTulsa Roughnecks
22Goals conceded (season)16
Charleston BatteryTulsa Roughnecks
3.31Average goals in match2.43
Charleston BatteryTulsa Roughnecks
15Goals scored (last 5)5
Charleston BatteryTulsa Roughnecks
7Goals conceded (last 5)7
Charleston BatteryTulsa Roughnecks

How often they score at least...

69%1 goal71%
Charleston BatteryTulsa Roughnecks
56%2 goals36%
Charleston BatteryTulsa Roughnecks
31%3 goals14%
Charleston BatteryTulsa Roughnecks
25%4 goals7%
Charleston BatteryTulsa Roughnecks

How often they concede at least...

81%1 goal64%
Charleston BatteryTulsa Roughnecks
38%2 goals29%
Charleston BatteryTulsa Roughnecks
13%3 goals7%
Charleston BatteryTulsa Roughnecks
6%4 goals7%
Charleston BatteryTulsa Roughnecks

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)gaano kadalas nakaka-score ang parehong teams?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

50%
Charleston Battery - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.8 of 16 matches
58%
League average

Goal patterns

13%BTTS at half-time14%
Charleston BatteryTulsa Roughnecks
6%BTTS in both halves7%
Charleston BatteryTulsa Roughnecks
38%Scored in both halves29%
Charleston BatteryTulsa Roughnecks

BTTS and goal count

38%Min. 3 goals and BTTS36%
Charleston BatteryTulsa Roughnecks
19%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Charleston BatteryTulsa Roughnecks
80%BTTS - last 540%
Charleston BatteryTulsa Roughnecks

Goal count (Over/Under)gaano kadalas lumalagpas sa goal lines ang kanilang matches?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

Full match - team comparison (Over)

1st half

63%Min. 1 goal before half-time64%
Charleston BatteryTulsa Roughnecks
44%Min. 2 goals before half-time14%
Charleston BatteryTulsa Roughnecks
19%Min. 3 goals before half-time7%
Charleston BatteryTulsa Roughnecks

2nd half

94%Min. 1 goal after half-time79%
Charleston BatteryTulsa Roughnecks
63%Min. 2 goals after half-time50%
Charleston BatteryTulsa Roughnecks
31%Min. 3 goals after half-time14%
Charleston BatteryTulsa Roughnecks

Match halvessaang half mas madalas silang maka-score?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Charleston Battery is 13% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.69 pts / match - Charleston Battery · 1.5 pts / match - Tulsa Roughnecks

Charleston Battery - half-time state
44% leading38% draw19% trailing
Tulsa Roughnecks - half-time state
36% leading43% draw21% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.69Points per match (1st half)1.5
Charleston BatteryTulsa Roughnecks
0.94Goals scored (1st half)0.5
Charleston BatteryTulsa Roughnecks
0.44Goals conceded (1st half)0.43
Charleston BatteryTulsa Roughnecks
1.38Average goals (1st half)0.93
Charleston BatteryTulsa Roughnecks
69%Clean sheet before half-time71%
Charleston BatteryTulsa Roughnecks
56%No goal before half-time50%
Charleston BatteryTulsa Roughnecks

After half-time (2nd half)

1.56Points per match (2nd half)1.57
Charleston BatteryTulsa Roughnecks
1Goals scored (2nd half)0.79
Charleston BatteryTulsa Roughnecks
0.94Goals conceded (2nd half)0.71
Charleston BatteryTulsa Roughnecks
1.94Average goals (2nd half)1.5
Charleston BatteryTulsa Roughnecks
31%Clean sheet after half-time50%
Charleston BatteryTulsa Roughnecks
38%No goal after half-time50%
Charleston BatteryTulsa Roughnecks

Charleston Battery - second-half results

44% W25% R31% P
27
Half-time points
15
Half-time goals
+8
Goal difference (1st half)
25
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.69
PPG before half-time
Lead holding114%

Leads at half-time in 44% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Tulsa Roughnecks - second-half results

43% W29% R29% P
21
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
22
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.50
PPG before half-time
Lead holding119%

Leads at half-time in 36% of matches and wins 43%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Charleston Battery - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.202.00
Goals scored / match1.61.4
Goals conceded / match0.41.0
Average goals in match2.02.4
1 goal60%100%
2 goals60%100%
3 goals40%40%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference+6+2
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 8
Tulsa Roughnecks - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.001.00
Goals scored / match0.80.2
Goals conceded / match0.60.8
Average goals in match1.41.0
1 goal80%60%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal20%80%
Goal difference+1-3
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Charleston Battery
ScoredConceded
4
2
0-15
6
3
16-30
5
2
31-45
5
3
46-60
3
5
61-75
8
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Tulsa Roughnecks
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
1
3
16-30
5
2
31-45
5
4
46-60
4
3
61-75
2
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (5 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Karagdagang team indicatorsano ang ipinapakita ng xG, efficiency at form?

Comparison ng chance quality, results at trends mula sa mga natapos na matches ngayong season.

Match profile

2.88
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.5 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
103%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+74%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
49%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
9%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 11 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Charleston Battery

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.34
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.22
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.33
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.11
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
126%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
110%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.31
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
26% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
26%

Tulsa Roughnecks

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
0.00
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.15
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
0.00
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.15
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
103%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
74%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.17
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
11% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 6% come in the first quarter-hour.
11%

* Ang estimated goals, goal split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk at goal range ay galing sa public season averages at frequencies ng dalawang teams. Statistical match profile ito, hindi private model prediction o betting pick.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (USL Championship).

Teams vs league

Charleston BatteryLigaTulsa Roughnecks
Average goals in match 3.312.79 2.43
Both teams scored 50%58% 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 56%52% 36%
Clean sheets 19%26% 36%
Goal before half-time 63%67% 64%
Goal after half-time 94%80% 79%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.79
Average goals per match
58%
Both teams scored
52%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
26%
Clean sheets
1.54
Home goals / match
1.25
Away goals / match
+23%
Home attack advantage
+19%
Home defence advantage
+17%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
67%
1 goal
36%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
50%
2 goals
22%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Charleston Battery 1 - 0 - 0 Tulsa Roughnecks. Average goals 5.00, both teams scored in 100% mga match.

Tulsa Roughnecks
1 : 4
Charleston Battery

Mga madalas itanong

Ano ang result ng Charleston Battery vs Tulsa Roughnecks?

Natapos ang USL Championship match sa score na Charleston Battery 5:1 Tulsa Roughnecks. Nasa page na ito ang match statistics, half-by-half data at head-to-head record.

Ano ang ipinapakita ng goal statistics bago ang Charleston Battery vs Tulsa Roughnecks?

Charleston Battery scores 1.94 goals per match at Tulsa Roughnecks 1.29. Ang USL Championship average ay 2.79 goals, may Over 2.5 sa 52% ng matches. BTTS: Charleston Battery 50%, Tulsa Roughnecks 50%.

Ano ang current form ng Charleston Battery at Tulsa Roughnecks?

Sa last 5 matches, ang Charleston Battery ay 3-1-1 (2.00 points per match), habang ang Tulsa Roughnecks ay 2-1-2 (1.40 points per match).

Saan makikita ang betting pick at full analysis ng Charleston Battery vs Tulsa Roughnecks?

Nasa page na ito ang statistical context: form, H2H, goals, BTTS at Over/Under. Makikita sa NoFluffPicks app ang betting pick, value bet at full reasoning.