United States - USL League OneDavid Stanton Field At CCSData updated noong July 23, 2026

Chattanooga Red Wolves vs Richmond Kickers: match stats

Chattanooga Red Wolves vs Richmond Kickers: form, goals at mahahalagang stats

Mahahalagang detalye ng match

Chattanooga Red Wolves vs Richmond Kickers sa USL League One (United States). Naka-schedule ang match sa 28 May 2026 at 01:00. Venue: David Stanton Field At CCS. Final score: 5:0.

Current form

Chattanooga Red Wolves: 4-0-1 sa last five matches at 2.40 points per match. Richmond Kickers: 0-1-4 at 0.20 points per match.

Goal statistics

Chattanooga Red Wolves scores 1.93 at concedes 1.21 goals per match. Richmond Kickers scores 0.71 at concedes 1.88. League average: 2.85 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Chattanooga Red Wolves 57%, Richmond Kickers 35%. Over 2.5: Chattanooga Red Wolves 64%, Richmond Kickers 47%. League level: BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 59%.

xG, shots at playing style

Chattanooga Red Wolves ang may mas mataas na xG per match: 1.52 vs 1.24. Chattanooga Red Wolves averages 12.5 shots per match, habang Richmond Kickers ay 10.1.

First at second half

Chattanooga Red Wolves leads at half-time sa 36% ng matches at scores 1.07 goals after the break. Richmond Kickers: 18% at 0.29.

Goals by minute

Chattanooga Red Wolves: 46-60 (7 goals). Richmond Kickers: 0-15 (3 goals). Historical goal distribution ito, hindi prediction ng exact goal minute.

League context

USL League One: 2.85 goals per match, BTTS 55% at Over 2.5 59%.

Head-to-head

Sa 2 head-to-head matches, ang record ay 1-1-0. Average goals: 1.00, BTTS: 0%.

Match description

Favorite sa match: Chattanooga Red Wolves — home xG nila 1.66 vs Richmond away 1.04. Chattanooga gumagawa ng average na 11.5 shots at 5 on target per match vs 8.25 shots at 3 on target ng visitors. Nagri-reflect ito sa average goals: 2.0 para Chattanooga home vs 1.25 para Richmond away, at mas mababang goals conceded avg sa hosts (1.0 vs 1.25 away). Samantala, Richmond may better recent form at efficiency — 3 wins at 7 goals in last 5 matches at 1.8 points per match, kontra 1 win, 6 goals at 0.8 points para Chattanooga. Risk din for hosts: Chattanooga failed to score in 50% ng home games, habang Richmond failed to score away only in 25% ng matches. Considering higher chance creation ng hosts (xG 1.66, 11.5 shots) pero better form ng visitors, nagbibigay ako ng Chattanooga 50%, draw 20% at Richmond 30% chance sa final result.

Half-by-half

2 : 0
1st half
3 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

53Possession (%)47
Chattanooga Red WolvesRichmond Kickers
23Shots12
Chattanooga Red WolvesRichmond Kickers
8Shots on target4
Chattanooga Red WolvesRichmond Kickers
2.41xG1.3
Chattanooga Red WolvesRichmond Kickers
7Corners5
Chattanooga Red WolvesRichmond Kickers
57Dangerous attacks36
Chattanooga Red WolvesRichmond Kickers
12Fouls18
Chattanooga Red WolvesRichmond Kickers
2Cards4
Chattanooga Red WolvesRichmond Kickers

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Chattanooga Red WolvesRichmond Kickers
1.93Goals scored / match0.71
Chattanooga Red WolvesRichmond Kickers
1.21Goals conceded / match1.88
Chattanooga Red WolvesRichmond Kickers
Chattanooga Red WolvesRichmond Kickers
38%Average possession43%
Chattanooga Red WolvesRichmond Kickers
4.64Shots on target / match3.24
Chattanooga Red WolvesRichmond Kickers
Chattanooga Red WolvesRichmond Kickers

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.5Shots per match10.06
Chattanooga Red WolvesRichmond Kickers
4.64Shots on target3.24
Chattanooga Red WolvesRichmond Kickers
15.4%Shot conversion7%
Chattanooga Red WolvesRichmond Kickers
38%Possession43%
Chattanooga Red WolvesRichmond Kickers
1.52xG for1.24
Chattanooga Red WolvesRichmond Kickers
1.56xG against1.76
Chattanooga Red WolvesRichmond Kickers

Shooting quality

Chattanooga Red Wolves: Counter-attackingRichmond Kickers: Balanced
Chattanooga Red WolvesRichmond Kickers
Accuracy (shots on target)37%32%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.420.22

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Chattanooga Red Wolves is 1100% better for: last-5 form.

2.4 pts / match - Chattanooga Red Wolves · 0.2 pts / match - Richmond Kickers

Chattanooga Red Wolves
WWLWW
Season result split
57% W7% R36% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-1-5
1.79 pts / match · goal difference +10
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-0-1
2.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-0-2
Last 5 at home
4-0-1
WLWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.52Opponent xG: 1.38BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Richmond Kickers
LDLLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
18% W18% R65% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-3-11
0.71 pts / match · goal difference -20
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-4
0.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-1-7
Last 5 away
0-0-5
LLLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.2Goals conceded: 2.6xG: 0.97Opponent xG: 1.73BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalspaano nag-i-score at nagko-concede ang dalawang teams?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Chattanooga Red Wolves is 172% better for: goals scored per match.

1.93 goals / match - Chattanooga Red Wolves · 0.71 goals / match - Richmond Kickers

Chattanooga Red Wolves is 55% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.21 goals / match - Chattanooga Red Wolves · 1.88 goals / match - Richmond Kickers

Scoring profile ng Chattanooga Red Wolves: napakalakas

Chattanooga Red Wolves scores in 86% of matches (12 of 14 matches), while Richmond Kickers keeps a clean sheet in 18% (3 of 17 matches).

Scoring profile ng Richmond Kickers: mixed

Richmond Kickers scores in 47% of matches (8 of 17 matches), while Chattanooga Red Wolves keeps a clean sheet in 29% (4 of 14 matches).

27Goals scored (season)12
Chattanooga Red WolvesRichmond Kickers
17Goals conceded (season)32
Chattanooga Red WolvesRichmond Kickers
3.14Average goals in match2.59
Chattanooga Red WolvesRichmond Kickers
9Goals scored (last 5)1
Chattanooga Red WolvesRichmond Kickers
4Goals conceded (last 5)13
Chattanooga Red WolvesRichmond Kickers

How often they score at least...

86%1 goal47%
Chattanooga Red WolvesRichmond Kickers
57%2 goals18%
Chattanooga Red WolvesRichmond Kickers
21%3 goals6%
Chattanooga Red WolvesRichmond Kickers
21%4 goals0%
Chattanooga Red WolvesRichmond Kickers

How often they concede at least...

71%1 goal82%
Chattanooga Red WolvesRichmond Kickers
43%2 goals53%
Chattanooga Red WolvesRichmond Kickers
7%3 goals24%
Chattanooga Red WolvesRichmond Kickers
0%4 goals18%
Chattanooga Red WolvesRichmond Kickers

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)gaano kadalas nakaka-score ang parehong teams?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

57%
Chattanooga Red Wolves - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.8 of 14 matches
55%
League average

Goal patterns

36%BTTS at half-time24%
Chattanooga Red WolvesRichmond Kickers
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Chattanooga Red WolvesRichmond Kickers
29%Scored in both halves18%
Chattanooga Red WolvesRichmond Kickers

BTTS and goal count

57%Min. 3 goals and BTTS29%
Chattanooga Red WolvesRichmond Kickers
7%Min. 3 goals without BTTS18%
Chattanooga Red WolvesRichmond Kickers
40%BTTS - last 520%
Chattanooga Red WolvesRichmond Kickers

Goal count (Over/Under)gaano kadalas lumalagpas sa goal lines ang kanilang matches?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

Full match - team comparison (Over)

Chattanooga Red WolvesRichmond Kickers
Chattanooga Red WolvesRichmond Kickers

1st half

79%Min. 1 goal before half-time82%
Chattanooga Red WolvesRichmond Kickers
50%Min. 2 goals before half-time53%
Chattanooga Red WolvesRichmond Kickers
21%Min. 3 goals before half-time6%
Chattanooga Red WolvesRichmond Kickers

2nd half

86%Min. 1 goal after half-time65%
Chattanooga Red WolvesRichmond Kickers
43%Min. 2 goals after half-time29%
Chattanooga Red WolvesRichmond Kickers
14%Min. 3 goals after half-time18%
Chattanooga Red WolvesRichmond Kickers

Match halvessaang half mas madalas silang maka-score?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Chattanooga Red Wolves is 70% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.5 pts / match - Chattanooga Red Wolves · 0.88 pts / match - Richmond Kickers

Chattanooga Red Wolves - half-time state
36% leading43% draw21% trailing
Richmond Kickers - half-time state
18% leading35% draw47% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.5Points per match (1st half)0.88
Chattanooga Red WolvesRichmond Kickers
0.86Goals scored (1st half)0.41
Chattanooga Red WolvesRichmond Kickers
0.71Goals conceded (1st half)1
Chattanooga Red WolvesRichmond Kickers
1.57Average goals (1st half)1.41
Chattanooga Red WolvesRichmond Kickers
43%Clean sheet before half-time35%
Chattanooga Red WolvesRichmond Kickers
43%No goal before half-time59%
Chattanooga Red WolvesRichmond Kickers

After half-time (2nd half)

1.71Points per match (2nd half)0.88
Chattanooga Red WolvesRichmond Kickers
1.07Goals scored (2nd half)0.29
Chattanooga Red WolvesRichmond Kickers
0.5Goals conceded (2nd half)0.88
Chattanooga Red WolvesRichmond Kickers
1.57Average goals (2nd half)1.18
Chattanooga Red WolvesRichmond Kickers
57%Clean sheet after half-time53%
Chattanooga Red WolvesRichmond Kickers
43%No goal after half-time76%
Chattanooga Red WolvesRichmond Kickers

Chattanooga Red Wolves - second-half results

50% W21% R29% P
21
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
24
Second-half points
+8
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.50
PPG before half-time
Lead holding158%

Leads at half-time in 36% of matches and wins 57%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Richmond Kickers - second-half results

18% W35% R47% P
15
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
-10
Goal difference (1st half)
15
Second-half points
-10
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.88
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 18% of matches and wins 18%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Chattanooga Red Wolves - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.202.00
Goals scored / match0.41.4
Goals conceded / match0.40.4
Average goals in match0.81.8
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference0+5
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
Richmond Kickers - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.400.40
Goals scored / match0.20.0
Goals conceded / match1.21.4
Average goals in match1.41.4
1 goal80%60%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet20%40%
No goal80%100%
Goal difference-5-7
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Chattanooga Red Wolves
ScoredConceded
4
8
0-15
5
0
16-30
3
2
31-45
7
3
46-60
3
2
61-75
5
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (7 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

Richmond Kickers
ScoredConceded
3
6
0-15
2
8
16-30
2
3
31-45
3
7
46-60
1
3
61-75
1
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (3 goli). Concedes most in 16-30 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Karagdagang team indicatorsano ang ipinapakita ng xG, efficiency at form?

Comparison ng chance quality, results at trends mula sa mga natapos na matches ngayong season.

Match profile

2.86
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.9 : 1.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
101%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
46%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-65%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
40%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
7%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 14 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Chattanooga Red Wolves

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.04
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.76
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.41
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.35
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
112%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
108%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.61
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
19% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
19%

Richmond Kickers

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.52
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.65
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+5.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.53
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.12
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
63%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
109%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.51
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
8% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 25% come in the first quarter-hour.
8%

* Ang estimated goals, goal split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk at goal range ay galing sa public season averages at frequencies ng dalawang teams. Statistical match profile ito, hindi private model prediction o betting pick.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (USL League One).

Teams vs league

Chattanooga Red WolvesLigaRichmond Kickers
Average goals in match 3.142.85 2.59
Both teams scored 57%55% 35%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 64%59% 47%
Clean sheets 29%26% 18%
Goal before half-time 79%73% 82%
Goal after half-time 86%80% 65%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.85
Average goals per match
55%
Both teams scored
59%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
26%
Clean sheets
1.73
Home goals / match
1.12
Away goals / match
+54%
Home attack advantage
+35%
Home defence advantage
+30%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
42%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
47%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Chattanooga Red Wolves 1 - 1 - 0 Richmond Kickers. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% mga match.

Richmond Kickers
0 : 2
Chattanooga Red Wolves SC
Chattanooga Red Wolves SC
0 : 0
Richmond Kickers

Mga madalas itanong

Ano ang result ng Chattanooga Red Wolves vs Richmond Kickers?

Natapos ang USL League One match sa score na Chattanooga Red Wolves 5:0 Richmond Kickers. Nasa page na ito ang match statistics, half-by-half data at head-to-head record.

Ano ang head-to-head record ng Chattanooga Red Wolves at Richmond Kickers?

Sa huling 2 head-to-head matches, nanalo ang Chattanooga Red Wolves ng 1, ang Richmond Kickers ng 0, at 1 ang draws. Average goals: 1.00; BTTS: 0%.

Ano ang ipinapakita ng goal statistics bago ang Chattanooga Red Wolves vs Richmond Kickers?

Chattanooga Red Wolves scores 1.93 goals per match at Richmond Kickers 0.71. Ang USL League One average ay 2.85 goals, may Over 2.5 sa 59% ng matches. BTTS: Chattanooga Red Wolves 57%, Richmond Kickers 35%.

Ano ang current form ng Chattanooga Red Wolves at Richmond Kickers?

Sa last 5 matches, ang Chattanooga Red Wolves ay 4-0-1 (2.40 points per match), habang ang Richmond Kickers ay 0-1-4 (0.20 points per match).

Saan makikita ang betting pick at full analysis ng Chattanooga Red Wolves vs Richmond Kickers?

Nasa page na ito ang statistical context: form, H2H, goals, BTTS at Over/Under. Makikita sa NoFluffPicks app ang betting pick, value bet at full reasoning.