England - EFL League TwoData updated noong July 23, 2026

Cheltenham Town vs Barrow: match stats

Cheltenham Town crest
Cheltenham Town
2 : 2half-time 1:1
Barrow crest
Barrow
155%(2.45)
X25%(3.40)
220%(2.80)

Mas maganda ang performance ng Cheltenham Town sa direct comparison, kahit difficult ang league situation ng both teams. May clear advantage ang hosts sa home matches na may 44% win rate at only 31% scoreless matches, habang ang Barrow on the road ay nananalo lang ng 24% at natatalo ng 59%. Ang form sa last 5 matches ay pabor din sa hosts (1.2 points per match) compared sa disastrous form ng guests (0.6 points per match at streak ng 4 losses). May defensive problems ang Barrow sa away games, conceding avg 1.65 goals per match, na considering sa decent efficiency ng Cheltenham sa home (1.19 avg goals) ay nagbibigay ng chance for 3 points. Kahit hindi peak form ang both teams, ang home advantage at better disposition ay dapat mag-tilt ng win sa Cheltenham Town.

Cheltenham Town vs Barrow: form, goals at mahahalagang stats

Mahahalagang detalye ng match

Cheltenham Town vs Barrow sa EFL League Two (England). Naka-schedule ang match sa 6 March 2026 at 20:45. Final score: 2:2.

Current form

Cheltenham Town: 2-0-3 sa last five matches at 1.20 points per match. Barrow: 1-0-4 at 0.60 points per match.

Goal statistics

Cheltenham Town scores 1.15 at concedes 1.72 goals per match. Barrow scores 0.98 at concedes 1.70. League average: 2.57 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Cheltenham Town 52%, Barrow 57%. Over 2.5: Cheltenham Town 48%, Barrow 63%. League level: BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 48%.

xG, shots at playing style

Barrow ang may mas mataas na xG per match: 1.22 vs 1.16. Cheltenham Town averages 10.3 shots per match, habang Barrow ay 10.6.

First at second half

Cheltenham Town leads at half-time sa 11% ng matches at scores 0.83 goals after the break. Barrow: 17% at 0.52.

Goals by minute

Cheltenham Town: 61-75 (16 goals). Barrow: 31-45+ (11 goals). Historical goal distribution ito, hindi prediction ng exact goal minute.

League context

League Two: 2.57 goals per match, BTTS 52% at Over 2.5 48%.

Head-to-head

Sa 1 head-to-head matches, ang record ay 1-0-0. Average goals: 3.00, BTTS: 100%.

Match description

Mas maganda ang performance ng Cheltenham Town sa direct comparison, kahit difficult ang league situation ng both teams. May clear advantage ang hosts sa home matches na may 44% win rate at only 31% scoreless matches, habang ang Barrow on the road ay nananalo lang ng 24% at natatalo ng 59%. Ang form sa last 5 matches ay pabor din sa hosts (1.2 points per match) compared sa disastrous form ng guests (0.6 points per match at streak ng 4 losses). May defensive problems ang Barrow sa away games, conceding avg 1.65 goals per match, na considering sa decent efficiency ng Cheltenham sa home (1.19 avg goals) ay nagbibigay ng chance for 3 points. Kahit hindi peak form ang both teams, ang home advantage at better disposition ay dapat mag-tilt ng win sa Cheltenham Town.

Half-by-half

1 : 1
1st half
1 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

53Possession (%)47
Cheltenham TownBarrow
15Shots10
Cheltenham TownBarrow
4Shots on target7
Cheltenham TownBarrow
1.55xG1.41
Cheltenham TownBarrow
1Corners3
Cheltenham TownBarrow
43Dangerous attacks38
Cheltenham TownBarrow
9Fouls15
Cheltenham TownBarrow
1Cards2
Cheltenham TownBarrow

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Cheltenham TownBarrow
1.15Goals scored / match0.98
Cheltenham TownBarrow
1.72Goals conceded / match1.7
Cheltenham TownBarrow
49%Average possession46%
Cheltenham TownBarrow
2.98Shots on target / match3.17
Cheltenham TownBarrow

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.26Shots per match10.63
Cheltenham TownBarrow
2.98Shots on target3.17
Cheltenham TownBarrow
11.2%Shot conversion9.2%
Cheltenham TownBarrow
49%Possession46%
Cheltenham TownBarrow
1.16xG for1.22
Cheltenham TownBarrow
1.64xG against1.62
Cheltenham TownBarrow

Shooting quality

Cheltenham Town: BalancedBarrow: Balanced
Cheltenham TownBarrow
Accuracy (shots on target)29%30%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.390.31

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Cheltenham Town is 100% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - Cheltenham Town · 0.6 pts / match - Barrow

Cheltenham Town
WWLLL
Season result split
30% W22% R48% P
Season (W-D-L)
14-10-22
1.13 pts / match · goal difference -26
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
9-4-10
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
DWWLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 2.4xG: 1.20Opponent xG: 1.54BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%
Barrow
LWLLL
Season result split
20% W20% R61% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-9-28
0.78 pts / match · goal difference -33
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-4
0.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-5-14
Last 5 away
0-1-4
LLDLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 2.6xG: 1.31Opponent xG: 1.83BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 100%

Goalspaano nag-i-score at nagko-concede ang dalawang teams?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Cheltenham Town is 17% better for: goals scored per match.

1.15 goals / match - Cheltenham Town · 0.98 goals / match - Barrow

Scoring profile ng Cheltenham Town: napakalakas

Cheltenham Town scores in 74% of matches (34 of 46 matches), while Barrow keeps a clean sheet in 15% (7 of 46 matches).

Scoring profile ng Barrow: malakas

Barrow scores in 63% of matches (29 of 46 matches), while Cheltenham Town keeps a clean sheet in 24% (11 of 46 matches).

53Goals scored (season)45
Cheltenham TownBarrow
79Goals conceded (season)78
Cheltenham TownBarrow
2.87Average goals in match2.67
Cheltenham TownBarrow
5Goals scored (last 5)7
Cheltenham TownBarrow
12Goals conceded (last 5)13
Cheltenham TownBarrow

How often they score at least...

74%1 goal63%
Cheltenham TownBarrow
30%2 goals30%
Cheltenham TownBarrow
9%3 goals4%
Cheltenham TownBarrow
2%4 goals0%
Cheltenham TownBarrow

How often they concede at least...

76%1 goal85%
Cheltenham TownBarrow
48%2 goals59%
Cheltenham TownBarrow
24%3 goals22%
Cheltenham TownBarrow
13%4 goals2%
Cheltenham TownBarrow

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)gaano kadalas nakaka-score ang parehong teams?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

52%
League average

Goal patterns

17%BTTS at half-time20%
Cheltenham TownBarrow
7%BTTS in both halves7%
Cheltenham TownBarrow
13%Scored in both halves17%
Cheltenham TownBarrow

BTTS and goal count

37%Min. 3 goals and BTTS57%
Cheltenham TownBarrow
11%Min. 3 goals without BTTS7%
Cheltenham TownBarrow
60%BTTS - last 580%
Cheltenham TownBarrow

Goal count (Over/Under)gaano kadalas lumalagpas sa goal lines ang kanilang matches?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

59%Min. 1 goal before half-time70%
Cheltenham TownBarrow
33%Min. 2 goals before half-time37%
Cheltenham TownBarrow
15%Min. 3 goals before half-time7%
Cheltenham TownBarrow

2nd half

91%Min. 1 goal after half-time80%
Cheltenham TownBarrow
63%Min. 2 goals after half-time50%
Cheltenham TownBarrow
13%Min. 3 goals after half-time17%
Cheltenham TownBarrow

Match halvessaang half mas madalas silang maka-score?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Barrow is 18% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.83 pts / match - Cheltenham Town · 0.98 pts / match - Barrow

Cheltenham Town - half-time state
11% leading50% draw39% trailing
Barrow - half-time state
17% leading46% draw37% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.83Points per match (1st half)0.98
Cheltenham TownBarrow
0.33Goals scored (1st half)0.46
Cheltenham TownBarrow
0.78Goals conceded (1st half)0.7
Cheltenham TownBarrow
1.11Average goals (1st half)1.15
Cheltenham TownBarrow
52%Clean sheet before half-time48%
Cheltenham TownBarrow
72%No goal before half-time63%
Cheltenham TownBarrow

After half-time (2nd half)

1.28Points per match (2nd half)0.89
Cheltenham TownBarrow
0.83Goals scored (2nd half)0.52
Cheltenham TownBarrow
0.93Goals conceded (2nd half)1
Cheltenham TownBarrow
1.76Average goals (2nd half)1.52
Cheltenham TownBarrow
37%Clean sheet after half-time35%
Cheltenham TownBarrow
41%No goal after half-time57%
Cheltenham TownBarrow

Cheltenham Town - second-half results

30% W37% R33% P
38
Half-time points
15
Half-time goals
-21
Goal difference (1st half)
59
Second-half points
-5
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.83
PPG before half-time
Lead holding273%

Leads at half-time in 11% of matches and wins 30%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Barrow - second-half results

17% W37% R46% P
45
Half-time points
21
Half-time goals
-11
Goal difference (1st half)
41
Second-half points
-22
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.98
PPG before half-time
Lead holding118%

Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 20%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Cheltenham Town - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.40
Goals scored / match0.20.8
Goals conceded / match1.21.2
Average goals in match1.42.0
1 goal80%100%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference-5-2
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
Barrow - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.000.80
Goals scored / match0.41.0
Goals conceded / match0.81.8
Average goals in match1.22.8
1 goal80%100%
2 goals40%100%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet40%0%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-2-4
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Cheltenham Town
ScoredConceded
4
13
0-15
4
10
16-30
7
13
31-45
9
14
46-60
16
13
61-75
13
16
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (16 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (16). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

Barrow
ScoredConceded
7
7
0-15
3
12
16-30
11
13
31-45
6
12
46-60
8
11
61-75
10
23
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (11 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (23). Late-goal balance (76-90): -13 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Karagdagang team indicatorsano ang ipinapakita ng xG, efficiency at form?

Comparison ng chance quality, results at trends mula sa mga natapos na matches ngayong season.

Match profile

2.77
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.4 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
108%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
55%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+8%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
47%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
10%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 10 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Cheltenham Town

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.48
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.09
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+9.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.01
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.08
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
84%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
143%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.07
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

Barrow

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.40
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.32
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.24
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.08
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
82%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
124%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.18
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
22% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 16% come in the first quarter-hour.
22%

* Ang estimated goals, goal split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk at goal range ay galing sa public season averages at frequencies ng dalawang teams. Statistical match profile ito, hindi private model prediction o betting pick.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (League Two).

Teams vs league

Cheltenham TownLigaBarrow
Average goals in match 2.872.57 2.67
Both teams scored 52%52% 57%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 48%48% 63%
Clean sheets 24%27% 15%
Goal before half-time 59%67% 70%
Goal after half-time 91%78% 80%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.57
Average goals per match
52%
Both teams scored
48%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
27%
Clean sheets
1.37
Home goals / match
1.20
Away goals / match
+14%
Home attack advantage
+12%
Home defence advantage
+9%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
67%
1 goal
33%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
43%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
4%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Cheltenham Town 1 - 0 - 0 Barrow. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% mga match.

Mga madalas itanong

Ano ang result ng Cheltenham Town vs Barrow?

Natapos ang EFL League Two match sa score na Cheltenham Town 2:2 Barrow. Nasa page na ito ang match statistics, half-by-half data at head-to-head record.

Ano ang ipinapakita ng goal statistics bago ang Cheltenham Town vs Barrow?

Cheltenham Town scores 1.15 goals per match at Barrow 0.98. Ang EFL League Two average ay 2.57 goals, may Over 2.5 sa 48% ng matches. BTTS: Cheltenham Town 52%, Barrow 57%.

Ano ang current form ng Cheltenham Town at Barrow?

Sa last 5 matches, ang Cheltenham Town ay 2-0-3 (1.20 points per match), habang ang Barrow ay 1-0-4 (0.60 points per match).

Saan makikita ang betting pick at full analysis ng Cheltenham Town vs Barrow?

Nasa page na ito ang statistical context: form, H2H, goals, BTTS at Over/Under. Makikita sa NoFluffPicks app ang betting pick, value bet at full reasoning.