Timog Korea - K League 2Data updated noong July 23, 2026

Cheongju vs Gimpo Citizen: match stats

Cheongju crest
Cheongju
1 : 1half-time 1:0
Gimpo Citizen crest
Gimpo Citizen

Cheongju vs Gimpo Citizen: form, goals at mahahalagang stats

Mahahalagang detalye ng match

Cheongju vs Gimpo Citizen sa K League 2 (Timog Korea). Naka-schedule ang match sa 9 May 2026 at 09:30. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

Cheongju: 2-1-2 sa last five matches at 1.40 points per match. Gimpo Citizen: 1-2-2 at 1.00 points per match.

Goal statistics

Cheongju scores 1.18 at concedes 1.59 goals per match. Gimpo Citizen scores 1.18 at concedes 1.12. League average: 2.75 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Cheongju 76%, Gimpo Citizen 53%. Over 2.5: Cheongju 53%, Gimpo Citizen 35%. League level: BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 56%.

xG, shots at playing style

Gimpo Citizen ang may mas mataas na xG per match: 1.52 vs 1.41. Cheongju averages 11.2 shots per match, habang Gimpo Citizen ay 12.3.

First at second half

Cheongju leads at half-time sa 29% ng matches at scores 0.65 goals after the break. Gimpo Citizen: 24% at 0.65.

Goals by minute

Cheongju: 76-90+ (6 goals). Gimpo Citizen: 76-90+ (8 goals). Historical goal distribution ito, hindi prediction ng exact goal minute.

League context

K League 2: 2.75 goals per match, BTTS 61% at Over 2.5 56%.

Head-to-head

Sa 3 head-to-head matches, ang record ay 1-0-2. Average goals: 3.33, BTTS: 33%.

Match description

Ako bet: draw (X). Cheongju sa home season zero wins (0 wins), 8 draws at 2 losses; last 5 matches nila: 5 draws, goal tally 3-3. Gimpo Citizen has better offensive efficiency (3 wins, 4 draws, 2 losses this season) and scored 8 goals in last 5; higher PPG in last 5 (1.2 vs 1.0 Cheongju) at average 1.33 away goals with xG 1.54. Visitors convert more chances (11% vs 5% for home) at average conceded 1.11 goals away, while Cheongju at home concedes 1.6 on average and despite higher home xG (1.66) finishes poorly (avg 0.8 goals per game). Given Cheongju’s lack of home wins, high draw rates for both teams (Cheongju 5 draws in last 5, Gimpo 44% draws away) and the visitors’ efficiency edge, most probable outcome is a shared points (draw).

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

52Possession (%)48
CheongjuGimpo Citizen
9Shots8
CheongjuGimpo Citizen
1Shots on target2
CheongjuGimpo Citizen
1.22xG1.13
CheongjuGimpo Citizen
6Corners2
CheongjuGimpo Citizen
81Dangerous attacks67
CheongjuGimpo Citizen
16Fouls14
CheongjuGimpo Citizen
1Cards2
CheongjuGimpo Citizen

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

CheongjuGimpo Citizen
1.18Goals scored / match1.18
CheongjuGimpo Citizen
1.59Goals conceded / match1.12
CheongjuGimpo Citizen
55%Average possession50%
CheongjuGimpo Citizen
3.88Shots on target / match4
CheongjuGimpo Citizen

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.18Shots per match12.29
CheongjuGimpo Citizen
3.88Shots on target4
CheongjuGimpo Citizen
10.5%Shot conversion9.6%
CheongjuGimpo Citizen
55%Possession50%
CheongjuGimpo Citizen
1.41xG for1.52
CheongjuGimpo Citizen
1.3xG against1.27
CheongjuGimpo Citizen

Shooting quality

Cheongju: BalancedGimpo Citizen: Balanced
CheongjuGimpo Citizen
Accuracy (shots on target)35%33%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.300.29

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Cheongju is 40% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / match - Cheongju · 1 pts / match - Gimpo Citizen

Cheongju
LWLDW
Season result split
12% W65% R24% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-11-4
1.00 pts / match · goal difference -7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-4-4
Last 5 at home
1-2-2
DDLLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.37Opponent xG: 1.54BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%
Gimpo Citizen
WDLLD
Season result split
35% W41% R24% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-7-4
1.47 pts / match · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
6-5-3
Last 5 away
3-1-1
DWWWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.78Opponent xG: 1.50BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalspaano nag-i-score at nagko-concede ang dalawang teams?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Gimpo Citizen is 42% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.59 goals / match - Cheongju · 1.12 goals / match - Gimpo Citizen

Scoring profile ng Cheongju: napakalakas

Cheongju scores in 82% of matches (14 of 17 matches), while Gimpo Citizen keeps a clean sheet in 29% (5 of 17 matches).

Scoring profile ng Gimpo Citizen: napakalakas

Gimpo Citizen scores in 76% of matches (13 of 17 matches), while Cheongju keeps a clean sheet in 24% (4 of 17 matches).

20Goals scored (season)20
CheongjuGimpo Citizen
27Goals conceded (season)19
CheongjuGimpo Citizen
2.76Average goals in match2.29
CheongjuGimpo Citizen
7Goals scored (last 5)5
CheongjuGimpo Citizen
10Goals conceded (last 5)8
CheongjuGimpo Citizen

How often they score at least...

82%1 goal76%
CheongjuGimpo Citizen
35%2 goals29%
CheongjuGimpo Citizen
0%3 goals12%
CheongjuGimpo Citizen
0%4 goals0%
CheongjuGimpo Citizen

How often they concede at least...

76%1 goal71%
CheongjuGimpo Citizen
47%2 goals35%
CheongjuGimpo Citizen
18%3 goals6%
CheongjuGimpo Citizen
12%4 goals0%
CheongjuGimpo Citizen

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)gaano kadalas nakaka-score ang parehong teams?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

61%
League average

Goal patterns

24%BTTS at half-time29%
CheongjuGimpo Citizen
6%BTTS in both halves6%
CheongjuGimpo Citizen
24%Scored in both halves24%
CheongjuGimpo Citizen

BTTS and goal count

53%Min. 3 goals and BTTS35%
CheongjuGimpo Citizen
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
CheongjuGimpo Citizen
80%BTTS - last 560%
CheongjuGimpo Citizen

Goal count (Over/Under)gaano kadalas lumalagpas sa goal lines ang kanilang matches?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

76%Min. 1 goal before half-time65%
CheongjuGimpo Citizen
29%Min. 2 goals before half-time29%
CheongjuGimpo Citizen
6%Min. 3 goals before half-time12%
CheongjuGimpo Citizen

2nd half

71%Min. 1 goal after half-time88%
CheongjuGimpo Citizen
53%Min. 2 goals after half-time18%
CheongjuGimpo Citizen
35%Min. 3 goals after half-time12%
CheongjuGimpo Citizen

Match halvessaang half mas madalas silang maka-score?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Cheongju - half-time state
29% leading41% draw29% trailing
Gimpo Citizen - half-time state
24% leading53% draw24% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.29Points per match (1st half)1.24
CheongjuGimpo Citizen
0.53Goals scored (1st half)0.53
CheongjuGimpo Citizen
0.59Goals conceded (1st half)0.53
CheongjuGimpo Citizen
1.12Average goals (1st half)1.06
CheongjuGimpo Citizen
53%Clean sheet before half-time47%
CheongjuGimpo Citizen
47%No goal before half-time59%
CheongjuGimpo Citizen

After half-time (2nd half)

0.94Points per match (2nd half)1.59
CheongjuGimpo Citizen
0.65Goals scored (2nd half)0.65
CheongjuGimpo Citizen
1Goals conceded (2nd half)0.59
CheongjuGimpo Citizen
1.65Average goals (2nd half)1.24
CheongjuGimpo Citizen
41%Clean sheet after half-time59%
CheongjuGimpo Citizen
47%No goal after half-time41%
CheongjuGimpo Citizen

Cheongju - second-half results

18% W41% R41% P
22
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
16
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.29
PPG before half-time
Lead holding41%

Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 12%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Gimpo Citizen - second-half results

47% W18% R35% P
21
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
27
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.24
PPG before half-time
Lead holding146%

Leads at half-time in 24% of matches and wins 35%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Cheongju - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.400.80
Goals scored / match0.60.8
Goals conceded / match0.81.2
Average goals in match1.42.0
1 goal100%80%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference-1-2
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
Gimpo Citizen - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.20
Goals scored / match0.60.4
Goals conceded / match0.80.8
Average goals in match1.41.2
1 goal80%100%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet20%40%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference-1-2
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 0% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Cheongju
ScoredConceded
1
2
0-15
3
2
16-30
5
6
31-45
4
4
46-60
1
5
61-75
6
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

Gimpo Citizen
ScoredConceded
3
4
0-15
2
3
16-30
4
2
31-45
0
2
46-60
3
2
61-75
8
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Karagdagang team indicatorsano ang ipinapakita ng xG, efficiency at form?

Comparison ng chance quality, results at trends mula sa mga natapos na matches ngayong season.

Match profile

2.54
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.1 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
92%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
65%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+32%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
62%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Cheongju

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.11
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.52
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.23
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.29
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
84%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
118%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.40
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
30% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 5% come in the first quarter-hour.
30%

Gimpo Citizen

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.25
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.19
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.34
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.15
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
87%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
80%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.47
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
40% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
40%

* Ang estimated goals, goal split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk at goal range ay galing sa public season averages at frequencies ng dalawang teams. Statistical match profile ito, hindi private model prediction o betting pick.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (K League 2).

Teams vs league

CheongjuLigaGimpo Citizen
Average goals in match 2.762.75 2.29
Both teams scored 76%61% 53%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 53%56% 35%
Clean sheets 24%24% 29%
Goal before half-time 76%73% 65%
Goal after half-time 71%76% 88%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.75
Average goals per match
61%
Both teams scored
56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
24%
Clean sheets
1.40
Home goals / match
1.35
Away goals / match
+4%
Home attack advantage
+4%
Home defence advantage
+1%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
50%
2 goals
26%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (3): Cheongju 1 - 0 - 2 Gimpo Citizen. Average goals 3.33, both teams scored in 33% mga match.

Cheongju FC
0 : 2
Gimpo Citizen FC
Cheongju FC
0 : 3
Gimpo Citizen FC
Gimpo Citizen FC
2 : 3
Cheongju FC

Mga madalas itanong

Ano ang result ng Cheongju vs Gimpo Citizen?

Natapos ang K League 2 match sa score na Cheongju 1:1 Gimpo Citizen. Nasa page na ito ang match statistics, half-by-half data at head-to-head record.

Ano ang head-to-head record ng Cheongju at Gimpo Citizen?

Sa huling 3 head-to-head matches, nanalo ang Cheongju ng 1, ang Gimpo Citizen ng 2, at 0 ang draws. Average goals: 3.33; BTTS: 33%.

Ano ang ipinapakita ng goal statistics bago ang Cheongju vs Gimpo Citizen?

Cheongju scores 1.18 goals per match at Gimpo Citizen 1.18. Ang K League 2 average ay 2.75 goals, may Over 2.5 sa 56% ng matches. BTTS: Cheongju 76%, Gimpo Citizen 53%.

Ano ang current form ng Cheongju at Gimpo Citizen?

Sa last 5 matches, ang Cheongju ay 2-1-2 (1.40 points per match), habang ang Gimpo Citizen ay 1-2-2 (1.00 points per match).

Saan makikita ang betting pick at full analysis ng Cheongju vs Gimpo Citizen?

Nasa page na ito ang statistical context: form, H2H, goals, BTTS at Over/Under. Makikita sa NoFluffPicks app ang betting pick, value bet at full reasoning.