United States - MLS Next ProSeatGeek StadiumData updated noong July 23, 2026

Chicago Fire II vs Inter Miami II: match stats

Chicago Fire II vs Inter Miami II: form, goals at mahahalagang stats

Mahahalagang detalye ng match

Chicago Fire II vs Inter Miami II sa MLS Next Pro (United States). Naka-schedule ang match sa 14 June 2026 at 22:00. Venue: SeatGeek Stadium. Final score: 3:1.

Current form

Chicago Fire II: 2-2-1 sa last five matches at 1.60 points per match. Inter Miami II: 0-1-4 at 0.20 points per match.

Goal statistics

Chicago Fire II scores 1.56 at concedes 1.56 goals per match. Inter Miami II scores 0.82 at concedes 2.65. League average: 3.23 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Chicago Fire II 67%, Inter Miami II 59%. Over 2.5: Chicago Fire II 83%, Inter Miami II 65%. League level: BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 65%.

xG, shots at playing style

Chicago Fire II ang may mas mataas na xG per match: 1.49 vs 1.40. Chicago Fire II averages 12.4 shots per match, habang Inter Miami II ay 11.6.

First at second half

Chicago Fire II leads at half-time sa 39% ng matches at scores 0.67 goals after the break. Inter Miami II: 18% at 0.41.

Goals by minute

Chicago Fire II: 31-45+ (10 goals). Inter Miami II: 0-15 (3 goals). Historical goal distribution ito, hindi prediction ng exact goal minute.

League context

MLS Next Pro: 3.23 goals per match, BTTS 61% at Over 2.5 65%.

Head-to-head

Sa 2 head-to-head matches, ang record ay 1-1-0. Average goals: 3.00, BTTS: 100%.

Match description

Chicago Fire II may clear defensive edge at home and better form: sa bahay nagla-loss lang ng avg 1.5 goals per match with xG conceded 1.48 at may positive home goal difference +1, habang Inter Miami II concedes avg 3.0 goals away with xG conceded 2.07 at may away goal difference -11. Sa attack, hosts score avg 1.67 goals per home match (xG 1.63) at may 50% home wins, samantalang visitors score 1.17 goals away (xG 1.43) at wala silang away wins (0%). In the last five, Chicago scored 9 goals and earned 1.2 points per match, habang Inter conceded 18 goals in five and has 0 points in that period. Additionally, hosts are more efficient in finishing – home shot conversion 13% with avg 3.17 shots on target, habang Inter 10% conversion despite 4.67 SoT and 0% clean sheets on the road. Dahil sa difference sa avg goals conceded (1.5 vs 3.0), worse defensive xG ng visitors (2.07 vs 1.48) at poor recent form ng Inter (5 losses in a row, 18 conceded), forecast ko win for the hosts.

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
2 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

49Possession (%)51
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II
15Shots7
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II
4Shots on target4
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II
1.61xG1.05
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II
3Corners2
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II
53Dangerous attacks44
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II
10Fouls11
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II
1Cards2
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II
1.56Goals scored / match0.82
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II
1.56Goals conceded / match2.65
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II
50%Average possession55%
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II
4.11Shots on target / match4.65
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.39Shots per match11.59
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II
4.11Shots on target4.65
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II
12.6%Shot conversion7.1%
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II
50%Possession55%
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II
1.49xG for1.4
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II
1.51xG against1.91
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II

Shooting quality

Chicago Fire II: BalancedInter Miami II: Balanced
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II
Accuracy (shots on target)33%40%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.380.18

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Chicago Fire II is 700% better for: last-5 form.

1.6 pts / match - Chicago Fire II · 0.2 pts / match - Inter Miami II

Chicago Fire II
WDDWL
Season result split
33% W28% R39% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-5-7
1.28 pts / match · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-1-2
Last 5 at home
4-0-1
LWWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.39Opponent xG: 1.83BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 100%
Inter Miami II
DLLLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
0% W24% R76% P
Season (W-D-L)
0-4-13
0.24 pts / match · goal difference -31
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-4
0.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-2-9
Last 5 away
0-0-5
LLLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.2Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.48Opponent xG: 1.78BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalspaano nag-i-score at nagko-concede ang dalawang teams?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Chicago Fire II is 90% better for: goals scored per match.

1.56 goals / match - Chicago Fire II · 0.82 goals / match - Inter Miami II

Chicago Fire II is 70% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.56 goals / match - Chicago Fire II · 2.65 goals / match - Inter Miami II

Scoring profile ng Chicago Fire II: napakalakas

Chicago Fire II scores in 78% of matches (14 of 18 matches), while Inter Miami II keeps a clean sheet in 6% (1 of 17 matches).

Scoring profile ng Inter Miami II: malakas

Inter Miami II scores in 59% of matches (10 of 17 matches), while Chicago Fire II keeps a clean sheet in 22% (4 of 18 matches).

28Goals scored (season)14
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II
28Goals conceded (season)45
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II
3.11Average goals in match3.47
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II
11Goals scored (last 5)1
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II
8Goals conceded (last 5)10
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II

How often they score at least...

78%1 goal59%
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II
50%2 goals12%
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II
22%3 goals6%
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II
6%4 goals6%
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II

How often they concede at least...

78%1 goal94%
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II
56%2 goals71%
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II
22%3 goals59%
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II
0%4 goals35%
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)gaano kadalas nakaka-score ang parehong teams?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

61%
League average

Goal patterns

28%BTTS at half-time18%
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II
17%BTTS in both halves12%
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II
39%Scored in both halves12%
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II

BTTS and goal count

61%Min. 3 goals and BTTS47%
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II
22%Min. 3 goals without BTTS18%
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II
80%BTTS - last 520%
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II

Goal count (Over/Under)gaano kadalas lumalagpas sa goal lines ang kanilang matches?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

78%Min. 1 goal before half-time82%
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II
50%Min. 2 goals before half-time35%
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II
17%Min. 3 goals before half-time18%
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II

2nd half

89%Min. 1 goal after half-time88%
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II
61%Min. 2 goals after half-time71%
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II
17%Min. 3 goals after half-time24%
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II

Match halvessaang half mas madalas silang maka-score?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Chicago Fire II is 90% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.56 pts / match - Chicago Fire II · 0.82 pts / match - Inter Miami II

Chicago Fire II - half-time state
39% leading39% draw22% trailing
Inter Miami II - half-time state
18% leading29% draw53% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.56Points per match (1st half)0.82
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II
0.89Goals scored (1st half)0.41
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II
0.56Goals conceded (1st half)1.06
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II
1.44Average goals (1st half)1.47
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II
56%Clean sheet before half-time29%
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II
39%No goal before half-time71%
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II

After half-time (2nd half)

1.11Points per match (2nd half)0.29
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II
0.67Goals scored (2nd half)0.41
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II
1Goals conceded (2nd half)1.59
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II
1.67Average goals (2nd half)2
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II
22%Clean sheet after half-time12%
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II
44%No goal after half-time59%
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II

Chicago Fire II - second-half results

22% W44% R33% P
28
Half-time points
16
Half-time goals
+6
Goal difference (1st half)
20
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.56
PPG before half-time
Lead holding85%

Leads at half-time in 39% of matches and wins 33%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Inter Miami II - second-half results

0% W29% R71% P
14
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
-11
Goal difference (1st half)
5
Second-half points
-20
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.82
PPG before half-time
Lead holding0%

Leads at half-time in 18% of matches and wins 0%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Chicago Fire II - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.60
Goals scored / match1.21.0
Goals conceded / match0.80.8
Average goals in match2.01.8
1 goal100%100%
2 goals80%60%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal20%20%
Goal difference+2+1
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 6
Inter Miami II - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.400.40
Goals scored / match0.00.2
Goals conceded / match0.81.2
Average goals in match0.81.4
1 goal60%60%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal100%80%
Goal difference-4-5
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Chicago Fire II
ScoredConceded
4
4
0-15
2
1
16-30
10
5
31-45
7
8
46-60
2
4
61-75
3
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (10 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

Inter Miami II
ScoredConceded
3
4
0-15
1
6
16-30
3
8
31-45
2
11
46-60
2
9
61-75
3
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (3 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Karagdagang team indicatorsano ang ipinapakita ng xG, efficiency at form?

Comparison ng chance quality, results at trends mula sa mga natapos na matches ngayong season.

Match profile

3.29
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
2.1 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
102%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
63%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-9%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
46%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
9%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 11 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Chicago Fire II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.02
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.02
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.07
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.05
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
86%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
111%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.32
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
11% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
11%

Inter Miami II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.51
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-1.32
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.58
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.74
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
59%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
146%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.04
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
21% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 21% come in the first quarter-hour.
21%

* Ang estimated goals, goal split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk at goal range ay galing sa public season averages at frequencies ng dalawang teams. Statistical match profile ito, hindi private model prediction o betting pick.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS Next Pro).

Teams vs league

Chicago Fire IILigaInter Miami II
Average goals in match 3.113.23 3.47
Both teams scored 67%61% 59%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 83%65% 65%
Clean sheets 22%22% 6%
Goal before half-time 78%75% 82%
Goal after half-time 89%84% 88%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.23
Average goals per match
61%
Both teams scored
65%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
22%
Clean sheets
1.82
Home goals / match
1.40
Away goals / match
+30%
Home attack advantage
+23%
Home defence advantage
+20%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
42%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
84%
1 goal
59%
2 goals
27%
3 goals
9%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Chicago Fire II 1 - 1 - 0 Inter Miami II. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% mga match.

Inter Miami II
1 : 1
Chicago Fire II
Club Internacional de Fútbol Miami II
1 : 3
Chicago Fire Premier FC II

Mga madalas itanong

Ano ang result ng Chicago Fire II vs Inter Miami II?

Natapos ang MLS Next Pro match sa score na Chicago Fire II 3:1 Inter Miami II. Nasa page na ito ang match statistics, half-by-half data at head-to-head record.

Ano ang head-to-head record ng Chicago Fire II at Inter Miami II?

Sa huling 2 head-to-head matches, nanalo ang Chicago Fire II ng 1, ang Inter Miami II ng 0, at 1 ang draws. Average goals: 3.00; BTTS: 100%.

Ano ang ipinapakita ng goal statistics bago ang Chicago Fire II vs Inter Miami II?

Chicago Fire II scores 1.56 goals per match at Inter Miami II 0.82. Ang MLS Next Pro average ay 3.23 goals, may Over 2.5 sa 65% ng matches. BTTS: Chicago Fire II 67%, Inter Miami II 59%.

Ano ang current form ng Chicago Fire II at Inter Miami II?

Sa last 5 matches, ang Chicago Fire II ay 2-2-1 (1.60 points per match), habang ang Inter Miami II ay 0-1-4 (0.20 points per match).

Saan makikita ang betting pick at full analysis ng Chicago Fire II vs Inter Miami II?

Nasa page na ito ang statistical context: form, H2H, goals, BTTS at Over/Under. Makikita sa NoFluffPicks app ang betting pick, value bet at full reasoning.