United States - MLSData updated noong July 23, 2026

Chicago Fire vs Nashville SC: match stats

Chicago Fire crest
Chicago Fire
1 : 0half-time 1:0
Nashville SC crest
Nashville SC

Chicago Fire vs Nashville SC: form, goals at mahahalagang stats

Mahahalagang detalye ng match

Chicago Fire vs Nashville SC sa MLS (United States). Naka-schedule ang match sa 5 April 2026 at 02:30. Final score: 1:0.

Current form

Chicago Fire: 3-0-2 sa last five matches at 1.80 points per match. Nashville SC: 4-1-0 at 2.60 points per match.

Goal statistics

Chicago Fire scores 1.93 at concedes 1.14 goals per match. Nashville SC scores 2.13 at concedes 0.73. League average: 3.30 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Chicago Fire 57%, Nashville SC 47%. Over 2.5: Chicago Fire 71%, Nashville SC 60%. League level: BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 62%.

xG, shots at playing style

Chicago Fire ang may mas mataas na xG per match: 1.64 vs 1.37. Chicago Fire averages 14.9 shots per match, habang Nashville SC ay 11.5.

First at second half

Chicago Fire leads at half-time sa 43% ng matches at scores 1.14 goals after the break. Nashville SC: 47% at 1.13.

Goals by minute

Chicago Fire: 76-90+ (7 goals). Nashville SC: 16-30 (7 goals). Historical goal distribution ito, hindi prediction ng exact goal minute.

League context

MLS: 3.30 goals per match, BTTS 61% at Over 2.5 62%.

Head-to-head

Wala pang sapat na head-to-head sample para gawing pangunahing comparison.

Match description

I’m backing the home win: Chicago Fire have a clear advantage in chance creation — average 16 shots and 6.5 on target per home match with xG 1.86, versus just 7.5 shots and 2.5 on target and xG 0.84 for Nashville away. The hosts score an average of 2.0 goals per home game and haven’t had a goalless match yet (0% matches without a goal), while Nashville average 0.5 goals away and have 50% of away matches without scoring. Nashville’s season record is impressive (4 wins, 1 draw, 0 losses) and over the last five games they average 2.2 points per game vs Chicago’s 1.4, and their overall defense has conceded only 2 goals this season, which raises the draw risk. Considering Chicago’s superiority in chance quality (xG 1.86 vs 0.84), better shot efficiency (13% vs 7%) and the fact they average 2.0 goals at home, I rate their chances at 60%, draw 25% and away win 15%.

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

39Possession (%)61
Chicago FireNashville SC
10Shots10
Chicago FireNashville SC
3Shots on target4
Chicago FireNashville SC
0.99xG1.25
Chicago FireNashville SC
1Corners3
Chicago FireNashville SC
20Dangerous attacks44
Chicago FireNashville SC
19Fouls13
Chicago FireNashville SC
2Cards1
Chicago FireNashville SC

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Chicago FireNashville SC
1.93Goals scored / match2.13
Chicago FireNashville SC
1.14Goals conceded / match0.73
Chicago FireNashville SC
53%Average possession54%
Chicago FireNashville SC
5.21Shots on target / match5.13
Chicago FireNashville SC

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

14.86Shots per match11.53
Chicago FireNashville SC
5.21Shots on target5.13
Chicago FireNashville SC
13%Shot conversion18.5%
Chicago FireNashville SC
53%Possession54%
Chicago FireNashville SC
1.64xG for1.37
Chicago FireNashville SC
1.38xG against1.2
Chicago FireNashville SC

Shooting quality

Chicago Fire: AttackingNashville SC: Efficient finishing
Chicago FireNashville SC
Accuracy (shots on target)35%44%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.370.42

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Nashville SC is 44% better for: last-5 form.

1.8 pts / match - Chicago Fire · 2.6 pts / match - Nashville SC

Chicago Fire
LLWWW
Season result split
57% W14% R29% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-2-4
1.86 pts / match · goal difference +11
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-0-3
Last 5 at home
3-0-2
WWLLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.92Opponent xG: 1.35BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%
Nashville SC
DWWWW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
73% W20% R7% P
Season (W-D-L)
11-3-1
2.40 pts / match · goal difference +21
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-1-0
2.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-2-1
Last 5 away
3-1-1
LWWDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.27Opponent xG: 1.44BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalspaano nag-i-score at nagko-concede ang dalawang teams?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Nashville SC is 10% better for: goals scored per match.

1.93 goals / match - Chicago Fire · 2.13 goals / match - Nashville SC

Nashville SC is 56% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.14 goals / match - Chicago Fire · 0.73 goals / match - Nashville SC

Scoring profile ng Chicago Fire: napakalakas

Chicago Fire scores in 93% of matches (13 of 14 matches), while Nashville SC keeps a clean sheet in 47% (7 of 15 matches).

Scoring profile ng Nashville SC: malakas

Nashville SC scores in 80% of matches (12 of 15 matches), while Chicago Fire keeps a clean sheet in 43% (6 of 14 matches).

27Goals scored (season)32
Chicago FireNashville SC
16Goals conceded (season)11
Chicago FireNashville SC
3.07Average goals in match2.87
Chicago FireNashville SC
10Goals scored (last 5)11
Chicago FireNashville SC
8Goals conceded (last 5)5
Chicago FireNashville SC

How often they score at least...

93%1 goal80%
Chicago FireNashville SC
57%2 goals67%
Chicago FireNashville SC
29%3 goals40%
Chicago FireNashville SC
7%4 goals20%
Chicago FireNashville SC

How often they concede at least...

57%1 goal53%
Chicago FireNashville SC
36%2 goals20%
Chicago FireNashville SC
21%3 goals0%
Chicago FireNashville SC
0%4 goals0%
Chicago FireNashville SC

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)gaano kadalas nakaka-score ang parehong teams?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

61%
League average

Goal patterns

29%BTTS at half-time27%
Chicago FireNashville SC
7%BTTS in both halves13%
Chicago FireNashville SC
36%Scored in both halves53%
Chicago FireNashville SC

BTTS and goal count

57%Min. 3 goals and BTTS47%
Chicago FireNashville SC
14%Min. 3 goals without BTTS13%
Chicago FireNashville SC
80%BTTS - last 560%
Chicago FireNashville SC

Goal count (Over/Under)gaano kadalas lumalagpas sa goal lines ang kanilang matches?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

79%Min. 1 goal before half-time67%
Chicago FireNashville SC
29%Min. 2 goals before half-time53%
Chicago FireNashville SC
14%Min. 3 goals before half-time27%
Chicago FireNashville SC

2nd half

79%Min. 1 goal after half-time80%
Chicago FireNashville SC
50%Min. 2 goals after half-time47%
Chicago FireNashville SC
36%Min. 3 goals after half-time13%
Chicago FireNashville SC

Match halvessaang half mas madalas silang maka-score?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Nashville SC is 5% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.71 pts / match - Chicago Fire · 1.8 pts / match - Nashville SC

Chicago Fire - half-time state
43% leading43% draw14% trailing
Nashville SC - half-time state
47% leading40% draw13% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.71Points per match (1st half)1.8
Chicago FireNashville SC
0.79Goals scored (1st half)1
Chicago FireNashville SC
0.5Goals conceded (1st half)0.47
Chicago FireNashville SC
1.29Average goals (1st half)1.47
Chicago FireNashville SC
57%Clean sheet before half-time60%
Chicago FireNashville SC
36%No goal before half-time47%
Chicago FireNashville SC

After half-time (2nd half)

1.5Points per match (2nd half)2.2
Chicago FireNashville SC
1.14Goals scored (2nd half)1.13
Chicago FireNashville SC
0.64Goals conceded (2nd half)0.27
Chicago FireNashville SC
1.79Average goals (2nd half)1.4
Chicago FireNashville SC
64%Clean sheet after half-time73%
Chicago FireNashville SC
36%No goal after half-time20%
Chicago FireNashville SC

Chicago Fire - second-half results

43% W21% R36% P
24
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
+4
Goal difference (1st half)
21
Second-half points
+7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.71
PPG before half-time
Lead holding133%

Leads at half-time in 43% of matches and wins 57%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Nashville SC - second-half results

60% W40% R0% P
27
Half-time points
15
Half-time goals
+8
Goal difference (1st half)
33
Second-half points
+13
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.80
PPG before half-time
Lead holding155%

Leads at half-time in 47% of matches and wins 73%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Chicago Fire - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.80
Goals scored / match0.81.2
Goals conceded / match1.00.6
Average goals in match1.81.8
1 goal100%100%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet20%60%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference-1+3
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 0% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4
Nashville SC - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.602.60
Goals scored / match1.01.2
Goals conceded / match0.80.2
Average goals in match1.81.4
1 goal80%100%
2 goals80%40%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet40%80%
No goal40%0%
Goal difference+1+5
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 20% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Chicago Fire
ScoredConceded
3
0
0-15
5
1
16-30
3
6
31-45
3
1
46-60
6
1
61-75
7
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Nashville SC
ScoredConceded
4
1
0-15
7
4
16-30
4
2
31-45
6
1
46-60
5
2
61-75
6
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (7 goli). Concedes most in 16-30 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Karagdagang team indicatorsano ang ipinapakita ng xG, efficiency at form?

Comparison ng chance quality, results at trends mula sa mga natapos na matches ngayong season.

Match profile

2.96
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 1.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
90%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
52%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
74%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
1%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 100 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Chicago Fire

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.26
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.53
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.29
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.24
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
101%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
83%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.06
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
26% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
26%

Nashville SC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.17
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+1.23
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.76
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.47
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
154%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
38%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.20
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
19% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
19%

* Ang estimated goals, goal split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk at goal range ay galing sa public season averages at frequencies ng dalawang teams. Statistical match profile ito, hindi private model prediction o betting pick.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS).

Teams vs league

Chicago FireLigaNashville SC
Average goals in match 3.073.30 2.87
Both teams scored 57%61% 47%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 71%62% 60%
Clean sheets 43%22% 47%
Goal before half-time 79%77% 67%
Goal after half-time 79%80% 80%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.30
Average goals per match
61%
Both teams scored
62%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
22%
Clean sheets
1.91
Home goals / match
1.38
Away goals / match
+38%
Home attack advantage
+28%
Home defence advantage
+18%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
45%
2 goals
21%
3 goals
6%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
52%
2 goals
25%
3 goals
13%
4 goals

Mga madalas itanong

Ano ang result ng Chicago Fire vs Nashville SC?

Natapos ang MLS match sa score na Chicago Fire 1:0 Nashville SC. Nasa page na ito ang match statistics, half-by-half data at head-to-head record.

Ano ang ipinapakita ng goal statistics bago ang Chicago Fire vs Nashville SC?

Chicago Fire scores 1.93 goals per match at Nashville SC 2.13. Ang MLS average ay 3.30 goals, may Over 2.5 sa 62% ng matches. BTTS: Chicago Fire 57%, Nashville SC 47%.

Ano ang current form ng Chicago Fire at Nashville SC?

Sa last 5 matches, ang Chicago Fire ay 3-0-2 (1.80 points per match), habang ang Nashville SC ay 4-1-0 (2.60 points per match).

Saan makikita ang betting pick at full analysis ng Chicago Fire vs Nashville SC?

Nasa page na ito ang statistical context: form, H2H, goals, BTTS at Over/Under. Makikita sa NoFluffPicks app ang betting pick, value bet at full reasoning.