Northern Ireland - NIFL PremiershipData updated noong July 23, 2026

Cliftonville vs Bangor: match stats

Cliftonville crest
Cliftonville
3 : 1half-time 1:0
Bangor crest
Bangor
165%(1.53)
X20%(3.80)
215%(5.50)

Ipinapakita ng Cliftonville ang decidedly better home form with 42% win efficiency at positive goal balance (+2) sa sariling stadium. Ang hosts ay may advantage sa ball possession (54% vs 41%) at better shooting effectiveness sa home matches (1.5 goals average). Ang Bangor ay nagpapakita ng weak away disposition with as much as 58% losses at negative goal balance (-8), conceding average 1.92 goals per match. Ang form ng both teams sa last five matches ay pabor din sa hosts (1.4 PPG vs 0.6 PPG). Ang statistics ng xG confirm the advantage of Cliftonville (1.51 vs 1.06), na nagsu-suggest ng mas mataas na quality ng created situations. Considering all these factors, ang victory ng hosts ay mukhang ang most likely scenario.

Cliftonville vs Bangor: form, goals at mahahalagang stats

Mahahalagang detalye ng match

Cliftonville vs Bangor sa NIFL Premiership (Northern Ireland). Naka-schedule ang match sa 10 February 2026 at 20:45. Final score: 3:1.

Current form

Cliftonville: 2-0-3 sa last five matches at 1.20 points per match. Bangor: 0-3-2 at 0.60 points per match.

Goal statistics

Cliftonville scores 1.44 at concedes 1.56 goals per match. Bangor scores 1.08 at concedes 1.71. League average: 2.94 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Cliftonville 59%, Bangor 55%. Over 2.5: Cliftonville 59%, Bangor 53%. League level: BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 56%.

xG, shots at playing style

Cliftonville ang may mas mataas na xG per match: 1.41 vs 1.12. Cliftonville averages 11.8 shots per match, habang Bangor ay 8.3.

First at second half

Cliftonville leads at half-time sa 28% ng matches at scores 0.79 goals after the break. Bangor: 29% at 0.55.

Goals by minute

Cliftonville: 76-90+ (14 goals). Bangor: 31-45+ (12 goals). Historical goal distribution ito, hindi prediction ng exact goal minute.

League context

NIFL Premiership: 2.94 goals per match, BTTS 52% at Over 2.5 56%.

Head-to-head

Sa 2 head-to-head matches, ang record ay 0-1-1. Average goals: 3.00, BTTS: 100%.

Match description

Ipinapakita ng Cliftonville ang decidedly better home form with 42% win efficiency at positive goal balance (+2) sa sariling stadium. Ang hosts ay may advantage sa ball possession (54% vs 41%) at better shooting effectiveness sa home matches (1.5 goals average). Ang Bangor ay nagpapakita ng weak away disposition with as much as 58% losses at negative goal balance (-8), conceding average 1.92 goals per match. Ang form ng both teams sa last five matches ay pabor din sa hosts (1.4 PPG vs 0.6 PPG). Ang statistics ng xG confirm the advantage of Cliftonville (1.51 vs 1.06), na nagsu-suggest ng mas mataas na quality ng created situations. Considering all these factors, ang victory ng hosts ay mukhang ang most likely scenario.

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
2 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

61Possession (%)39
CliftonvilleBangor
21Shots10
CliftonvilleBangor
9Shots on target4
CliftonvilleBangor
2.35xG1.29
CliftonvilleBangor
2Corners5
CliftonvilleBangor
55Dangerous attacks52
CliftonvilleBangor
6Fouls5
CliftonvilleBangor
0Cards1
CliftonvilleBangor

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

CliftonvilleBangor
1.44Goals scored / match1.08
CliftonvilleBangor
1.56Goals conceded / match1.71
CliftonvilleBangor
52%Average possession41%
CliftonvilleBangor
4.28Shots on target / match3.24
CliftonvilleBangor

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.77Shots per match8.26
CliftonvilleBangor
4.28Shots on target3.24
CliftonvilleBangor
12.2%Shot conversion13.1%
CliftonvilleBangor
52%Possession41%
CliftonvilleBangor
1.41xG for1.12
CliftonvilleBangor
1.46xG against1.6
CliftonvilleBangor

Shooting quality

Cliftonville: BalancedBangor: Counter-attacking
CliftonvilleBangor
Accuracy (shots on target)36%39%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.14
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.340.33

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Cliftonville is 100% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - Cliftonville · 0.6 pts / match - Bangor

Cliftonville
LLWWL
Season result split
38% W21% R41% P
Season (W-D-L)
15-8-16
1.36 pts / match · goal difference -5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
9-4-7
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
WDLWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 1.27Opponent xG: 1.38BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%
Bangor
DDDLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
26% W24% R50% P
Season (W-D-L)
10-9-19
1.03 pts / match · goal difference -24
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-3-2
0.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-6-8
Last 5 away
1-4-0
DDWDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 0.80Opponent xG: 1.46BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalspaano nag-i-score at nagko-concede ang dalawang teams?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Cliftonville is 33% better for: goals scored per match.

1.44 goals / match - Cliftonville · 1.08 goals / match - Bangor

Cliftonville is 10% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.56 goals / match - Cliftonville · 1.71 goals / match - Bangor

Scoring profile ng Cliftonville: napakalakas

Cliftonville scores in 77% of matches (30 of 39 matches), while Bangor keeps a clean sheet in 16% (6 of 38 matches).

Scoring profile ng Bangor: malakas

Bangor scores in 66% of matches (25 of 38 matches), while Cliftonville keeps a clean sheet in 26% (10 of 39 matches).

56Goals scored (season)41
CliftonvilleBangor
61Goals conceded (season)65
CliftonvilleBangor
3Average goals in match2.79
CliftonvilleBangor
7Goals scored (last 5)3
CliftonvilleBangor
11Goals conceded (last 5)8
CliftonvilleBangor

How often they score at least...

77%1 goal66%
CliftonvilleBangor
41%2 goals32%
CliftonvilleBangor
15%3 goals8%
CliftonvilleBangor
5%4 goals3%
CliftonvilleBangor

How often they concede at least...

74%1 goal84%
CliftonvilleBangor
54%2 goals42%
CliftonvilleBangor
15%3 goals29%
CliftonvilleBangor
8%4 goals11%
CliftonvilleBangor

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)gaano kadalas nakaka-score ang parehong teams?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

52%
League average

Goal patterns

26%BTTS at half-time21%
CliftonvilleBangor
8%BTTS in both halves5%
CliftonvilleBangor
21%Scored in both halves24%
CliftonvilleBangor

BTTS and goal count

54%Min. 3 goals and BTTS39%
CliftonvilleBangor
5%Min. 3 goals without BTTS13%
CliftonvilleBangor
80%BTTS - last 540%
CliftonvilleBangor

Goal count (Over/Under)gaano kadalas lumalagpas sa goal lines ang kanilang matches?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

74%Min. 1 goal before half-time79%
CliftonvilleBangor
38%Min. 2 goals before half-time45%
CliftonvilleBangor
13%Min. 3 goals before half-time13%
CliftonvilleBangor

2nd half

77%Min. 1 goal after half-time76%
CliftonvilleBangor
49%Min. 2 goals after half-time39%
CliftonvilleBangor
23%Min. 3 goals after half-time18%
CliftonvilleBangor

Match halvessaang half mas madalas silang maka-score?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Cliftonville is 6% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.23 pts / match - Cliftonville · 1.16 pts / match - Bangor

Cliftonville - half-time state
28% leading38% draw33% trailing
Bangor - half-time state
29% leading29% draw42% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.23Points per match (1st half)1.16
CliftonvilleBangor
0.64Goals scored (1st half)0.53
CliftonvilleBangor
0.77Goals conceded (1st half)0.84
CliftonvilleBangor
1.41Average goals (1st half)1.37
CliftonvilleBangor
46%Clean sheet before half-time45%
CliftonvilleBangor
54%No goal before half-time55%
CliftonvilleBangor

After half-time (2nd half)

1.38Points per match (2nd half)0.97
CliftonvilleBangor
0.79Goals scored (2nd half)0.55
CliftonvilleBangor
0.79Goals conceded (2nd half)0.87
CliftonvilleBangor
1.59Average goals (2nd half)1.42
CliftonvilleBangor
46%Clean sheet after half-time42%
CliftonvilleBangor
49%No goal after half-time55%
CliftonvilleBangor

Cliftonville - second-half results

36% W31% R33% P
48
Half-time points
25
Half-time goals
-5
Goal difference (1st half)
54
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.23
PPG before half-time
Lead holding136%

Leads at half-time in 28% of matches and wins 38%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Bangor - second-half results

21% W34% R45% P
44
Half-time points
20
Half-time goals
-12
Goal difference (1st half)
37
Second-half points
-12
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.16
PPG before half-time
Lead holding90%

Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 26%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Cliftonville - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.40
Goals scored / match1.00.4
Goals conceded / match1.60.6
Average goals in match2.61.0
1 goal80%80%
2 goals80%20%
3 goals40%0%
Clean sheet20%60%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference-3-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 5
Bangor - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.000.40
Goals scored / match0.40.2
Goals conceded / match0.80.8
Average goals in match1.21.0
1 goal60%60%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference-2-3
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Cliftonville
ScoredConceded
9
3
0-15
7
11
16-30
9
16
31-45
10
8
46-60
7
13
61-75
14
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (14 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (16). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

Bangor
ScoredConceded
4
9
0-15
4
10
16-30
12
13
31-45
9
9
46-60
5
10
61-75
7
14
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (12 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (14). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Karagdagang team indicatorsano ang ipinapakita ng xG, efficiency at form?

Comparison ng chance quality, results at trends mula sa mga natapos na matches ngayong season.

Match profile

2.90
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.6 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
98%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
57%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+4%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
51%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
8%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 13 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Cliftonville

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.05
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.07
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.03
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.10
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
89%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
117%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.16
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 16% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

Bangor

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.48
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.15
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+6.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.04
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.11
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
81%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
106%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.43
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.0
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

* Ang estimated goals, goal split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk at goal range ay galing sa public season averages at frequencies ng dalawang teams. Statistical match profile ito, hindi private model prediction o betting pick.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (NIFL Premiership).

Teams vs league

CliftonvilleLigaBangor
Average goals in match 3.002.94 2.79
Both teams scored 59%52% 55%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 59%56% 53%
Clean sheets 26%26% 16%
Goal before half-time 74%76% 79%
Goal after half-time 77%80% 76%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.94
Average goals per match
52%
Both teams scored
56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
26%
Clean sheets
1.61
Home goals / match
1.33
Away goals / match
+21%
Home attack advantage
+17%
Home defence advantage
+11%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
40%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
47%
2 goals
22%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Cliftonville 0 - 1 - 1 Bangor. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% mga match.

Bangor FC
1 : 1
Cliftonville FC
Bangor FC
3 : 1
Cliftonville FC

Mga madalas itanong

Ano ang result ng Cliftonville vs Bangor?

Natapos ang NIFL Premiership match sa score na Cliftonville 3:1 Bangor. Nasa page na ito ang match statistics, half-by-half data at head-to-head record.

Ano ang head-to-head record ng Cliftonville at Bangor?

Sa huling 2 head-to-head matches, nanalo ang Cliftonville ng 0, ang Bangor ng 1, at 1 ang draws. Average goals: 3.00; BTTS: 100%.

Ano ang ipinapakita ng goal statistics bago ang Cliftonville vs Bangor?

Cliftonville scores 1.44 goals per match at Bangor 1.08. Ang NIFL Premiership average ay 2.94 goals, may Over 2.5 sa 56% ng matches. BTTS: Cliftonville 59%, Bangor 55%.

Ano ang current form ng Cliftonville at Bangor?

Sa last 5 matches, ang Cliftonville ay 2-0-3 (1.20 points per match), habang ang Bangor ay 0-3-2 (0.60 points per match).

Saan makikita ang betting pick at full analysis ng Cliftonville vs Bangor?

Nasa page na ito ang statistical context: form, H2H, goals, BTTS at Over/Under. Makikita sa NoFluffPicks app ang betting pick, value bet at full reasoning.