Dila vs Gagra: match stats
Dila vs Gagra: form, goals at mahahalagang stats
Mahahalagang detalye ng match
Dila vs Gagra sa Erovnuli Liga (Georgia). Naka-schedule ang match sa 7 April 2026 at 19:00. Final score: 1:1.
Current form
Dila: 2-0-3 sa last five matches at 1.20 points per match. Gagra: 3-2-0 at 2.20 points per match.
Goal statistics
Dila scores 1.11 at concedes 1.00 goals per match. Gagra scores 0.95 at concedes 1.26. League average: 2.53 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Dila 37%, Gagra 58%. Over 2.5: Dila 37%, Gagra 42%. League level: BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 52%.
xG, shots at playing style
Dila ang may mas mataas na xG per match: 1.38 vs 1.36. Dila averages 10.9 shots per match, habang Gagra ay 10.3.
First at second half
Dila leads at half-time sa 21% ng matches at scores 0.58 goals after the break. Gagra: 11% at 0.53.
Goals by minute
Dila: 76-90+ (6 goals). Gagra: 46-60 (5 goals). Historical goal distribution ito, hindi prediction ng exact goal minute.
League context
Erovnuli Liga: 2.53 goals per match, BTTS 56% at Over 2.5 52%.
Head-to-head
Sa 5 head-to-head matches, ang record ay 4-0-1. Average goals: 2.20, BTTS: 0%.
Match description
May defensive edge ang Dila sa home: tumatanggap lang ng 0.5 goal per game at may 50% clean sheets, habang ang Gagra away ay tumatanggap ng 1.0 goal at walang clean sheet. Offensively mas maganda ang stats ng Gagra — away goals average 1.5 at shot conversion mga 14%, samantalang ang Dila home nag-aaverage ng 0.5 goals with conversion mga 5% at hindi nakakaguol ng goal sa 50% ng mga matches. Sa last 5 matches Dila scored 6 goals at nanalo ng 3 games (average 1.8 points per game), habang ang Gagra scored 4 goals, may 1 win at 1 draw at 0.8 points per game. xG nagpapakita ng comparable chance creation: Dila xG for home 1.32 vs Gagra xG for away 1.33, kaya magiging decisive ang finishing efficiency at defensive organization. Given ang 50% clean sheets ng Dila, better form (3 wins from 5) at level xG, I favour the hosts to win.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Dila | Gagra | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 33% | 38% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.31 | 0.24 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Gagra is 83% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / match - Dila · 2.2 pts / match - Gagra
Goals— paano nag-i-score at nagko-concede ang dalawang teams?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Dila is 17% better for: goals scored per match.
1.11 goals / match - Dila · 0.95 goals / match - Gagra
Dila is 26% better for: goals conceded per match.
1 goals / match - Dila · 1.26 goals / match - Gagra
Dila scores in 68% of matches (13 of 19 matches), while Gagra keeps a clean sheet in 16% (3 of 19 matches).
Gagra scores in 68% of matches (13 of 19 matches), while Dila keeps a clean sheet in 37% (7 of 19 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— gaano kadalas nakaka-score ang parehong teams?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— gaano kadalas lumalagpas sa goal lines ang kanilang matches?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Dila
Over / Under — Gagra
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— saang half mas madalas silang maka-score?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Dila is 42% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.26 pts / match - Dila · 0.89 pts / match - Gagra
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Dila - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 42%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Gagra - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 11% of matches and wins 26%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 100% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +3 | +1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (5 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Karagdagang team indicators— ano ang ipinapakita ng xG, efficiency at form?
Comparison ng chance quality, results at trends mula sa mga natapos na matches ngayong season.
Match profile
Dila
Gagra
* Ang estimated goals, goal split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk at goal range ay galing sa public season averages at frequencies ng dalawang teams. Statistical match profile ito, hindi private model prediction o betting pick.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Erovnuli Liga).
Teams vs league
| Dila | Liga | Gagra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.11 | 2.53 | ▼ 2.21 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 37% | 56% | ▲ 58% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 37% | 52% | ▼ 42% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 37% | 28% | ▼ 16% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 53% | 65% | ▼ 63% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 68% | 72% | ▼ 68% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (5): Dila 4 - 0 - 1 Gagra. Average goals 2.20, both teams scored in 0% mga match.
Mga madalas itanong
Ano ang result ng Dila vs Gagra?
Natapos ang Erovnuli Liga match sa score na Dila 1:1 Gagra. Nasa page na ito ang match statistics, half-by-half data at head-to-head record.
Ano ang head-to-head record ng Dila at Gagra?
Sa huling 5 head-to-head matches, nanalo ang Dila ng 4, ang Gagra ng 1, at 0 ang draws. Average goals: 2.20; BTTS: 0%.
Ano ang ipinapakita ng goal statistics bago ang Dila vs Gagra?
Dila scores 1.11 goals per match at Gagra 0.95. Ang Erovnuli Liga average ay 2.53 goals, may Over 2.5 sa 52% ng matches. BTTS: Dila 37%, Gagra 58%.
Ano ang current form ng Dila at Gagra?
Sa last 5 matches, ang Dila ay 2-0-3 (1.20 points per match), habang ang Gagra ay 3-2-0 (2.20 points per match).
Saan makikita ang betting pick at full analysis ng Dila vs Gagra?
Nasa page na ito ang statistical context: form, H2H, goals, BTTS at Over/Under. Makikita sa NoFluffPicks app ang betting pick, value bet at full reasoning.