Egersund vs Moss: match stats
Egersund vs Moss: form, goals at mahahalagang stats
Mahahalagang detalye ng match
Egersund vs Moss sa First Division (Norway). Naka-schedule ang match sa 4 July 2026 at 14:00. Venue: Egersund Idrettsparken. Final score: 3:0.
Current form
Egersund: 2-0-3 sa last five matches at 1.20 points per match. Moss: 1-1-3 at 0.80 points per match.
Goal statistics
Egersund scores 1.71 at concedes 1.79 goals per match. Moss scores 1.64 at concedes 2.29. League average: 3.75 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Egersund 50%, Moss 79%. Over 2.5: Egersund 79%, Moss 86%. League level: BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 73%.
xG, shots at playing style
Moss ang may mas mataas na xG per match: 1.69 vs 1.41. Egersund averages 11.4 shots per match, habang Moss ay 14.6.
First at second half
Egersund leads at half-time sa 43% ng matches at scores 0.79 goals after the break. Moss: 29% at 1.00.
Goals by minute
Egersund: 31-45+ (6 goals). Moss: 76-90+ (7 goals). Historical goal distribution ito, hindi prediction ng exact goal minute.
League context
First Division: 3.75 goals per match, BTTS 60% at Over 2.5 73%.
Head-to-head
Sa 2 head-to-head matches, ang record ay 2-0-0. Average goals: 4.00, BTTS: 50%.
Match description
Predict ko: home win (1). Egersund has defensive edge at home, conceding average 1.29 goals at home vs Moss conceding 2.57 away. Hosts score 1.57 goals per home game with xG 1.51, while Moss scores 2.00 goals away with xG 1.87 and averages 6.71 shots on target—indikasyon ng higher offensive quality for the visitors. Key advantage for Egersund is 43% clean sheets at home vs 0% clean sheets for Moss on the road; at the same time Moss less often fail to score away (no goal in 14% of away matches), habang hosts had 43% home games without scoring. Recent form is poor for both: Egersund 0.6 pts in last five and just 1 win, Moss 0.8 pts and 1 win in last 5. Considering Egersund’s more stable defense and higher offensive quality of the visitors, expect a tight game with a slight edge for Egersund.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Egersund | Moss | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 34% | 37% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.44 | 0.31 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Egersund is 50% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / match - Egersund · 0.8 pts / match - Moss
Goals— paano nag-i-score at nagko-concede ang dalawang teams?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Egersund is 28% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.79 goals / match - Egersund · 2.29 goals / match - Moss
Egersund scores in 79% of matches (11 of 14 matches), while Moss keeps a clean sheet in 7% (1 of 14 matches).
Moss scores in 86% of matches (12 of 14 matches), while Egersund keeps a clean sheet in 36% (5 of 14 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— gaano kadalas nakaka-score ang parehong teams?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— gaano kadalas lumalagpas sa goal lines ang kanilang matches?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Egersund
Over / Under — Moss
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— saang half mas madalas silang maka-score?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Egersund is 40% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.5 pts / match - Egersund · 1.07 pts / match - Moss
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Egersund - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 43% of matches and wins 43%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Moss - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 36%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.2 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Average goals in match | 2.4 | 2.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.2 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.6 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 2.8 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 60% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 0% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (6 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goli). Concedes most in 16-30 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Karagdagang team indicators— ano ang ipinapakita ng xG, efficiency at form?
Comparison ng chance quality, results at trends mula sa mga natapos na matches ngayong season.
Match profile
Egersund
Moss
* Ang estimated goals, goal split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk at goal range ay galing sa public season averages at frequencies ng dalawang teams. Statistical match profile ito, hindi private model prediction o betting pick.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division).
Teams vs league
| Egersund | Liga | Moss | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 3.50 | 3.75 | ▲ 3.93 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 50% | 60% | ▲ 79% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 79% | 73% | ▲ 86% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 36% | 21% | ▼ 7% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 79% | 77% | ▲ 79% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 86% | 88% | ▲ 93% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Egersund 2 - 0 - 0 Moss. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 50% mga match.
Mga madalas itanong
Ano ang result ng Egersund vs Moss?
Natapos ang First Division match sa score na Egersund 3:0 Moss. Nasa page na ito ang match statistics, half-by-half data at head-to-head record.
Ano ang head-to-head record ng Egersund at Moss?
Sa huling 2 head-to-head matches, nanalo ang Egersund ng 2, ang Moss ng 0, at 0 ang draws. Average goals: 4.00; BTTS: 50%.
Ano ang ipinapakita ng goal statistics bago ang Egersund vs Moss?
Egersund scores 1.71 goals per match at Moss 1.64. Ang First Division average ay 3.75 goals, may Over 2.5 sa 73% ng matches. BTTS: Egersund 50%, Moss 79%.
Ano ang current form ng Egersund at Moss?
Sa last 5 matches, ang Egersund ay 2-0-3 (1.20 points per match), habang ang Moss ay 1-1-3 (0.80 points per match).
Saan makikita ang betting pick at full analysis ng Egersund vs Moss?
Nasa page na ito ang statistical context: form, H2H, goals, BTTS at Over/Under. Makikita sa NoFluffPicks app ang betting pick, value bet at full reasoning.