EIF vs PK-35: match stats
EIF vs PK-35: form, goals at mahahalagang stats
Mahahalagang detalye ng match
EIF vs PK-35 sa Ykkösliiga (Finland). Naka-schedule ang match sa 4 July 2026 at 15:00. Venue: Ekenäs Centrumplan. Final score: 0:3.
Current form
EIF: 0-1-4 sa last five matches at 0.20 points per match. PK-35: 5-0-0 at 3.00 points per match.
Goal statistics
EIF scores 1.40 at concedes 2.00 goals per match. PK-35 scores 1.67 at concedes 0.53. League average: 2.47 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: EIF 53%, PK-35 33%. Over 2.5: EIF 67%, PK-35 40%. League level: BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 44%.
xG, shots at playing style
PK-35 ang may mas mataas na xG per match: 1.45 vs 1.35. EIF averages 10.2 shots per match, habang PK-35 ay 11.7.
First at second half
EIF leads at half-time sa 20% ng matches at scores 0.87 goals after the break. PK-35: 33% at 1.13.
Goals by minute
EIF: 76-90+ (8 goals). PK-35: 46-60 (9 goals). Historical goal distribution ito, hindi prediction ng exact goal minute.
League context
Ykkösliiga: 2.47 goals per match, BTTS 44% at Over 2.5 44%.
Head-to-head
Sa 4 head-to-head matches, ang record ay 3-0-1. Average goals: 3.50, BTTS: 75%.
Match description
Bet ko sa away: away win (PK-35). PK-35 has form na 4W-1D sa last 5, scoring 10 and conceding 2, habang EIF sa last 5 is 2W-1D-2L with just 4 goals scored and 7 conceded. Defense ng guests ang key: PK-35 concedes avg 0.17 goals on the road at nagpapanatili ng clean sheet sa 83% ng away matches, samantalang EIF at home concedes 0.83 goals per game with 50% clean sheets. Home attack medyo potent: EIF scores 2.17 avg at home, with 10.33 shots and 5 on target, conversion 21%, habang PK-35 away has 1.33 goals per game, 11.17 shots and 3.67 on target with 12% conversion. xG ng both teams ay similar (1.38 EIF home vs 1.38 PK-35 away), pero guests defend much better than xG suggests (xG against 1.32 vs actual 0.17 conceded), kaya higher chance para sa PK-35 to win despite EIF’s real attacking strengths.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| EIF | PK-35 | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 39% | 34% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.36 | 0.42 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
PK-35 is 1400% better for: last-5 form.
0.2 pts / match - EIF · 3 pts / match - PK-35
Goals— paano nag-i-score at nagko-concede ang dalawang teams?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
PK-35 is 19% better for: goals scored per match.
1.4 goals / match - EIF · 1.67 goals / match - PK-35
PK-35 is 277% better for: goals conceded per match.
2 goals / match - EIF · 0.53 goals / match - PK-35
EIF scores in 73% of matches (11 of 15 matches), while PK-35 keeps a clean sheet in 53% (8 of 15 matches).
PK-35 scores in 73% of matches (11 of 15 matches), while EIF keeps a clean sheet in 20% (3 of 15 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— gaano kadalas nakaka-score ang parehong teams?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— gaano kadalas lumalagpas sa goal lines ang kanilang matches?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — EIF
Over / Under — PK-35
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— saang half mas madalas silang maka-score?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
PK-35 is 60% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1 pts / match - EIF · 1.6 pts / match - PK-35
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
EIF - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
PK-35 - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 67%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.60 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 2.0 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 2.4 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -8 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 2.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 2.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 80% |
| No goal | 40% | 0% |
| Goal difference | +3 | +9 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (9 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Karagdagang team indicators— ano ang ipinapakita ng xG, efficiency at form?
Comparison ng chance quality, results at trends mula sa mga natapos na matches ngayong season.
Match profile
EIF
PK-35
* Ang estimated goals, goal split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk at goal range ay galing sa public season averages at frequencies ng dalawang teams. Statistical match profile ito, hindi private model prediction o betting pick.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ykkösliiga).
Teams vs league
| EIF | Liga | PK-35 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.40 | 2.47 | ▼ 2.20 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 53% | 44% | ▼ 33% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 67% | 44% | ▼ 40% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 20% | 31% | ▲ 53% |
| Goal before half-time | • 60% | 60% | ▼ 47% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 93% | 73% | ▼ 67% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (4): EIF 3 - 0 - 1 PK-35. Average goals 3.50, both teams scored in 75% mga match.
Mga madalas itanong
Ano ang result ng EIF vs PK-35?
Natapos ang Ykkösliiga match sa score na EIF 0:3 PK-35. Nasa page na ito ang match statistics, half-by-half data at head-to-head record.
Ano ang head-to-head record ng EIF at PK-35?
Sa huling 4 head-to-head matches, nanalo ang EIF ng 3, ang PK-35 ng 1, at 0 ang draws. Average goals: 3.50; BTTS: 75%.
Ano ang ipinapakita ng goal statistics bago ang EIF vs PK-35?
EIF scores 1.40 goals per match at PK-35 1.67. Ang Ykkösliiga average ay 2.47 goals, may Over 2.5 sa 44% ng matches. BTTS: EIF 53%, PK-35 33%.
Ano ang current form ng EIF at PK-35?
Sa last 5 matches, ang EIF ay 0-1-4 (0.20 points per match), habang ang PK-35 ay 5-0-0 (3.00 points per match).
Saan makikita ang betting pick at full analysis ng EIF vs PK-35?
Nasa page na ito ang statistical context: form, H2H, goals, BTTS at Over/Under. Makikita sa NoFluffPicks app ang betting pick, value bet at full reasoning.