Finland - YkkösliigaEkenäs CentrumplanData updated noong July 23, 2026

EIF vs SJK Akatemia: match stats

EIF crest
EIF
3 : 0half-time 2:0
SJK Akatemia crest
SJK Akatemia

EIF vs SJK Akatemia: form, goals at mahahalagang stats

Mahahalagang detalye ng match

EIF vs SJK Akatemia sa Ykkösliiga (Finland). Naka-schedule ang match sa 17 May 2026 at 15:00. Venue: Ekenäs Centrumplan. Final score: 3:0.

Current form

EIF: 0-1-4 sa last five matches at 0.20 points per match. SJK Akatemia: 0-2-3 at 0.40 points per match.

Goal statistics

EIF scores 1.40 at concedes 2.00 goals per match. SJK Akatemia scores 0.47 at concedes 1.33. League average: 2.47 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: EIF 53%, SJK Akatemia 27%. Over 2.5: EIF 67%, SJK Akatemia 20%. League level: BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 44%.

xG, shots at playing style

EIF ang may mas mataas na xG per match: 1.35 vs 1.20. EIF averages 10.2 shots per match, habang SJK Akatemia ay 9.3.

First at second half

EIF leads at half-time sa 20% ng matches at scores 0.87 goals after the break. SJK Akatemia: 7% at 0.40.

Goals by minute

EIF: 76-90+ (8 goals). SJK Akatemia: 76-90+ (4 goals). Historical goal distribution ito, hindi prediction ng exact goal minute.

League context

Ykkösliiga: 2.47 goals per match, BTTS 44% at Over 2.5 44%.

Head-to-head

Sa 3 head-to-head matches, ang record ay 2-0-1. Average goals: 3.33, BTTS: 67%.

Match description

EIF has clear offensive edge at home — avg 2.67 goals per match and 10.33 shots, 6 on target, vs SJK’s away avg 1.00 goal, 8 shots and 2 on target. Finishing efficiency higher for EIF: 26% shot conversion vs 13% for visitors, at the same time avg xG 1.35 for EIF and 0.99 for SJK, indicating better quality and efficiency of created chances. Home defense is however vulnerable — EIF concedes 1.67 goals at home on avg and conceded 12 goals in last 5 matches, while SJK concedes 1.33 away and only 5 goals in their last five, so guests can exploit defensive gaps. Additional point: hosts have no trouble scoring at home (matches without goal 0%), whereas SJK still winless away (win rate 0%) and register 67% draws on the road, increasing likelihood of point split. Considering higher quantity and quality of hosts’ chances and visitors’ poor away efficiency, I tip an EIF win; estimated probabilities: home 62%, draw 24%, away 14%.

Half-by-half

2 : 0
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

47Possession (%)53
EIFSJK Akatemia
12Shots9
EIFSJK Akatemia
4Shots on target2
EIFSJK Akatemia
1.39xG1.18
EIFSJK Akatemia
5Corners3
EIFSJK Akatemia
50Dangerous attacks66
EIFSJK Akatemia
10Fouls11
EIFSJK Akatemia
0Cards0
EIFSJK Akatemia

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.4Goals scored / match0.47
EIFSJK Akatemia
2Goals conceded / match1.33
EIFSJK Akatemia
51%Average possession49%
EIFSJK Akatemia
3.93Shots on target / match2.73
EIFSJK Akatemia

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.2Shots per match9.27
EIFSJK Akatemia
3.93Shots on target2.73
EIFSJK Akatemia
13.7%Shot conversion5%
EIFSJK Akatemia
51%Possession49%
EIFSJK Akatemia
1.35xG for1.2
EIFSJK Akatemia
1.48xG against1.74
EIFSJK Akatemia

Shooting quality

EIF: Efficient finishingSJK Akatemia: Balanced
EIFSJK Akatemia
Accuracy (shots on target)39%29%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.360.17

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

SJK Akatemia is 100% better for: last-5 form.

0.2 pts / match - EIF · 0.4 pts / match - SJK Akatemia

EIF
LDLLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
33% W7% R60% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-1-9
1.07 pts / match · goal difference -9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-4
0.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-0-3
Last 5 at home
3-0-2
WWWLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 2.6xG: 1.27Opponent xG: 1.74BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
SJK Akatemia
LLLDD
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
7% W33% R60% P
Season (W-D-L)
1-5-9
0.53 pts / match · goal difference -13
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-2-3
0.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-3-5
Last 5 away
0-1-4
LLLLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.41Opponent xG: 1.94BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalspaano nag-i-score at nagko-concede ang dalawang teams?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

EIF is 198% better for: goals scored per match.

1.4 goals / match - EIF · 0.47 goals / match - SJK Akatemia

SJK Akatemia is 50% better for: goals conceded per match.

2 goals / match - EIF · 1.33 goals / match - SJK Akatemia

Scoring profile ng EIF: napakalakas

EIF scores in 73% of matches (11 of 15 matches), while SJK Akatemia keeps a clean sheet in 13% (2 of 15 matches).

Scoring profile ng SJK Akatemia: mixed

SJK Akatemia scores in 33% of matches (5 of 15 matches), while EIF keeps a clean sheet in 20% (3 of 15 matches).

21Goals scored (season)7
EIFSJK Akatemia
30Goals conceded (season)20
EIFSJK Akatemia
3.4Average goals in match1.8
EIFSJK Akatemia
3Goals scored (last 5)3
EIFSJK Akatemia
13Goals conceded (last 5)8
EIFSJK Akatemia

How often they score at least...

73%1 goal33%
EIFSJK Akatemia
33%2 goals13%
EIFSJK Akatemia
20%3 goals0%
EIFSJK Akatemia
7%4 goals0%
EIFSJK Akatemia

How often they concede at least...

80%1 goal87%
EIFSJK Akatemia
53%2 goals40%
EIFSJK Akatemia
40%3 goals7%
EIFSJK Akatemia
20%4 goals0%
EIFSJK Akatemia

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)gaano kadalas nakaka-score ang parehong teams?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

27%BTTS at half-time0%
EIFSJK Akatemia
20%BTTS in both halves0%
EIFSJK Akatemia
27%Scored in both halves0%
EIFSJK Akatemia

BTTS and goal count

47%Min. 3 goals and BTTS13%
EIFSJK Akatemia
20%Min. 3 goals without BTTS7%
EIFSJK Akatemia
60%BTTS - last 540%
EIFSJK Akatemia

Goal count (Over/Under)gaano kadalas lumalagpas sa goal lines ang kanilang matches?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

60%Min. 1 goal before half-time47%
EIFSJK Akatemia
40%Min. 2 goals before half-time13%
EIFSJK Akatemia
27%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
EIFSJK Akatemia

2nd half

93%Min. 1 goal after half-time73%
EIFSJK Akatemia
53%Min. 2 goals after half-time33%
EIFSJK Akatemia
47%Min. 3 goals after half-time7%
EIFSJK Akatemia

Match halvessaang half mas madalas silang maka-score?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

EIF is 37% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1 pts / match - EIF · 0.73 pts / match - SJK Akatemia

EIF - half-time state
20% leading40% draw40% trailing
SJK Akatemia - half-time state
7% leading53% draw40% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1Points per match (1st half)0.73
EIFSJK Akatemia
0.53Goals scored (1st half)0.07
EIFSJK Akatemia
0.73Goals conceded (1st half)0.53
EIFSJK Akatemia
1.27Average goals (1st half)0.6
EIFSJK Akatemia
53%Clean sheet before half-time60%
EIFSJK Akatemia
60%No goal before half-time93%
EIFSJK Akatemia

After half-time (2nd half)

1.33Points per match (2nd half)0.67
EIFSJK Akatemia
0.87Goals scored (2nd half)0.4
EIFSJK Akatemia
1.27Goals conceded (2nd half)0.8
EIFSJK Akatemia
2.13Average goals (2nd half)1.2
EIFSJK Akatemia
33%Clean sheet after half-time33%
EIFSJK Akatemia
40%No goal after half-time73%
EIFSJK Akatemia

EIF - second-half results

40% W13% R47% P
15
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
20
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding165%

Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

SJK Akatemia - second-half results

7% W47% R47% P
11
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
-7
Goal difference (1st half)
10
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.73
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 7% of matches and wins 7%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

EIF - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.600.60
Goals scored / match0.20.4
Goals conceded / match0.62.0
Average goals in match0.82.4
1 goal40%100%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals20%60%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-2-8
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 0% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1
SJK Akatemia - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.600.40
Goals scored / match0.00.6
Goals conceded / match0.41.2
Average goals in match0.41.8
1 goal40%100%
2 goals0%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%0%
No goal100%60%
Goal difference-2-3
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

EIF
ScoredConceded
2
3
0-15
2
2
16-30
4
6
31-45
4
7
46-60
1
5
61-75
8
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

SJK Akatemia
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
0
4
16-30
0
3
31-45
2
8
46-60
0
3
61-75
4
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (4 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Karagdagang team indicatorsano ang ipinapakita ng xG, efficiency at form?

Comparison ng chance quality, results at trends mula sa mga natapos na matches ngayong season.

Match profile

2.60
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.4 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
105%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
40%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+28%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
24%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
18%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 6 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

EIF

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.13
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.47
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.05
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.52
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
105%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
177%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.87
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
38% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
38%

SJK Akatemia

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.54
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.32
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+3.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.73
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.41
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
42%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
100%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.13
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
57% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
57%

* Ang estimated goals, goal split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk at goal range ay galing sa public season averages at frequencies ng dalawang teams. Statistical match profile ito, hindi private model prediction o betting pick.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ykkösliiga).

Teams vs league

EIFLigaSJK Akatemia
Average goals in match 3.402.47 1.80
Both teams scored 53%44% 27%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 67%44% 20%
Clean sheets 20%31% 13%
Goal before half-time 60%60% 47%
Goal after half-time 93%73% 73%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.47
Average goals per match
44%
Both teams scored
44%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
31%
Clean sheets
1.33
Home goals / match
1.13
Away goals / match
+18%
Home attack advantage
+15%
Home defence advantage
+8%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
60%
1 goal
25%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
43%
2 goals
23%
3 goals
12%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (3): EIF 2 - 0 - 1 SJK Akatemia. Average goals 3.33, both teams scored in 67% mga match.

Ekenäs IF
2 : 3
Kerho 07 SJK II
Ekenäs IF
3 : 1
Kerho 07 SJK II
Kerho 07 SJK II
0 : 1
Ekenäs IF

Mga madalas itanong

Ano ang result ng EIF vs SJK Akatemia?

Natapos ang Ykkösliiga match sa score na EIF 3:0 SJK Akatemia. Nasa page na ito ang match statistics, half-by-half data at head-to-head record.

Ano ang head-to-head record ng EIF at SJK Akatemia?

Sa huling 3 head-to-head matches, nanalo ang EIF ng 2, ang SJK Akatemia ng 1, at 0 ang draws. Average goals: 3.33; BTTS: 67%.

Ano ang ipinapakita ng goal statistics bago ang EIF vs SJK Akatemia?

EIF scores 1.40 goals per match at SJK Akatemia 0.47. Ang Ykkösliiga average ay 2.47 goals, may Over 2.5 sa 44% ng matches. BTTS: EIF 53%, SJK Akatemia 27%.

Ano ang current form ng EIF at SJK Akatemia?

Sa last 5 matches, ang EIF ay 0-1-4 (0.20 points per match), habang ang SJK Akatemia ay 0-2-3 (0.40 points per match).

Saan makikita ang betting pick at full analysis ng EIF vs SJK Akatemia?

Nasa page na ito ang statistical context: form, H2H, goals, BTTS at Over/Under. Makikita sa NoFluffPicks app ang betting pick, value bet at full reasoning.