Gnistan vs Jaro: match stats
Gnistan vs Jaro: form, goals at mahahalagang stats
Mahahalagang detalye ng match
Gnistan vs Jaro sa Veikkausliiga (Finland). Naka-schedule ang match sa 16 May 2026 at 18:00. Final score: 5:0.
Current form
Gnistan: 2-2-1 sa last five matches at 1.60 points per match. Jaro: 1-2-2 at 1.00 points per match.
Goal statistics
Gnistan scores 1.56 at concedes 1.25 goals per match. Jaro scores 0.94 at concedes 2.00. League average: 2.67 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Gnistan 44%, Jaro 50%. Over 2.5: Gnistan 38%, Jaro 56%. League level: BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 47%.
xG, shots at playing style
Halos pareho ang xG per match ng dalawang teams. Gnistan averages 12.4 shots per match, habang Jaro ay 11.7.
First at second half
Gnistan leads at half-time sa 38% ng matches at scores 0.94 goals after the break. Jaro: 38% at 0.25.
Goals by minute
Gnistan: 61-75 (7 goals). Jaro: 16-30 (4 goals). Historical goal distribution ito, hindi prediction ng exact goal minute.
League context
Veikkausliiga: 2.67 goals per match, BTTS 51% at Over 2.5 47%.
Head-to-head
Sa 3 head-to-head matches, ang record ay 0-2-1. Average goals: 2.33, BTTS: 100%.
Match description
Expect ko ng draw dito. Jaro wala pang away win (0 wins, 4 draws, 2 losses — 67% draws), habang Gnistan sa home naman may only 1 win this season at 33% home win rate. Visitors create way more chances: avg 14 shots, 5.33 on target and xG 1.61 per match vs home 7.67 shots, 2.33 on target and xG 0.91. Despite that, Jaro kapag away converts terribly (2% conversion at only 0.33 goals per match), habang Gnistan sa home may 13% conversion at avg 1.00 goal, so it neutralizes the quality edge ng visitors. Plus, hosts concede avg 2.67 goals at home, pero sa last 5 matches may 1.6 points per game (goal diff 6–5), while visitors in last 5 have 1.0 PPG and goal diff 8–10, which increases the likelihood ng point split.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Gnistan | Jaro | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 35% | 37% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.36 | 0.21 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Gnistan is 60% better for: last-5 form.
1.6 pts / match - Gnistan · 1 pts / match - Jaro
Goals— paano nag-i-score at nagko-concede ang dalawang teams?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Gnistan is 66% better for: goals scored per match.
1.56 goals / match - Gnistan · 0.94 goals / match - Jaro
Gnistan is 60% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.25 goals / match - Gnistan · 2 goals / match - Jaro
Gnistan scores in 75% of matches (12 of 16 matches), while Jaro keeps a clean sheet in 19% (3 of 16 matches).
Jaro scores in 56% of matches (9 of 16 matches), while Gnistan keeps a clean sheet in 31% (5 of 16 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— gaano kadalas nakaka-score ang parehong teams?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— gaano kadalas lumalagpas sa goal lines ang kanilang matches?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Gnistan
Over / Under — Jaro
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— saang half mas madalas silang maka-score?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Gnistan is 9% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.5 pts / match - Gnistan · 1.38 pts / match - Jaro
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Gnistan - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 44%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Jaro - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 13%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.20 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 20% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +3 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.2 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 2.0 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (7 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (4 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Karagdagang team indicators— ano ang ipinapakita ng xG, efficiency at form?
Comparison ng chance quality, results at trends mula sa mga natapos na matches ngayong season.
Match profile
Gnistan
Jaro
* Ang estimated goals, goal split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk at goal range ay galing sa public season averages at frequencies ng dalawang teams. Statistical match profile ito, hindi private model prediction o betting pick.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Veikkausliiga).
Teams vs league
| Gnistan | Liga | Jaro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.81 | 2.67 | ▲ 2.94 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 44% | 51% | • 50% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 38% | 47% | ▲ 56% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 31% | 28% | ▼ 19% |
| Goal before half-time | • 75% | 75% | ▲ 81% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 94% | 78% | ▼ 75% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (3): Gnistan 0 - 2 - 1 Jaro. Average goals 2.33, both teams scored in 100% mga match.
Mga madalas itanong
Ano ang result ng Gnistan vs Jaro?
Natapos ang Veikkausliiga match sa score na Gnistan 5:0 Jaro. Nasa page na ito ang match statistics, half-by-half data at head-to-head record.
Ano ang head-to-head record ng Gnistan at Jaro?
Sa huling 3 head-to-head matches, nanalo ang Gnistan ng 0, ang Jaro ng 1, at 2 ang draws. Average goals: 2.33; BTTS: 100%.
Ano ang ipinapakita ng goal statistics bago ang Gnistan vs Jaro?
Gnistan scores 1.56 goals per match at Jaro 0.94. Ang Veikkausliiga average ay 2.67 goals, may Over 2.5 sa 47% ng matches. BTTS: Gnistan 44%, Jaro 50%.
Ano ang current form ng Gnistan at Jaro?
Sa last 5 matches, ang Gnistan ay 2-2-1 (1.60 points per match), habang ang Jaro ay 1-2-2 (1.00 points per match).
Saan makikita ang betting pick at full analysis ng Gnistan vs Jaro?
Nasa page na ito ang statistical context: form, H2H, goals, BTTS at Over/Under. Makikita sa NoFluffPicks app ang betting pick, value bet at full reasoning.