Timog Korea - K League 2Changwon Football CenterData updated noong July 23, 2026

Gyeongnam vs Ansan Greeners: match stats

Gyeongnam crest
Gyeongnam
5 : 0half-time 3:0
Ansan Greeners crest
Ansan Greeners

Gyeongnam vs Ansan Greeners: form, goals at mahahalagang stats

Mahahalagang detalye ng match

Gyeongnam vs Ansan Greeners sa K League 2 (Timog Korea). Naka-schedule ang match sa 19 July 2026 at 12:30. Venue: Changwon Football Center. Final score: 5:0.

Current form

Gyeongnam: 2-2-1 sa last five matches at 1.60 points per match. Ansan Greeners: 1-0-4 at 0.60 points per match.

Goal statistics

Gyeongnam scores 1.47 at concedes 1.47 goals per match. Ansan Greeners scores 1.00 at concedes 2.00. League average: 2.75 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Gyeongnam 65%, Ansan Greeners 65%. Over 2.5: Gyeongnam 53%, Ansan Greeners 65%. League level: BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 56%.

xG, shots at playing style

Gyeongnam ang may mas mataas na xG per match: 1.37 vs 1.18. Gyeongnam averages 11.7 shots per match, habang Ansan Greeners ay 8.9.

First at second half

Gyeongnam leads at half-time sa 18% ng matches at scores 0.88 goals after the break. Ansan Greeners: 18% at 0.53.

Goals by minute

Gyeongnam: 76-90+ (9 goals). Ansan Greeners: 31-45+ (4 goals). Historical goal distribution ito, hindi prediction ng exact goal minute.

League context

K League 2: 2.75 goals per match, BTTS 61% at Over 2.5 56%.

Head-to-head

Sa 4 head-to-head matches, ang record ay 1-2-1. Average goals: 1.50, BTTS: 50%.

Match description

Gyeongnam nasa 9th place sa table habang Ansan nasa 15th; home team naka-20 goals this season kumpara sa 17 goals ng visitors, at Gyeongnam conceded 25 goals samantalang Ansan 29. Sa last 5 matches Gyeongnam: 1 win, 2 draws, 2 losses (avg 1 point per match), habang Ansan: 1 win, 4 losses (avg 0.6 point per match); sa period na ito home side conceded 7 goals at guests 12. Sa kanilang stadium Gyeongnam averages 1.56 goals per match with 11.78 shots and 3.67 shots on target, at only 11% ng matches na hindi sila nakakagawa ng goal; Ansan away averages 1.2 goals per match at may 40% ng away matches without scoring. Sa quality ng chances Gyeongnam may average xG 1.34 at xG against 1.22, samantalang Ansan away xG 1.18 pero xG against 2.18, which suggests guests allow opponents to create much better opportunities. Considering higher finishing efficiency ng home team, lower percentage ng matches without a goal (11% vs 40%) at mahina defensive form ng Ansan in last five, I forecast a Gyeongnam win (probability 60%), draw 25% at away win 15%.

Half-by-half

3 : 0
1st half
2 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

54Possession (%)46
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners
14Shots3
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners
7Shots on target1
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners
1.85xG0.56
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners
2Corners1
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners
65Dangerous attacks41
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners
8Fouls8
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners
1Cards4
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

GyeongnamAnsan Greeners
1.47Goals scored / match1
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners
1.47Goals conceded / match2
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners
50%Average possession46%
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners
3.71Shots on target / match3.82
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.71Shots per match8.94
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners
3.71Shots on target3.82
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners
12.6%Shot conversion11.2%
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners
50%Possession46%
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners
1.37xG for1.18
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners
1.25xG against2.07
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners

Shooting quality

Gyeongnam: BalancedAnsan Greeners: Balanced
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners
Accuracy (shots on target)32%43%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.400.26

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Gyeongnam is 167% better for: last-5 form.

1.6 pts / match - Gyeongnam · 0.6 pts / match - Ansan Greeners

Gyeongnam
LDWDW
Season result split
35% W29% R35% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-5-6
1.35 pts / match · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-2-3
Last 5 at home
4-1-0
WWDWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.87Opponent xG: 1.24BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Ansan Greeners
LLLWL
Season result split
24% W12% R65% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-2-11
0.82 pts / match · goal difference -17
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-4
0.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-1-3
Last 5 away
1-1-3
DWLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 3.0xG: 1.24Opponent xG: 2.70BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 100%

Goalspaano nag-i-score at nagko-concede ang dalawang teams?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Gyeongnam is 47% better for: goals scored per match.

1.47 goals / match - Gyeongnam · 1 goals / match - Ansan Greeners

Gyeongnam is 36% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.47 goals / match - Gyeongnam · 2 goals / match - Ansan Greeners

Scoring profile ng Gyeongnam: napakalakas

Gyeongnam scores in 76% of matches (13 of 17 matches), while Ansan Greeners keeps a clean sheet in 6% (1 of 17 matches).

Scoring profile ng Ansan Greeners: napakalakas

Ansan Greeners scores in 71% of matches (12 of 17 matches), while Gyeongnam keeps a clean sheet in 12% (2 of 17 matches).

25Goals scored (season)17
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners
25Goals conceded (season)34
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners
2.94Average goals in match3
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners
10Goals scored (last 5)4
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners
6Goals conceded (last 5)15
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners

How often they score at least...

76%1 goal71%
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners
41%2 goals18%
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners
18%3 goals6%
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners
6%4 goals6%
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners

How often they concede at least...

88%1 goal94%
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners
47%2 goals59%
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners
6%3 goals35%
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners
6%4 goals6%
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)gaano kadalas nakaka-score ang parehong teams?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

61%
League average

Goal patterns

29%BTTS at half-time29%
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners
0%BTTS in both halves0%
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners
29%Scored in both halves0%
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners

BTTS and goal count

47%Min. 3 goals and BTTS53%
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners
6%Min. 3 goals without BTTS12%
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners
60%BTTS - last 560%
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners

Goal count (Over/Under)gaano kadalas lumalagpas sa goal lines ang kanilang matches?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

65%Min. 1 goal before half-time82%
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners
41%Min. 2 goals before half-time35%
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners
24%Min. 3 goals before half-time12%
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners

2nd half

76%Min. 1 goal after half-time71%
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners
59%Min. 2 goals after half-time65%
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners
24%Min. 3 goals after half-time29%
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners

Match halvessaang half mas madalas silang maka-score?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Gyeongnam is 6% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1 pts / match - Gyeongnam · 0.94 pts / match - Ansan Greeners

Gyeongnam - half-time state
18% leading47% draw35% trailing
Ansan Greeners - half-time state
18% leading41% draw41% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1Points per match (1st half)0.94
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners
0.59Goals scored (1st half)0.47
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners
0.71Goals conceded (1st half)0.82
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners
1.29Average goals (1st half)1.29
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners
53%Clean sheet before half-time35%
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners
53%No goal before half-time53%
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners

After half-time (2nd half)

1.29Points per match (2nd half)0.82
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners
0.88Goals scored (2nd half)0.53
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners
0.76Goals conceded (2nd half)1.18
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners
1.65Average goals (2nd half)1.71
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners
47%Clean sheet after half-time47%
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners
41%No goal after half-time76%
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners

Gyeongnam - second-half results

29% W41% R29% P
17
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
22
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding194%

Leads at half-time in 18% of matches and wins 35%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Ansan Greeners - second-half results

18% W29% R53% P
16
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
-6
Goal difference (1st half)
14
Second-half points
-11
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.94
PPG before half-time
Lead holding133%

Leads at half-time in 18% of matches and wins 24%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Gyeongnam - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.60
Goals scored / match0.81.2
Goals conceded / match0.40.8
Average goals in match1.22.0
1 goal60%80%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference+2+2
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4
Ansan Greeners - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.000.60
Goals scored / match0.40.4
Goals conceded / match1.02.0
Average goals in match1.42.4
1 goal80%100%
2 goals40%100%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference-3-8
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 0% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Gyeongnam
ScoredConceded
4
2
0-15
1
2
16-30
5
8
31-45
2
2
46-60
4
3
61-75
9
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Ansan Greeners
ScoredConceded
2
4
0-15
2
3
16-30
4
7
31-45
2
6
46-60
3
3
61-75
4
11
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (4 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Karagdagang team indicatorsano ang ipinapakita ng xG, efficiency at form?

Comparison ng chance quality, results at trends mula sa mga natapos na matches ngayong season.

Match profile

2.97
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.7 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
108%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
65%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-49%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
54%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
7%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 14 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Gyeongnam

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.12
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.12
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.10
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.22
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
105%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
109%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.25
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
36% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 16% come in the first quarter-hour.
36%

Ansan Greeners

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.89
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.11
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+3.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.18
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.07
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
74%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
143%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.22
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 12% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

* Ang estimated goals, goal split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk at goal range ay galing sa public season averages at frequencies ng dalawang teams. Statistical match profile ito, hindi private model prediction o betting pick.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (K League 2).

Teams vs league

GyeongnamLigaAnsan Greeners
Average goals in match 2.942.75 3.00
Both teams scored 65%61% 65%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 53%56% 65%
Clean sheets 12%24% 6%
Goal before half-time 65%73% 82%
Goal after half-time 76%76% 71%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.75
Average goals per match
61%
Both teams scored
56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
24%
Clean sheets
1.40
Home goals / match
1.35
Away goals / match
+4%
Home attack advantage
+4%
Home defence advantage
+1%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
50%
2 goals
26%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (4): Gyeongnam 1 - 2 - 1 Ansan Greeners. Average goals 1.50, both teams scored in 50% mga match.

Ansan Greeners
1 : 1
Gyeongnam
Gyeongnam FC
1 : 0
Ansan Greeners FC
Gyeongnam FC
1 : 1
Ansan Greeners FC
Ansan Greeners FC
1 : 0
Gyeongnam FC

Mga madalas itanong

Ano ang result ng Gyeongnam vs Ansan Greeners?

Natapos ang K League 2 match sa score na Gyeongnam 5:0 Ansan Greeners. Nasa page na ito ang match statistics, half-by-half data at head-to-head record.

Ano ang head-to-head record ng Gyeongnam at Ansan Greeners?

Sa huling 4 head-to-head matches, nanalo ang Gyeongnam ng 1, ang Ansan Greeners ng 1, at 2 ang draws. Average goals: 1.50; BTTS: 50%.

Ano ang ipinapakita ng goal statistics bago ang Gyeongnam vs Ansan Greeners?

Gyeongnam scores 1.47 goals per match at Ansan Greeners 1.00. Ang K League 2 average ay 2.75 goals, may Over 2.5 sa 56% ng matches. BTTS: Gyeongnam 65%, Ansan Greeners 65%.

Ano ang current form ng Gyeongnam at Ansan Greeners?

Sa last 5 matches, ang Gyeongnam ay 2-2-1 (1.60 points per match), habang ang Ansan Greeners ay 1-0-4 (0.60 points per match).

Saan makikita ang betting pick at full analysis ng Gyeongnam vs Ansan Greeners?

Nasa page na ito ang statistical context: form, H2H, goals, BTTS at Over/Under. Makikita sa NoFluffPicks app ang betting pick, value bet at full reasoning.