Finland - YkkösliigaTehtaan kenttäData updated noong July 22, 2026

Haka vs EIF: match stats

Haka crest
Haka
3 : 1half-time 0:0
EIF crest
EIF

Haka vs EIF: form, goals at mahahalagang stats

Mahahalagang detalye ng match

Haka vs EIF sa Ykkösliiga (Finland). Naka-schedule ang match sa 11 July 2026 at 15:00. Venue: Tehtaan kenttä. Final score: 3:1.

Current form

Haka: 2-1-2 sa last five matches at 1.40 points per match. EIF: 0-1-4 at 0.20 points per match.

Goal statistics

Haka scores 1.73 at concedes 1.13 goals per match. EIF scores 1.40 at concedes 2.00. League average: 2.47 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Haka 53%, EIF 53%. Over 2.5: Haka 53%, EIF 67%. League level: BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 44%.

xG, shots at playing style

Haka ang may mas mataas na xG per match: 1.59 vs 1.35. Haka averages 12.0 shots per match, habang EIF ay 10.2.

First at second half

Haka leads at half-time sa 27% ng matches at scores 1.27 goals after the break. EIF: 20% at 0.87.

Goals by minute

Haka: 76-90+ (8 goals). EIF: 76-90+ (8 goals). Historical goal distribution ito, hindi prediction ng exact goal minute.

League context

Ykkösliiga: 2.47 goals per match, BTTS 44% at Over 2.5 44%.

Head-to-head

Sa 1 head-to-head matches, ang record ay 1-0-0. Average goals: 7.00, BTTS: 100%.

Match description

Bet ko ang win ng Haka dahil sa malaking home offensive edge: Haka averages 2.14 goals per home match vs EIF 1.17 away. EIF concedes 3.00 goals away on average, habang Haka concedes only 1.57 at home — sa last 5, EIF na-concede 10 goals vs Haka 6. Haka rin has higher home xG 1.67 vs EIF away xG 1.28, more on-target shots (5.14 vs 3.0) at higher shot efficiency 16% vs 12%. Plus, Haka has positive stadium record (GD +4, win rate 43%), habang EIF away shows negative GD (-11) at 0% away wins. Considering Haka’s offensive superiority, EIF’s weak away defence and last 5 form (points 1.2 vs 0.8), mas mataas ang probability para sa hosts kaysa draw o away win.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
3 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

58Possession (%)42
HakaEIF
13Shots11
HakaEIF
5Shots on target6
HakaEIF
1.73xG1.46
HakaEIF
8Corners2
HakaEIF
77Dangerous attacks48
HakaEIF
10Fouls11
HakaEIF
0Cards2
HakaEIF

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.73Goals scored / match1.4
HakaEIF
1.13Goals conceded / match2
HakaEIF
58%Average possession51%
HakaEIF
4.73Shots on target / match3.93
HakaEIF

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12Shots per match10.2
HakaEIF
4.73Shots on target3.93
HakaEIF
14.4%Shot conversion13.7%
HakaEIF
58%Possession51%
HakaEIF
1.59xG for1.35
HakaEIF
1.18xG against1.48
HakaEIF

Shooting quality

Haka: Efficient finishingEIF: Efficient finishing
HakaEIF
Accuracy (shots on target)39%39%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.370.36

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Haka is 600% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / match - Haka · 0.2 pts / match - EIF

Haka
WLLWD
Season result split
47% W27% R27% P
Season (W-D-L)
7-4-4
1.67 pts / match · goal difference +9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-2-2
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
DWLLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.81Opponent xG: 1.22BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
EIF
LDLLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
33% W7% R60% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-1-9
1.07 pts / match · goal difference -9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-4
0.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-1-6
Last 5 away
0-1-4
LLLDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 2.6xG: 1.27Opponent xG: 1.74BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalspaano nag-i-score at nagko-concede ang dalawang teams?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Haka is 24% better for: goals scored per match.

1.73 goals / match - Haka · 1.4 goals / match - EIF

Haka is 77% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.13 goals / match - Haka · 2 goals / match - EIF

Scoring profile ng Haka: napakalakas

Haka scores in 80% of matches (12 of 15 matches), while EIF keeps a clean sheet in 20% (3 of 15 matches).

Scoring profile ng EIF: malakas

EIF scores in 73% of matches (11 of 15 matches), while Haka keeps a clean sheet in 33% (5 of 15 matches).

26Goals scored (season)21
HakaEIF
17Goals conceded (season)30
HakaEIF
2.87Average goals in match3.4
HakaEIF
8Goals scored (last 5)3
HakaEIF
7Goals conceded (last 5)13
HakaEIF

How often they score at least...

80%1 goal73%
HakaEIF
53%2 goals33%
HakaEIF
20%3 goals20%
HakaEIF
13%4 goals7%
HakaEIF

How often they concede at least...

67%1 goal80%
HakaEIF
40%2 goals53%
HakaEIF
7%3 goals40%
HakaEIF
0%4 goals20%
HakaEIF

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)gaano kadalas nakaka-score ang parehong teams?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

20%BTTS at half-time27%
HakaEIF
7%BTTS in both halves20%
HakaEIF
33%Scored in both halves27%
HakaEIF

BTTS and goal count

47%Min. 3 goals and BTTS47%
HakaEIF
7%Min. 3 goals without BTTS20%
HakaEIF
60%BTTS - last 560%
HakaEIF

Goal count (Over/Under)gaano kadalas lumalagpas sa goal lines ang kanilang matches?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

73%Min. 1 goal before half-time60%
HakaEIF
20%Min. 2 goals before half-time40%
HakaEIF
20%Min. 3 goals before half-time27%
HakaEIF

2nd half

80%Min. 1 goal after half-time93%
HakaEIF
47%Min. 2 goals after half-time53%
HakaEIF
27%Min. 3 goals after half-time47%
HakaEIF

Match halvessaang half mas madalas silang maka-score?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Haka is 7% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.07 pts / match - Haka · 1 pts / match - EIF

Haka - half-time state
27% leading27% draw47% trailing
EIF - half-time state
20% leading40% draw40% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.07Points per match (1st half)1
HakaEIF
0.47Goals scored (1st half)0.53
HakaEIF
0.67Goals conceded (1st half)0.73
HakaEIF
1.13Average goals (1st half)1.27
HakaEIF
47%Clean sheet before half-time53%
HakaEIF
60%No goal before half-time60%
HakaEIF

After half-time (2nd half)

2Points per match (2nd half)1.33
HakaEIF
1.27Goals scored (2nd half)0.87
HakaEIF
0.47Goals conceded (2nd half)1.27
HakaEIF
1.73Average goals (2nd half)2.13
HakaEIF
60%Clean sheet after half-time33%
HakaEIF
27%No goal after half-time40%
HakaEIF

Haka - second-half results

53% W40% R7% P
16
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
30
Second-half points
+12
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.07
PPG before half-time
Lead holding174%

Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 47%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

EIF - second-half results

40% W13% R47% P
15
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
20
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding165%

Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Haka - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.802.00
Goals scored / match0.41.2
Goals conceded / match0.80.6
Average goals in match1.21.8
1 goal80%100%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference-2+3
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
EIF - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.600.60
Goals scored / match0.20.4
Goals conceded / match0.62.0
Average goals in match0.82.4
1 goal40%100%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals20%60%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-2-8
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 0% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Haka
ScoredConceded
1
5
0-15
3
2
16-30
3
3
31-45
6
1
46-60
5
4
61-75
8
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.

EIF
ScoredConceded
2
3
0-15
2
2
16-30
4
6
31-45
4
7
46-60
1
5
61-75
8
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Karagdagang team indicatorsano ang ipinapakita ng xG, efficiency at form?

Comparison ng chance quality, results at trends mula sa mga natapos na matches ngayong season.

Match profile

3.13
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.9 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
127%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
53%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+123%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
58%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
5%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 20 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Haka

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.41
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.19
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.14
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.05
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
130%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
100%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.27
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.8
Late goals
31% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 4% come in the first quarter-hour.
31%

EIF

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.13
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.47
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.05
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.52
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
124%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
150%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.87
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
38% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
38%

* Ang estimated goals, goal split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk at goal range ay galing sa public season averages at frequencies ng dalawang teams. Statistical match profile ito, hindi private model prediction o betting pick.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ykkösliiga).

Teams vs league

HakaLigaEIF
Average goals in match 2.872.47 3.40
Both teams scored 53%44% 53%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 53%44% 67%
Clean sheets 33%31% 20%
Goal before half-time 73%60% 60%
Goal after half-time 80%73% 93%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.47
Average goals per match
44%
Both teams scored
44%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
31%
Clean sheets
1.33
Home goals / match
1.13
Away goals / match
+18%
Home attack advantage
+15%
Home defence advantage
+8%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
60%
1 goal
25%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
43%
2 goals
23%
3 goals
12%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Haka 1 - 0 - 0 EIF. Average goals 7.00, both teams scored in 100% mga match.

Mga madalas itanong

Ano ang result ng Haka vs EIF?

Natapos ang Ykkösliiga match sa score na Haka 3:1 EIF. Nasa page na ito ang match statistics, half-by-half data at head-to-head record.

Ano ang ipinapakita ng goal statistics bago ang Haka vs EIF?

Haka scores 1.73 goals per match at EIF 1.40. Ang Ykkösliiga average ay 2.47 goals, may Over 2.5 sa 44% ng matches. BTTS: Haka 53%, EIF 53%.

Ano ang current form ng Haka at EIF?

Sa last 5 matches, ang Haka ay 2-1-2 (1.40 points per match), habang ang EIF ay 0-1-4 (0.20 points per match).

Saan makikita ang betting pick at full analysis ng Haka vs EIF?

Nasa page na ito ang statistical context: form, H2H, goals, BTTS at Over/Under. Makikita sa NoFluffPicks app ang betting pick, value bet at full reasoning.