Finland - YkkösliigaTehtaan kenttäData updated noong July 23, 2026

Haka vs JäPS: match stats

Haka crest
Haka
1 : 2half-time 1:2
JäPS crest
JäPS

Haka vs JäPS: form, goals at mahahalagang stats

Mahahalagang detalye ng match

Haka vs JäPS sa Ykkösliiga (Finland). Naka-schedule ang match sa 5 June 2026 at 17:30. Venue: Tehtaan kenttä. Final score: 1:2.

Current form

Haka: 2-1-2 sa last five matches at 1.40 points per match. JäPS: 2-0-3 at 1.20 points per match.

Goal statistics

Haka scores 1.73 at concedes 1.13 goals per match. JäPS scores 0.93 at concedes 1.53. League average: 2.47 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Haka 53%, JäPS 27%. Over 2.5: Haka 53%, JäPS 47%. League level: BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 44%.

xG, shots at playing style

Haka ang may mas mataas na xG per match: 1.59 vs 1.21. Haka averages 12.0 shots per match, habang JäPS ay 9.5.

First at second half

Haka leads at half-time sa 27% ng matches at scores 1.27 goals after the break. JäPS: 33% at 0.40.

Goals by minute

Haka: 76-90+ (8 goals). JäPS: 61-75 (4 goals). Historical goal distribution ito, hindi prediction ng exact goal minute.

League context

Ykkösliiga: 2.47 goals per match, BTTS 44% at Over 2.5 44%.

Head-to-head

Sa 1 head-to-head matches, ang record ay 1-0-0. Average goals: 5.00, BTTS: 0%.

Match description

Bet ko sa home win ng Haka. Haka averages 2.8 goals per home match at nag-score ng 8 goals sa last 5 games, habang ang JäPS only 0.75 goals away at 4 goals sa last 5. Haka generates 1.62 xG sa home, nag-audit ng 5.8 shots on target from 12.8 attempts at 56% possession; JäPS naman 1.24 xG away, 3.75 SOT at 44% possession; effectiveness ng Haka 22% vs 7% ng JäPS. Guests hindi nagse-score sa 50% ng away matches at concede average 1.75 goals away, habang Haka concedes 1.4 at home at may 0% clean sheet-less matches, which further favors the home side. Kahit na Haka has 40% draws at home, kanilang better form (3 wins in last 5 at 2.0 points per game vs JäPS 1 win and 0.6 ppg) at superiority sa quality and finishing ng chances make Haka win the most likely outcome.

Half-by-half

1 : 2
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

71Possession (%)29
HakaJäPS
17Shots10
HakaJäPS
5Shots on target4
HakaJäPS
2.09xG1.19
HakaJäPS
9Corners2
HakaJäPS
93Dangerous attacks39
HakaJäPS
12Fouls19
HakaJäPS
4Cards4
HakaJäPS

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.73Goals scored / match0.93
HakaJäPS
1.13Goals conceded / match1.53
HakaJäPS
58%Average possession44%
HakaJäPS
4.73Shots on target / match3.47
HakaJäPS

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12Shots per match9.53
HakaJäPS
4.73Shots on target3.47
HakaJäPS
14.4%Shot conversion9.8%
HakaJäPS
58%Possession44%
HakaJäPS
1.59xG for1.21
HakaJäPS
1.18xG against1.61
HakaJäPS

Shooting quality

Haka: Efficient finishingJäPS: Balanced
HakaJäPS
Accuracy (shots on target)39%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.370.27

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Haka is 17% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / match - Haka · 1.2 pts / match - JäPS

Haka
WLLWD
Season result split
47% W27% R27% P
Season (W-D-L)
7-4-4
1.67 pts / match · goal difference +9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-2-2
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
DWLLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.81Opponent xG: 1.22BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
JäPS
LLWLW
Season result split
47% W7% R47% P
Season (W-D-L)
7-1-7
1.47 pts / match · goal difference -9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-1-4
Last 5 away
2-0-3
LWLLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 2.4xG: 1.24Opponent xG: 1.42BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalspaano nag-i-score at nagko-concede ang dalawang teams?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Haka is 86% better for: goals scored per match.

1.73 goals / match - Haka · 0.93 goals / match - JäPS

Haka is 35% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.13 goals / match - Haka · 1.53 goals / match - JäPS

Scoring profile ng Haka: malakas

Haka scores in 80% of matches (12 of 15 matches), while JäPS keeps a clean sheet in 47% (7 of 15 matches).

Scoring profile ng JäPS: malakas

JäPS scores in 67% of matches (10 of 15 matches), while Haka keeps a clean sheet in 33% (5 of 15 matches).

26Goals scored (season)14
HakaJäPS
17Goals conceded (season)23
HakaJäPS
2.87Average goals in match2.47
HakaJäPS
8Goals scored (last 5)4
HakaJäPS
7Goals conceded (last 5)12
HakaJäPS

How often they score at least...

80%1 goal67%
HakaJäPS
53%2 goals20%
HakaJäPS
20%3 goals7%
HakaJäPS
13%4 goals0%
HakaJäPS

How often they concede at least...

67%1 goal53%
HakaJäPS
40%2 goals40%
HakaJäPS
7%3 goals27%
HakaJäPS
0%4 goals20%
HakaJäPS

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)gaano kadalas nakaka-score ang parehong teams?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

20%BTTS at half-time13%
HakaJäPS
7%BTTS in both halves0%
HakaJäPS
33%Scored in both halves7%
HakaJäPS

BTTS and goal count

47%Min. 3 goals and BTTS27%
HakaJäPS
7%Min. 3 goals without BTTS20%
HakaJäPS
60%BTTS - last 540%
HakaJäPS

Goal count (Over/Under)gaano kadalas lumalagpas sa goal lines ang kanilang matches?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

73%Min. 1 goal before half-time60%
HakaJäPS
20%Min. 2 goals before half-time20%
HakaJäPS
20%Min. 3 goals before half-time7%
HakaJäPS

2nd half

80%Min. 1 goal after half-time73%
HakaJäPS
47%Min. 2 goals after half-time47%
HakaJäPS
27%Min. 3 goals after half-time20%
HakaJäPS

Match halvessaang half mas madalas silang maka-score?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

JäPS is 37% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.07 pts / match - Haka · 1.47 pts / match - JäPS

Haka - half-time state
27% leading27% draw47% trailing
JäPS - half-time state
33% leading47% draw20% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.07Points per match (1st half)1.47
HakaJäPS
0.47Goals scored (1st half)0.53
HakaJäPS
0.67Goals conceded (1st half)0.33
HakaJäPS
1.13Average goals (1st half)0.87
HakaJäPS
47%Clean sheet before half-time67%
HakaJäPS
60%No goal before half-time60%
HakaJäPS

After half-time (2nd half)

2Points per match (2nd half)1.13
HakaJäPS
1.27Goals scored (2nd half)0.4
HakaJäPS
0.47Goals conceded (2nd half)1.2
HakaJäPS
1.73Average goals (2nd half)1.6
HakaJäPS
60%Clean sheet after half-time53%
HakaJäPS
27%No goal after half-time67%
HakaJäPS

Haka - second-half results

53% W40% R7% P
16
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
30
Second-half points
+12
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.07
PPG before half-time
Lead holding174%

Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 47%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

JäPS - second-half results

27% W33% R40% P
22
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
17
Second-half points
-12
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.47
PPG before half-time
Lead holding142%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 47%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.9

Concedes 0.9 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Haka - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.802.00
Goals scored / match0.41.2
Goals conceded / match0.80.6
Average goals in match1.21.8
1 goal80%100%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference-2+3
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
JäPS - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.20
Goals scored / match0.40.4
Goals conceded / match0.42.0
Average goals in match0.82.4
1 goal60%100%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference0-8
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 0% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Haka
ScoredConceded
1
5
0-15
3
2
16-30
3
3
31-45
6
1
46-60
5
4
61-75
8
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.

JäPS
ScoredConceded
2
2
0-15
3
0
16-30
3
3
31-45
2
5
46-60
4
7
61-75
0
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (4 goli). Concedes most in 61-75 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Karagdagang team indicatorsano ang ipinapakita ng xG, efficiency at form?

Comparison ng chance quality, results at trends mula sa mga natapos na matches ngayong season.

Match profile

2.66
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.6 : 1.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
108%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
40%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+87%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
54%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
7%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 14 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Haka

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.41
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.19
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.14
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.05
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
130%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
100%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.27
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.8
Late goals
31% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 4% come in the first quarter-hour.
31%

JäPS

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.40
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.20
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+9.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.28
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.08
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
82%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
115%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.27
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

* Ang estimated goals, goal split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk at goal range ay galing sa public season averages at frequencies ng dalawang teams. Statistical match profile ito, hindi private model prediction o betting pick.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ykkösliiga).

Teams vs league

HakaLigaJäPS
Average goals in match 2.872.47 2.47
Both teams scored 53%44% 27%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 53%44% 47%
Clean sheets 33%31% 47%
Goal before half-time 73%60% 60%
Goal after half-time 80%73% 73%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.47
Average goals per match
44%
Both teams scored
44%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
31%
Clean sheets
1.33
Home goals / match
1.13
Away goals / match
+18%
Home attack advantage
+15%
Home defence advantage
+8%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
60%
1 goal
25%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
43%
2 goals
23%
3 goals
12%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Haka 1 - 0 - 0 JäPS. Average goals 5.00, both teams scored in 0% mga match.

Mga madalas itanong

Ano ang result ng Haka vs JäPS?

Natapos ang Ykkösliiga match sa score na Haka 1:2 JäPS. Nasa page na ito ang match statistics, half-by-half data at head-to-head record.

Ano ang ipinapakita ng goal statistics bago ang Haka vs JäPS?

Haka scores 1.73 goals per match at JäPS 0.93. Ang Ykkösliiga average ay 2.47 goals, may Over 2.5 sa 44% ng matches. BTTS: Haka 53%, JäPS 27%.

Ano ang current form ng Haka at JäPS?

Sa last 5 matches, ang Haka ay 2-1-2 (1.40 points per match), habang ang JäPS ay 2-0-3 (1.20 points per match).

Saan makikita ang betting pick at full analysis ng Haka vs JäPS?

Nasa page na ito ang statistical context: form, H2H, goals, BTTS at Over/Under. Makikita sa NoFluffPicks app ang betting pick, value bet at full reasoning.