Ilirija vs Nafta: match stats
Ilirija vs Nafta: form, goals at mahahalagang stats
Mahahalagang detalye ng match
Ilirija vs Nafta sa 2. SNL (Slovenia). Naka-schedule ang match sa 30 April 2026 at 17:00. Final score: 0:2.
Current form
Ilirija: 1-0-4 sa last five matches at 0.60 points per match. Nafta: 3-1-1 at 2.00 points per match.
Goal statistics
Ilirija scores 1.27 at concedes 1.73 goals per match. Nafta scores 2.17 at concedes 0.77. League average: 2.82 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Ilirija 70%, Nafta 60%. Over 2.5: Ilirija 60%, Nafta 47%. League level: BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 54%.
xG, shots at playing style
Nafta ang may mas mataas na xG per match: 1.60 vs 1.57. Ilirija averages 11.3 shots per match, habang Nafta ay 12.3.
First at second half
Ilirija leads at half-time sa 30% ng matches at scores 0.67 goals after the break. Nafta: 57% at 1.23.
Goals by minute
Ilirija: 16-30 (9 goals). Nafta: 76-90+ (14 goals). Historical goal distribution ito, hindi prediction ng exact goal minute.
League context
2. SNL: 2.82 goals per match, BTTS 50% at Over 2.5 54%.
Head-to-head
Sa 1 head-to-head matches, ang record ay 0-0-1. Average goals: 3.00, BTTS: 100%.
Match description
Nafta ang clear favorite dito: nasa 1st place sila at may 20 wins, 5 draws at 0 losses this season, samantalang Ilirija nasa 11th place with 5 wins, 9 draws at 11 losses. Guests have scored 58 goals this season at 13 in the last 5 matches, averaging 2.0 goals per away game, habang Ilirija may 35 goals this season at 9 in the last 5, with 1.33 average goals per home match. Defensively, mas solid Nafta: concede lang ng 0.67 goals on average away at keep 58% clean sheets away, samantalang Ilirija concede 1.83 goals at home at 17% clean sheets. Although Ilirija’s home xG is 1.73 vs Nafta’s 1.48 away xG, Nafta converts chances better (shot conversion 18% vs 11%) at wala silang goalless away matches (0%), so mas efficient ang conversion ng opportunities. Considering Nafta’s 5 wins in last 5 (average 3 points per game) vs Ilirija’s form of 2 wins, 1 draw, 2 losses in last 5 (average 1.4 points), ina-expect ko win ng guests.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Ilirija | Nafta | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 39% | 41% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.14 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.29 | 0.43 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Nafta is 233% better for: last-5 form.
0.6 pts / match - Ilirija · 2 pts / match - Nafta
Goals— paano nag-i-score at nagko-concede ang dalawang teams?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Nafta is 71% better for: goals scored per match.
1.27 goals / match - Ilirija · 2.17 goals / match - Nafta
Nafta is 125% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.73 goals / match - Ilirija · 0.77 goals / match - Nafta
Ilirija scores in 83% of matches (25 of 30 matches), while Nafta keeps a clean sheet in 40% (12 of 30 matches).
Nafta scores in 100% of matches (30 of 30 matches), while Ilirija keeps a clean sheet in 17% (5 of 30 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— gaano kadalas nakaka-score ang parehong teams?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— gaano kadalas lumalagpas sa goal lines ang kanilang matches?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Ilirija
Over / Under — Nafta
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— saang half mas madalas silang maka-score?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Nafta is 85% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.1 pts / match - Ilirija · 2.03 pts / match - Nafta
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Ilirija - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 30% of matches and wins 20%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Nafta - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 57% of matches and wins 77%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.2 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 80% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -4 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (9 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (14 goli). Concedes most in 61-75 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +10 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Karagdagang team indicators— ano ang ipinapakita ng xG, efficiency at form?
Comparison ng chance quality, results at trends mula sa mga natapos na matches ngayong season.
Match profile
Ilirija
Nafta
* Ang estimated goals, goal split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk at goal range ay galing sa public season averages at frequencies ng dalawang teams. Statistical match profile ito, hindi private model prediction o betting pick.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (2. SNL).
Teams vs league
| Ilirija | Liga | Nafta | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.00 | 2.82 | ▲ 2.93 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 70% | 50% | ▲ 60% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 60% | 54% | ▼ 47% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 17% | 28% | ▲ 40% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 83% | 74% | ▲ 77% |
| Goal after half-time | • 80% | 81% | ▲ 87% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Ilirija 0 - 0 - 1 Nafta. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% mga match.
Mga madalas itanong
Ano ang result ng Ilirija vs Nafta?
Natapos ang 2. SNL match sa score na Ilirija 0:2 Nafta. Nasa page na ito ang match statistics, half-by-half data at head-to-head record.
Ano ang ipinapakita ng goal statistics bago ang Ilirija vs Nafta?
Ilirija scores 1.27 goals per match at Nafta 2.17. Ang 2. SNL average ay 2.82 goals, may Over 2.5 sa 54% ng matches. BTTS: Ilirija 70%, Nafta 60%.
Ano ang current form ng Ilirija at Nafta?
Sa last 5 matches, ang Ilirija ay 1-0-4 (0.60 points per match), habang ang Nafta ay 3-1-1 (2.00 points per match).
Saan makikita ang betting pick at full analysis ng Ilirija vs Nafta?
Nasa page na ito ang statistical context: form, H2H, goals, BTTS at Over/Under. Makikita sa NoFluffPicks app ang betting pick, value bet at full reasoning.