Belgium - First Division BData updated noong July 23, 2026

KAA Gent II vs Patro Eisden: match stats

KAA Gent II crest
KAA Gent II
2 : 1half-time 0:1
Patro Eisden crest
Patro Eisden
130%(3.03)
X28%(3.45)
242%(2.17)

Ang Patro Eisden ay nagpapakita ng decidedly better form at stats sa away matches. Ang guests ay may impressive 42% win rate sa away at positive goal difference (+5), habang ang KAA Gent II sa home matches ay nananalo lang sa 25% ng cases with a -6 balance. Ang key factor ay ang advantage ng Patro Eisden sa average xG (1.79 vs 1.54) at higher scoring efficiency (1.5 goals per away match vs 1.08 ng hosts). Ang form sa last five matches ay pabor din sa guests (1.6 PPG vs 1.2 PPG). Natalo ang hosts sa 3 of their last 5 games, na lalong nagpapahina sa position nila. Lahat ng indicators ay nagtuturo sa advantage ng Patro Eisden, though ang weak ability ng both teams na mag-keep ng clean sheet ay nag-susuggest ng exciting match.

KAA Gent II vs Patro Eisden: form, goals at mahahalagang stats

Mahahalagang detalye ng match

KAA Gent II vs Patro Eisden sa First Division B (Belgium). Naka-schedule ang match sa 27 February 2026 at 20:00. Final score: 2:1.

Current form

KAA Gent II: 1-1-3 sa last five matches at 0.80 points per match. Patro Eisden: 1-1-3 at 0.80 points per match.

Goal statistics

KAA Gent II scores 1.31 at concedes 1.59 goals per match. Patro Eisden scores 1.38 at concedes 1.29. League average: 2.84 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: KAA Gent II 53%, Patro Eisden 53%. Over 2.5: KAA Gent II 56%, Patro Eisden 47%. League level: BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 54%.

xG, shots at playing style

Patro Eisden ang may mas mataas na xG per match: 1.65 vs 1.50. KAA Gent II averages 12.5 shots per match, habang Patro Eisden ay 14.8.

First at second half

KAA Gent II leads at half-time sa 28% ng matches at scores 0.72 goals after the break. Patro Eisden: 35% at 0.82.

Goals by minute

KAA Gent II: 61-75 (12 goals). Patro Eisden: 76-90+ (12 goals). Historical goal distribution ito, hindi prediction ng exact goal minute.

League context

First Division B: 2.84 goals per match, BTTS 55% at Over 2.5 54%.

Head-to-head

Sa 1 head-to-head matches, ang record ay 0-0-1. Average goals: 3.00, BTTS: 100%.

Match description

Ang Patro Eisden ay nagpapakita ng decidedly better form at stats sa away matches. Ang guests ay may impressive 42% win rate sa away at positive goal difference (+5), habang ang KAA Gent II sa home matches ay nananalo lang sa 25% ng cases with a -6 balance. Ang key factor ay ang advantage ng Patro Eisden sa average xG (1.79 vs 1.54) at higher scoring efficiency (1.5 goals per away match vs 1.08 ng hosts). Ang form sa last five matches ay pabor din sa guests (1.6 PPG vs 1.2 PPG). Natalo ang hosts sa 3 of their last 5 games, na lalong nagpapahina sa position nila. Lahat ng indicators ay nagtuturo sa advantage ng Patro Eisden, though ang weak ability ng both teams na mag-keep ng clean sheet ay nag-susuggest ng exciting match.

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
2 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

69Possession (%)31
KAA Gent IIPatro Eisden
10Shots9
KAA Gent IIPatro Eisden
7Shots on target1
KAA Gent IIPatro Eisden
1.55xG0.91
KAA Gent IIPatro Eisden
2Corners4
KAA Gent IIPatro Eisden
57Dangerous attacks36
KAA Gent IIPatro Eisden
15Fouls20
KAA Gent IIPatro Eisden
2Cards3
KAA Gent IIPatro Eisden

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

KAA Gent IIPatro Eisden
1.31Goals scored / match1.38
KAA Gent IIPatro Eisden
1.59Goals conceded / match1.29
KAA Gent IIPatro Eisden
58%Average possession37%
KAA Gent IIPatro Eisden
4.38Shots on target / match5.24
KAA Gent IIPatro Eisden

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.47Shots per match14.82
KAA Gent IIPatro Eisden
4.38Shots on target5.24
KAA Gent IIPatro Eisden
10.5%Shot conversion9.3%
KAA Gent IIPatro Eisden
58%Possession37%
KAA Gent IIPatro Eisden
1.5xG for1.65
KAA Gent IIPatro Eisden
1.63xG against1.16
KAA Gent IIPatro Eisden

Shooting quality

KAA Gent II: BalancedPatro Eisden: Attacking
KAA Gent IIPatro Eisden
Accuracy (shots on target)35%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.300.26

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

KAA Gent II
LWLLD
Season result split
38% W16% R47% P
Season (W-D-L)
12-5-15
1.28 pts / match · goal difference -9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-4-7
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
LWDWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 1.49Opponent xG: 1.88BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
Patro Eisden
LLWDL
Season result split
41% W29% R29% P
Season (W-D-L)
14-10-10
1.53 pts / match · goal difference +3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
6-5-6
Last 5 away
1-1-3
LDWLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.41Opponent xG: 1.63BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalspaano nag-i-score at nagko-concede ang dalawang teams?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Patro Eisden is 5% better for: goals scored per match.

1.31 goals / match - KAA Gent II · 1.38 goals / match - Patro Eisden

Patro Eisden is 23% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.59 goals / match - KAA Gent II · 1.29 goals / match - Patro Eisden

Scoring profile ng KAA Gent II: malakas

KAA Gent II scores in 66% of matches (21 of 32 matches), while Patro Eisden keeps a clean sheet in 29% (10 of 34 matches).

Scoring profile ng Patro Eisden: napakalakas

Patro Eisden scores in 71% of matches (24 of 34 matches), while KAA Gent II keeps a clean sheet in 19% (6 of 32 matches).

42Goals scored (season)47
KAA Gent IIPatro Eisden
51Goals conceded (season)44
KAA Gent IIPatro Eisden
2.91Average goals in match2.68
KAA Gent IIPatro Eisden
5Goals scored (last 5)7
KAA Gent IIPatro Eisden
11Goals conceded (last 5)10
KAA Gent IIPatro Eisden

How often they score at least...

66%1 goal71%
KAA Gent IIPatro Eisden
44%2 goals41%
KAA Gent IIPatro Eisden
16%3 goals15%
KAA Gent IIPatro Eisden
6%4 goals12%
KAA Gent IIPatro Eisden

How often they concede at least...

81%1 goal71%
KAA Gent IIPatro Eisden
47%2 goals38%
KAA Gent IIPatro Eisden
22%3 goals12%
KAA Gent IIPatro Eisden
9%4 goals9%
KAA Gent IIPatro Eisden

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)gaano kadalas nakaka-score ang parehong teams?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

55%
League average

Goal patterns

19%BTTS at half-time15%
KAA Gent IIPatro Eisden
0%BTTS in both halves6%
KAA Gent IIPatro Eisden
28%Scored in both halves21%
KAA Gent IIPatro Eisden

BTTS and goal count

47%Min. 3 goals and BTTS41%
KAA Gent IIPatro Eisden
9%Min. 3 goals without BTTS6%
KAA Gent IIPatro Eisden
60%BTTS - last 540%
KAA Gent IIPatro Eisden

Goal count (Over/Under)gaano kadalas lumalagpas sa goal lines ang kanilang matches?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

66%Min. 1 goal before half-time68%
KAA Gent IIPatro Eisden
41%Min. 2 goals before half-time18%
KAA Gent IIPatro Eisden
16%Min. 3 goals before half-time9%
KAA Gent IIPatro Eisden

2nd half

81%Min. 1 goal after half-time82%
KAA Gent IIPatro Eisden
53%Min. 2 goals after half-time47%
KAA Gent IIPatro Eisden
22%Min. 3 goals after half-time24%
KAA Gent IIPatro Eisden

Match halvessaang half mas madalas silang maka-score?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Patro Eisden is 13% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.28 pts / match - KAA Gent II · 1.44 pts / match - Patro Eisden

KAA Gent II - half-time state
28% leading44% draw28% trailing
Patro Eisden - half-time state
35% leading38% draw26% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.28Points per match (1st half)1.44
KAA Gent IIPatro Eisden
0.59Goals scored (1st half)0.56
KAA Gent IIPatro Eisden
0.66Goals conceded (1st half)0.44
KAA Gent IIPatro Eisden
1.25Average goals (1st half)1
KAA Gent IIPatro Eisden
56%Clean sheet before half-time59%
KAA Gent IIPatro Eisden
59%No goal before half-time59%
KAA Gent IIPatro Eisden

After half-time (2nd half)

1.34Points per match (2nd half)1.24
KAA Gent IIPatro Eisden
0.72Goals scored (2nd half)0.82
KAA Gent IIPatro Eisden
0.94Goals conceded (2nd half)0.85
KAA Gent IIPatro Eisden
1.66Average goals (2nd half)1.68
KAA Gent IIPatro Eisden
44%Clean sheet after half-time41%
KAA Gent IIPatro Eisden
47%No goal after half-time50%
KAA Gent IIPatro Eisden

KAA Gent II - second-half results

34% W31% R34% P
41
Half-time points
19
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
43
Second-half points
-7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.28
PPG before half-time
Lead holding136%

Leads at half-time in 28% of matches and wins 38%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Patro Eisden - second-half results

29% W35% R35% P
49
Half-time points
19
Half-time goals
+4
Goal difference (1st half)
42
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.44
PPG before half-time
Lead holding117%

Leads at half-time in 35% of matches and wins 41%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

KAA Gent II - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.601.00
Goals scored / match0.01.0
Goals conceded / match0.81.4
Average goals in match0.82.4
1 goal40%100%
2 goals20%80%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%0%
No goal100%40%
Goal difference-4-2
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0
Patro Eisden - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.200.80
Goals scored / match0.41.0
Goals conceded / match0.81.2
Average goals in match1.22.2
1 goal100%100%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference-2-1
Half-time: 40% leading - 0% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

KAA Gent II
ScoredConceded
6
8
0-15
6
6
16-30
7
7
31-45
4
7
46-60
12
11
61-75
7
12
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (12 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

Patro Eisden
ScoredConceded
7
6
0-15
5
4
16-30
7
5
31-45
8
9
46-60
8
7
61-75
12
13
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Karagdagang team indicatorsano ang ipinapakita ng xG, efficiency at form?

Comparison ng chance quality, results at trends mula sa mga natapos na matches ngayong season.

Match profile

2.79
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
98%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
53%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+7%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
47%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
10%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 10 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

KAA Gent II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.13
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.15
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.19
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.04
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
90%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
116%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.48
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

Patro Eisden

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.49
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.40
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.27
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.13
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
101%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
88%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.73
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
26% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
26%

* Ang estimated goals, goal split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk at goal range ay galing sa public season averages at frequencies ng dalawang teams. Statistical match profile ito, hindi private model prediction o betting pick.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division B).

Teams vs league

KAA Gent IILigaPatro Eisden
Average goals in match 2.912.84 2.68
Both teams scored 53%55% 53%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 56%54% 47%
Clean sheets 19%26% 29%
Goal before half-time 66%71% 68%
Goal after half-time 81%79% 82%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.84
Average goals per match
55%
Both teams scored
54%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
26%
Clean sheets
1.46
Home goals / match
1.37
Away goals / match
+7%
Home attack advantage
+6%
Home defence advantage
+5%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
71%
1 goal
34%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
79%
1 goal
50%
2 goals
22%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: KAA Gent II 0 - 0 - 1 Patro Eisden. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% mga match.

Mga madalas itanong

Ano ang result ng KAA Gent II vs Patro Eisden?

Natapos ang First Division B match sa score na KAA Gent II 2:1 Patro Eisden. Nasa page na ito ang match statistics, half-by-half data at head-to-head record.

Ano ang ipinapakita ng goal statistics bago ang KAA Gent II vs Patro Eisden?

KAA Gent II scores 1.31 goals per match at Patro Eisden 1.38. Ang First Division B average ay 2.84 goals, may Over 2.5 sa 54% ng matches. BTTS: KAA Gent II 53%, Patro Eisden 53%.

Ano ang current form ng KAA Gent II at Patro Eisden?

Sa last 5 matches, ang KAA Gent II ay 1-1-3 (0.80 points per match), habang ang Patro Eisden ay 1-1-3 (0.80 points per match).

Saan makikita ang betting pick at full analysis ng KAA Gent II vs Patro Eisden?

Nasa page na ito ang statistical context: form, H2H, goals, BTTS at Over/Under. Makikita sa NoFluffPicks app ang betting pick, value bet at full reasoning.