Finland - YkkösliigaArto Tolsa AreenaData updated noong July 22, 2026

KTP vs JäPS: match stats

KTP crest
KTP
4 : 1half-time 0:1
JäPS crest
JäPS

KTP vs JäPS: form, goals at mahahalagang stats

Mahahalagang detalye ng match

KTP vs JäPS sa Ykkösliiga (Finland). Naka-schedule ang match sa 10 July 2026 at 17:30. Venue: Arto Tolsa Areena. Final score: 4:1.

Current form

KTP: 3-1-1 sa last five matches at 2.00 points per match. JäPS: 2-0-3 at 1.20 points per match.

Goal statistics

KTP scores 1.67 at concedes 1.00 goals per match. JäPS scores 0.93 at concedes 1.53. League average: 2.47 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: KTP 40%, JäPS 27%. Over 2.5: KTP 40%, JäPS 47%. League level: BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 44%.

xG, shots at playing style

KTP ang may mas mataas na xG per match: 1.77 vs 1.21. KTP averages 15.3 shots per match, habang JäPS ay 9.5.

First at second half

KTP leads at half-time sa 27% ng matches at scores 1.07 goals after the break. JäPS: 33% at 0.40.

Goals by minute

KTP: 61-75 (8 goals). JäPS: 61-75 (4 goals). Historical goal distribution ito, hindi prediction ng exact goal minute.

League context

Ykkösliiga: 2.47 goals per match, BTTS 44% at Over 2.5 44%.

Head-to-head

Sa 1 head-to-head matches, ang record ay 1-0-0. Average goals: 1.00, BTTS: 0%.

Match description

KTP has clear advantage sa available data — sa home matches win nila 67%, score avg 2.00 goals per match at have average xG 1.96, habang si JäPS sa away matches win lang 33%, avg goals 1.00 at xG 1.21. Hosts nag-aattempt ng avg 16 shots per match with 6.33 on target at maintain 51% possession, samantalang guests may 10.5 shots with 3.5 on target at 42% possession, nagpapakita ng greater control and more quality chances for KTP. Sa last 5 matches KTP scored 12 goals at record 2.0 points per match, habang JäPS has 5 goals at 1.2 points per match; additionally guests conceded 11 goals in those five games. Defensively JäPS looks weaker — concede avg 1.83 goals away at have xG against 1.98, vs 1.17 conceded by KTP at home at hosts' xG against 1.10, which increases probability na hosts will create decisive situations. Considering higher efficiency (no-score rate 17% vs 33%), better chance quality (xG 1.96 vs 1.21) and form (12 goals vs 5 in last 5), tip ko is a home win.

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
4 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

60Possession (%)40
KTPJäPS
12Shots4
KTPJäPS
6Shots on target2
KTPJäPS
1.63xG0.76
KTPJäPS
7Corners6
KTPJäPS
63Dangerous attacks51
KTPJäPS
10Fouls20
KTPJäPS
1Cards2
KTPJäPS

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.67Goals scored / match0.93
KTPJäPS
1Goals conceded / match1.53
KTPJäPS
51%Average possession44%
KTPJäPS
5.07Shots on target / match3.47
KTPJäPS

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

15.27Shots per match9.53
KTPJäPS
5.07Shots on target3.47
KTPJäPS
10.9%Shot conversion9.8%
KTPJäPS
51%Possession44%
KTPJäPS
1.77xG for1.21
KTPJäPS
1.13xG against1.61
KTPJäPS

Shooting quality

KTP: AttackingJäPS: Balanced
KTPJäPS
Accuracy (shots on target)33%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.330.27

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

KTP is 67% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / match - KTP · 1.2 pts / match - JäPS

KTP
WWDWL
Season result split
67% W13% R20% P
Season (W-D-L)
10-2-3
2.13 pts / match · goal difference +10
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-1-2
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
LWDWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.8Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.65Opponent xG: 1.24BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
JäPS
LLWLW
Season result split
47% W7% R47% P
Season (W-D-L)
7-1-7
1.47 pts / match · goal difference -9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-1-4
Last 5 away
2-0-3
LWLLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 2.4xG: 1.24Opponent xG: 1.42BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalspaano nag-i-score at nagko-concede ang dalawang teams?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

KTP is 80% better for: goals scored per match.

1.67 goals / match - KTP · 0.93 goals / match - JäPS

KTP is 53% better for: goals conceded per match.

1 goals / match - KTP · 1.53 goals / match - JäPS

Scoring profile ng KTP: malakas

KTP scores in 80% of matches (12 of 15 matches), while JäPS keeps a clean sheet in 47% (7 of 15 matches).

Scoring profile ng JäPS: mixed

JäPS scores in 67% of matches (10 of 15 matches), while KTP keeps a clean sheet in 47% (7 of 15 matches).

25Goals scored (season)14
KTPJäPS
15Goals conceded (season)23
KTPJäPS
2.67Average goals in match2.47
KTPJäPS
14Goals scored (last 5)4
KTPJäPS
6Goals conceded (last 5)12
KTPJäPS

How often they score at least...

80%1 goal67%
KTPJäPS
47%2 goals20%
KTPJäPS
20%3 goals7%
KTPJäPS
13%4 goals0%
KTPJäPS

How often they concede at least...

53%1 goal53%
KTPJäPS
20%2 goals40%
KTPJäPS
13%3 goals27%
KTPJäPS
7%4 goals20%
KTPJäPS

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)gaano kadalas nakaka-score ang parehong teams?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

27%BTTS at half-time13%
KTPJäPS
13%BTTS in both halves0%
KTPJäPS
33%Scored in both halves7%
KTPJäPS

BTTS and goal count

40%Min. 3 goals and BTTS27%
KTPJäPS
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS20%
KTPJäPS
60%BTTS - last 540%
KTPJäPS

Goal count (Over/Under)gaano kadalas lumalagpas sa goal lines ang kanilang matches?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

60%Min. 1 goal before half-time60%
KTPJäPS
27%Min. 2 goals before half-time20%
KTPJäPS
20%Min. 3 goals before half-time7%
KTPJäPS

2nd half

80%Min. 1 goal after half-time73%
KTPJäPS
33%Min. 2 goals after half-time47%
KTPJäPS
27%Min. 3 goals after half-time20%
KTPJäPS

Match halvessaang half mas madalas silang maka-score?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

JäPS is 11% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.33 pts / match - KTP · 1.47 pts / match - JäPS

KTP - half-time state
27% leading53% draw20% trailing
JäPS - half-time state
33% leading47% draw20% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.33Points per match (1st half)1.47
KTPJäPS
0.6Goals scored (1st half)0.53
KTPJäPS
0.53Goals conceded (1st half)0.33
KTPJäPS
1.13Average goals (1st half)0.87
KTPJäPS
60%Clean sheet before half-time67%
KTPJäPS
53%No goal before half-time60%
KTPJäPS

After half-time (2nd half)

1.87Points per match (2nd half)1.13
KTPJäPS
1.07Goals scored (2nd half)0.4
KTPJäPS
0.47Goals conceded (2nd half)1.2
KTPJäPS
1.53Average goals (2nd half)1.6
KTPJäPS
67%Clean sheet after half-time53%
KTPJäPS
33%No goal after half-time67%
KTPJäPS

KTP - second-half results

53% W27% R20% P
20
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
28
Second-half points
+9
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.33
PPG before half-time
Lead holding248%

Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 67%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

JäPS - second-half results

27% W33% R40% P
22
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
17
Second-half points
-12
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.47
PPG before half-time
Lead holding142%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 47%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.9

Concedes 0.9 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

KTP - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.602.00
Goals scored / match1.01.8
Goals conceded / match0.80.4
Average goals in match1.82.2
1 goal80%100%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals40%40%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference+1+7
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 5
JäPS - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.20
Goals scored / match0.40.4
Goals conceded / match0.42.0
Average goals in match0.82.4
1 goal60%100%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference0-8
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 0% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

KTP
ScoredConceded
4
2
0-15
2
2
16-30
3
4
31-45
4
4
46-60
8
1
61-75
4
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (8 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

JäPS
ScoredConceded
2
2
0-15
3
0
16-30
3
3
31-45
2
5
46-60
4
7
61-75
0
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (4 goli). Concedes most in 61-75 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Karagdagang team indicatorsano ang ipinapakita ng xG, efficiency at form?

Comparison ng chance quality, results at trends mula sa mga natapos na matches ngayong season.

Match profile

2.57
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.6 : 1.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
104%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
34%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-61%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
54%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
7%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 14 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

KTP

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.64
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.03
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.10
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.13
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
126%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
88%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.13
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
16% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 16% come in the first quarter-hour.
16%

JäPS

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.40
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.20
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+9.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.28
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.08
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
82%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
115%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.27
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

* Ang estimated goals, goal split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk at goal range ay galing sa public season averages at frequencies ng dalawang teams. Statistical match profile ito, hindi private model prediction o betting pick.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ykkösliiga).

Teams vs league

KTPLigaJäPS
Average goals in match 2.672.47 2.47
Both teams scored 40%44% 27%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 40%44% 47%
Clean sheets 47%31% 47%
Goal before half-time 60%60% 60%
Goal after half-time 80%73% 73%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.47
Average goals per match
44%
Both teams scored
44%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
31%
Clean sheets
1.33
Home goals / match
1.13
Away goals / match
+18%
Home attack advantage
+15%
Home defence advantage
+8%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
60%
1 goal
25%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
43%
2 goals
23%
3 goals
12%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: KTP 1 - 0 - 0 JäPS. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% mga match.

Mga madalas itanong

Ano ang result ng KTP vs JäPS?

Natapos ang Ykkösliiga match sa score na KTP 4:1 JäPS. Nasa page na ito ang match statistics, half-by-half data at head-to-head record.

Ano ang ipinapakita ng goal statistics bago ang KTP vs JäPS?

KTP scores 1.67 goals per match at JäPS 0.93. Ang Ykkösliiga average ay 2.47 goals, may Over 2.5 sa 44% ng matches. BTTS: KTP 40%, JäPS 27%.

Ano ang current form ng KTP at JäPS?

Sa last 5 matches, ang KTP ay 3-1-1 (2.00 points per match), habang ang JäPS ay 2-0-3 (1.20 points per match).

Saan makikita ang betting pick at full analysis ng KTP vs JäPS?

Nasa page na ito ang statistical context: form, H2H, goals, BTTS at Over/Under. Makikita sa NoFluffPicks app ang betting pick, value bet at full reasoning.